Hidden text that's not really "hidden" - seo
-
Hi guys,
I have a question for you about a thing I saw on a website.
I've attached the prints.
They have like "hidden text". It must be good for indexation, they can
target a lot of important keywords in it, and still keep the website
"clean".
Is this penalized by google if discovered? Do they see this as black hat?Thanks,
Ricardo
?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+06.00.36.png ?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+06.00.36.png ?name=Captura+de+ecra%CC%83+2012-08-11%2C+a%CC%80s+05.59.56.png
-
I don't think this is black hat stuff. It looks like some type of rotating banner like lots of sites have. Now, if the so called "hidden" text is just a random list of keywords then this would look more manipulative.
In my mind, hidden text is more like when someone displays the text off of the screen with CSS or uses white text on a white background.
-
When deciding if a technique is black hat, we need to specifically state which one of Google's Guidelines the presentation violates. Google's Guidelines are broken in to three areas: Design and Content Guidelines, Technical Guidelines, and Quality Guidelines. A quick review of the first two areas shows the page does not violate those guidelines. The question is whether this method violations Google's Quality Guidelines.
The only specific Quality Guidelines one would suggest this site violates is "hidden text and links". Clearly, the method used here does not violate that guideline. From the Google site:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66353
Hiding text or links in your content can cause your site to be perceived as untrustworthy since it presents information to search engines differently than to visitors. Text (such as excessive keywords) can be hidden in several ways, including:
- Using white text on a white background
- Including text behind an image
- Using CSS to hide text
- Setting the font size to 0
So none of the "specific guidelines" are violated. The next question is whether the site violates any of the "basic principles". There is only one which causes concern:
Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you'd feel comfortable explaining what you've done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"
The question is whether a Google Spam Team member would manually penalize a site solely for this particular issue. The spam team members are highly calibrated and must follow strict guidelines. In my experience they would not presently penalize such a page, but I would love to receive a definitive response. Even if the question was asked directly, we would likely receive general info rather then "yes this violates our guidelines" or "no, it does not". It does not seem to go far enough to violate the guidelines.
Either way, I would state my belief the presentation on this site (scasino.com) is not helpful for users and should not be used in its present format. If it was a rotating banner that automatically cycled through the 5 pages, then clearly it would be fine. The only reason the question arises is the user needs to take an action, clicking one of the numbers, in order for the content to display.
Google has come a long way recently. With their "Above The Fold" update and other changes, I am confident Google understands what content is immediately visible on the page, what content the user is likely to engage with (i.e. scroll down on the page) and what content users are unlikely to engage with (such as pressing these numbers).
I don't believe much in "grey hat". Something either complies with Google Guidelines, or it does not. With that said, this particular issue is subject to the interpretation of Google as to how likely a user is to interact with this setup, and whether they believe this technique was done deliberately to manipulate search rankings.
In summary, my response is NO, it would not draw a manual penalty.
-
I agree with Host1.
Stay away from these practices.
-
Yes, this is seen as black hat by google and will be penalized.
See http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66353
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Image elements have [alt] attributes that are redundant text.
I have a problem on page speed insight
Content Development | | Adina Laura Matei
https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-www-antena24-ro/kxt8qtdaik?form_factor=mobile
My portal is created on wordpress cms.
I deleted the alternative text of the image and still, if I put text instead of the image, that problem disappears. It's not something serious, but I like that everything is perfect
"Image elements have [alt] attributes that are redundant text."0 -
SEO, Rel Author and Several Clients
How do you deal with Rel author on blogs for your clients? Suppose I'm a contributor (or rather, the only copywriter) to a clients blog - which happens to be about DIY. The blog articles are written from the business perspective and published from 'the business'. not from Me. Should I be adding myself as a contributor and using my own personal Google profile on these blogs? If so, then it's my face that appears next to the blog post and I'm not sure that's what I want for a blog about fixing shelves etc! Am I misunderstanding how I should be using rel author? Is it for SEOs to work into client strategy, or is it just for our own personal blogs?
Content Development | | littlesthobo0 -
Can you help me with my options on publishing others' news releases on my site?
I wish to add a "News" section to a highly-read, highly ranked blog I have. The News pieces will not be in the same flow as my regular posts. I'm contemplating what the best way to do this is, and would like some advice, please. I see these options: Option 1. Pay textbroker type people to rewrite news releases and post them into the news flow. Pro: indexable content. Con: expense. Option 2: Have a Submit News form on the site for vendors to submit their news stories. I would have to ask them to rewrite their stories to avoid dup content. Pros: Easy for me, no cost. Cons: Will still get dup content I bet, a lot of companies won't take the time to do it, and I will have no control over quality. (I really doubt this option will work). Option 3: Post news releases from companies in their raw format, and mark them as no index (even if I don't noindex, they won't move up the SERPs anyway, so why not just noindex them). Pros: very easy, all the news I want. Cons: not creating any indexable content. Bonus question: If I do Option #3, and I place an adsense ad on the page, will it work the same as if it was an indexed, non-duplicate content page? Your thoughts?
Content Development | | bizzer0 -
WHAT IS THE BEST WORDPRESS THEME FOR SEO
Hi, Seomozers I would like to know if theres any particular Wordpress Thema that works better for SEO purposes rathen than other. Thanks in advance Maria Jesus
Content Development | | goperformancelabs0 -
Second Blog on the Same Site? Best SEO Practice
I would like to start up another blog which has more of a "technical" topic coverage vs my regular blog, which appeals more to non-techie business folks. If the goal is to drive traffic ultimately to the main site, should I do this second blog on a different domain, a subdomain, or try to incorporate it as a separate-but-equal blog on the same domain as the currrent one? What would you do?
Content Development | | JMagary0 -
What's the best way to list products with multiple size options?
For some of my suppliers, there may be a Model A, Model B, and Model C. Within each model, the height and the width may be the same, but there might be 10 variants of length. Is is better to just list the 3 models on 3 separate product pages and have the various lengths as an option in a drop-down menu on each page, or should I actually create 30 different product pages? Just listing 3 would seem to be better from a usability perspective, but having 30 might lead to more pages being indexed. I believe that I'll have 30 different entries in my Google/Bing Product Search feeds, but what is the recommended practice for actual sites? Thanks
Content Development | | nks20120 -
Blog for SEO: embedded in the site or separate
Hello, For both ecommerce and sites that sell services, I've seen a lot of people recommending a blog for SEO. Should this blog be inside or separate from the main website for the most results? I can see how adding one to a site would create more unique content and an opportunity for link bait, but perhaps there is a reason to have a blog separate from the main site Thank you.
Content Development | | BobGW1 -
Our blog is indexed by "google web" but does not show up in "google blogs". Why not and how can I fix this?
We have a pretty simple blog http://www.aviawest.com/blog I've noticed our articles arn't showing up in Google blogs on "web", we've submitted to http://blogsearch.google.com/ping a month ago. Anyone have some insight here?
Content Development | | Aviawest0