Migrating to New site keywords question
-
We are converting an old static html ecommerce site to a new platform. The old site has excellent ranking for some of the products.
In order to maintain our ranking we will implement 301 redirects from old to new pages (as the urls will change to SEF).
I am using Googles Keyword tool (in adwords) and entering each page url of the old site (there are hundreds, I'm doing the top 50 in traffic) and generating a set of keywords, then sorting each list by global searches.
For each page, Google's Keyword Tool is giving me hundreds of keywords, but in meta tags there should be no more than 15, so I need a method to choose the keywords on the new page.
Question: in the new meta tags should we emphasize the most common keywords (as defined by most global searches) or the least common keywords?
I would hate to lose the good ranking for the least common (long tail) keywords.
-
How about focusing on the keywords and products that make you money?
My husband sells kits for model warships that shoot and sink each other. A high-volume keyword would be battleship, but that doesn't get us any sales. A low volume keyword would be uss iowa 1:144 scale turret cover, but that's a low-priced item that's not going to help us too much. For us, a different keyword makes much more sense.
-
Your original question asked what keywords to put in your META tags... That technique may have worked years ago, but META tags are worthless these days. So I think people were starting at square one to illustrate this fact.
Here's an idea - go to your competitors sites and look at their META tags (if they are silly enough to use them.) This will give you an idea what keywords (low or high competition/priority) they find important enough to target. Then you can go after those. (But don't put them in your METAs...)
And now a pointer for forum communications - try not to get so defensive. It's an ugly color and tonality never conveys well on internet forums.
Good luck!
-
Take your pick.
When you put these pages on the web they might be there for years so the small amount of time needed to make a decision can payback many times over with increased traffic and increased conversions.
I am trying to advice on best practices to maximize your return, not give you quick and easy.
-
I'm sorry I'm not making you feel helpful. You have been helpful.
-
Ok, got that and I agree that customer feedback and knowledgeable sales people are great reviewers of keywords and they are one of the primary sources we are using.
We have thousands of skus however and thus a we have a business need that the process be automated to whatever extent is possible.
We can ignore the Google Keyword tool results entirely - that's an option and perhaps a rationale one. But the Keyword tool is based on Google's own indices and therefore I think is a great source of keywords that have not appeared on our lists by other means. It also shows total searches and competition for those keywords so you can get a sense of what your competition is doing and how many pages already have those keywords pointed at them.
All that said, he question remains whether the most common or least common are more important to emphasize for SEO purposes.
-
whether most common or least common would be better for SEO
I use a lot more thought than picking the most common or the least. I consider the ones that best represent my product, the ones that I think people are searching for and the ones that I think will elicit clicks.
I also consider the power of my site and how I think it will rank against competitors for those specific keywords.
The google keyword tool is good for prospecting but when you combine it with a little knowledge of people, search engines, the power of your site, and your competitors you can get better performance.
-
I thumbed you down ssaltman--your replies aren't making me feel very helpful.
-
EGOL,
I have a very specific question regarding keywords generated by the Google Keyword tool - whether most common or least common would be better for SEO.
Your royal "we" makes you sound silly, but I'm figuring you hang around here because you know something about SEO.
If you google me, you'll see that I've actually built and sold companies before. I know something about SEO but I'm not arrogant enough to make assumptions.
My question was pretty specific. If you have an answer or comment on the question, I'd love to hear it.
-
We are telling you that we think you will make a lot more money with more knowledge.
We can't teach you the full scope of SEO in a forum. And we don't want to give specific advice on a site when we are guessing.
So, you can improve your knowledge or get assistance and probably make a lot more money. Or you can be satisfied with making less money.
I hope that this isn't a client site.
-
I'm not sure why folks seem to think I am completely new to this. We already captured all the incoming keywords and are implementing content and url nomenclature strategies around those.
Was just wondering if we should be using most common or least common google-generated keywords to boost SEO.
The rationale of using long-tail keywords with higher likely CTR vs. common keywords with lower CTR is compelling and I was trying to phrase to question to get feedback.
So far: question: 1, answers: 0
-
To line your new site up with the existing baseline of the old site, I'd be looking more at your stats than at the keyword tool. Go to your analytics and look to see which keywords were bringing you in the most traffic for each landing page and focus on those.
-
Well, let's take the question more generally then and ask:
which keywords should be emphasized in the content and the meta information: most common or least common?
-
Uh....ok
-
SSaltman,
If you're speaking specifically populating the keyword meta tag, you don't have to worry about it.
http://www.seomoz.org/q/meta-keywords-should-we-use-them-or-not
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/keywords-meta-tag-in-web-search/
-
You are rebuilding a site and that is a great time to kick your SEO up a notch and make a lot more money. That is how it should be done.
You seem to be putting a lot of work into keywords and meta tags but I am not sure that you are focusing on the right things.
Have you considered spending a nice block of time improving your knowledge of SEO before making this move or hiring a pro to map out the changes that will kick the performance up nicely?
That's what I would do. I often get advice from other SEOs before making big moves. It pays.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Subdomain Ranking Question
Hi All - Quick question that I think I know the answer to, but I feel like I've been going around in circles a bit. My client is launching a new product and wants us to build a microsite for it (product.clientname.com). My client really dislikes their brand website, and wants to use paid media to push their audience to this new microsite. However, they also said want it to rank well organically. I feel uneasy about this, because of the subdomain vs. subfolder argument. I believe that the product will also be listed/featured on their main brand website. What is the best way forward? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | AinsleyAgency0 -
New site - http or https?
Hi. We are currently in the process of creating a new website. We will be using our old domain name. However, the current website is currently live on both http and https protocols, with no re-directs in place. When we launch the new website, we would like to redirect everything to one or the other. Would the preference be to use https as the preferred protocol?
Technical SEO | | Lexica0 -
Site hacked in Jan. Redeveloped new site. Still not ranking. Should we change domain?
Our top ranking site in the UK was hacked at the end of 2014. http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/ The site was the subject of a manual spam action from Google. After several unsuccessful attempts to clean it up, using Securi.net and reinstating old versions of the site, changing passwords etc. we took the decision to redevelop the site. We also changed hosting provider as we had received absolutely no support from them whatsoever in resolving the issue. So far we have: Removed the old website files off the server Developed a new website having implemented 301's for all the old URL's (except the spam ones) Submitted a reconsideration request for the manual spam action, which was accepted. Disavowed all the spammy inbound links through Webmaster Tools Implemented custom URL parameters through Google to not index the SPAM URLs ( which were using parameters) Our organic traffic is down by 63% compared to last year, and we are not ranking for most of our target keywords any longer. Is there anything that I am missing in the actions I have taken so far? We were advised that at this stage changing domain and starting again might be the way to go. However the current domain has been used by us since 2007, so it would be a big call. Any advice is appreciated, thanks. Sue - http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/
Technical SEO | | galwaygirl0 -
Is it problematic for Google when the site of a subdomain is on a different host than the site of the primary domain?
The Website on the subdomain runs on a different server (host) than the site on the main domain.
Technical SEO | | Christian_Campusjaeger0 -
Post Site Migration - thousands of indexed pages, 4 months after
Hi all, Believe me. I think I've already tried and googled for every possible question that I have. This one is very frustrating – I have the following old domain – fancydiamonds dot net. We built a new site – Leibish dot com and done everything by the book: Individual 301 redirects for all the pages. Change of address via the GWT. Trying to maintain and improve the old optimization and hierarchy. 4 months after the site migration – we still have to gain back more than 50% of our original organic traffic (17,000 vs. 35,500-50,000 The thing that strikes me the most that you can still find 2400 indexed pages on Google (they all have 301 redirects). And more than this – if you'll search for the old domain name on Google – fancydiamonds dot net you'll find the old domain! Something is not right here, but I have no explanation why these pages still exist. Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | skifr0 -
One Keyword Penalty
Hi There, Quick question for everyone. Is it possible to get penalized a keyword level not page level. I have a site that only seems to be penalized on one keyword which is currently at page 22, whilst the rest are on page 1 or page 2. I came to the site late so I have no idea when the site lost its ranking for this keyword after a site redesign but the onpage is almost the same. Kind Regards Neil
Technical SEO | | nezona0 -
Traffic has dropped from my site.
Hello, I never had amazing traffic, but during the last week my site seems to have almost dropped of search engines. Nothing drastic has changed during this time that I can see would have caused this. The site is http://www.comparebestodds.com Does any one have any ideas that can help? Thanks
Technical SEO | | jwdesign0 -
How to setup tumblr blog.site.com to give juice to site.com
Is it possible to get a subdomain blog.site.com that is on tumblr to count toward site.com. I hoped I could point it in webmaster tools like we do www but alas no. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | oznappies0