Two websites in different niches. Should I create separate G+ authorship profiles?
-
I have two different websites. One of them is one of the most authoritative e-commerce websites in its niche. I own forums, installation resource websites and various other sites that provide excellent user information and customer interactions.
There is another e-commerce website that I own which is very young and not as authoritative. I am about to start building it out like I did for my other site.
My question is about whether I should link my G+ profile and become a "contributor/author" to the new e-commerce site(s) or if I should have someone else in the company be the "face" of this website. Since they're in two completely different niche's, I didn't know if it will give mixed signals to Google if my G+ profile is all about niche A, and then I start throwing in rel=author and being a contributor to other sites that have nothing to do with the original niche.
Should I create another G+ profile to contribute to all of the guest posting & 2nd tier site creation for the new niche site or just use the one I have now for the time being?
-
From my interpretation of Google's Patent filing in 2011 on Agent Rank (continuation patent from the original one in 2005), if you are truly writing good content on both fields, one is the way to go. The industry is using the term AuthorRank so I'll use that for consistency going forward.
The idea that you can have higher AuthorRank in one subject vs another, I feel, is completely wrong. AuthorRank will be determined by a number of factors including how often your content is shared, how quickly it's shared, who shared it, how many +1s, likes, etc. It will be a completely query-independent calculation. It's much like PageRank in that respect. PageRank is query-independent because it takes the links pointing to your site, the quality of those links and comes up with a numerical score. I think this is what AuthorRank will do to. It will take the author, the number of shares, likes etc and come up with a numerical score. Google will then implement this score into their Algorithm and produce a SERP.
"...the reputation of a particular agent is a function of the reputation of the content and agents which refer to it." (from the patent) I think what this is saying is they're going to grade you on the quality of the people who like your content.
Basically, what I'm saying is that your "reputation" will depend on how often your content is shared as a whole, NOT on which topics you write about. SEO of the page will still matter when it comes to placement in the SERP but AuthorRank, much like PageRank, will have a major factor.
Let's take this from Google's point of view for a second. Their job is to provide the most relevant content for a given query.
Now, let's say I write articles about SEO all the time, they get shared, promoted on SEOmoz, +1d etc. In general, me showing up high in the SERPs is good for searches because I'm a reputable source on SEO because my peers "voted" for me.
But let's say I start a brand new blog on Cookies (the edible kind) and no one cares about my cookies, no one shares my recipes, no one +1s them on Google+. Just because I had a high AuthorRank doesn't mean I deserve to rank for everything, right.
So here's what I think will happen.
I will start to loose AuthorRank because a portion of my content is not being shared. The percentage of my content that is being shared drops to only about 60 percent or so. As a SEO, I want my SEO stuff to start ranking again so I'll stop writing about cookies and stick to SEO.
Google likes this because the people who do like Cookies didn't like my content enough to share it so I drop out of the SERPs on that end. AuthorRank will FORCE people to create really high quality content or suffer the consequence of it. People will naturally stick to the topics they know really really well so it can be shared and the searcher looking for a particular subject gets a really good experience because the SERPs will provide the most relevant content for a given query.
To answer your actual question...got off topic there a little...of "should [I] link my G+ profile and become a "contributor/author" to the new e-commerce site(s) or if I should have someone else in the company be the "face" of this website." If you are truly passionate about both topics then I would say connect it and run with it. If you are truly writing quality content, it will get shared, liked etc and help contribute to your AuthorRank. You mentioned you were authoritative in your niche. I'm not sure what you mean by that and how that relates to authorship. I do know that for Google+, you can have circles and it's a great way to separate the two fields unlike that on Facebook. You can set up Circles with different niches so you can drive content to those particular people in each niche. That should get you more likes, shares +1s. Not to mention that a lot of Google+ stuff passes link juice too.
I hope this helps. I know it is a little long winded but I hope I conveyed my thoughts clearly.
BTW, here's the links to the Agent Rank patent so you can read it over and determine (predict) what is best.
Original Agent Rank Patent (2005
<address>Agent Rank Patent (Continuation) (2011) </address>
-
I had a client who has the same problem and I advised him the same what i am advising you... Think about the real life and see if a person can talk and talk about two completely different niches and the answer will probably be yes!
I am writing on my SEO blog as it’s my profession and at the same time I have a blog where I write short stories which is kind of my hobby! It is actually good to go with both website with the same author tag as I am actually the person behind it!
Similar is your case, If you are the real face behind the two website from completely different niches then you should go for the same anchor text.
-
There's plenty of room within a profile to write about the stuff you want to write about without having to feel like you're pigeonholed. I don't think G+ profiles should be looked at as restrictive. Rather, just like in the real world, you are as authoritative on a subject as you are able to devote time to it. By splitting your time between two or three or four or ten subjects, leaves you less time to be an authority on any one in particular. But that's a choice we all make everyday. I don't think you are going to dilute any relevance by doing so.
-
Are you contributing to both the websites as an Author ? Do you have real content that is being authored/posted under your name on both the websites ? Do you have people that relate to both industries in your Circles or following you ? If yes, I wouldn't mind using the same G+ Profile. It's what's correct. That's what makes sense.
It's like if I am working for a Pet Supplies company for example and I am posting on it's blog everyday, but then at home I am also a Coin Collector and have a blog about it. They have nothing in common but it would still make sense that I am the author of both the websites since I really do contribute to both of them.
I hope this helps. Most of the times, it's a very easy answer if you try to think search engines don't exist. What would you do ? You get the answer and apply that. That's what is correct, right and the most accurate way of doing it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Temporarily redirecting a small website to a specific url of another website
Hi, I would like to redirect a small website that contains info about a specific project temporarily to a specific url about this project on my main website. Reason for this is that the small website doesn't contain accurate info anymore. We will adapt the content in the next few weeks and then remove the redirect again. Should I set up a 301 or a 302? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mat_C1 -
Redirecting external blog to main website blog - two questions I'm struggling with
Hiya Mozzers - I have a blog separate from main website which is duplicating the blog on the main website. This separate blog is duplicating the main website blog, so it needs to be closed down and redirected. There are some 200 pages of separate blog (identified via Screaming Frog). So I am suggesting the blog pages should be 301 redirected from the separate blog to the equivalent blog pages on the main website. Q1) Should the root domain of the separate blog be 301 redirected to the main www.mainwebsite.com/blog page, or to the root domain of the main website? Q2) Should the blog pages, which lack equivalent content on the main website, be 301 redirected to the main www.mainwebsite.com/blog page, or to the root domain of the main website? Thanks for your help on this one, Luke
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart1 -
Canonicalized Website
We are new to SEO MOZ, and as we are doing our evaluation, multiple page problems have arisen. Our domain is www.moxicopy.com and www.moxicopy.com/blog. Our blog is wordpress hosted but integrated into our site. As we ran our analytics from MOZ PRO, we got TONS of Duplicate Page Title and Duplicate Page Content warnings, over 90 each. Most seem to come from our blog and our different products (we are an ecommerce website). Would the canonicalization of the pages be the cause? And couuld someone further explain exactly what canonical/canonicalization is>? I am very confused, and have a feeling that this is what has hurt our site so much in the last 2-3 weeks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Moxicopy.com0 -
API to power all websites
I spoke to one of my lead web developers and we are planning on powering all of our desktop, mobile and tablet sites with our new API. Everything will be populated through javascript and is cloud-based rather than through actual HTML. How do we incorporate all of our SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | recbrands0 -
Question about multiple websites in same field
I know what most people say that it is best to only have the 1 website for focus but if we can put this to the back of our minds, if we create 2 different websites that are totally different designs (one upmarket one and one targeting the cheaper market) but in the same fields (printing) and go after 80% of the same keywords is this ok (could we be penalized). Please note we will not be interlinking the websites, the website .will be on different servers and the names will be registered under different people (2 partners in the business). We will however be accessing webmaster tools from the same location.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
Hosting two websites
Hi guys, I work with a company that has a business to consumer (B2C) website and a business to business (B2B) website selling the same product. The content will differ but the structure / templates will be similar across both sites. Any recommendations or suggested reading to ensure both sites appear in Search? Many thanks in advance! Richard
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Richard5550 -
Target Different Countries
How to target same site with same content for different countries? Any Useful tips and techniques for both on page and off page
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cygnismedia0 -
One platform, multiple niche sites: Worth $60/mo so each site has different class C?
Howdy all, The short of it is that I currently run a very niche business directory/review website and am in the process of expanding the system to support running multiple sites out of the same database/codebase. In a normal setup I'd just run all the sites off of the same server with all of them sharing a single IP address, but thanks to the wonders of the cloud, it would be fairly simple for me to run each site on it's own server at a cost of about $60/mo/site giving each site a unique IP on a unique c-block (in many cases a unique a-block even.) The ultimate goal here is to leverage the authority I've built up for the one site I currently run to help grow the next site I launch, and repeat the process. The question is: Is the SEO-value that the sites can pass to each other worth the extra cost and management overhead? I've gotten conflicting answers on this topic from multiple people I consider pretty smart so I'd love to know what other people say.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | qurve0