Google.co.uk & Google.com difference of ranking
-
How can our website rank on page 3 in google.co.uk and yet it ranks on page 20 for the same keyword on google.com?
This doesn't seem to affect our competitors though and its only our site that is being affected/penalized.
-
For technical signals they'd have to remove any UK signals by replacing with US or neutral. Like hosting location (US) or Webmaster Tools' geographic target setting (Unlisted).
For content signals, agree: keep what already exists with possibly some revisions and/or build additional content that refers to the global nature of the business and the markets being served. Maybe home page copy that talks about "serving clients world-wide". Pages like "Top 5 Reasons Californians Visit Blackpool", and all that kind of thing indicating the page is relevant to Californians.
-
Instead of removing UK ranking signals, would it not be better to add some US ranking signals in addition - in an effort to rank for both .co.uk and .com?
-
I see this happening in Canada. Even though in reality your business, like many in Canada, is serving a global market, Google suddenly decides your website is primarily relevant for one of the non-US English speaking markets, and so knocks it back on .com while leaving it alone on .ca (or .uk or ..au.).
My strategy would be to remove as many signals as possible that would make them think you're only serving the UK.
There can be a problem with this approach: hopefully not in your case but there may be a period where the non-.com ranking suffers as a result. I had a situation where I had a clear choice between ranking page 1 on .ca .uk .au while page 10 on .com - or on page 2 for all. Webmaster tools market setting could be flipped back and forth at will to cause either state. The only way out was to set it at page 2 for everywhere and do everything else to get back on 1 - took time and we had to accept the page 2 .ca etc ranking meanwhile.
-
We used to get good traffic from both google.co.uk and google.com as some mobile devices are set to use google.com by default and its still showing the correct listings for all other sites which rank in the uk search in google.com so its more curiosity as to why we were being penalized.
The other point is our not wanting to miss out on foreign visitors who are looking for hotels in Blackpool as it is a tourist hotspot so to speak.
We're clearing cache and checking in incognito browsers to check rankings and to add to the mystery some visitors (depending on isp's) see the sites on page 1.
Thanks for the offer of checking rankings, we have this covered.
-
Out of interest why do you want to rank on google.com if you are targeting "blackpool hotels" are you getting a lot of US clients?
I would of thought it would be mainly UK searchers you're looking to target?
Also have you tried using SEO Moz's ranking checker to confirm a US search position? (It could be google personalising your search).
If you PM me your domain and keyword ill check for you.
-
Pre-penguin we had 2 sites which dominated the Google search for "blackpool hotels" and hundreds of variations. The sites are beginning to perform again for the longer keywords and most are returning to page 1. The money term, so to speak, is "blackpool hotels" as it gets over 27,000 searches in google per month.
One of our main competitors had/has a much worse linking profile than us and they jumped back into page 1. They hold less content for their clients than we do too. With the content of our competitors and ourselves being related to the UK no overseas office are in play.
Geographically our servers are located in the US, simply down to budget at this time. The links we have were never paid for and we've never really launched any campaigns down to our content being so good.
Neither site has any duplication of its content on other domain names (this was removed in May) and all duplicate content was redirected to the main or given canonical meta info.
Rankings were always top 5 in both google.com and google.co.uk pre-penguin.
All the rankings in Bing and Yahoo have been unaffected with the post-penguin changes we've made which does point out the links we had were poor to begin with.
Does this all sound like its to do with old links from duplicate sites still playing a part?
-
There's lots of factors at play here - for example, what are you competitors backlink profiles like? Are they getting links from the US / World wide? How does this compare to your backlink profile.
What about citations, (reputable) directory listings? How about on-page references to over-seas offices etc. Do you have projects/services targeted at these markets? Where are their sites hosted?
How are they ranking for other keywords, particularly geographically relevant terms? Can you identify what your competitors are doing that you aren't?
You mention that you had to remove content to get back the .co.uk rankings. I take it your trying to recover from penguin?
Have the ranking on google.com always been this way though (even before you were penalised?)
It's hard to be more specific without details of the site/keyword(s) in question.
-
Its a good point you make, but all the sites ranking in the top 4 pages remain the same in google.com search for the same keyphrase that rank in google.co.uk - all apart from our site(s) which seem to be penalized.
Would this be down to a difference in algorithms on differing google servers? Could some be seeing content we've removed to get back the .co.uk rankings?
-
Generally speaking it's a lot harder to rank on google.com than it is for a geo location like google.co.uk - perhaps you are sending stronger signals to google that you are a uk based company?
FYI if you are only trying to rank in the UK then anyone going to google.com gets redirected to .co.uk any way.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Was Google Analytics and Adsense Down Today?
For the last 4 hours of so we were registering zero users and Adsense reporting has not changed. We checked the site, and there were no problems. It seems for some reason there was no reporting. Just now it came back up and we are showing live traffic. Trying to figure out if this was a problem specific to us or if it is on Google's end. Thanks,
Reporting & Analytics | | akin670 -
Referral Traffic from Google
Hello, I have a question about my company's new website. I've worked in SEO and studied Google Analytics results for a few years now but have never really come across something like this. I started in this position in January of this year and when I started breaking down the traffic sources in Google Analytics, I noticed most of the traffic was coming from Google.com as a referral source. I had never seen Google.com as a referral source before so I looked into options for what it could be. It was not a paid ad and our organic traffic was coming through in Analytics, Before I could get any further, our new website was launched (we switched CRM's to WordPress) and the referral traffic from google went from 2,966 in January of 2015 to 22 in February 2015. for more comparison, in February of 2014, the referral traffic from Google was 2,496. I expected a drop when we switched CRM's but we correctly re-directed all pages and created a new sitemap and our organic traffic is up since the switch (not enough to cover drop in referral). I thought at first this had to do with our Google sellers account being de-activated when we made the switch, but I quickly fixed this over a month ago and no change. I'm wondering if anyone has ever seen Google.com come through as a referral source in Google Analytics and if they we're able to figure out what it actually was. This would be a great help! Thank you, Alex
Reporting & Analytics | | RASEO1 -
Google Webmaster Tools During GA Transition?
I'm working with a client that is launching a new website. Google Webmaster Tools can just be disconnected, then reconnected to the new Google Analytics property, correct? Without any data loss in Webmaster Tools? Thanks! Becky
Reporting & Analytics | | Becky_Converge0 -
Google Analytics Auto Report Config
Buonpormeriggio from 15 degrees C, very cloudy wetherby UK 🙂 In Google Analytics I love how you can eMail dashboard reports as illustrated here:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/philpotts-tweak-auto-date-range-2_zps3e2b3e50.jpg But a client wants a weekly report but with a week range from Tues to Mon so my question is please:
How do you or can you tweak the date range so when you select weekly it doesnt spit out the standard Mon to sunday report (or Whatever it is). Thanks is advance,
David0 -
How long does Google Analytics store data?
Hello All, How long analytics keep the data for one website? at least two years at least 25 months other I guess that they guarantee at least 25 months, but it might be more.
Reporting & Analytics | | CommercePundit
Anyone has any other suggestion? Thanks,0 -
Major practices which helps to index pages by google.
Actually, We have submitted more than 100 pages in to google through xml sitemap. But, we see in that 75% of the pages where indexed by google. Note : Excluding the duplicate pages
Reporting & Analytics | | Webworld_Norway0 -
Best practices to track blog.mydomain.com in Google Analytics?
What is the best practice in Google Analytics? Tracking blog.mydomain.com + mydomain.com under the same profile? Or creating separate profiles for each blog.mydomain.com and mydomain.com? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | gerardoH0 -
Google Analytics/ Contact 7 Plugin
I have a site that uses the contact 7 plugin for its contact form sitewide in a sidebar and on a contact us page. I've set up a goal in analytics and tracked using the "on_sent_ok" hook but the number of goals GA is creating is far outweighing the number of times the form is actually completed. I figured my initial mistake was to use the contact-us page as the page tracker variable for the goal but wondered if it was counting all form completions AND anyone who went to the contact page. So I amended it to a contact-us/thank-you page that no site visitor could navigate to, and since I have no goals completed, even though we're getting enquiries through the form. Am I being dumb here and missing something quite simple?
Reporting & Analytics | | PerchDigital0