Ideas on why Pages Per Visit Dropped?
-
Week over week our pages per visit continue to drop. Any ideas on where to look to diagnose?
-
Thanks for your candor, EGOL. Was just looking for some insight on where I might look outside of the obvious markers I'd already evaluated.
These forums have been been extremely helpful in the past when folks have encountered similar issues before mine.
Have a great day!
-
We're a news media site,
This is some of the most volatile stuff on the web.
Really... if you have concerns and don't know what's going on it would be best to hire a pro to review the site instead of chasing shots in the dark from people who have never seen the site.
Your effort and theirs could be divining for a problem that does not exist.
-
Thanks, Tom. I'm quite puzzled because I don't see anything that would indicate why organic search pages per visit have dropped 7%.
404s and server errors are fairly stable. We did see a spike last Monday from spam that we have since fixed, so not sure if that would translate to organic.
Our organic traffic was growing in the teens week over week, and in the past few weeks, we are down by 2% or flat. I know this is kind of a micro look, but I try to stay on top of things as much as possible.
And now the pages per visit are down two weeks in a row. We're a news media site, so I'm trying to see if I can see a pattern, but can't seem to find one.
Thanks for your input.
If any other ideas pop into your head about pages per visit or ideas on stabilizing traffic, I'd be grateful.
Thanks,
Lisa
-
Hi Aggie
This really could be a number of things, but there's a few places to start looking.
First, I would jump into your webmaster tools and see if you have had a spike in errors, which you can find in the traffic tab. If the Googlebot is seeing 404 or server errors, your users might be getting the same thing. Look for any spikes in those graphs and see if there is anything that might put a user off.
Next, I would look at segmenting your analytics data. Are you looking at all of your traffic as a whole? It may be worthwhile to look at the data over time in segments, such as the non-paid search, referral, and paid search segments Google analytics provides. It may be that there is one particular traffic channel that is driving the "bad" traffic - such as PPC ads that aren't converting or referral traffic from a new partner. For instance, one of my clients places a banner on an affiliated website with its own tracking URL. We saw traffic increase over a number of weeks, but bounce rate, dwell time and pages per visit fell and it turned out that the users referred from the banner were, by in large, bouncing straight off. After running it for a bit longer, we decided to remove the banner as it wasn't driving relevant traffic. If you see anything unnatural in these segments, you might be able to identify the cause.
Similarly, have you started ranking for any "educational" terms lately? By that I mean, have you started ranking for terms like "what is [keyword]" or "[keyword] explained"? If so, you may be getting traffic for the terms, but because your landing pages have served their purpose, users are arriving, reading, and leaving. Not a lot you can do in this case to improve pages per visit, but you could be able to capture some lead data by adding an email signup to those landing pages.
You should also have a look at your user journeys in Google analytics, which you can find if you go to Audience -> Visitors Flow in the left hand side navigation. See if you can see a pattern here - are there particularly pages that users are going to that has seen a jump in exit rate over time? Look at those pages - has any HTML/javascript code gone wrong? Is anything broken on those pages? Are they, in fact, just low quality pages that you could improve? This might also reveal something.
Don't be too worried though if you can't see anything standing out. Sometimes these things happen and recover - other times user behaviour simply changes. These methods above might be able to point out any faults you need to address or any improvements you could make. But if your traffic and conversions are steady, pages per visit decreasing isn't such a bad thing. In fact, if conversions are steady (how ever you measure them), one could argue that users taking a shorter time (and journey) to convert show that they're trusting your brand and website more to make the decision earlier.
Hope this helps Aggie!
-
Irving-
404 pages seem to be stable as do referring sites, and no navigation updates. I'm not sure about the GA tagging. I did not implement the tagging, so I wouldn't know where to look to find out.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Lisa
-
Did you update any navigation lately?
Are pages still properly tagged with analytics?
Have you seen a spike in 404 pages?
Are visitors coming from the same places, or are you getting unqualified traffic?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any SEO disadvantages with creating pages under a directory page which doesn't exists?
Hi, Let's say we are going to create pages in the URL path www.website.com/directory/sub-pages/. In case this page www.website.com/directory/ doesn't exists or redirected; will the pages created in this URL path like stated above have any issues in-terms of SEO? We will link these pages from somewhere in the website and planning to redirect the /directory/ to homepage. Suggestions please.
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
How often should I update the content on my pages?
I have started dropping on my rankings - due to lack of time after having a baby. I'm still managing to blog but I'm wondering if I update the content on my pages will that help? All my Meta tags and page descriptions were updated over a year ago - do I need to update these too? We were ranking in the top spots for a good few years, but we're slowly falling 😞 Please give me any advice to keep us from falling even further. I have claimed all my listings, and try to add new links once a month. I share my blog to all social sites and work hard to get Google reviews, we have 53 which is higher than any of our competitors. Any other ideas? Have I missed something that Google is looking for nowadays? Many thanks 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | Lauren16890 -
Drop in Organic Traffic for Homepage and Branded terms but Steady in Rankings and According to WMT.
I am stumped. I have been researching for over two days now. Our homepage organic traffic YoY is down approx. 25%. However, rank has not changed according to Conductor, Bing and Google WMT. Impressions have gone up according to both search engines and we rank now for more keywords in top 3 than we did last year. Both WMTs' present a pretty healthy picture. No insignificant indexing issues, Error URLs & blocked resources are down, daily page crawls are higher than ever, etc. I drilled into Google Analytics from a few different view points. The closest I got to an answer was I saw huge out-liars YoY in browsers and browser versions. We saw significant differences in organic traffic YoY from IE 11, 9 ,10, 8 and 7. Android Browser 31, 32 and Safari 6 and 7. I tested our homepage and search results in all of these, and found no issues. Yet, GA reports 50K+ differences YoY. My only thought is it is perhaps a GA attribution error? And/or browsers defaulting organic traffic to direct or other? Yet, our direct traffic is up but does not correlate with as much as we are down. Any tips on where to look next would be extremely helpful!
Algorithm Updates | | lunavista-comm0 -
Links to category pages unnatural?
If people are linking to your site, it would seem natural that the vast majority of those links would point to the homepage, product page, or a article/content page. Let's say you have 100 links pointing to your site, and 40 of them are pointing to category pages. Would this seem unnatural? Does Google or other search engines have a way of determining this as a factor in ascertaining whether the links are natural or not? Is there a rule of thumb when it comes to the pages that are linked to on your site?
Algorithm Updates | | inhouseseo0 -
Significant drop in traffic
Hi there, We run 3 websites in a similar niche (bins) but tend to have a different area of focus on each site, wheelie, recycling and general litter. They all have unique descriptions, images etc (as much as possible) One of our sites has been a long standing penalty sufferer and we still dont want to give up on it. They are all located on unique IP's but on the same server with the same owner in whois. My question is could our site that has struggled with a penalty in the past be effecting our other sites which havent had problems? I know google likes to see brands and we do regular content, social media etc on all the sites, The drop came today and appears across all our sites. The main site that had the penalty usually gets around 50 visits a day from search, so far today it has had 10 and that is most of the working day now gone. I hope someone can shed a little light on the issues we are facing Thank you Jon
Algorithm Updates | | imrubbish0 -
Do you think this page has been algorithmically penalised or is it just old?
Here is the page: http://www.designquotes.com.au/business-blog/top-10-australian-business-directories-in-2012/ It's fairly old, but when it was first written it hit #1 for "business directories". After a while it dropped but was receieving lots of traffic for long tail variations of "business directories Australia" As of the 4th of October (Penguin 2.1) it lost traffic and rankings entirely. I checked it's link profile and there isn't anything fishy: From Google Webmaster https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtwbT3wshHRsdEc1OWl4SFN0SDdiTkwzSmdGTFpZOFE&usp=sharing In fact, two links are entirely natural http://blog.businesszoom.com.au/2013/09/use-customer-reviews-to-improve-your-website-ranking/ http://dianajones.com.au/google-plus-local-equals-more-business-blog/ Yet when I search for a close match in title in Google AU, the article doesn't appear within even the first 4 pages. https://www.google.com.au/#q=top+10+Australian+Business+Directories&start=10 Is this simple because it's an old article? Should I re-write it, update the analysis and use a rel=canonical on the old article to the new?
Algorithm Updates | | designquotes0 -
Anyone notice a 25% + drop in Google Traffic since the 23/24 August 2013?
Hi Guys, My site has seen a 25% drop in Google Traffic since Saturday the 24th August 2013. I see it being mentioned here: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-update-17268.html but not anywhere else really. I want to find out if there is anyone else that has been hit and what it is we have been hit by. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | joblife0 -
Source for how many searches are done on Google per day?
Hi, All! The figure I've seen going around is 3 billion and is attributed to ComScore, but in the comScore press release that was linked to (actually the one from Rand's article - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/21-tactics-to-increase-blog-traffic-2012) all I could find was percentage of market share, but no total numbers of searches. Anyone have a source on that? Thanks, Aviva
Algorithm Updates | | debi_zyx0