Crawl Diagnostics - unexpected results
-
I received my first Crawl Diagnostics report last night on my dynamic ecommerce site.
It showed errors on generated URLs which simply are not produced anywhere when running on my live site. Only when running on my local development server.
It appears that the Crawler doesn't think that it's running on the live site.
For example
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/candlestick-centrepiece-p-1140.html
will go to a Product Not Found page, and therefore Duplicate Content errors are produced.
Running
http://www.nhlocal.co.uk/candlestick-centrepiece-p-1140.html
produces the correct product page and not a Product Not Found page
Any thoughts?
-
Hi Nordichouse,
Sorry it took awhile for me to get back to you on this.
I agree with the SEOmoz techs, it doesn't matter if it is a crawler or a actual person, if you go to an invalid url you should be redirected as 301 to the actual page. If the product doesn't exist it should not allow for superfluous urls.
So basically what you should have is if the product exist then the site redirects to the correct URL. If it doesn't exist then send any query for that product to the same page and display the oscommerce product not found message. By doing this you prevent the system from creating upteenthousand urls for each product.
If you want to test what I mean you can visit our store a www.rubberstore.com/catalog and try a few urls like:
catalog/nipple-clips-p-1000.html
we don't have a product with the id of 1000 so you'll get redirected to the not found message and the root page
-p-1000.htmlhowever if you try:
catalog/a-fake-url-p-29.html
you'll get redirected to our actual product page matching this product id.Hope that makes since. All this is done with the .htaccess url re-writter I posted above.
-
Don
Yes, that is how it is done and there is no problem with that. The above is just how inbound URLs get processed.
The issue here is how the crawler works. The only possible way for this particular URL to be generated is for a certain parameter to be appended to the URL - and that would be unusual (unless SEOmoz techies tell me different)
Alan
-
Did you ever have a product with the id of 1140? If you look at your products table just check the auto number in the product_id column..
If you did and it was live at some point it could be finding the old product based on the old url it used to have.
If you never made that product live then I don't know how a crawler could of found a product that doesn't exist unless they starting using some technology that I'm unaware of.
Since you said you use OSC this what we use to deal with the problem I outlined above..
Begin Ultimate SEO V2.2d
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine On# RewriteBase instructions
# Change RewriteBase dependent on how your shop is accessed as below.
# http://www.mysite.com = RewriteBase /
# http://www.mysite.com/catalog/ = RewriteBase /catalog/
# http://www.mysite.com/catalog/shop/ = RewriteBase /catalog/shop/# Change the following line using the instructions above
RewriteBase /catalog/RewriteRule ^(.)-p-(.).html$ product_info.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-c-(.).html$ index.php?cPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-m-(.).html$ index.php?manufacturers_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pi-(.).html$ popup_image.php?pID=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-by-(.).html$ all-products.php?fl=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-t-(.).html$ articles.php?tPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-a-(.).html$ article_info.php?articles_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-au-(.).html$ articles.php?authors_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
#RewriteRule ^(.)-pr-(.).html$ product_reviews.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pri-(.).html$ product_reviews_info.php?products_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-f-(.).html$ faqdesk_info.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fc-(.).html$ faqdesk_index.php?faqPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fri-(.).html$ faqdesk_reviews_info.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-fra-(.).html$ faqdesk_reviews_article.php?faqdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-i-(.).html$ information.php?info_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-links-(.).html$ links.php?lPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-pm-([0-9]+).html$ info_pages.php?pages_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-n-(.).html$ newsdesk_info.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nc-(.).html$ newsdesk_index.php?newsPath=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nri-(.).html$ newsdesk_reviews_info.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-nra-(.).html$ newsdesk_reviews_article.php?newsdesk_id=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}
RewriteRule ^(.)-po-([0-9]+).html$ pollbooth.php?pollid=$2&%{QUERY_STRING}End Ultimate SEO V2.2d
You may try it to see if it helps fix your issue.
-
Thanks, Don
You are right in your analysis - it is osC, but highly modified by myself. Yes, it does redirect.
That, however, is not the point. On the live site, the URL containing 1140 (for example) is never generated.
The mystery is how the Crawler can find something that isn't there! Magic.
Alan
-
Hi nordichouse,
You may want to check with your CMS provider. The urls are similar to Oscommerce which I'm experienced with, but I can see that isn't an Oscommerce setup. The system should have some sort of URL re-writer to deal with this problem.
The issue that I see is the system actually doesn't care what you type in between .co.uk/ and -p-1140.html
For example try this url to get a valid product..
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/nipple-clips-p-1000.html
which is the same as
http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/-p-1000.html
But should 301 redirect to: http://www.nordichouse.co.uk/linen-style-collection-p-1000.htmlOscommerce has a URL 301 re-writer that prevents the system for using incorrect URL's I would hope your system does as well.
I'm not trying to avoid helping you, but the without an exact knowledge of how the system handles URL's it generates it is hard to troubleshoot, however since it is a CMS somebody who works on it should already have this knowledge.
My best,
Don
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does MOZ still do deep crawls of the website?
In the past you could get MOZ to crawl your website, now I don't see this option, no do I see a crawl at the beginning of the month. Has this change? I saw this as a useful feature.
Moz Pro | | cdgospel0 -
Why might Google be crawling via old sitemap, when the new one has been submitted and verified?
We have recently relaunched Scoutzie.com and re-submitted our new sitemap to Google. When I look on Webmaster tools, our new sitemap has been submitted just fine, but at the same time, Google is finding a lot of 404s when crawling the site. My understanding, it is still using crawling the old links, which do not exists. How can I tell Google to refresh it's index and to stop looking at all the old links?
Moz Pro | | scoutzie0 -
What tools can I use to crawl a site which uses #! hasbhang?
I have a site which was created in a way that it uses hasbang #!. I am using 3 different SEO tools and they can't seem to crawl the website. Or what suggestion can you give me in dealing with hasbang. Any ideas please. Thanks a lot for your help. Allan
Moz Pro | | AllanDuncan0 -
SEOMOZ stopped counting local results as a rank?
I had a terrifying experience today upon receiving my weekly rankings report that stated I had dropped out of google for the majority of my keywords! However upon further inspection it would appear the report is not including local results in the ranking (my page shows up #1 but is a local result). This didn't happen before, did something change that I didn't know about?
Moz Pro | | r1200gsa0 -
Crawl test tool from SEOmoz - which URLs does it actually crawl?
I am using for the first time the crawl test tool from SEOmoz and I do not really understand which URLs the tool is going to crawl. First, it says "enter any subdomain" --> why can´t I do the crawl for the root domain? Second it says "we'll crawl up to 3,000 linked-to pages" --> does that mean that the tool crawls all internal links that it can find on the given domain? Thanks for your help!
Moz Pro | | Elke.GetApp0 -
Dynamic URL pages in Crawl Diagnostics
The crawl diagnostic has found errors for pages that do not exist within the site. These pages do not appear in the SERPs and are seemingly dynamic URL pages. Most of the URLs that appear are formatted http://mysite.com/keyword,%20_keyword_,%20key_word_/ which appear as dynamic URLs for potential search phrases within the site. The other popular variety among these pages have a URL format of http://mysite.com/tag/keyword/filename.xml?sort=filter which are only generated by a filter utility on the site. These pages comprise about 90% of 401 errors, duplicate page content/title, overly-dynamic URL, missing meta decription tag, etc. Many of the same pages appear for multiple errors/warnings/notices categories. So, why are these pages being received into the crawl test? and how to I stop it to gauge for a better analysis of my site via SEOmoz?
Moz Pro | | Visually0 -
Crawling a website with redirects
Hi, I started a campaign for a website which uses multiple redirects before showing the real content. in the crawling report only one page is crawled. Is there a way to let the crawler pass the redirects to get usefull reports? The website is www.cegeka.be Thank you
Moz Pro | | Cegeka0 -
Campaign Not Crawling
I set up my first 5 campaigns and one is not crawling beyond one-page. It's been over 48 hours. This site has nearly 3.500 pages the others much less, however, this shouldn't make any difference. I searched for the problem and couldn't find it so I hope this question isn't redundant. Comments and advice would be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | JavaManOne0