Why isn't SEOmoz a BBB accredited Business?
-
I'm just curious.
I help run an online resource-based business. Recent'y, I've done a fair amount of research about becoming a BBB accredited business and it all seems to point to it being worth the money. No only for the link, but also for the potential increase in conversion due to the trust that comes along with their brand. It just seems to make good business sense.
But I noticed that SEOmoz isn't accredited, and it made me wonder if there was something I wasn't considering? I mean, why wouldn't they want a valuable link like that?
Does anyone know anything I don't?
-
-
-
I am not a BBB fan. Here are some excerpts from an earlier thread, beginning with a post from me
-
There is a decidedly less sunny view of the Better Business Bureau. It has been the subject of many journalistic exposes. Critics say it supresses consumer complaints for cash, acts as a shill for its paying members, and operates a pay for play scheme. The basic accusation is that it is a bad guy posing as a good guy. Wolfgang Puck and the Boston Ritz Carlton Hotel got failing grades. So did Disney World -- until it became a paying member.
-
The Connecticut Attorney General opened an investgation at one point.
See the ABC News 20/20 expose
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8kfV9kONw
After a highly unflattering series of columns in the New York Times, The BBB tried to defend itself here
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/10/your-money/10haggler.html
The BBB may have high domain authority. But whether it is wise for businesses to be associated with such an organization is quite another matter.
i agree with a previous poster: local Chamber of Commerce directories are the way to go
-
-
**Aaron Schinke **| July 5th, 2011
I have heard some of these horror stories as well. However I don't think the vast majority of people have. So, even if the BBB just passes the perception of trust along with the link juice it's probably worht it. Perception is reality.
<a rel="nofollow">###### 2</a> <a rel="nofollow">###### 0</a> ReplyPermalink
-
<a name="137344f8f9416707_jtc147147"> </a>**BathroomGetaways **| July 11th, 2011
I think part of the reason they get a bad rep is because just because you're not a member, doesn't mean you won't get turned in. For instance, we had a hosting client that turned us in because we HAD to raise her hosting rates and she didn't feel she should have to pay (not very bright person was she). So she complained to the BBB, despite the fact we're not a member. We got a letter, we let them know how we resolved the issue, and they considered the matter CLOSED, and said we did everything we could do satisfy her.
So my guess with many of the companies that have had the "pay for play" complaint, isn't that they were necessarily being strong-armed into paying to join, but that before they joined, they weren't resolving complaints because they probably didn't fully realize they had to.
I agree the BBB walks the gray line, but lets not forget that 20/20 and other news outlets love to latch on to stories like that about big company or org messing with the little guy, and they are probably worse from a "bad standpoint" (20/20 and news outlets that is) than the BBB could ever dream of being.
The media are whore's that will air anything they can. The BBB, while not awesome, does provide a valuable service to both businesses and consumers. What's the news media really do other than stir the pot for ratings?
<a rel="nofollow"></a>
-
-
But of course I'd be willing to reconsider my previous post.
Perhaps the BBB would care to avail itself of my complaints resolution services?
My fees are very reasonable.
And everybody wins!
This is a joke. I'm not serious.
But the BBB is. Which is a problem.
-
<a name="137344f8f9416707_jtc146406"> </a>**Djjinx13 **| July 1st, 2011
Hmmm
I think the point of the post was in direct referece to the search engine marketing implications of BBB which is not only a powerful backlink, but as another poster pointed out it appears its "brand" gets a Google human "trust" bump which is understandable as Google always states they are about the user not the fringe opinons (not blasting your opinion.) Just stating that in consumers eyes the BBB is trustworthy ( i understand that is you point that it should not be) but once again the point I believe is the SEM benefits. Now in the future if consumers begin to gain your views that "trust" metric will begin to fall... But that is not today!!! and Today it appears in local search asepect a BBB link is good in consumers eyes and search enigne eyes so i see no reason if ROI justifies it one would not get it.
once again just my opinion
Edited by Djjinx13 on July 1st, 2011 at 6:16 am<a rel="nofollow"></a>
-
-
-
-
-
I did not see any change to the sales conversion rate after adding BBB. However I had other trust (authority) graphics on the site.
D&B also told me the same thing - many companies requesting our company report (which was pot possible at that time). I have always questioned the validity of the data in D&B because a lot of it is self-reported (no audit or verification process). I also have experience purchasing the D&B credit builder service (which can be manipulated to help build one's credit score).
Listing of your site in D&B may be an extremely small factor in Google's algorithm but I don't think it is worth the expense. I would prefer to spend the money on the Yahoo Directory and Best of The Web directory.
On your site you need some type of major authority "seal" to gain the confidence of site visitors. D&B would be a very low priority one. TrustE, McAfee Secure are perhaps the top ones.
Last advice about D&B - make certain supplier invoices are paid perfectly on time and your credit score should increase over time. Your D&B credit score is critical in being able to obtain open account terms from suppliers.
-
Loren,
Thank you for this generous sharing of your experience.
I have been contacted by BBB but did not pay for membership.
Did you notice any lift in sales after posting the BBB badge on your website?
Do you have a similar story about D&B listings?
D&B has contacted me several times telling me that people are requesting my report. I asked them to tell me who is requesting and then I will consider providing my information. I also told them that they should be paying me since my information is a revenue-producing product for them. They don't "get" that logic.
Thanks!
-
I have been operating an online furniture e-commerce site for over 8 years. Once I became a member of BBB and my experience and opinions are as follows.
1. As soon as paid the fee to become a BBB member the rating of my company substantially increased. The dialogue that I had with the aggressive telemarketer sales rep made me feel that this was their strong arm tactic - pay and we improve your rating.
2. BBB is very aggressive in persuading a prospect to join. I think the sales reps receive a large portion of their income based on sales commissions.
3. The majority of consumers perceive BBB as being some type of government related organization. This means that consumers trust and believe that BBB is a legitimate entity. Because of this perception the BBB online seal helps gain credibility when displayed on websites.
4. Perhaps the listing in BBB is a very minor favorable SEO benefit.
I've talked to other company owners who had a similar experience as mine. They agree with my conclusion as follows.
The BBB comes across as a "scam" type organization. Buying into their system is a necessary evil because so many online shoppers erroneously believe that BBB is like a government entity and operates ethically.
I'm doing my best to not pay the membership fees and make a statement that supports my negative feelings towards how BBB operates. Many of my peers are also avoiding BBB.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We're looking at providing SEO for a website that has the majority of its incoming links from websites created solely to provide links. Few have bad spam rankings. How worried should I be about those links?
The majority of incoming links to a prospect's website are from website pages apparently created solely to provide links to the website. Few have high spam scores. The sites linking to the main site have versions of blogs with linked text. They seem to be providing positive SEO value now, but I'm concerned they might get noticed and hurt the main site in the future.
Link Building | | PKI_Niles1 -
Linkbuild on 'new' or 'old' url?
Hi, I'm trying to rank for a keyword. For the last year and 4 months the rank hasn't changed much. It stays on the 3th page. Within this period the rank has first gone down and then up. Three months ago I started doing linkbuilding for the url the keyword was linked to. This is a main category page. Lately, I don't know when exactly I've discovered that the keyword is ranking for a different url, a product category of these items for 1 brand. I'm wondering if it's wise to shift my focus and start using the 'new' url for linkbuilding? The 'old' url isn't in the top 100 for the keyword. However, if you search for the url in Google, it shows up. And, if I'm advised to shift my focus to the 'new' url, is it advisable to go back and change the backlinks to the 'new' url? A question related to the above one, is there another tool like Open Site Explorer which shows you an overview of the backlinks directing to a deeplink? Like MajestickSEO. I'm trying to get the most extensive overview possible. Thanks in advance.
Link Building | | anubis20 -
What's the best seo link building company after May 2013?
Which is the best and most trustworthy seo company if I want to outsource my link building after being severely hit by the google penguin 4 update?
Link Building | | naimelhajj0 -
Perhaps the SEOMoz beginner's guide should be updated?
I was on the phone tonight with a site owner who may have been affected by Penguin. I was explaining how overuse of keywords with anchor text can adversely affect a site and he asked me an interesting question: "If that is the case, then why does the SEOMoz guide say differently?" Here are some quotes from the SEOMoz beginner's guide: "Anchor Text - One of the strongest signals the engines use in rankings is anchor text. If dozens of links point to a page with the right keywords, that page has a very good probability of ranking well for the targeted phrase in that anchor text." That pretty much implies that you should try to get as many keyword anchor texted links to your site as possible. There should probably be some type of Penguin warning in here. "Self-Created, Non-Editorial - Hundreds of thousands of websites offer any visitor the opportunity to create links through guest book signings, forum signatures, blog comments, or user profiles. These links offer the lowest value, but can, in aggregate, still have an impact for some sites. " Granted, the text goes on to say this: "In general, search engines continue to devalue most of these types of links, and have been known to penalize sites that pursue these links aggressively. Today, these types of links are often considered spammy and should be pursued with caution." That's a good warning, but I think it could be perhaps made a little more clear that self made links like this are not wise to use as an SEO tool. I think that to a beginner, it kind of sounds like the guide is saying, "There are lots of opportunities out there where you can get a link by making one yourself. Go ahead and use them but don't overdo it."
Link Building | | MarieHaynes6 -
Directories Section on SeoMoz
Is this section still being used? http://www.seomoz.org/directories I wasn't sure about the quality of some of them (ex. porn chat). I've seen better lists of directories! 🙂
Link Building | | dvduval0 -
Can't rank with certain keywords for the life of me
I have a website http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com in which functions as a scrabble dictionary lookup and word finder for scrabble. There are many keywords that rank well for this niche but the main ones I target are Scrabble Dictionary Scrabble Cheat Scrabble Word Finder Scrabble Help I used to rank well for all these keywords, I am 4th with scrabble dictionary currently but with the other 3 am no where near the top. On March 24th I dropped off the map for scrabble cheat, scrabble word finder and scrabble help. I actually dropped to 9/10th for scrabble dictionary on that date as well but since then I have been able to hold on steady to 4th. I can't figure out why I can't rank for those other keywords anymore. Its almost like Google has penalized me for those keywords. I have contacted Google a few times to ask if I have any penalties and they have told me that I don't. Even though in my backlinking I have targeted these keywords I can't seem to rank for them no matter what I do. The only idea I have come up with is that Google has re-associated those other 3 keywords in a group and separated scrabble dictionary on its own. I have other sites I have created in the same niche and I have noticed if the URL contains "word", "Finder" and/or "cheat" I can rank in the 3 keywords within about a week all the way up to the second page. My main site FSD has the highest DA and PA compared to my other sites. Any idea why I can't seem to rank for those other 3 keywords anymore?
Link Building | | cbielich0 -
JavaScript is crawled by search engines, isn’t it? Does it mean that links embedded in JavaScript pass link juice?
I wonder If links embedded in JavaScript from an external Website pass link juice to the linked page and thus have a positive effect on google rankings. I read that JavaScipt is craweld. Does it mean that also the link juice is passed? I'm looking forward to your answers.
Link Building | | Tabea0