Great Content
-
Hello fellow Mozzers!
I'm still new to the SEO game and have been doing lots of reading and research about SEO. From what I've learned nowadays it all comes down to great content and links that come from it. I have to admit I'm a visual learner, I need to see it to understand and learn better. I was hoping that someone can provide some examples of GREAT Content (whether its a blog post, page, article, etc...) I know EGOL is one of the most valuabe SEOMoz users and by reading his forum responses he always advises to write great content to build links... Hoping EGOL and other SEOMoz users would be so kind to share an example or two of what they think is great content.
One more question (related). Since all the Google updates this year in regards to links and content, I've read numerous times on this Q&A forum that great content gets links, and that submitting articles to directories or buying links doesn't work anymore or at least not something that a whitehat SEO should implement for a long term strategy, does that mean that if you publish great content on your site that is informative, unique and valuable it will get you links without submitting to directories or buying links? Is it really that simple?
Thank you in advance!
Igor
-
Hello Robert,
Thank you for your input I agree with you, EGOL whether intentionally or not did provide a great example of GREAT content just by answering my question.
-
Hi Gamer07,
Thank you, that's a good strategy.
-
Something that is GREAT to you may not be THAT GREAT to another and it could possibly be bad to another one.
You should try to understand who your visitors are. I would check out the websites they visit. See what they are interested in. See which topics and posts receive more attention. Comments, social media shares etc.
I have been learning this myself in the last two years. Before, I thought GREAT content meant FLAWLESS content and it wasn't true in some cases.
Keep an eye on Google Analytics to see which content receives high bounce rates and which content is really read (look at average time on page). Then start doing some A/B testing for content that is failing in terms of BOUNCE RATE and Avg Time on Page. Create an alternative of the same page but change the layout, places of text and media. Increase the number of visuals, decrease the text and vice versa.
good luck!
-
EGOL
As a confirmed content junky, I have to say this is great content.
...my goal is to be aware of the above and produce things that have potential. We have all written things that we knew would be stunning to the world and later scratched our heads wondering where we missed the boat. At the same time, we have written something because it needed to be written and looked up a few days later as it was showing up everywhere and then re-read it to see what those who shared it liked about it.
IGOR,
Please understand the wisdom of this statement:
**This type of content is not written in a moment or acquired for a few bucks on a freelance site. It is produced by someone who knows a subject very well and has creativity to come up with something awesome. **
One cannot overstate the importance of understanding the subject and of creativity. We are an agency and our copywriters are tasked with writing on a lot of subjects. Literally everything from rewriting product pages so that they are not the same dupe all others have to writing about the law, the weather, medicine, current events, and so forth. While they are great at what they do, without giving them enough time on a subject to know it, all the creativity in the world will not make a piece good. At the same time, subject matter experts who lack creativity usually write like...subject matter experts without creativity...(read the text book, ain't this fun?!). Lastly, asking them to write something great in an hour or two will not produce something great. (We are aware, that on some sites, we are writing to cover a given page topic in the best possible way based on time and money limitations of clients.)
Search the web for queries that provide basic information in your niche and identify content that ranks well and clearly deserves it. Then create something that beats it soundly. Well said in my opinion.
Great content alone will not win the war instantly. You must have a powerful site to get instant rankings, or get it in front of influencers who will help you promote it or put word of it it out to places like slashdot, reddit, facebook where people can share it.
I could not agree more. All to often in SEO we see those who want to do one thing and capture position one in the SERPs. There is no easy path. Yes, there are tricks, etc. but in the final analysis the battle will be won by those who are meticulous in their approach. Someone getting 500 backlinks from a Chinese ginseng business directory, etc. may rank ahead today; I guarantee you they will not win out over time against skilled SEO's who possess determination, skill, and an understanding of reaity.
EGOL,
This was great content you provided to all. Thanks,
-
Hello EGOL,
Thank you for your answer. It's very helpful and informative! I will try to follow it as a guideline when working on content.
-
Hello Greg,
Thank you for your answer! Yes promoting and sharing the content makes sense.
-
....an example or two of what they think is great content.
What I think doesn't matter. It's what my visitors think and their friends think that makes all of the difference. Go to sites like slashdot and reddit to see what is getting heavy action, look at pages like this on sites like NewYork Times. These show what is taking off with people. Look at your own site to see what is getting a little action and make it bettter.
The above shows you the type of content that is highly shareable. It is hard to predict what will be highly shared and produce it repeatedly.
So, my goal is to be aware of the above and produce things that have potential. But another area where I focus is on basic information topics where I can produce content that is better than anything that is already out there. Then produce substantive, well-written content that is rich with photos, graphics, video, data. Substantive content is long and has a huge diversity of words. Rich content is attractive and interesting and motivates sharing.
Put these all together... a topic with potential, basic information that is best-on-the-web, substantive to be impressive and pull lots of longtail queries, well written for appeal and rich with media to capture attention.
This type of content is not written in a moment or acquired for a few bucks on a freelance site. It is produced by someone who knows a subject very well and has creativity to come up with something awesome.
If you read the SEOmoz blog you will certainly see some content that knocks your socks off, triggers lots of discussion and lots of thumbs up. Those people didn't sit down and crank that out in an afternoon. They began writing with deep experience, did more research to be sure that they were write, created something great that they were not afraid to show to experts who would give them heavy thumbs down if they were full of it.
Search the web for queries that provide basic information in your niche and identify content that ranks well and clearly deserves it. Then create something that beats it soundly.
Great content alone will not win the war instantly. You must have a powerful site to get instant rankings, or get it in front of influencers who will help you promote it or put word of it it out to places like slashdot, reddit, facebook where people can share it. Sometimes it takes a hurricane or a convention in the news to trigger interest.
-
In layman's terms, yes, useful great content is all you need to get links naturally.
That's how search engines work, they expect that if people like a website or an article, they will link to it. If you can satisfy your visitors by giving them what they want, they will link/like/share your content. (creating brand exposure, more links)
Obviously its not as simple as posting a "great" article on your site and then forgetting about everything else.
You still need to promote the article in social channels/blog comments etc etc to spread the word.
In time, when your website/brand grows in authority (by building relationships with related webmasters/bloggers etc) Google will rank your articles without you having to do anything as your domain has the authority and trust to back it up.
Publish your great content, but then also promote/share it among the influential people in your niche and over time, the links will come.
Just my opinion on the matter.
Greg
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it better to have micro-sites with good content or redirect domains?
I have a domain with a lot of content and it is an eCommerce site. I've just been told that we have another 12 domains that are inactive and do not redirect. I don't know what to do with them as they haven't been used for ages and do not direct or have any content (max of a DA or 4). Therefore which is better for SEO? To have really good content with perhaps a few regular blog posts on each of the 12 domains, or to redirect all of the domains to the one main domain? I would take 1 domain and put a lot of content on and optimise is.. spending a few weeks on one and then move onto another, all while posting on each blog on each domain. Thank you for any help! 🙂
Link Building | | schloeee0 -
Ugh content! I don't get it
Everyone on this website says the proper way to build links is with great content. I don't get that because I am trying to build links for a classified ads website and there is no "great content" for any of the classified ads websites. None of them have blogs or any content other than the stuff people are selling. When I look at my competitors inbound links using open site explorer, they are all junk. Most of the links listed in open site explorer are dead /broken links and the ones that are not dead links are spammy, low quality links including many link exchanges. So, I don't get the "great content to build links" route because in my vertical it's not being done. Suggestions on how to build links in this situation?
Link Building | | Noob150 -
Building my Portfolio of 70 MicroNiche Sites (10-15 Pages of Content)
Hello Moz Community, I just bought 70 new domains in the past month in different niches with exact match domains, installing these sites on 2 different hostgator servers, installing all the plugins needed etc. and start publishing first 10 articles on each site. ( the keyword research was done with long tail pro and choosing the best long tails with MOZ difficulty grader that is under 40-45.) My question is the following: If I will have some of these sites that will don’t rank in Google in the next 3-6 months for the main keyword without building links…what will be the best course/method/resources I need to know about building quality backlinks and having the time to do these tasks on each website to be sure that every site will be a winner, or even 50-70% of them in both traffic & money ROI !?! I want to have a minimum of 10 sites that will make around 150$ per month because my Intention is to sell these sites on flippa for higher multiples of 15-20 monthly revenue. ( I sold my first website on flippa in September for 1650$ and is awesome. I want to repeat this success at a higher level ) Thank you ! I built niche sites since February 2012 but in terms of building backlinks to microniche sites I didn’t do too many things in the past when is about backlinking (just submitting in directories) so I ask about the experience of this community. Which are the best methods to build links in 2013 J Best regards, Sebastian Papp & His Team
Link Building | | Sebastyan220 -
Content optimisation or Link Building first? Small clients & small budgets
Hi there. Apologies in advance for this long message! I have come from a large client-side SEO position where I had a small team of online marketers to assist in our SEO efforts. The effect was that we were able to work on link building and onsite optimisation at the same time and obviously give it 100% of our attention (and the website had very high DA and Trust). I have recently moved to a small agency where I am the sole SEO-Guy and my clients are small. I typically have no more than 8 hours to spend per month on all aspects of SEO (analysis, reporting, link building and content optimisation) per client and I have to strictly adhere to this. To make matters more difficult, these clients typically have weak back-link profiles (low in number and quality and all pointing to the home page) and poorly optimised content (which contributes to low DA & PR). I went through my first 'monthly process' for a particular client in September and focused my 8 hours on optimising the site content for a particular section of the website. This involved optimising meta titles & descriptions, body content and images for our chosen keywords. I didn't focus on links at all. I published the changes to the site on 23rd September. When I look at my rankings as of 6th October, one keyword in particular has dropped by 28 places (from 11 to 39) which seems excessive to me. In my mind, the changes I made were small, so this drop concerns me. The particular URL was ranking in position 11 for a keyword that I subsequently targeted to another (more relevant) page in the site. Both pages have the same MR, PA and links etc. I think I may have effectively cannibalised the keyword and to make matters worse, the new page isn't even in the top 50! Both pages are in the Google Index. So, this is my longwinded way of asking for your opinion on whether other SEOs in my position would recommend spending time on building the back link profile to strengthen DA and PR of deeper pages before you start making content optimisations (given I am unable to do them at the same time). It's tricky with small clients as they don't necessarily understand how long these things can take. Cheers! Laurie
Link Building | | Laurie-Tomahawk0 -
How much important is the connection between content and backlink relevancy?
My question is about the connection between web page content and backlink relevancy, how much it is important? Let’s have an example: If I publish a guest post about “cell phone model review” and get a link back to my website which is on the subject of “cell phone monitoring”. Now my question is: Is this a relevant and good quality backlink? As content is about “cell phone Model Review” while the backlink is about “cell phone Monitoring”, How Google would take this as if; 1- Anchor text is “cell phone monitoring” 2- Anchor text is URL based
Link Building | | shaz_lhr0 -
Backlinks from websites with duplicate content
How does backlinks from websites with duplicate contect affect your rank in search engine? Is there any negative factor?
Link Building | | prunarevic0 -
What is the Best Way to Site Structure My New Content?
I am about to start adding some serious content to my site in hopes of providing more info to my visitors and to build organic traffic. I am looking for the best structure and places to put my inbound links. My website is tradethink.com and we specialize in trading systems for the commodities markets. I am going to be adding content about the particular commodities markets we follow; gold, soybeans, crude oil, etc. From my research I see it is best to place as many inbound links as possible to the content pages. On the other hand I see that it is important for the site to be user friendly and not have to much link clutter on the home page. I have a few options. Lets use "gold trading" instance. 1. Have individual links on the home page and most other internal pages that link directly to tradethink.com/gold-trading.html (lots of link clutter, but best SEO?). Problem is that I am doing this for like thirty pages and would have an additional thirty links on all of my pages. A possible work around is to place these individual links at the bottom of my pages. 2. Have home page and other internal pages link to tradethink.com/trading/ (just 1 link to add to each page), with the individual link still going to tradethink.com/gold-trading.html. Here I am adding a folder "/trading/" to place all of the links in, but when you click on the link inside the trading folder it goes to tradethink.com/gold-trading.html and bypasses the /trading/ folder to get better SEO, shorter url? 3. Have home page and other internal pages link to /trading/, with the individual link going to /trading /gold-trading.html This seems the proper way, but am I giving up link juice by going to trading/gold-trading.html vs #2 above going direct to /gold-trading Any advise/questions appreciated.
Link Building | | trader2470 -
How to Add Content to a Product-Focused Site
I recently took over management of the SEO work for the following site: http://www.grovercorp.com/rings-and-seals/. I want to do link building, but don't have a ton of experience with it. From what I've read, offering linkable content is the best way to get links. However, this site -- like many in industrial B-2-B -- is focused primarily on promoting their products. I'd like tto offer an article or add an infographic, but am not sure where I would put it? It doesn't seem like the architecture offers a good place to add linkable content. Anyone have thoughts or suggestions?
Link Building | | EricVallee340