Crawl Diagnostics - unexpected results
-
I received my first Crawl Diagnostics report last night on my dynamic ecommerce site.
It showed errors on generated URLs which simply are not produced anywhere when running on my live site. Only when running on my local development server.
It appears that the Crawler doesn't think that it's running on the live site.
For example
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/candlestick-centrepiece-p-1140.html
will go to a Product Not Found page, and therefore Duplicate Content errors are produced.
Running
http://www.nhlocal.co.uk/candlestick-centrepiece-p-1140.html
produces the correct product page and not a Product Not Found page
Any thoughts?
-
Hi Nordichouse,
Sorry it took awhile for me to get back to you on this.
I agree with the SEOmoz techs, it doesn't matter if it is a crawler or a actual person, if you go to an invalid url you should be redirected as 301 to the actual page. If the product doesn't exist it should not allow for superfluous urls.
So basically what you should have is if the product exist then the site redirects to the correct URL. If it doesn't exist then send any query for that product to the same page and display the oscommerce product not found message. By doing this you prevent the system from creating upteenthousand urls for each product.
If you want to test what I mean you can visit our store a www.rubberstore.com/catalog and try a few urls like:
catalog/nipple-clips-p-1000.html
we don't have a product with the id of 1000 so you'll get redirected to the not found message and the root page
-p-1000.htmlhowever if you try:
catalog/a-fake-url-p-29.html
you'll get redirected to our actual product page matching this product id.Hope that makes since. All this is done with the .htaccess url re-writter I posted above.
-
Don
Yes, that is how it is done and there is no problem with that. The above is just how inbound URLs get processed.
The issue here is how the crawler works. The only possible way for this particular URL to be generated is for a certain parameter to be appended to the URL - and that would be unusual (unless SEOmoz techies tell me different)
Alan
-
Did you ever have a product with the id of 1140? If you look at your products table just check the auto number in the product_id column..
If you did and it was live at some point it could be finding the old product based on the old url it used to have.
If you never made that product live then I don't know how a crawler could of found a product that doesn't exist unless they starting using some technology that I'm unaware of.
Since you said you use OSC this what we use to deal with the problem I outlined above..
Begin Ultimate SEO V2.2d
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On# RewriteBase instructions
# Change RewriteBase dependent on how your shop is accessed as below.
# http://www.mysite.com = RewriteBase /
# http://www.mysite.com/catalog/ = RewriteBase /catalog/
# http://www.mysite.com/catalog/shop/ = RewriteBase /catalog/shop/# Change the following line using the instructions above
RewriteBase /catalog/RewriteRule ^(.)-p-(.).html$ product_info.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-c-(.).html$ index.php?cPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-m-(.).html$ index.php?manufacturers_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pi-(.).html$ popup_image.php?pID=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-by-(.).html$ all-products.php?fl=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-t-(.).html$ articles.php?tPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-a-(.).html$ article_info.php?articles_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-au-(.).html$ articles.php?authors_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
#RewriteRule ^(.)-pr-(.).html$ product_reviews.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pri-(.).html$ product_reviews_info.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-f-(.).html$ faqdesk_info.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fc-(.).html$ faqdesk_index.php?faqPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fri-(.).html$ faqdesk_reviews_info.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fra-(.).html$ faqdesk_reviews_article.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-i-(.).html$ information.php?info_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-links-(.).html$ links.php?lPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pm-([0-9]+).html$ info_pages.php?pages_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-n-(.).html$ newsdesk_info.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nc-(.).html$ newsdesk_index.php?newsPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nri-(.).html$ newsdesk_reviews_info.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nra-(.).html$ newsdesk_reviews_article.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-po-([0-9]+).html$ pollbooth.php?pollid=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}End Ultimate SEO V2.2d
You may try it to see if it helps fix your issue.
-
Thanks, Don
You are right in your analysis - it is osC, but highly modified by myself. Yes, it does redirect.
That, however, is not the point. On the live site, the URL containing 1140 (for example) is never generated.
The mystery is how the Crawler can find something that isn't there! Magic.
Alan
-
Hi nordichouse,
You may want to check with your CMS provider. The urls are similar to Oscommerce which I'm experienced with, but I can see that isn't an Oscommerce setup. The system should have some sort of URL re-writer to deal with this problem.
The issue that I see is the system actually doesn't care what you type in between .co.uk/ and -p-1140.html
For example try this url to get a valid product..
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/nipple-clips-p-1000.html
which is the same as
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/-p-1000.html
But should 301 redirect to: http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/linen-style-collection-p-1000.htmlOscommerce has a URL 301 re-writer that prevents the system for using incorrect URL's I would hope your system does as well.
I'm not trying to avoid helping you, but the without an exact knowledge of how the system handles URL's it generates it is hard to troubleshoot, however since it is a CMS somebody who works on it should already have this knowledge.
My best,
Don
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Redesign Launch - How Can I crawl for immediate review
Just redesigned my site and want to have a crawl done to check for errors or any items which need to be cleaned up. Anyone know how I can do this as SEOMoz only crawls once per week. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | creativemobseo0 -
OpenExplorer vs Majestic results...?
I'm checking one of my competitors out, dubdubdub ny maids com, in both OpenExplorer and MajesticSEO. The former is showing about 2600 links from 850 domains (historic), while the latter is showing 58 links from 20 domains. I don't see that SEOMoz has a historic feature, which is vague to begin with, but even the 'fresh index' of MajesticSEO is showing more backlinks than SEOMoz. Could someone explain this dramatic difference in services? And could they also comment on how strong of an actual link profile they have? It's clearly a very old domain, which I realize has some weight, but with so many services showing such different results, I'm having a tough time discerning what it would take to dethrown them. Thanks everyone.
Moz Pro | | Neyzio0 -
Campaign status stock in status "Next Crawl in Progress!
Has anyone else had an issue laetly where the campaign status was stock in _ **"Next Crawl in Progress!" **_? One of our campaigns has been in this status for the page 2 1/2 days and this has not happened in the past as there are only 597 pages for this campaign to crawl. I send a help ticket request to the SEOMOZ team but was wondering if this is an isolated issue or if other community members have also experienced it? Thanks.
Moz Pro | | DRTBA0 -
Pages Crawled: 250 | Limit: 250
One of my campaigns says: Pages Crawled: 250 | Limit: 250 Is this because it's new and the limit will go up to 10,000 after the crawl is complete? I have a pro account, 4 other campaigns running and should be allowed 50,000 pages in total
Moz Pro | | MirandaP0 -
Why does the crawl report say I should have meta description and title tags in my xml files?
Just had my first crawl report today which has been very useful in finding missing and duplicated title tags and meta descriptions but it has flagged up the fact that my xml files are missing these. Surely non HTML documents shouldn't have them (or need them) so why are they showing up in the report?
Moz Pro | | PandyLegend0 -
SEOMoz Pro still hasn't crawled 10k pages for one campaign
I looked for a question in the forum already for this but couldn't find anything. Perhaps I am using the wrong keywords, so I apologize if this is a duplicate. I recently signed up with SEOMoz Pro and added two campaigns. For one campaign, 10,000 pages were crawled. For the other campaign, only about 300. It's been 2 weeks since I created the campaigns. Is there a way to force a crawl of the site associated with the second campaign?
Moz Pro | | SharieBags0 -
How can I change (specifically, decrease) the reporting/crawling frequency of the keyword ranking?
It always seem to compare the standings based on the week before, which confuses the issue when I'm only reporting monthly or quarterly. Is there currently (or might there be in the future) a way to set this so that the comparison is based on a time period that I specify?
Moz Pro | | MackenzieFogelson0 -
"Issue: Duplicate Page Content " in Crawl Diagnostics - but these pages are noindex
Hello guys, our site is nearly perfect - according to SEOmoz campaign overview. But, it shows me 5200 Errors, more then 2500 Pages with Duplicate Content plus more then 2500 Duplicated Page Titles. All these pages are sites to edit profiles. So I set them "noindex, follow" with meta robots. It works pretty good, these pages aren't indexed in the search engines. But why the SEOmoz tools list them as errors? Is there a good reason for it? Or is this just a little bug with the toolset? The URLs which are listet as duplicated are http://www.rimondo.com/horse-edit/?id=1007 (edit the IDs to see more...) http://www.rimondo.com/movie-edit/?id=10653 (edit the IDs to see more...) The crawling picture is still running, so maybe the errors will be gone away in some time...? Kind regards
Moz Pro | | mdoegel0