Internal linking question
-
Hi there. Are all internal links listed in GWMT actually indexed?
-
Jonnygeekuk,
If GWT is telling you they are "aware" (whether indexed or not) of URLs that you do not want indexed, and you have either blocked them in the robot.txt file or the robots header tag, or the page serves a 404 or 410 response in the http header, it wouldn't hurt to use the URL removal tool to remove those pages from the index just to be sure.
-
So, sounds like you're looking for a list of indexed pages? Will this tool help?
http://www.intavant.com/tools/google-indexed-pages-extractor/
-
I'm sorry it's taking me so long to get back to you on this. However you told me you say you're using the removal tool in Google Webmaster tools?
I want to be certain you're not using the link disavow tool as a removal tool is that correct?
"Google updates its entire index regularly. When we crawl the web, we automatically find new pages, remove outdated links, and reflect updates to existing pages, keeping the Google index fresh and as up-to-date as possible.
If outdated pages from your site appear in the search results, ensure that the pages return a status of either 404 (not found) or 410 (gone) in the header. These status codes tell Googlebot that the requested URL isn't valid. Some servers are misconfigured to return a status of 200 (Successful) for pages that don't exist, which tells Googlebot that the requested URLs are valid and should be indexed. If a page returns a true 404 error via the http headers, anyone can remove it from the Google index using the webpage removal request tool. Outdated pages that don't return true 404 errors usually fall out of our index naturally when other pages stop linking to them."
"
Reincluding content in search
"Content removed using the URL removal tool will not appear in search results for a minimum of 90 days or until the content has been removed from the Google index. However, if you've updated robots.txt, added meta tags, or password-protected content to prevent it being crawled, the content should naturally have dropped out of our index, and you shouldn't need to worry about it reappearing after 90 days. You can reinclude your content at any time during the 90-day period by following the steps below.
Reinclude content:
- On the Webmaster Tools Home page, click the site you want.
- In the left-hand menu, click Optimization, and then click Remove URLs.
- Select the Removed content tab, and then click Reinclude next to the content you want to reinclude in the Google index.
Pending requests are usually processed within 3-5 business days."
-
Hi Chris, Thomas
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Essentially, the reason i'm asking this question is recently the site in question became heavily over indexed due to search filters etc becoming indexed. This resulted in a ton of thin content being indexed. We've since no indexed these pages but they are taking time to drop off so we are helping a little by using the removal tool in GWMT. A lot of these pages are hidden, it's difficult to find them in the main index but index status says we still have >7k pages indexed when we really should have fewer than 2k. A site: command reveals about 9k but only 600 are listed and they are all valid pages. Basically we're trying to find the urls to remove and noticed that a lot of them are listed in the internal links tab on GWMT. I just wondered whether it was advisable to remove these too, in addition to the 2.5k we have already removed.
-
Hi Johnny, I want to tell you that I agree with what Chris stated above. If you're looking for someone to confirm that. You want to also make sure you do not have over 100 to 150 URLs or internal links on your site. This will hurt Google indexing of the website.
I also use a tool to make internal links. And if that is what you are speaking of. It's called http://scribecontent.com. You can use it not only on word press but on all sites. I have found it to be extremely useful please be cautious though it how many links you built internally so that you do not create a page that cannot be indexed correctly.
http://www.distilled.net/u/search-engine-basics/#crawling
I hope I've been in help,
Thomas
-
Hey JonnyG,
Be sure not to confuse links with URLs. Essentially, a link is clickable thing on a web page that, when clicked, takes the user to another URL. A URL is an address (non-clickable) . A web page is the resource that exists at a URL.
Anyway, the Internal Links tab shows how many links exist on your site that can take you to other pages on your site. However, if you click on the Health | Index Status tab, you'll get choices to see Basic and Advanced info on your indexed URLs. In the advanced tab, you'll see the total number of pages Google's index on your site. Google's Webmaster Tools Help has a page on Index Status for more info.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical Page Question
Hi, I have a question relation to Canonical pages That i need clearing up. I am not sure that my bigcommere website is correctly configured and just wanted clarification from someone in the know. Take this page for example https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/ Canonical link is https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/ The Rel="next" link is https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?sort=bestselling&page=2 and this page has a canonical tag as rel='canonical' href='https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?page=2' /> Is this correct as above and working as it should or should the canonical tag for the second (pagination page) https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/?page=2 in our source code be saying rel='canonical' href='https://www.fishingtackleshop.com.au/barra-lures/' />
Technical SEO | | oceanstorm0 -
Disavow links old links
We have built a lot of sites and there a few sites we no longer manage or want any association with. When I have looked at webmasters I can see 20 to 200+ odd links back to our site. The page however at source has no reference to our website. I have searched the code but there isn't anything. Is it safe to disavow these or just leave them?
Technical SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Webmaster internal links issue
Hi All, In webmaster > Internal links https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/internal-links?hl=en&siteUrl= I get counts as in the image http://imgur.com/9bO5H0f is this logical and ok or should i work on finding why so many links and reduce them? Thanks Martin
Technical SEO | | mtthompsons0 -
Should I no follow all external links?
I have worked with a few different SEO firms lately and a lot of them have recommended on the sites I was working on to "no-follow" all external links on the site. On one hand this traps all the link equity/Pagerank. On the other I would think this practice is frowned upon by Google. What are some opinions on this?
Technical SEO | | MarloSchneider0 -
How Does Link Juice Pass?
Say there is a link on an authoritative site to my site, and the link points to www.mysite.com. However, I have set all URL variations (https://mysite.com, www.mysite.com, mysite.com, etc.) to redirect to http://mysite.com automatically. Does the link juice from this authoritative site pass through the www.mysite.com URL to http://mysite.com automatically due to the automatic redirect? I guess my question is does the link juice automatically pass on to the destination URL, even though it is not the original URL the authoritative site pointed to?
Technical SEO | | NiallTom0 -
OSE Link Differential
I have the chrome toolbar installed. In the SERP a site I was looking at had 686 links from 12 domains linking to the root domain. When I checked this site in OSE with filters set to all pages in root domain it shows 65 links from 12 domains. Can anyone explain the difference?
Technical SEO | | waynekolenchuk0 -
Is this a good link?
Found a .gov link to my website www.kars4kids.org. The url it links to is http://www.nyc.gov/cgi-bin/exit.pl?url=http://www.kars4kids.org/ which does eventually redirect to kars4kids. Will search engines see this as a link?
Technical SEO | | Morris770 -
Links from Youtube Channel
I stumbled across this blog post: http://garyreid.com/youtube-removes-nofollow/ and also this one : http://www.kevin-barnes.com/youtube-secret-authority-loophole/ which talks about no-follow links from your Youtube Channel Page. We've setup a Youtube channel, and have begun updating it regularly, however the link appears to be a redirect-type link -presumably this means no link juice is passed? The code of the link on our Youtube channel: http://www.pretavoir.co.uk The second blog mentions building PA on your Youtube channel by commenting on other videos which then links back to your channel page - if that juice can't go to your site, then I assume the technique is of limited use? Apart from boosting your Youtube Channel's rankings of course, which I guess can't hurt.
Technical SEO | | seanmccauley0