Is 301 redirecting all old URLS after a new site redesign to the root domain bad for SEO?
-
After a new site redesign ...would it hinder our rankings if we 301 redirected all old URLS that are returning 404 error codes to the root domain (home page) ?
Would this be a good temporary solution until we are able to redirect the pages to the appropriate corresponding page?
Thanks so much!
-
You will need to check the server error log files for the new site in order to pick these up, if this hasn't been detected in WMT.
-
There's a free XML sitemap creator at http://www.auditmypc.com/xml-sitemap.asp. Not only will it create a sitemap for you that you can upload, but will also show you any internal bad links which can cause you the biggest problems.
Outside of that Webmaster Tools will be your most effective tool for catching those external sites linking to your old or missing pages. Be sure to reach out to repeat offenders and ask them to update their links to you.
-
If the URL is a 404, there's no "link juice" to pass. The home page of any site will always have the most page rank anyway. I wouldn't be concerned with that. Focus on user experience.
-
If they were, and still are, indexed in Google just do a site: search
-
Great!
Now is the only way to find old pages that weren't redirected to a new site is through webmaster tools correct?
Are there any other tools out there that would find old URLS.. URLS maybe even a year old that weren't redirected?
Thanks for all the reassurance so far.
-
"Google is aware that 404 errors can't always be avoided since you don't have any control over someone creating a bad link on an external site. So the impact on your SEO should be little to none unless it's completely out of hand and occurring as a result of something internal such as a bad navigational structure."
I respectfully disagree, the SEO impact is not because Google will punish you for having 404's, the SEO impact is that the new corresponding pages will not rank and the old pages that no longer exist will lose their rank after a little while of remaining in the index and taking visitors to a 404 and not converting.
-
Are you hoping to just make it easier on yourself by sending all old pages to the root rather than mapping them to the most relevant pages? If you have a large site I understand but I would strongly suggest, at the VERY LEAST, mapping the more important pages to the new site's counterpart pages that are the most relevant and then you can send the remaining pages to the home page or a sitemap.htm page. I don't know that pointing them all to the root would be 'bad', per-say, but I feel you would be missing an opportunity to help boost new internal pages that you need ranking asap.
-
Thanks. I have a custom 404 page but what if I'm looking to pass along the link juice from pages on an old site to the new site. Will this pass along any page authority by just redirecting it to the root domain?
-
Google is aware that 404 errors can't always be avoided since you don't have any control over someone creating a bad link on an external site. So the impact on your SEO should be little to none unless it's completely out of hand and occurring as a result of something internal such as a bad navigational structure.
I would not suggest 301 redirecting 404 pages to the home page of a site because it's frustrating to users who may not be aware of what's going on. It can be potentially frustrating if they're expecting to see a specific page and keep getting pushed to the home page with no explanation as to why it's happening.
Your best bet is going to be creating a custom 404 page that indicates that the page is not available and make suggestions to other areas on your site and a means to contact you if they can't find what they're looking for. That way they know what's happening and don't get frustrated in the process.
And don't forget to continually monitor the reporting errors in Google Webmaster Tools to see the biggest offenders. If you see missing pages getting double digit visits, build an actual page on that URL directing them to the right alternate place (assuming that the page actually exists elsewhere in your new site setup). If there are simply too many 404 errors happening, just stick with the custom 404 solution above and clean as you monitor the activity. But it's just not a good user experience or practice to 301 without an explanation.
-
Yes. That is what should be done I agree.
But since it wasn't done.. instead of just leaving it & not doing anything about it... would it be better to redirect any 404 pages to the root domain in the mean time?
Or should it be left until we can redirect all the individual pages to their appropriate new page?
Thanks
-
No, you should have the redirects map out and implemented prior to launch or risk the loss of their organic position.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Changing Domains - 301 old https to new https
Brief History: Our company made change to a new domain. Both domains had an SSL configured on it in which the old domain SSL was controlled and created by Shopify which gave us limited control. Because we couldn't redirect the old https:// to the new https:// So basically we duplicated our new HTML website and put canonical ref on all duplicate pages to the final domain to help get search to navigate to the newer domain. Question: In the near future I would like to take down the old domain and do a 301 domain forwarding. What is the correct course of action to complete this? Our old domain was indexed and SERP results were tied to it's https:// url's.
Technical SEO | | bnewt1 -
Redirecting http to https, do I need to add new url to webaster tools?
Hey all, we just 301 redirected all our http url's to https. I'm getting some funky data in webmaster tools, such as a drastic change in pages indexed and pages submitted over pages indexed. Might be a dumb question, but do I need to update my website in webmaster tools with the new https address, or should I be getting credible data from the old http url that is already in there? Thank you in advance!
Technical SEO | | jaychow0 -
301 Redirect / cross-domain canonical to a URL w/ Ampersand
I have a question regarding ampersands, we are needing to redirect to a URL w/ an ampersand in the URL: http://local.sfgate.com/b18915250/Sam-&-Associates-Insurance-Agency Will Google pass page authority/juice despite the fact that there is an ampersand in the URL, if we were to 301 redirect or cross-domain canonical to the url? Should we 301 redirect to http://local.sfgate.com/b18915250/Sam-%26-Associates-Insurance-Agency instead of http://local.sfgate.com/b18915250/Sam-&-Associates-Insurance-Agency? I don't have the option of removing the ampersand Thank you for your time!
Technical SEO | | Gatelist0 -
301 Redirect
The SEOmoz crawl campaign found some 404 errors in my Joomla site poker-brands.ca. So, I figured I would set up 301 redirects in my hosting account to make sure bots don't read that there is a page missing. For example: This link gave a 404 error in the crawl: http://www.poker-brands.ca/download-pokertracker-software/holdemmanager I redirected it to: http://www.poker-brands.ca/download-pt3-pokertracker-software/holdemmanager-hem-hm2 However, when I visit the first link it doesn't send me to the second link. Am I supposed to get forwarded to the second link now?
Technical SEO | | Uramark0 -
301-redirect
Hi My website is fairly new and i wasnt aware of the difference btw 'website.com' and 'www.website.com' when i started up. It doesnt matter which one i use as long as i am consistent right ? Most of my ingoing links are to mainpage on 'website.com'. I have som ingoing links to 'www.website.com' but also some to 'www.website.com/brandname'. is it enough to 301-redir 'www.website.com' to 'website.com' or does it need to be done on several levels ? I need to have someone do the redirect for me - how can i check its working when its done ? Dan Lærum
Technical SEO | | danlae0 -
Is there a great tool for URL mapping old to new web site?
We are implementing new design and removing some pages and adding new content. Task is to correctly map and redirect old pages that no longer exist.
Technical SEO | | KnutDSvendsen0 -
Will Google index a 301 redirect for a new site?
So here is the problem... We have setup a 301redirect for our clients website. When you search the clients name it comes up with the old .co.uk website. We have made this redirect to the new .com website. However on the SERPs when it shows the .co.uk it shows the old title pages which currently say 'Holding Page'. When you click on that link it takes you to the fully functioning .com website. My question is, will the title tags in the SERPs which show the .co.uk update to the new ones from the .com? I'm thinking it will be just a case of Google catching up on things and it will sort itself out eventually. If anyone could help I would REALLY appreciate it. Thanks Chris
Technical SEO | | Weerdboil0 -
Redirecting root domains to sub domains
Mozzers: We have a instance where a client is looking to 301 a www.example.com to www.example.com/shop I know of several issues with this but wondered if anyone could chip in with any previous experiences of doing so, and what outcomes positive and negative came out of this. Issues I'm aware of: The root domain URL is the most linked page, a HTTP 301 redirect only passes about 90% of the value. you'll loose 10-15% of your link value of these links. navigational queries (i.e.: the "domain part" of "domain.tld") are less likely to produce google site-links less deep-crawling: google crawls top down - starts with the most linked page, which will most likely be your domain url. as this does not exist you waste this zero level of crawling depth. robots.txt is only allowed on the root of the domain. Your help as always is greatly appreciated. Sean
Technical SEO | | Yozzer0