URL tracking on offline material
-
Hi there,
Hope someone can give some advice.
We are doing some magazine advertising, the main purpose of the advert is to promote one of our new products, however the URL goes something like this:
http://www.domain.com/products/new-product-libra-furniture/ which is just too long for anyone to remember, I think it should be simply domain.com/libra which redirects to the product page, however how can I track this in Google Analytics? if using a 301 that's impossible?
Any advice would be grateful.
-
Hi Gary,
Has your question been answered? You've received some stellar responses in this thread!
Christy
-
I agree! And thanks for reminding the community about to award great answers with the "Helpful Answer" status, Paul!
-
The level of thought and comprehensiveness Jason has put into each of these replies is really impressive! Such great answers around each of these specific issues. Gotta agree with him on each one.
Nicely done, IMO.
Paul
P.S. Gary, when you feel the question's been fully answered, don't forget to mark the most useful responses with "Helpful Answer" status. You got some great info here and it's a great way to reward the folks who helped most.
-
Hi Jason,
Thanks for you detailed reply.
The conversion will be for the consumer to enter a give-away on a new product we are soon to launch, which is exclusive to a particular magazine.
Yes, prints ads will be a primary ongoing marketing vehicle which will be promoting the same product but in different magazines however using different CTAs so I will have to create various landing pages for this, maybe this could be an issue in the near future?
Thanks
-
Great question. I debated suggesting that your just keep all those landing pages out of the index, but I don't know enough about your content/use-case to make a suggestion.
What's the conversion action you are trying to achieve? Are you selling a product or service right on the landing page, or are you sending them to a Product Detail page to make a purchase?
The challenge is that, you might have users see your magazine ad, and then later try to find you with "Cool thing I saw in Time Magazine"
You have to balance a number of factors:
1. Are print ads a primary and ongoing marketing vehicle for you. So you'll have an ever growing inventory of publication specific landing pages.
2. Do you get a lot of search volume that would convert better if it went to a non-publication specific landing page.
3. Is there a high converting canonical non-pub specific version of all the content that will exist on the pub specific landing page?
4. What is your sales cycle? Are you a low-consideration product that a prospect will buy shortly after consuming your landing page content, or will a prospect make numerous visits to your site, and consume dozens of pages of content before making a purchase?
Part of the fun of what we all do for a living is that every circumstance is different
-
Thanks Jason.
Would you not use a noindex tag on the page instead of rel=canonical?
-
Yep, if you're willing to set up a separate landing page for each Ad/Campaign, then by all means do that. Then you can assume all direct traffic on the URL is the campaign traffic.
That would also let you customize each landing page for the publication, which will improve your relevancy and reduce your bounce rate. I.E. If www.mysite.com/life has an image with the cover of the actual edition of Life magazine I saw your ad in, then I know I'm in the right place.
As you mentioned, if the content of many landing page is basically the same, then make sure you use rel="canonical" tags to consolidate your link juice.
My suggestion to use vanity urls linking to a landing page with campagin codes, would be if you wanted a single landing page to serve multiple campaigns (or other sources of traffic).
-
Hi All,
Thanks for all your feedback so far.
I don't think I will use a URL shortener, not memorable enough.
QR Code, not quite right for the audience.
Regarding:
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Why don't I just use www.mysite.com/Life as the landing page which replicates the original product page and put a noindex on the page or a canonical?
What do you think?
-
Create a short vanity URL to put in the magazine (i.e. Life Magazine).
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Now you have a campaign in GA you can track.
Alternatively, (as others have suggested) you can use a URL shortener:
bit.ly/adsf72 -> http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
The shortener gives you a short url and an extra layer of tracking, but the short url will be less meaningful or memorable (unless you do a completely custom one).
If you want to go with a QRCode, do it in addition to (not instead of) printing, the short URL.
Use the shortest URL possible in the QRCode because short URL's = lower density QR Codes that are easier to scan.
-
A 301 redirect or something like bitly should work.
-
Hi Gary,
You can use Google's URL shortener to manage your campaigns and then set up Custom Segment and view it in the report in Google Analytics. I know this works for Social Media and Email campaigns but not sure about offline campaigns. http://www.mktdojo.com/how-to-track-email-and-social-media-campaigns-with-google-analytics
Another way I guess is to use bit.ly, when you shorten a link, they provide stats to track the number of people clicking on the link. Once again, I know it works for Social Media campaigns but not sure about offline.
Finally, you can try using QR codes. QR Codes are widely used in off line campaigns or events. Readers don't have to memorize the link and enter it in the url, they can simply scan it with their phone. Furthermore, you can use either method mentioned above and create a QR code with it so that you can track the number of visits.
Why create a custom link and use it for the QR Code instead of your original link? If you are using the custom link for the QR code, then you know that if you have visits via the custom link, they are definitely from scanning the QR code.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Changing URLS: from a short well optimised URL to a longer one – What's the traffic risk
I'm working with a client who has a website that is relatively well optimised, thought it has a pretty flat structure and a lot of top level pages. They've invested in their content over the years and managed to rank well for key search terms. They're currently in the process of changing CMS and as a result of new folder structuring in the CMS the URLs for some pages look to have significantly changed. E.g Existing URL is: website.com/grampians-luxury-accommodation which ranked quite well for luxury accommodation grampians New URL when site is launched on new CMS would be website.com/destinations/victoria/grampians My feeling is that the client is going to lose out on a bit of traffic as a result of this. I'm looking for information or ways or case studies to demonstrate the degree of risk, and to help make a recommendation to mitigate risk.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | moge0 -
Images with a token in the url, in Drupal. How does it affect to SEO?
Hi everyone! I am checking now a website that works with Drupal, and I found that images have urls like this... http://www.brandname.com/sites/default/files/styles/directory_xyz/public/name-of-the-picture.png?itok=T89RpzrK I was wondering how an URL like that with the token at the and, can affect to SEO. I cound't find anything. Anyone knows? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | teconsite0 -
Ecommerce SEO URL Structure Questions
| I am in the process of developing a new Magento ecommerce store. Take for instance this website is in the apparel industry and i have the following main categories. Clothing Shoes Accessories Beauty Sub categories for clothing would be: Dresses Pants jeans Tops Products would be: Kelly Maxi dresses What is the best SEO Structure for this? Main categories obviously: www.example.com/clothing Sub Categories:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WayneRooney
www.example.com/clothing/dresses Or www.example.com/dresses (Zappos seem to pursue the second type) Products:
www.example.com/clothing/dresses/kelly-maxi-dresses/ Or www.example.com/kelly-maxi-dresses ? Which one would be the best way to structure your site? Also what about filters that available in category pages? Say if i were to filter by color. what would be the best URL? I am sure canonical tag is needed here. New to Ecommerce SEO so i need some guidance! |0 -
Doubts with URL's structure
Hi guys i have some doubts with the correct URL structure for a new site. The question is about how show the city, the district and also the filters. I would do that: www.domain.com/category/city/disctict but maybe is better do that: **www.domain.com/category/city-district ** I also have 3 filters that are "individual/colective" "indoor/outdoor" and "young/adult" but that are not really interesting for the querys so where and how i put this filtters? At the end of the url showing these: **www.domain.com/cateogry/city/district#adult#outdoor#colective ** ? Well really i don't know what to do with the filters. Check if you could help me with that please. I also have a lof of interest in knowing if maybe is better use this combination **www.domain.com/category-city or domain.com/category/city **and know about the diference. Thank you very much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | omarmoscatt0 -
Should /node/ URLs be 301 redirect to Clean URLs
Hi All! We are in the process of migrating to Drupal and I know that I want to block any instance of /node/ URLs with my robots.txt file to prevent search engines from indexing them. My question is, should we set 301 redirects on the /node/ versions of the URLs to redirect to their corresponding "clean" URL, or should the robots.txt blocking and canonical link element be enough? My gut tells me to ask for the 301 redirects, but I just want to hear additional opinions. Thank you! MS
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MargaritaS0 -
Does URL format affect Keyword effectiveness for a URL?
I am looking at our site structure, and don't want to have to rebuild the way the site was linked together based on it's current folder structure so I am wondering what option would work better for our URL structure. I will uses car categories as an example of what I am talking about, but you can insert any category structure you like. For example I would like to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford-convertibles
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SL_SEM
www.example.com/chevy-convertibles But instead due to the site structure I will need to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford/convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/convertibles But wonder if I shouldn't do the following to ensure the proper phrase is known for the page: www.example.com/ford/ford-convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/chevy-convertibles The "/ford/ford-convertibles" just seems odd to me as a human, but I haven't seen anything on how well a keyphrase in a URL split by /'s does and I know dashes for phrases are fine. This means I am inclined to go with the"/ford/ford-convertibles"style because it keeps the keyphrase separated by dashes even if it is a bit repetitive. There will be other pages too like "/ford/top-10-fords-ever" but I don't wonder about that since it isnt "ford/ford-xxxxx" Thoughts on whether /'s in a keyphrase are as good as dashes?0 -
Rewriting dynamic urls to static
We're currently working on an SEO project for http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/. After a crawl of their site, tons of duplicate content issues came up. We think this is largely down to the use of their brand filtering system, which works like this: By clicking on a brand, the site generates a url with the brand keywords in, for example: http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/3-season-synthetic-cid77.html filtered by the brand Mammut becomes: http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/3-season-synthetic-Mammut-cid77.html?filter_brand=48 This was done by a previous SEO agency in order to prevent duplicate content. We suspect that this has made the issue worse though, as by removing the dynamic string from the end of the URL, the same content is displayed as the unfiltered page. For example http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/3-season-synthetic-Mammut-cid77.html shows the same content as: http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/3-season-synthetic-cid77.html Now, if we're right in thinking that Google is unlikely to the crawl the dynamic filter, this would seem to be the root of the duplicate issue. If this is the case, would rewriting the dynamic URLs to static on the server side be the best fix? It's a Windows Server/asp site. I hope that's clear! It's a pretty tricky issue and it would be good to know your thoughts. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | neooptic0 -
Blocking Dynamic URLs with Robots.txt
Background: My e-commerce site uses a lot of layered navigation and sorting links. While this is great for users, it ends up in a lot of URL variations of the same page being crawled by Google. For example, a standard category page: www.mysite.com/widgets.html ...which uses a "Price" layered navigation sidebar to filter products based on price also produces the following URLs which link to the same page: http://www.mysite.com/widgets.html?price=1%2C250 http://www.mysite.com/widgets.html?price=2%2C250 http://www.mysite.com/widgets.html?price=3%2C250 As there are literally thousands of these URL variations being indexed, so I'd like to use Robots.txt to disallow these variations. Question: Is this a wise thing to do? Or does Google take into account layered navigation links by default, and I don't need to worry. To implement, I was going to do the following in Robots.txt: User-agent: * Disallow: /*? Disallow: /*= ....which would prevent any dynamic URL with a '?" or '=' from being indexed. Is there a better way to do this, or is this a good solution? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AndrewY1