How do I separate 2 Google+ business listings?
-
Ever since Google Places started merging with Google+, my client's business listing is now showing up in local search results incorrectly under another business name who shares the same address as them.
Has anyone else encountered this problem or a way to correct it?
-
You are most welcome.
-
Thank you Miriam, I will look at those.
-
Yes that is correct.
They have different phone numbers. The business is bail bonding. Yes, client is showing up as OtherGuy in search results. Which is a problem because Client has great reviews that are now boosting OtherGuy's brand.
-
Hello TheeDesign Studio,
Merging issues are absolutely astronomical right now. Go and search the Google And Your Business Forum for the word 'merged' alone and you will see threads from here to pluto on this topic. Why your specific issue is happening cannot be resolved with an investigation of the specific business details, but likely, you will end up walking through the Places Troubleshooter (yes, Google is still calling it Places despite all the recent changes). Here's the link:
http://support.google.com/places/bin/static.py?hl=en&ts=1386120&page=ts.cs
And here's the link the Google and Your Business Forum, in case you don't have that handy. Sometimes, this can be very helpful in uncovering scenarios others have experienced that match yours:
http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!forum/business
Hope these resources help.
-
Hello TheeDesign
First, yes it has happened to many. Second, I am a bit unsure that there is any correlation between Places/Google+ as we have seen this when it was Google Places and we did not see anything and I have not read of that happening concomitantly with the G+ change. (We handle a few G+/formerly Places accounts).
So, Your client is Client and the other listing is OtherGuy. Client offices at 123 hohum lane, Denver. OtherGuy offices at 123 hohum lane, Denver; is this correct?
Do both share same phone number? What types of businesses? Are both results showing or has Client disappeared and only listing is OtherGuy but with your Client's info?
There are multiple ways to approach this and with a couple of details i will endeavor to assist.
Best
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Googles Search Intent – Plural & Singular KW’s
This is more of a ‘gripe’ than a question, but I would love to hear people’s views. Typically, when you search for a product using the singular and plural versions of the keyword Google delivers different SERPs. As an example, ‘leather handbag’ and ‘leather handbags’ return different results, but surely the search intent is exactly the same? You’d have thought Google was now clever enough to work this out. We tend to optimise our webpages for both the plural and singular variations of the KW’s, but see a mixed bag of results when analysing rankings. Is Google trying to force us to create a unique webpage for the singular version, and another unique webpage for the plural version? This would confuse the visitor, and make no sense.. the search intent is the same! How do you combat this problem? Many thanks in advance. Lee.
Algorithm Updates | | Webpresence0 -
Fetch as Google in GWT - Functionality
Hi, For example, some of the HTML improvements notices from GWT, says dupe meta descriptions or titles, for pages that have since been 301 redirected or had a canonical tag added. So, my idea is to force google to read it using "Fetch as Google" - hoping that it will now see 301 redirection or the fix we have implemented. Does this work? How long does it take? Lastly, should I just click the "fetch as google" or should I also click on the "Submit to index" button? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | bjs20100 -
Next big Google update. Andy ideas when?
I'm interested to find out if anyone has and idea of when it will be or good guesses I would be interested to hear your thoughts. I have put a big effort into an SEO upgrade on my site and I'm interested in what impact I can expect when the next big update comes. Assuming I have fixed the issues that had been causing my traffic drop.
Algorithm Updates | | mark_baird0 -
Changing Googles Sitelinks
Hi all, I know Google will only show sitelinks if the site is deemed authoritive and if it will help the user searching a keyword, but is there anyway to order or control which links appear in the sitelinks? I know you can demote a sitelink in Webmasters, but is this not shooting yourself in the foot? If I demote a link will Google replace it with the next link it thinks is worthwhile and be doing this eventually show the links you want to appear in your sitelinks? Thanx Gary
Algorithm Updates | | gazza7770 -
Is Google Rotating Good Matches?
I have a theory that Google may be trying to be fair to white-hat-seo sites that are doing the right things with blogging, linking, social media, etc. [ie that deserve equal good positioning] are being cycled to and from the first page, perhaps in a weekly or monthly basis. My theory would be that they are purposefully doing it to give those sites more equal exposure. My case: I've had top rankings for http://thedogbitelawyer.com for almost all of the important terms for dog bite lawyers for a couple of years now. When Penguin came out we lost some ground across the board, and identified that perhaps there was too much duplicate content left over from when I inherited the site. I reworked the site wording and link structure a bit and gained back positioning. Since that time we are up and down like a yo-yo on the top terms! Anybody else have this suspicion? If it's true, I don't need to stress, if we are bouncing around for other reason's I'd better keep stressing!
Algorithm Updates | | JCDenver0 -
How do I get the expanded results in a Google search?
I notice for certain site (ex: mint.com) that when I search, the top result has a very detailed view with options to click to different subsections of the site. However for my site, even though we're consistently the top result for our branded terms, the result is still only a single line item. How do I adjust this?
Algorithm Updates | | syount1 -
Google Panda Update - google.com.br ( brazil )
Hello folks, Someone know if google run their panda update in brazil ( www.google.com.br ), this week? Coz I can see a interesting boost in my google traffic sources. Thank you.
Algorithm Updates | | augustos0 -
Google Directory vs DMOZ
What is the difference between the Google Directory and the DMOZ if any?
Algorithm Updates | | BrandonC-2698870