Is 301 redirecting all old URLS after a new site redesign to the root domain bad for SEO?
-
After a new site redesign ...would it hinder our rankings if we 301 redirected all old URLS that are returning 404 error codes to the root domain (home page) ?
Would this be a good temporary solution until we are able to redirect the pages to the appropriate corresponding page?
Thanks so much!
-
You will need to check the server error log files for the new site in order to pick these up, if this hasn't been detected in WMT.
-
There's a free XML sitemap creator at http://www.auditmypc.com/xml-sitemap.asp. Not only will it create a sitemap for you that you can upload, but will also show you any internal bad links which can cause you the biggest problems.
Outside of that Webmaster Tools will be your most effective tool for catching those external sites linking to your old or missing pages. Be sure to reach out to repeat offenders and ask them to update their links to you.
-
If the URL is a 404, there's no "link juice" to pass. The home page of any site will always have the most page rank anyway. I wouldn't be concerned with that. Focus on user experience.
-
If they were, and still are, indexed in Google just do a site: search
-
Great!
Now is the only way to find old pages that weren't redirected to a new site is through webmaster tools correct?
Are there any other tools out there that would find old URLS.. URLS maybe even a year old that weren't redirected?
Thanks for all the reassurance so far.
-
"Google is aware that 404 errors can't always be avoided since you don't have any control over someone creating a bad link on an external site. So the impact on your SEO should be little to none unless it's completely out of hand and occurring as a result of something internal such as a bad navigational structure."
I respectfully disagree, the SEO impact is not because Google will punish you for having 404's, the SEO impact is that the new corresponding pages will not rank and the old pages that no longer exist will lose their rank after a little while of remaining in the index and taking visitors to a 404 and not converting.
-
Are you hoping to just make it easier on yourself by sending all old pages to the root rather than mapping them to the most relevant pages? If you have a large site I understand but I would strongly suggest, at the VERY LEAST, mapping the more important pages to the new site's counterpart pages that are the most relevant and then you can send the remaining pages to the home page or a sitemap.htm page. I don't know that pointing them all to the root would be 'bad', per-say, but I feel you would be missing an opportunity to help boost new internal pages that you need ranking asap.
-
Thanks. I have a custom 404 page but what if I'm looking to pass along the link juice from pages on an old site to the new site. Will this pass along any page authority by just redirecting it to the root domain?
-
Google is aware that 404 errors can't always be avoided since you don't have any control over someone creating a bad link on an external site. So the impact on your SEO should be little to none unless it's completely out of hand and occurring as a result of something internal such as a bad navigational structure.
I would not suggest 301 redirecting 404 pages to the home page of a site because it's frustrating to users who may not be aware of what's going on. It can be potentially frustrating if they're expecting to see a specific page and keep getting pushed to the home page with no explanation as to why it's happening.
Your best bet is going to be creating a custom 404 page that indicates that the page is not available and make suggestions to other areas on your site and a means to contact you if they can't find what they're looking for. That way they know what's happening and don't get frustrated in the process.
And don't forget to continually monitor the reporting errors in Google Webmaster Tools to see the biggest offenders. If you see missing pages getting double digit visits, build an actual page on that URL directing them to the right alternate place (assuming that the page actually exists elsewhere in your new site setup). If there are simply too many 404 errors happening, just stick with the custom 404 solution above and clean as you monitor the activity. But it's just not a good user experience or practice to 301 without an explanation.
-
Yes. That is what should be done I agree.
But since it wasn't done.. instead of just leaving it & not doing anything about it... would it be better to redirect any 404 pages to the root domain in the mean time?
Or should it be left until we can redirect all the individual pages to their appropriate new page?
Thanks
-
No, you should have the redirects map out and implemented prior to launch or risk the loss of their organic position.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Missing 301 redirects
I just had a developer friend call me in a panic, because they had gone live with a new site and found out (the hard way) that they had missed some pages on their 301 redirects. So the pages are appearing in Google but serving 404s. Ouch! So their question was: other than running a report for 404 errors in something like Screaming Frog, is there a way to hunt down ONLY pages serving 404s, then export to CSV so they can be redirected? Anyone got any tricks up their sleeve?
Technical SEO | | muzzmoz0 -
Why would this site outrank a Pr2 site with higher domain authority?
I am trying to get a pr2 site to be on top 7 local spot for the keyword Van Nuys Bail bonds but have discovered a site which has barely any back links and is not even a year old on top results. Their backlinks are from lower authority domains than what we have. How could this site be beating a 7 year old pr2 website? The site I'm working on is http://bbbail.com/ The site that is ranking in 5th spot local with pr0 is http://www.vipbailbonds.org/ is it maybe because it is a .org site? Also I notice that all websites in top spots have www, could that be a factor as well?
Technical SEO | | jesse13410 -
We just recently moved site domains, and I tried to set up a new campaign for the new root domain, but it threw an error?
It threw an error saying we cannot access the SERPs of this site? Any reason why? It is an https:// site instead of the http://, but even our older domain had an https://
Technical SEO | | josh1230 -
Does 301 redirecting a site multiple times keep the value of the original site?
Hi, All! If I 301 redirect site www.abc.com to www.def.com, it should pass (almost) all linkjuice, rank, trust, etc. What happens if I then redirect site www.def.com to www.ghi.com? Does the value of the original site pass indefinitely as long as you do the redirects correctly? Or does it start to be devalued at some point? If anyone's had experience redirecting a site more than once and they've seen reportable good/bad/neutral results, that would be very helpful. Thanks in advance! -Aviva B
Technical SEO | | debi_zyx0 -
Will 301 redirecting a site multiple times still preserve the original site value?
Hi, All! If site www.abc.com was already 301 redirected to site www.def.com, and now the site owner wants to redirect www.def.com to www.ghi.com - is there any concern that it's not going to work, and some of the original linkjuice, rank, trust, etc. is going to vanish? Or as long as the 301s are set up right, should you be able to 301 indefinitely? Does anyone have any experience with actually doing this and seeing good/bad/neutral results? Thanks in advance! -Aviva B
Technical SEO | | debi_zyx0 -
Is a 302 redirect the correct redirect from a root URL to a detail page?
Hi guys The widely followed SEO best practice is that 301 redirects should be used instead of 302 redirects when it is a permanent redirect that is required. Matt Cutts said last year that 302 redirects should "only" be used for temporary redirects. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-interview-googles-matt-cutts-on-redirects-trust-more For a site that I am looking at the SEO Moz Crawll Diagnostics tool lists as an issue that the URL / redirects to www.abc.com/Pages/default.aspx with a 302 redirect. On further searching I found that on a Google Support forum (http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=276539078ba67f48&hl=en) that a Google Employee had said "For what it's worth, a 302 redirect is the correct redirect from a root URL to a detail page (such as from "/" to "/sites/bursa/"). This is one of the few situations where a 302 redirect is preferred over a 301 redirect." Can anyone confirm if it is the case that "a 302 redirect is the correct redirect from a root URL to a detail page"? And if so why as I haven't found an explanation. If it is the correct best practice then should redirects of this nature be removed from displaying as issues in the SEO Moz Crawll Diagnostics tool Thanks for your help
Technical SEO | | CPU0 -
301 redirect
We have just had an outside SEO agency report on our site: One of things brought up were arounf broken links, and how they class them as broken links. Could any body tell me whether this statement holds true please, as I am not aware of this "Our latest intelligence shows that google are downgrading ranking from sites that feature 301 redirects within the internal link structure". Any help would be greatly appreciated Regards
Technical SEO | | Yozzer0