How to remove non-requested, non-desired backlinks
-
Dear Mosers,
Before Penguin update we start a link back profile study about who and why are linking and we found hundred of garbage sites like these:
http://rakeback-blogger.com/links/
and hundred more...
They don't have contact form or email address, so what is the best way to remove our link from there (there are any quick way), these sites are damaging our rank.
Thank you for your help
Claudio
-
If the drop started April 23 then it's not likely to be Penguin. However, it's a tough call because you could have had a natural drop that started on April 23 and then got augmented on the 24th. But, there were Panda refreshes on April 19 and 27th. I'm pretty reluctant to call it either without a real in depth look at your analytics.
Penguin is generally a keyword specific drop, so if you can pinpoint that you have dropped for particular keywords that have been overoptimized in your backlink profile then you could go in this direction. However, the backlinks that you pointed out originally all seem to have your url as anchor text so I have a hard time believing that this is Penguin. (With that being said, I haven't done a full analysis of your site and backlink profile.)
What made me wonder if this was Panda was that your inner pages have very little content above the fold. All of the content above the fold seems to be the same for each page. And then, the content that is below the fold is mostly brief product descriptions - not a lot that Google can recognize as substantial content.
Again, I'd be really hesitant to go removing links in this case. If this were my site I'd do the following:
-have a really thorough look at my analytics to see if the traffic drop can be attributed to one or more particular keywords
-if yes, then I'd start cleaning up links that contained those keywords as anchors.
-if no, then I'd start changing my pages so that there is more substantial content, especially above the fold, for each of these pages. I'd also go looking for other places where I could be violating the quality guidelines on page such as hidden text, etc. Then, once this was cleared up I'd wait for the next Panda refresh to see if I had recovered.
-
Dear all,
I found this history google update doc http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change
and Penguin starts on Apr 24 and Apr 27 another Panda.
In conclusion (I want to share my point of view coming from your knowledge):
1. Penguin hits our site because, we has a few high quality links and some of them was hitted by Penguin. Possible solution get more links (natural etc).
2. Panda, some of our pages specially categories and sub categories were including repetitive content and canonical problems between them (this issue was partially resolved). I'll continue resolving this.
Finally please give me your opinions about this.
Thank you again for all your help, Im very happy to participate with you in SEOMOz and I think this is a great community!
-
Dear Marie,
Our Drops starts on April 23 to April 30 (500 visitors to 280) you're correct, so it was a Panda hit?
Thank you for all your help
Claudio
-
I would not work to remove them, yet.
I think that you are getting great advice from Marie. I would listen to her opinions.
-
Have a close look to see if your traffic drop coincides with either April 19th or April 27th which are days of Panda refreshes. In looking at your inner pages I'm starting to wonder if this is a Panda issue....
-
I wouldn't go removing links until you know that the links are actually what are causing your drop. The majority of these links are pointing at your home page so it would be weird for your inner pages to drop if they were causing you a problem. If you remove a bunch of links you could possibly do more harm than good!
Can you pinpoint your traffic drop to a particular day? Try looking at your analytics and selecting organic search traffic. If you can pinpoint a particular day then you may be able to determine if this is Penguin related or not. It could be a Panda issue and if that's the case then it's really nothing to do with your backlinks, but rather an onsite issue.
And there are other possible reasons as well! So again, don't go on a massive link removal campaign until you are sure that that's what needs to be done!
-
Dear EGOL,
No warnings from google, only traffic drops -50% (actually our Home page ranks well) but the internal pages not.
I extract from SEOMoz the links and I start sending them emails asking for link removal and no one has responded, and some of them don't have contact form or email details, I'll try contact them via Whois records.
Do you recommends perform this HUGE and slave task with minimal results or only forget and go ahead.
I appreciate your opinions and help
Thank you
Claudio
-
Dear Marie,
Our traffic drops on Apr and May at 50%, and some pages (not home) was performing well (google 3 first positions) and now they are on the 2 or 3rd page.
Honestly Im very worried about that.
I appreciate all your help
Claudio
-
Some of my sites have lots of backlinks from trashy directories and mash-up sites. I had nothing to do with getting these links. They are gifts from people who are making spammy websites.
I think that most websites acquire lots of these links over time - especially if you have a website that ranks well in popular SERPs. If you had nothing to do with placing them then I would not worry about them unless google sends you a warning.
-
This doesn't look like any kind of negative SEO campaign to me. The majority of your backlinks (including the ones that you are asking about) use your url as an anchor. If someone was attempting to try to get you a penguin hit or an unnatural links warning they'd be spamming you with a keyword anchor. (And it's debatable whether that would even work.)
It looks to me like you are still in the index and you are ranking #1 for the term that you are targeting in your home page title.
How do you feel these links are affecting your traffic? If you had an unnatural links penalty then you wouldn't be ranking. If you had a penguin hit then there would be a dramatic traffic drop on April 24 or May 25.
Otherwise I'm guessing there's something else going on. How dramatic is your traffic drop? Is it for all keywords or just specific ones?
It's possible that you lost some link equity because sites that link to you got hit with a penalty. And there are many other possible reasons.
-
No one from here works with backlinks services, I think it can be performed by one competitor, from years til now.
our site is freesharewaredepot.com please take a look and give us your ideas or something that Im mis.
Thank you
Claudio
-
Have you tried the whois info? A site's contact info is USUALLY in there. However, I have found that only a small percentage of website owners actually respond to the emails I have sent via whois info.
Just a question, and not meant to be condemning at all, but how do you think you got hundreds of links like this? It sounds to me like something that would happen after using a backlink service. (You know, the kind that promises hundreds of links for one low price.) I've got a few such spammy links to my site, but not hundreds.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
To remove or not remove a redirected page from index
We have a promotion landing page which earned some valuable inbound links. Now that the promotion is over, we have redirected this page to a current "evergreen" page. But in the search results page on Google, the original promotion landing page is still showing as a top result. When clicked, it properly redirects to the newer evergreen page. But, it's a bit problematic for the original promo page to show in the search results because the snippet mentions specifics of the promo which is no longer active. So, I'm wondering what would be the net impact of using the "removal request " tool for the original page in GSC. If we don't use that tool, what kind of timing might we expect before the original page drops out of the results in favor of the new redirected page? And if we do use the removal tool on the original page, will that negate what we are attempting to do by redirecting to the new page, with regard to preserving inbound link equity?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoelevated0 -
Does non-critical AMP errors prevent you from being featured on Top Stories Carousel?
Consider site A which is a news publishing site that has valid AMP pages with non-critical AMP pages (as notified within Search Console). Also, Site A publishes news articles from site B (its partner site) and posts it on site A which have AMP pages too but most of them are not valid AMP pages with critical AMP errors. For brand terms like Economic Times, it does show a top stories carousel for all articles published by Economic Times, however it doesn't look the same for site A (inspite of it having valid AMP pages). Image link: http://tinypic.com/r/219bh9j/9 Now that there are valid AMP pages from site A and invalid AMP pages from site B on site A, there have been instances wherein a news article from site A features on the top stories carousel on Desktop for a certain query whereas it doesn't feature on the mobile SERPs in spite of the page being a valid AMP page. For example, as mentioned in the screenshot below: Business Today ranks on the Top Stories carousel for a term like “jio news” on Desktop, but on Mobile although the page is a valid AMP page, it doesn’t show as an AMP page within the Top Stories Carousel. Image Link: http://tinypic.com/r/11sc8j6/9 There have been some cases where although the page is featured on the top carousel on desktop, the same article doesn't show up on the mobile version for the same query on the Top Stories Carousel. What could be the reason behind this? Also, would it be necessary to solve both critical and non-critical errors on site A (including those published from site B on site A)?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Starcom_Search1 -
How to get backlinks
I know that we should get the reputable backlinks for the website But which websites I'm doing seo nobody wants to exchange backlinks so how can I get reputable backlinks related to niche.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ramansaab0 -
Unnatural Links Warning, but nowhere to submit a reconsideration request.
More than a year ago (August 2013) I got an "Unnatural Links Warning," I ignored it because I thought it was erroneously sent and that it was odd that there was no place for me to submit a reconsideration request in the Manual Actions section of Webmaster Tools. This happened for several of my domains. I am now noticing a lost in ranking (but not a loss in "ability" to rank). It led me to post this question in the Webmaster Help Forum, I really didn't get an answer though. Here is a link to the Google Export of my links from zachrussell.net and protechig.com. Any idea of what I can do related to this? Even If I did disavow/remove any questionable links, there is no place for me to submit a reconsideration request.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Zachary_Russell0 -
Are these good backlinks?
I am trying to understand how to build good backlinks. I've read or been told that anchor text is bad (understood), websites with unrelated subjects is bad (understood), paid-for links are bad (?), "submitted" and article to get the link is bad (?), or it is a link/farm directory are bad (?). This is actually really confusing to me! Please bear with my silly questions, I am an engineer with an MBA, stay-at-home/homeschooling mom that helps run my husbands business. My brain gets full fast! Ha! I thought maybe if I post some of the links we have built, someone could look at them and tell me if they are good or bad. This way I can go forward understanding better. Articles... I thought that writing articles was a GOOD thing! Now I see that submitting articles isn't? So what about these two articles where my husband, as an expert in his field, wrote an article for a popular mag/blog. http://coastalanglermag.com/red-snapper-season/ (they did the hyperlink wrong and I am trying to get the publisher to fix it) http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/shark-encounter-capt.-gregg-rapp/ (this is a pretty funny story if you read it) Blog stories... what about when someone copies your blog post as a story on their website? Or someone scrapes your content? http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/ http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/heart-pressure/ http://www.sportfishermen.com/board/showthread.php?t=2627767&p=3294972 (we post fishing reports and they get copied) Un-related Directories... http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Glowing_Deep_Sea_Fish/ (I didn't create this!!! I guess they just crawl and link?) Related "farm" Directories http://www.sportsmansresource.com/ffishtarpon.htm Other directories/citations such as yellow pages, city search, etc. These are okay right? Local hotels and what not... concierge's link to me, I don't even ask them to http://laquintacocoabeach.com/things-to-do/index.cfm Paid - I pay for MOZ Local! Isn't that paying??? AND, I paid for a whois listing on enom... is that bad too? NOW FOR THE BAD.... these are bad right? http://darman.niniyoo.com/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters-Inc-FL.html (I have no idea how this got there) http://teensnow.comwww.whoisbusinesslistings.com/Other/10/23490/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters.html (what the heck is this??? how can they even append a website on a website?) http://forums.gq.com.au/member.php?u=1813973 (I think this was created on my behalf by my part-time SEO) If you have read all the way down to here, my sincerest thanks! Thank you for your time!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CalicoKitty20000 -
Same-server, Same-Market, Micro-Sites backlinks.. good or bad?
Hi there, We are a real estate listings portal and we also create micro sites for real estate agents. These micro-sites are hosted on our same server, similar in structure, different in design... different in content. They all link to us but not within each other. They all link to us because they have to access our login system in order to manage their property listings on their own micro sites (which updates on our own website too). (Also as marketing for others to see that we have built their sites with our engine). Would all these backlinks be considered to be coming from the same c-block? Thus, being sub-optimal for our SEO efforts? Should we worry about grouping them and giving them separate IP addresses? Should we add nofollow tags to these links or are there any other things you would worry about? Many thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | propertypalseo0 -
Removing content from Google's Indexes
Hello Mozers My client asked a very good question today. I didn't know the answer, hence this question. When you submit a 'Removing content for legal reasons report': https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_legalother?product=websearch will the person(s) owning the website containing this inflammatory content recieve any communication from Google? My clients have already had the offending URL removed by a court order which was sent to the offending company. However now the site has been relocated and the same content is glaring out at them (and their potential clients) with the title "Solicitors from Hell + Brand name" immediately under their SERPs entry. **I'm going to follow the advice of the forum and try to get the url removed via Googles report system as well as the reargard action of increasing my clients SERPs entries via Social + Content. ** However, I need to be able to firmly tell my clients the implications of submitting a report. They are worried that if they rock the boat this URL (with open access for reporting of complaints) will simply get more inflammatory)! By rocking the boat, I mean, Google informing the owners of this "Solicitors from Hell" site that they have been reported for "hosting defamatory" content. I'm hoping that Google wouldn't inform such a site, and that the only indicator would be an absence of visits. Is this the case or am I being too optimistic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | catherine-2793880 -
Redirecting non-www pages to www ones
Hello:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | romanbond
I'm trying to consolidate all the link juice and see that some of my pages are linked to by using both www.mysite.com/whatever.html and mysite.com/whatever.html.
Is there a safe re-write rule that not just redirects non-www(s) to www(s), but designates the redirect as 301, so link juice will be transfered as well. If not RewriteRule, are there any other ways to accoplishe this? And the last question: can this be solved by simply setting Preffered domain in google webmaster tools to display www URL? Any help will be appreciated.0