Google Places - Advanced Question
-
Hi All,
Ive found multiple threads about previous issues but I haven't found any tailored to my specific question.I know there are a large amount of factors so I wanted to see if any other individuals had ran into this previously.
We are currently in a centralized position in a major city. We are discussing moving the main office about 15 miles away into another city, moving us out of the main city where we have been for the past 3 years. The city where we are currently located has a lot more GEO search volume compared to the new city search terms and variants of.
If we move will our local rankings drop when someone searches in the city where we were previously? How long would it take for this ranking to fall? Or would we still rank because we are moving a short distance away and have a large amount of citations there?
I know we would need to change over all our online directories, on page etc..Any other suggestions on a smooth transition?
I know there are many factors that go into this and any past experience, guidance and/or assistance is greatly appreciated.
Cheers!
-
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the taking the time to provide the valuable insight and information.
A couple of points to add:
“So that I am clear, you are currently in City A which has good ranking/traffic for city A plus keyword.”
This is partially the case, what I am also seeing is that the main URL (www.url.com) is ranking for many head terms (In the 7 Pack). Not including the Geo terms. Which seem to be driving a large percentage of the traffic. So it seems like there may not be much we can do about this, as that ranking in the 7 pack would remove over time. (This is my main concern because it seems to be pushing most of the traffic)
Also in the analytic platform I am seeing that a large majority of the searches are being made near the centralized position of the city. (Very close to our office now)
Since a large majority of the searches are being made from the centralized location would it be worth maintaining another small office in this area? From reading through some of your points seems like even if we don’t have an office in the area we can still rank a local page? But this wouldn’t be in the 7 pack hence a drop in CTR..?
Also just recently I discussed with another individual that had made a similar move. He informed me he communicated directly with Google to change the address as well as get the reviews pushed to the new location. (He said he saw a considerable drop in traffic and rankings in a short period of time) which I'm sure can be from numerous factors, just not sure if you have had similar experience.
Thanks for your assistance.
Sam
-
Thanks for the response and info! I'm going to check out the links to gain a bit more insight.
-
Vadim,
I appreciate what you have given Sam here.
I think the link to David Mihm's post http://moz.com/blog/local-search-moving-locations, is appropriate but I caution Sam not to panic in that SCORE had a major issue which created many of their problems prior to the move. SCORE, had a branding problem - NAME - wherein in Austin and nationwide the name had many variations. That in and of itself (NAP= Name, Address, Phone) played as much if not more of a role in their problems than the move did. What David Mihm gives that is great, is the information on how to address the move at the citation and directory level.
So, good points, but please don't panic Sam.
Best,
-
Sam,
So that I am clear, you are currently in City A which has good ranking/traffic for city A plus keyword.You are concerned that when you move to city B you will lose ranking and traffic in City A.
If this is the case then the answer is yes, no, and maybe. I am not being flippant and I will offer you a way to handle it. Assuming there are good business reasons for the move and it is hard not to do it, then you need a strategy for retaining as much of what you have as possible. So, first and foremost you need to know what url (s) receive your CityA + keyword traffic (as you may need to do redirects after the move and you change the site to take into account the move).
Next, when you move to city b, you want to make sure you take care to handle your Google Places / Google plus correctly. Do not try to keep the old listing as it is a fools errand. Let me say the reason I tell you is that we work with clients who have made every Local / G+ / microsite vs. sub directory mistake known to man. The effort to fix what you will break by trying to have two locations with one not real or to keep the old and not use the new is well beyond benefit if you succeed. If you break this piece and the listings get merged in some way, you can spend a ton of $ and up to a year trying to correct it if you work with a Local pro.
If you look at your current rankings around CityA + KW, you will likely see that if you are in a 7 pack, that url will be different from any url ranking organically. Your concern re traffic, conversions, etc. will be to maintain organic as you will lose the ranking in 7 pack over time (anywhere from a week or two to several months depending on a lot of factors). So, where will that traffic go to? When you create the page(s) for city B + keyword, make sure you your url structure for City A either stays the same or is 301 redirected to new urls for the new CityA + KW url.
Next, if you are not currently using these next few things, they will assist you with maintaining your other rankings for CityA (If you are, keep it up):
Do you have Exif data in the images where you have City A images on the pages? Add it if not.
Do you have a Google maps API in the page with the location? (If the location is not there, put the map with the city only).
Are you using structured markup for place on all the pages for city A? If not, add it.
Pay attention to on-page SEO for city A (and B) + KW. So, url with cityA + KW. Title tag with same and following this convention (IMO): KW | City A | Brand, make sure your H1 has some version of KW and city A and that you have it appropriately in the content, alt text, etc.
The reason for all of this is that any place where you were weak before gives you room to improve with the hope the improvement offsets some of the negatives brought about by being in a different city.I really hope this helps you with the move. I can tell you we have clients who were using all types of devices trying to rank in cities where they were not located. When it was done cleanly, with the City + KW as an individual page/sub-directory and then a contact page with Google Map API as the "local" presence, we have shocked clients that they could be ranked and not be in the city. Understand, we are holistic in our SEO approach in that we believe in getting as close as possible to the holy grail of 100% SEO'd. (All, please no - Google doesn't want perfect SEO, etc. - I've heard it and read it; I also know what has worked in my efforts.)
Best,
Robert
-
Hi Sam,
If we move will our local rankings drop when someone searches in the city where we were previously? Yes, you will have to do much more work to rank for the previous location, being farther away from it. Google Local prefers to rank you locally. It is easier to move to a competitive area and rank well there and have a spill out effect to rank in low-competition areas. But since you are moving from high competition into low competition it will be more work to rank for that.
All the citations will need to be changed as well to match the new NAP. You mentioned you have read previous threads, not sure if you can across this resource for a smooth transition: http://moz.com/blog/local-search-moving-locations
More experience here: http://moz.com/ugc/local-seo-and-moving-business-5-steps-4-lessons
Also do not close your previous listing when moving (plus other experiances): http://www.seroundtable.com/google-places-moving-15176.html
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Missing Google verification
I just went to check my client sites in Google search console and noticed a whole bunch of them no longer 'verified'. They were all previously verified. Why would they suddenly change status to 'not verified'? Does this affect anything (eg. search analytics data flowing through to GA)? Does this mean I have to verify all over again?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | muzzmoz0 -
Location in URLs question
Hi there, my company is a national theater news publisher. Quick question about a particular use case. When an editor publishes a story they can assign several discrete locations, allowing it to appear on each of those locations within our website. This article (http://www.theatermania.com/denver-theater/news/full-casting-if-then-tour-idina-menzel_74354.html), for example, appears in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Denver section. We force the author to choose a primary location from that list, which controls the location displayed in the URL. Is this a bad practice? I'm wondering if the fact that having 'Denver' in the URL is misleading and hurts SEO value, particularly since that article features several other cities.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TheaterMania0 -
AngularJS - How does Google go?
We're rebuilding our entire website in angularJS. We've got it rendering fine in WMT, but does that mean that it's content is detectable? I've looked into prerender.io and that seems like a great solution to the problem of not seeing any static HTML, but is it really necessary? I'm looking into this as I'm having the argument currently with my devs, and they're all certain that Google renders angularJS fine.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | localdirectories0 -
Google Sitelinks Search Box
For some reason, a search for our company name (“hometalk”) does not produce the search box in the results (even though we do have sitelinks). We are adding schema markup as outlined here, but we're not sure about: Will adding the code make the search bar appear (or at least increase the chances), or is it only going to change the functionality of the search box (to on-site search) for results that are already showing a search bar?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | YairSpolter0 -
Penalty from Google due to spam that was not our doing
Hi, My company has enjoyed pretty good rankings for our main keywords in Google for the past 13+ years we have been in business. We have always been very white-hat about our SEO -- always erring on the side of not doing anything rather than risking a penalty. Well, last Thursday, we received the dreaded Google penalty due to a pattern of unnatural links. The hit is devastating - we are not even in the top 50 for our own company name anymore. Through research, we believe we have found the culprit -- and it has nothing to do with any of our own actions. We operate a discussion forum, and there was a link to one of the threads that was being used as the target for a lot of link spam -- Chinese blog comments, etc. We had nothing to do with this, but obviously someone had an agenda and was working on spamming to this page. Who knows - it may have even been the company that was being discussed negatively in the thread, attempting to have us blocked. We discovered it the same day we received the penalty notice, and issued a reconsideration request, detailing what we believe we found. So far, we haven't disavowed any of the links, but I am thinking we should. We have asked Google if they're able to just turn off any link juice for that one page, especially since we don't know who is doing this spamming, and whether they will continue. Has anyone experienced something similar? How does one prevent themselves from receiving a penalty that they had nothing to do with? What is there to keep any competitor from launching a spammy link-building campaign to get their competitor removed from Google? Is there anything we can do to resolve this? Thanks for any and all thoughts...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kylie_rw0 -
Is Google Webmaster tools Accurate?
Is Google webmaster Tools data completely inaccurate, or am I just missing something? I noticed a recent surge in 404 errors detected 3 days ago (3/6/11) from pages that have not existed since November 2011. They are links to tag and author archives from pages initially indexed in August 2011. We switched to a new site in December 2011 and created 301 redirects from categories that no longer exist, to new categories. I am a little perplexed since the Google sitemap test shows no 404 errors, neither does SEO MOZ Crawl test, yet under GWT site diagnostics, these errors, all 125 of them, just showed up. Any thought/insights? We've worked hard to ensure a smooth site migration and now we are concerned. -Jason
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jimmyjohnson0 -
Google Product Feed Newbie Question
Hi, I don't know much of anything about Google Pruduct Feeds. Here is my starting point on thia: 1. Is this really free? We'd be doing it without Google checkout, just landing on our own pages with our own checkout. 2. Where do you upload the file? 3. What determines if you come up or not as a result? Any strategy or tactics involved? 4. We're the manufacturer of a product and late to the product feed game. The description that Google has used for our products is not ours or great. How do we change that product description that Google has for our products? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Crawl questions
My first website crawl indicating many issues. I corrected the issues, requested another crawl and received the results. After viewing the excel file I have some questions. 1. There are many pages with missing Titles and Meta Descriptions in the Excel file. An example is http://www.terapvp.com/threads/help-us-decide-on-terapvp-com-logo.25/page-2 That page clearly has a meta description and title. It is a forum thread. My forum software does a solid job of always providing those tags. Why would my crawl report not show this information? This occurs on numerous pages. 2. I believe all my canonical URLs are properly set. My crawl report has 3k+ records, largely due to there being 10 records for many pages. These extra records are various sort orders and style differences for the same page i.e. ?direction=asc. My need for a crawl report is to provide actionable data so I can easily make SEO improvements to my site where necessary. These extra records don't provide any benefit. IF the crawl report determined there was not a clear canonical URL, then I could understand. But that is not the case. An example is http://www.terapvp.com/forums/news/ If you look at the source you will clearly see Where is the benefit to including the 10 other records in the Crawl report which show this same page in various sort orders? Am I missing anything? 3. My robots.txt appropriately blocks many pages that I do not wish to be crawled. What is the benefit to including these many pages in the crawl report? Perhaps I am over analyzing this report. I have read many articles on SEO, but now that I have found SEOmoz, I can see I will need to "unlearn what I have learned". Many things such as setting meta keyword tags are clearly not helpful. I wish to focus my energy and I was looking to the crawl report as my starting point. Either I am missing something, or the report design needs improvement.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RyanKent0