Best to Spend Marketing Budget on High Quality Articles OR Link Building Services?
-
Greeting MOZ Community:
My site has 400 domains linking to it of which about 180 are toxic and 180 are suspicious according to a site audit from a reputable SEO firm. The SEO firm is offering link removal and link building services to remedy the situation.
My question is this: if I can create and post high quality blog articles on a very regular basis, will this in and of itself create high quality links to my site? If the articles are of exceptional quality can I post them elsewhere to earn quality links?
Does it make more sense to use my budget on paying a PR agency to create high quality articles and posting them on my blog or elsewhere rather than spending on an SEO link building campaign? Should I do both?
I plan on having the SEO firm remove toxic links and optimize content using Yoast. But I want to be careful about not wasting my budget if the links will develop naturally if I post the content online myself. I am more inclined to have an SEO pro work on creating links but why pay if I can do it myself.
Any thoughts?
Alan -
Quality content properly promoted is the ultimate link building strategy.
Consider how many artificial link building strategies from the past have eventually caused site owners problems.
I'd post to your site first and when I was sure it was indexed, re-purpose it for social media.
Best of luck!
-
**So assuming I can create content that is unique interesting and engaging, where should I post it? My website blog, Google+, Facebook, LinkedIn an off site blog? **
I post my articles on my own site only. I don't give them to anyone else. I want my site to be the go-to place for the topics that I write about. When I write an article my intent is that it will be the best on the web for that topic or truly exceptional for some aspect of that topic.
So if I can create the content, how do I address the issue of optimizing and submitting to the appropriate places. Would an SEO firm add value in this area assuming they are pros and only engage in white hat?
I have a blog that gets a few very short posts each day about industry news. These are simply a sentence or two about an interesting article and a link (these posts are noindexed btw but they do go on category pages). That blog has slowly accumulated thousands of subscribers. When I post a new article on my site I add a link to it in my news and that usually results in a blast of immediate traffic, shares etc.
I don't use social media myself. My visitors do that for me without an prompt, request or incentive from me. To make that happen you need content that they want to share.
Obviously I would prefer to allocate my budget to creating high value content and more of it. Which not hiring an SEO firm would allow me to do. But I don't wan to be penny wise and pound foolish.
You have to be honest with your self and have courage. Honest that your content is good enough to merit sharing. If it isn't then the method that I suggest will not be successful. And you must be brave enough to stay on this path long enough to let it start building.
-
No that is an interesting!!!
So assuming I can create content that is unique interesting and engaging, where should I post it? My website blog, Google+, Facebook, LinkedIn an off site blog?
So if I can create the content, how do I address the issue of optimizing and submitting to the appropriate places. Would an SEO firm add value in this area assuming they are pros and only engage in white hat?
Obviously I would prefer to allocate my budget to creating high value content and more of it. Which not hiring an SEO firm would allow me to do. But I don't wan to be penny wise and pound foolish.
-
As far as I'm concerned, SEO link building today is content creation and distribution (social, etc). So, to me it sounds like you are trying to choose between two of the same thing. What other link building services are there out there these days that doesn't violate Google's guidelines?
If you accept my premise, then your choice is simply whether you think a PR firm or an SEO firm would do a better job of making sure the content you are creating is as engaging as possible and reaches as many people as possible. It's all about creating remarkable content, building an audience, and trying to get social/search traffic (to further build your audience).
Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
If you have an article that is truly exceptional it can very slowly accumulate links as long as you have traffic into it. If the article is truly exceptional and it gets shared on social media that can sometimes be like throwing gasoline on a fire - but this best happens when the content topic is a bit provocative, surprising, funny, beautiful or possesses some other attribute that triggers sharing.
If you have an article that accumulates just two natural links per year that can become a major force over time. How? Because if you have two hundred of those articles on your site then you have four hundred natural quality links coming in per year and that is better than one new link every day.
Most important, the quality of the links that you will get from this are 10x as valuable as those produced by the typical linkbuilder. The typical linkbuilder is going to get you into a Penguin problem in his push to produce results. Now that is going to make most of the linkbuilders who read this reach straight for the thumbs down - but look around and see how many people come here crying about a Penguin problem and how many people come in here asking how to build links.
Most people will not take the content route, because exceptional content is really expensive and requires hard work. But if you go that route you will eventually have enough content on your site that its performance will be equal to having one of the most highly skilled linkbuilders working on your site full time 24x7.
This is how great content can defeat SEO over time. But most people will not try this because they fail in budget, creativity, content knowledge, time, patience or faith.
The greatest risks in taking this path is that your opinion of great content is set too low or you decide to start taking shortcuts. You need content that is of the same quality as an article on National Geographic, the New York Times or one of the many posts that you read on the Moz.com blog.
-
I don't have the best answer here for that, and look forward to others chiming in. I was just afraid you were going to spend money to have someone who didn't know your field write up content for you, and glad to hear that people involved in the industry are involved in the authorship.
-
Hi Keri:
Thanks for your response!!
Well i am writing the content and have a PR agency making it more engaging, incorporating a strong call to action organizing in order to create a piece which is very informative while at the same time being entertaining.
So would something that is written more skillfully create more quality links than an article created by an SEO firm, maybe being better optimized but not as engaging? DO I spend my budget on superb content or on good content by an SEO expert who may have a better idea of where to get links?
Thanks,
Alan
-
A bit cynical here, but would a PR agency be able to create high-quality content that's relevant to your industry? Or would your time and money (for that type of content) be better spent having someone with knowledge of your industry (perhaps in your company) writing and paying for an editor to polish the content?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are These Links Junk?
I hired an SEO to create incoming links to me website insisting that only white hat techniques be used. The SEO was highly recommended by a family friend. In 3 months about 14 links to my site were obtained. The URLs for the domains where the links originate are below. I paid $8,000 for the services of the SEO provider to create the links over 4 months. When I looked at the links more carefully I noticed that the sites did not seem to have owners. That there was no phone number, physical address and scant information about ownership. I also noticed that most pages had outgoing links of a promotional nature. Also, that content created for me had grammatical and occasional spelling errors. The links did not look bad in terms of MOZ domain authority and MOZ page authority, but when I went subscribed to AHREFS a few days ago and evaluated the links, I noticed that the URL rating (somewhat equivalent to MOZ page authority) was really low. Furthermore, noticed that one of the domains solicits paid links from gambling sites. The SEO who sourced the links on my behalf says he will explain why I "have nothing to worry about". Dividing his monthly fee by the number of links and I paid $571 per link. Is it possible the the below domains could have pages that I would want links from? Would these links be potentially worth more than a few hundred dollars? O are these sites more like a cheap PBN or maybe "the hoth". If the links are in fact good I would be delighted. But if they are of poor quality could I legitimately ask for a refund? Also, are these domains so bad that it is imperative for me to get the links removed? <colgroup><col width="198"></colgroup>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
| https://www.equities.com |
| http://www.realestaterama.com |
| https://moneyinc.com |
| https://homebusinessmag.com |
| http://digitalconnectmag.com |
| https://suburbanfinance.com/ |
| http://www.homebunch.com |
| http://inman.com |
| https://www.propertytalk.com/ |
| http://activerain.com |
| https://www.conservativedailynews.com/ |
| http://moneyforlunch.com/ |
| http://baltimorepostexaminer.com/ |
| https://www.tgdaily.com/ |
| |0 -
What's your Link Building Tactics?
So my question is: What's your Link Building Tactic. I always have a bit of a problem building links for my websites. Also Do you use some kind of a tool? If yes can you reccomend it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Angelos_Savvaidis0 -
Counting over-optimised links - do internal links count too?
To whit: In working out whether I've too many over-optimised links pointing to my homepage, do I look at just external links -- or also the links from my internal pages to my homepage? In other words, can a natural link profile from internal pages help dilute overoptimisation from external links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jeepster0 -
Building Backlinks to Backlinks?
Should I be building back links to my Back links, I have a fairly decent amount of guest post on decent to standard blogs and just wondered if I should be building a few medium quality back links to these. I can understand that I should just build all links to my website but there are a lot of opportunities on cheaper blogs such as little better than article submission sites which I would not really want my main site on would this help?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson1 -
Link building idea - Will it work?
The SEO agency I am working for are currently trying out a unique link building tactic that i was hoping for some feedback about. Basically, we have launched a Free SEO package, and have posted it across various established social media profiles. So far we have had about 20 sign up. We gain access to their site and provide them with 4 keywords that we will be working on, we do the necessary on page optimization to get them ranking. We will then perform some very basic link building tactics on their site. In exchange for our services, we will get the following: Firstly, we will place a link on their home page linking to our own site. Secondly, we will personally write content related to their site, create a new page within their site that will contain this article. We will then have a link from this article leading to one of our own client's sites. (paying customers) What do you guys think? The Free SEO client sites have minimum PR's of 2, and we are hoping to build a database of these free clients that will be responsible for boosting the ranking of our paying customers. Is there anything that could be improved with this technique?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danielblinman0 -
How Can Low Quality Links Be Removed?
Let's say that in looking in OSE that you find an overall low quality link profile. Let's say that some of those links were acquired by using article marketing systems like UAW or SEO Link Vine, which were hard hit in Penguin. Let's also say that some keywords were targeted within blog networks that passed a lot of page rank to targeted pages. Let's say that at one point in time an offshore link building team was used and they posted low quality blog comments on pages with hundreds of outbound links. Let's say as a result of the drop in SERPS that you've finally been convinced that there must be a better way and in the process join SEO Moz - and now you want to clean up the low quality link profile. How does one go about removing links on such a diverse number of sites? Are there best practices for how to remove links you longer want pointed to your site? Or is it simply best to go on about the work of building a lot of quality links and let the past be in the past? Thanks for your input Mozzers...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sdennison0 -
Dynamic Links vs Static Links
There are under 100 pages that we are trying to rank for and we'd like to flatten our site architecture to give them more link juice. One of the methods that is currently in place now is a widget that dynamically links to these pages based on page popularity...the list of links could change day to day. We are thinking of redesigning the page to become more static, as we believe it's better for link juice to flow to those pages reliably than dynamically. Before we do so, we need a second opinion.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RBA0 -
Link Architecture - Xenu Link Sleuth Vs Manual Observation Confusion
Hi, I have been asked to complete some SEO contracting work for an e-commerce store. The Navigation looked a bit unclean so I decided to investigate it first. a) Manual Observation Within the catalogue view, I loaded up the page source and hit Ctrl-F and searched "href", turns out there's 750 odd links on this page, and most of the other sub catalogue and product pages also have about 750 links. Ouch! My SEO knowledge is telling me this is non-optimal. b) Link Sleuth I crawled the site with Xenu Link Sleuth and found 10,000+ pages. I exported into Open Calc and ran a pivot table to 'count' the number of pages per 'site level'. The results looked like this - Level Pages 0 1 1 42 2 860 3 3268 Now this looks more like a pyramid. I think is is because Link Sleuth can only read 1 'layer' of the Nav bar at a time - it doesnt 'hover' and read the rest of the nav bar (like what can be found by searching for "href" on the page source). Question: How are search spiders going to read the site? Like in (1) or in (2). Thankyou!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DigitalLeaf0