Wordpress & use of 'www' vs not for webmaster tools - explanation needed
-
I am having a hard time understanding the issue of canonization of site pages, specifically in regards to the 'www' or 'non-www' versions of a site. And specifically in regards to wordpress.
I can see that it doesn't matter whether you type in 'www' or not in the url for a wordpress site, what is going on in the back end that allows this?
When I link up to google webmaster tools, should i use www or not?
thanks for any help
d
-
Thanks Christopher.
Sorry I'm not quite sure what the code you have supplied is for? My site currently works fine with or without the 'www' - but does the code you have supplied acheive something else?
thanks
d
-
The issue is www.EXAMPLE.com and EXAMPLE.com are considered two different websites, and Google may split the links in if people are linking to both versions. A 301 redirect tells Google to assume all links are pointed at one version.
Your Question: I can see that it doesn't matter whether you type in 'www' or not in the url for a wordpress site, what is going on in the back end that allows this?
My Answer: This is not WordPress, it is your web host. Most LAMP webhosts will automatically server your website with our without "WWW". WordPress will create the links on the pages it creates to the one specified in your settings, but the site will come up weather or not you use "WWW."
To Address the Concern: Because you are using WordPress, you are probably on Apache, so add this to your .htaccess file in the root directory.
After:
END WordPress
Add:
Rewrite all old filenames RewriteEngine on
Options +FollowSymlinks
rewritecond %{http_host} ^EXAMPLE.com [nc] rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.EXAMPLE.com/$1 [r=301,nc]Test with and without "WWW." Test with a different browser.
-
Hi Joseph, do you run into any SSL errors by using absolute links especially with images? I hate when you get an error message on secure pages saying that some content is not secure would you like to see it... do you think leaving the http part out is a better idea for sites that have SSL pages, use something like www.mydomain.com instead?
Thanks!
-
Hello David,
When you install wordpress it installs the files which can be found with or without the www.
On the settings page you can add the www as the version you want to use.
What is going on in the back that allows this ? => ( .htacess file re-write rules)
Your host should have rewrite rule available via .htacess file This will rewite all the pages on the site to which ever version you choose.
then in your webmaster account choose the www. version as well.
Redirecting your site to one version or the other is going to reduce two versions of your site down to one version so you do not have duplicate content issues or penalties.
I always use the full url (absolute link) with the www.for several reasons below.
This should always be used in your links within your site and the code as well.
Absolute link example is = http://www.your-site-url.com
-
easier and faster for search engines to follow
-
safer when worried about site hijacking
-
works better in emails ( make sure a visitor gets to the right page)
-
better if your content gets stolen and the thief does not take time to check and fix all the code (i actually caught someone who stole one of my sites content this way )
If you use one version all the time you are also going to make sure you get all your link benefits to the right domain and not split between the two.
Some seo's and many web designers don't use the full url to save time and code bloat of the site. Myself as well as many other think the absolute link has added benefits.
I hope that helps.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
If I'm using a compressed sitemap (sitemap.xml.gz) that's the URL that gets submitted to webmaster tools, correct?
I just want to verify that if a compressed sitemap file is being used, then the URL that gets submitted to Google, Bing, etc and the URL that's used in the robots.txt indicates that it's a compressed file. For example, "sitemap.xml.gz" -- thanks!
Technical SEO | | jgresalfi0 -
"non-WWW" vs "WWW" in Google SERPS and Lost Back Link Connection
A Screaming Frog report indicates that Google is indexing a client's site for both: www and non-www URLs. To me this means that Google is seeing both URLs as different even though the page content is identical. The client has not set up a preferred URL in GWMTs. Google says to do a 301 redirect from the non-preferred domain to the preferred version but I believe there is a way to do this in HTTP Access and an easier solution than canonical.
Technical SEO | | RosemaryB
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/44231?hl=en GWMTs also shows that over the past few months this client has lost more than half of their backlinks. (But there are no penalties and the client swears they haven't done anything to be blacklisted in this regard. I'm curious as to whether Google figured out that the entire site was in their index under both "www" and "non-www" and therefore discounted half of the links. Has anyone seen evidence of Google discounting links (both external and internal) due to duplicate content? Thanks for your feedback. Rosemary0 -
Bogus Crawl Errors in Webmaster Tools?
I am suddenly seeing a ton of crawl errors in webmaster tools. Almost all of them are URL links coming from scraper sites.that I do not own. Do you see these in your Webmaster Tools account? Do you mark them as "fixed" if they are on a scraper site? There are waaaay too many of these to make redirects. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | EGOL0 -
Webmaster Tools vs Screaming from for 404's
Hey guys, I was just wondering which is better to use to find the 404's effecting your site. I have been using webmaster tools and just purchased screaming frog which has given me a totally different list of 404's compared to WMT. Which do I use, or do I use both? Cheers
Technical SEO | | Adamshowbiz0 -
Help! www and non-www urls are driving me mad!
Sorry folks, I'm a very recently joined member, and after a five year gap in creating websites, I've decided to get back into the saddle and start again. Boy how things have changed! I'm soaking up all sorts of information from everywhere I can to get up to date with these changes, but I've come across this www v non-www problem in a big way. I realise there are already posts in here about this, but each time I read them, my mind seems to slip into some sort of loop that does not get anywhere. Basically, I think Google has indexed most of my pages as non-www, and only a hadful as www's. I have opened two accounts in Google Webmaster Tools for both www and non-www, and declared my preference for both accordingly. That was two days ago. As unprofessional as it may sound, I use Serif Web Plus X6, simply beacause it did the job six years ago, and it's all I know until I find and teach myself something better. My question is this - I can only create one page on X6, and yet there are two versions indexed in Google (although not all of them). I can only amend the one page that exists in X6, so how do I canonicalize two pages when there's the only version I have access to amending? Or am I miissing the point??? I hope that made sense?! I wouldn't mind, but I specified that I didn't want the site to be indexed yet with 'no follow', as it's nowhere near finished, but for some reason (probably due to placing Adsense ads on there) Google went ahead and indexed it anyway! The site is either http://www.cushioncutengagementringsstore.com or http://cushioncutengagementringsstore.com, depending on how you look at it! Any light you can shed on this would be gratefuly received! Thanks. Cem.
Technical SEO | | ConwyWebDesign0 -
Having www. and non www. links indexed
Hey guys, As the title states, the two versions of the website are indexed in Google. How should I proceed? Please also note that the links on the website are without the www. How should I proceed knowing that the client prefers to have the www. version indexed. Here are the steps that I have in mind right now: I set the preferred domain on GWMT as the one with www. I 301 redirect any non www. URL to the www. version. What are your thoughts? Should I 301 redirect the URL's? or is setting the preference on GWMT enough? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | BruLee0 -
Google Webmaster Tool - Crawl Stats Query ?
Dear All, I have been looking at GWT Crawl Stats and wondering how should I be interrupting the crawl stats chart. AllI I see is 3 charts telling me a high , low and average for the below but I am wondering is there anything I really need to be looking for ?. Pages crawled per day Kilobytes downloaded per day Time spent downloading a page (in milliseconds) thanks Sarah
Technical SEO | | SarahCollins0 -
Schema Markup and Google's Rich Snippet Tool
Has anyone ever used the snippet tool and gotten the following error "could not fetch website"? When using the tool and placing an url that does not have markup present it will show that as the error. Or if part of markup is wrong, it will diagnose it accordingly. Did a search online and found limited info...one of which someone had this error but when other users tested it, they were not getting the same error.
Technical SEO | | andrewv0