Geotag city different from postal address. Can I mention both cities together in title tags?
-
This boundary thing seems to be haunting me at the mo. Oh what I'd give for somewhere within a defined boundary!
Anyway, just noticed a client has one city in its official postal address, and another city under its geotag.
So I'm looking at the title tags and I'm thinking of mentioning both cities on the main entry pages (6 of them) then dividing mention in sub pages.
Is this acceptable to Google? Might they see mention of both cities in homepage title tag (and other entry pages) as spammy. I don't want to upset Google!!!
PS. Both cities are core markets. I would say they're of equal importance in terms of current business bookings and business potential.
-
I will have another go I think
-
Hi Luke,
I'm so glad Mike replied to you. As Mike said, what you put on your website is up to you, but I was hoping you'd actually describe the scenario going on in your region a little more fully in that thread. It's good you got an answer, but bringing Google's attention to the border change issues and getting a response to that would likely be helpful to lots and lots of your neighbors. Maybe you can attempt to discuss that in their forum at some point.
-
http://productforums.google.com/d/topic/business/2b-n5hzA9EU/discussion - hope that helps > I posted it before and someone got wrong end of stick, so tried again.
The person answering here suggests it is fine, and having just looked back at SEOMoz forum notes, I've been given same advice from someone on these forums before.
That said, it might be logical in some way to have both, but it might land you in trouble as you've suggested. Would be so good to clarify this point.
A good many people will be getting this wrong.
-
Hi Luke,
Do you want to link to the thread you started in the Google and Your Business Forum?
-
Thanks Miriam. I haven't had an answer, so not holding up much hope. Is there anyone on the SEO Moz team who may have stumbled across such a specific ssue before? Do you have better access to Google? L
-
Good, Luke. I really do hope you get an answer on this. Deserves attention!
-
Hi Miriam, thanks again for your feedback. I've asked the question, so awaiting some feedback. Hope I can get their position on this (I live in hope!). Yes, it was me before mentioning some other sites. This is impacting me in several places at the moment, which is a right pain! If Google provides an answer, I'll definitely try to share it around
-
Hi Luke,
Now, was that you who started a similar thread on this recently about the great confusion of the postal service vs. administration in your country? I know that I just discussed a really similar situation in another thread, but for some reason, I can't seem to find it right now in the system. So, perhaps that was you, or perhaps a countryman of yours in the same predicament.
My thinking on this is that the postal address has to be seen as your core geo data, and thus would be the main thing occupying your footer, contact us page, and the front end of many of your titles and tags. But your situation is extraordinary. People visiting City A want to find a pizza in City A...they don't want to send mail to City B. So, Google would be crazy to penalize you for including City A in much of your optimization, but don't take my word for it.
I find your scenario with the conflict of boundaries to be important enough and curious enough to report to Google. I sincerely recommend that you do so. At the very least, you will have documentation of your efforts to play by the rules should anything go wrong in future. This just isn't an issue that comes up every day, and I believe you and your neighbors deserve an official answer from Google about how they would like you to proceed when such confusion surrounds locale in your area. I'd post about this to the Google and Your Business Forum with a very catchy title, such as:
Our Part Of England Is All Mixed Up - Please Guide Us, Google.
Something like that. Should grab some attention. Here is the link to the forum, if you don't have it handy:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!forum/business
I'd love to know if you get an answer.
-
This problem keeps coming up at the mo, partly because I'm working for out-of-town locations. Hey, ho...
Anyway, now I'm in S.W. England. The site has a Bristol postal address. But is actually in Bath & NE Somerset County. So the post office claims them for Bristol, the administrators for Bath, and the business is about the same distance from both.
Bristol is more of a key market than Bath, but both are very important.
This is a pizza takeaway, pizza restaurant, bar, function room. There's a homepage, and 4 key landing pages for each key service, then loads of internal pages under each category.
Web developer did this in the title tags - key service (e.g Function Room)| Bristol & Bath | [then company name] on the 4 key landing pages. Then they've targeted Bristol and Bath individually on interior pages - e.g. Function Room **| **Bath | [company name] on the party venue page.
This seems OK to me, but not sure if Google will find this spammy or not (2 key cities in the title tags). In which case I will start playing with the title tags. I don't want them to take a hit from Google, particularly with all the changes coming through at the mo. I'm being very cautious.
I also question the div between, for the service (e.g. Function Room) and they city in question. I would take that first div out.
Any thoughts on this would be great. I'm finding UK boundary confusion, and how Google might deal with that in instances like this, mighty confusing.
-
Hi Luke,
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. Now, I want to be sure I understand what you are referencing by using the word 'geotag'. Please, give a definition of that. The language of Local remains non-standard, so we sometimes use different terms for the same elements.Doing Local SEO, one has to get into Google's mindset. Google's approach to Local is that everything is founded on physical location. So, the name, address and phone number is the core of any Local SEO campaign. In cases where a client has offices in city A, but also welcomes clients from cities B and C or goes to clients to serve them in cities B and C, the client's main data is still about city A, because that is where he is physically located and that is what Google cares about most.
I'm not entirely sure about your particular client's business model. Is he, for example, a dentist located in San Franciso whose patients come to him from Oakland and Berkeley as well, or, is he, for example, a lawn care specialist located in San Francisco who has a service radius including Oakland or Berkeley. In any case, it's his city of location that counts most, and so, this takes priority in elements such as titles, tags, headers, footers and content.
In the case of service area businesses (plumbers, carpenters, carpet cleaners, etc.) it is a common best practice to create unique landing pages for each city in which the business goes to serve. These do not outweigh his main pages optimized for his city of location, but they are a way to let humans and bots know that the business' employees travel to these other cities to render services. You typically cannot expect to outrank other companies with physical locations in these services cities, but you can hope to gain at least some visibility for these secondary geographic terms.
Now, with what I've described, would you be able to be a little more detailed about what you would like to know, Luke? You are not in any way obliged to name the client, but perhaps you can give a few more details if you have further questions. I'll be glad to stop back by. Thanks!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Where can I find either web directories or decent sites that will link back to me...without paying thru the nose?
Hi Community! For starters, from my question, you can probably determine that I am either a novice, or very low intermediate SEO person. We all know, links are king with our friends at Google. I am a recently-retired IT person with a very small freelance IT company (just me), and I'd like to generate more leads/business. I'd be thrilled with one or two small jobs per week to supplement my pension. I've used the MOZ tools only to determine the majority of my competitors have like a thousand links, whereas Google reports me as having 97 links. My on-page grades are all upper 90s and a couple are at 100%. I am not targeting really competitive keywords, so that's not my problem. My problem is my DA, which is sitting at a mere 20...pause to laugh! I don't want to pay thru the nose for high DA links for the obvious reasons. I submitted my URLs to as many directories as I could find. Would anyone have a decent list of sites where I could submit my URL to get some more links? Thanks guys and Gals! Willy
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | NewSEOguy0 -
Can I Use Meta NoIndex to Block Unwanted Links?
I have a forum thread on my site that is completely user generated, not spammy at all, but it is attracting about 45 backlinks from really spammy sites. Usually when this happens, the thread is created by a spammer and I just 404 it. But in this instance, the thread is completely legit, and I wouldn't want to 404 it because users could find it useful. If I add a meta noindex, nofollow tag to the header, will the spammy pagerank still be passed? How best can I protect myself from these low quality backlinks? I don't want to get slapped by Penguin! **Note: I cannot find contact information from the spam sites and it's in a foreign language.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TMI.com0 -
I'm Getting Attacked, What Can I Do?
I recently noticed a jump in my Crawl Errors in Google Webmaster Tools. Upon further investigation I found hundreds of the most spammy web pages I've ever seen pointing to my domain (although all going to 404 errors): http://blurchelsanog1980.blog.com/ http://lenitsky.wordpress.com/ These are all created within the last week. A. What the hell is going on? B. Should I be very concerned? (because they are 404 errors) C. What should my next steps be? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
Local Map Pack: What's the best way to handle twin cities?
Google is increasing cracking down on bad local results. However, in many regions of the US there are twin cities or cities that reside next to each other, like Minneapolis-Saint Paul or Kansas City. According to Google guidelines your business should only be listed in the city in which your business is physically located. However, we've noticed that results just outside of the local map pack will still rank, especially for businesses that service the home. For example, let's say you have a ACME Plumbing in Saint Paul, MN. If you were to perform a search for "Plumbing Minneapolis" you typically see local Minneapolis plumbers, then Saint Paul outliers. Usually the outliers are in the next city or just outside of the Google map centroid. Are there any successful strategies to increase rank on these "Saint Paul outliers" that compete with local Minneapolis results or are the results always going lag behind in lieu of perceived accuracy? We're having to compete against some local competitors that are using some very blackhat techniques to rank multiple sites locally (in the map results). They rank multiple sites for the same company, under different company names and UPS store addresses. Its pretty obvious, especially when you see a UPS store on the street view of the address! We're not looking to bend the rules, but rather compete safely. Can anything be done in this service based scenario?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AaronHenry0 -
How do I write tags on a youtube video for a local Google search?
I've been reading into tags, and I would like to know what the best ways to do them for a local search are. Right now I have a title that reads similar to, "Keyword1 and Keyword2 in City X" Would I make a corresponding tag that reads "Keyword 1 and Keyword 2 in City X,"? Or would I do "Keyword 1," "Keyword 2," and, "City X," as separate tags? Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | OOMDODigital0 -
Backlinks for the same IP address
Hi Everyone I've been doing a backlink clean up as my site has dropped quite a lot in the search engine results over the last 4 months. While doing the backlink clean up I cam e across 20 different domains all based in the Washington/ VA area all with the same IP address. To make matters worse the contents and link to my site are all duplicated. Is this seen as bad practice from Google's perspective i.e. a link network.?? I look forward to hearing you comments Many thanks Jonathan
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | JonnytheB0 -
Rel Noindex Nofollow tag vs meta noindex nofollow
Hi Mozzers I have a bit of thing I was pondering about this morning and would love to hear your opinion on it. So we had a bit of an issue on our client's website in the beginning of the year. I tried to find a way around it by using wild cards in my robots.txt but because different search engines treat wild cards differently it dint work out so well and only some search engines understood what I was trying to do. so here goes, I had a parameter on a big amount of URLs on the website with ?filter being pushed from the database we make use of filters on the site to filter out content for users to find what they are looking for much easier, concluding to database driven ?filter URLs (those ugly &^% URLs we all hate so much*. So what we looking to do is implementing nofollow noindex on all the internal links pointing to it the ?filter parameter URLs, however my SEO sense is telling me that the noindex nofollow should rather be on the individual ?filter parameter URL's metadata robots instead of all the internal links pointing the parameter URLs. Am I right in thinking this way? (reason why we want to put it on the internal links atm is because the of the development company states that they don't have control over the metadata of these database driven parameter URLs) If I am not mistaken noindex nofollow on the internal links could be seen as page rank sculpting where as onpage meta robots noindex nofolow is more of a comand like your robots.txt Anyone tested this before or have some more knowledge on the small detail of noindex nofollow? PS: canonical tags is also not doable at this point because we still in the process of cleaning out all the parameter URLs so +- 70% of the URLs doesn't have an SEO friendly URL yet to be canonicalized to. Would love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks, Chris Captivate.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DROIDSTERS0 -
Why doesn't Google find different domains - same content?
I have been slowly working to remove near duplicate content from my own website for different locals. Google seems to be doing noting to combat the duplicate content of one of my competitors showing up all over southern California. For Example: Your Local #1 Rancho Bernardo Pest Control Experts | 858-352 ... <cite>www.pestcontrolranchobernardo.com/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Rancho Bernardo Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 858-352-7728. Your Local #1 Oceanside Pest Control Experts | 760-486-2807 ... <cite>www.pestcontrol-oceanside.info/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Oceanside Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 760-486-2807. The competitor is getting high page 1 listing for massively duplicated content across web domains. Will Google find this black hat workmanship? Meanwhile, he's sucking up my business. Do the results of the competitor's success also speak to the possibility that Google does in fact rank based on the name of the url - something that gets debated all the time? Thanks for your insights. Gerry
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | GerryWeitz0