Hit with Panda, but still confused
-
Back on March 24th I was hit with Panda. Pretty much all but my main keywords were hit and I was wiped off the board. Luckily I kept my rank with my main keyword which was part of my URL. I have been since trying to figure out what Google thought was spammy with my site. I made changes, but nothing changed except my main keyword. I have been confused as to why I still ranked well with my main keyword, but nothing else. I have read from several posts of others complaining about the same issue. Seeing some keyword rankings go down, but not all. I also have read that if Google thinks even one page is spammy it might effect my whole site.
Today I found a couple pages that might have been contributing to the low rankings. I am a scrabble based site and I had several pages that listed many words related to things like 2 letter words, 3 letter words, words that end and start with. These pages would contain from hundreds to over a thousand words and I was linking them all to my dictionary look up portion of my site. I have some other sites that do the same thing but not nearly as much as my main site and they were still doing just fine. I had over 3500 pages giving me warnings in my Pro Account about to many links on a page, but I have been ignoring it because I felt I was helping my users by giving them a less step in having to type the word to search. I have removed all these links except I found a couple pages that were still doing it. I just removed them so hopefully that helps this time.
My question is do I have to wait till the next panda refresh or just until the next time Google crawls my site to see the changes.
UPDATE: it is not 1.24.2013
It's been a while since I asked this question and just wanted to fill in on the updates and things I have done since then to maybe give some hope to all you penguinizers. My site https://www.wordgamedictionary.com/ has changed quite a bit since I posted this original question. I was hit on April 24th with Penguin and just was racking my brain trying to figure out what I did to get there. Here is some advice I have learned since then.
- Be Patient - Its going to be a long road to recover from it (I am still recovering almost 1 year later, but I am recovering)
- Don't Freak Out - Yeah it sucks when you income drops 50% in a matter of overnight, but you can change that.
- Check your back links (Yes this is beating a dead horse with a stick, but it's true)
- On page anchor link text - Are they over miss used keywords? Change that. Make it look natural
- For goodness sake! check for spelling errors
- ADD FRESH CONTENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would say about something new at least once a week. 3 to 4 is good (unless you are Q and A then you will have much more). Think to yourself "What would keep me coming back to my site?" If you don't have it, they add it
- Back links are not going to come to you unless you are creative. Sitting there thinking they are going to fall on your lap is dreaming.
- Back linking is nessary to stay ontop, but you can get them naturally. Experiment a ton and take risks. The more risks you take, the better chance you will eventually succeed.
Today I have almost fully recovered from Penguin, but what is awesome is that by taking the natural and pro active method to SEO I have actually increased my overall traffic to my site by double since April 24th. I am still recovering from the original keywords that I was hit at, but whats awesome is that I have gained so much traffic from other keywords that I ended up doubling my traffic.
The next time you think you know everything there is about SEO, slap yourself...because you don't
Some nice Link building articles I have found to be good
http://www.seobook.com/archives/001792.shtml
http://www.slideshare.net/RossHudgens/link-building-strategies-2013-edition-15477553
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/advanced-link-building-strategies/53439/
-
Hi Lilac,
This is an older thread, and it's probably best to start a new question on this topic rather than add to this older question. Thanks!
-
Hi all
I have been reading this with great interest. I have a client who has suddenly lost ranking for 2 keyword terms why others have remained solid. There are no anchor text links to this keyword. We only conducted on page work for them. There are only 7 linking root domains. The only thing that looks odd is multiple image links from a blog sub domain. Is this what you refer to as 'sitewide blogroll? Any help greatly appreciated. Karen
-
Thanks for updating this question!
-
Ah, ok, so April 24th was the date of the first Penguin hit. Penguin is less about on page quality and more about backlink quality.
Penguin usually affects just certain keywords though and not your whole site. Have a look at your backlink profile ranked by anchor text:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?site=www.freescrabbledictionary.com
I didn't delve into it deeply, but I notice that you've got 1018 links containing the word "scrabble dictionary" from just 12 sites. Do you have a sitewide blogroll somewhere? That can definitely trigger Penguin.
Unfortunately if this is a Penguin hit you've got an uphill battle. A quick look at your site shows lots of anchor texted comment spam. For any of those that are followed links you've got to get them removed.
We think the key to escaping Penguin is to clear up your backlinks ratio - so basically to get keyword anchor text changed to your url, removed or nofollowed.
Unfortunately, you can't recover from Penguin until there is a Penguin refresh and we've been waiting since the end of May for one!
Also look and see if you have warnings in your webmaster tools as this could be a factor. As your drop coincides with Penguin, it's likely Penguin, but you never know.
I found the canonical issue by looking at your source code.
-
I'm so sorry, didn't realize I said March. It was April 24th my rankings tanked. Also where did u see the canonical solver?
-
I've got a few thoughts for you Cesar.
Are you sure that your traffic drop happened around March 24? There was no known Panda refresh on that date. The closest dates were February 23 and April 11. If your drop happened March 24 then this is not Panda.
And it doesn't fit with Penguin either as Penguin didn't happen till April 24th.
Do you have any warnings in your webmaster tools? And if so, do the warnings have a yellow caution symbol next to them?
If not, if you had a drastic traffic drop March 24 you've got to look for other reasons such as a hosting problem, accidental noindexing, malware, canonical issues etc.
I just had a quick look at your site and you've got something unusual going on with your rel canonical. It points to www.yourdomain/solver, yet that page is not in the google index. Is there a reason you did this? I'm wondering if it would help to point the canonical on your home page simply to your home page.
-
If this is a Panda hit it's less likely to be about links and more likely to be about on site quality.
Plus, there's no point filing a reconsideration request if you've been hit with an algorithmic change. The reconsideration requests are for manual warnings in your webmaster tools.
-
Hi Cesar,
I have read your whole post and i came to conclusion is that you are using only one keyword for link building and i ma sure that Google consider that links as a unnatural links so you have to remove unnatural links which are given by Google, After removal all links you have to reconsider mail to Google. Google updates it's algorithm so it consider those links as a spam links which are coming from same sites for example you have getting 1000 links from single forum then it must be consider as a unnatural links. So remove all links and applied new strategies for link building which are produced by Google after these changes your site comes back with good position it takes time you did not get instant result but it works.
-
Cesar, I think you are missing something here!
Let me go step by step...
About your first confusing like why your many keywords go down but you are still ranking for one of your main keyword... well honestly Google’s penalty can be limited as well especially if you have a Big site it is fairly possible to have limited area to be affected by the update IMO.
Now the thing that you are missing here is links... it’s not only your on-site content (Although it’s good to remove the onsite errors as well) try to get in to links and see what low quality links are pointing to your website and remove them... try to build authority links and build new and great content to get out of the update...
It’s not really an easy and a quick job but to be honest until now this is the only thing to get out of Penguin!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Internal Links - First Link Rule Confusion
Hello All - I would like to create a guide for my team of rules for internal links and I could use some help. My understanding is that Google only counts the first link to a page, so any crafted keyword text links within the content do not count if the page in question is linked to from the main navigation. Is this correct? For example, if the menu or drop down menu in main site nav (which exists on all pages of the site) includes a link to a particular section that will be the only one that ever counts since the menu is on every page? Example: let's say a website selling cat toys includes a drop down menu on the homepage with links to "holiday cat toys". Does this mean that no other text links in content on the site will support that page from an SEO perspective since the link is in the main nav and will always be the first one counted? In the past we have added text links in the content on the homepage to important pages on the site. It seems to work, though now I'm questing these tactics based on the first link rule. I would appreciate some advice, clarification, thoughts, etc. Thanks!
Link Building | | JBMediaGroup0 -
Are niche directories still helpful as good links to have to help ranking in the serps?
Are niche directories still helpful as good links to have to help ranking in the serps or has Google discounted directories? The Niche directories that i would be using are not spammy at all and are quality sources of info. Thanks mozzers!
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Got a warning from Google but rankings still ok.. what to expect?
Yesterday I got THE warning from Google: "Dear site owner or webmaster of http://..., We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines. " It seems all my rankings are intact though. Some keywords got higher rankings, other dropped a little bit (-1, -2) but nothing unusual. My question is, since I got this warning, should I expect some sort of penalty soon? I see other webmasters who got their websites de-indexed after getting this warning so I'm quite concerned.
Link Building | | sbrault740 -
Is back linking still effective?
I know after the Panda update it seems that back linking is a no no but its hard to believe that its not still effective. What about paid links? Are there any trusted sites out there? Thoughts?
Link Building | | cbielich0 -
Traditional link requests still the right way?
Is the traditional way of link building wherein we send requests for two way or three way links still important? I feel posting articles, blog commenting, blog posting, forum commenting etc are better means to build links... but since I am still new to this industry I may be wrong. Please suggest.
Link Building | | KS__0 -
Is one way link exchange still worth?
I am new to link exchange do you think that by managing a link directory and start trying same subject industry good sties link exchange one way links is good idea ? do this still works ? I am seeing many competitors of me even do link exchange to non-subject industry site while i am sure that that shall not be worthy... But do you think that it worth to do link exchance with same industry sites ?
Link Building | | anand20100 -
Link-building / panda update!
Hi Mozers. WHat do you think, after panda-update, which is the best strategy to build links on Content, or blogspots, and it to website with a minimum PA40 and DA30 . . in which place is better to place, at the begining of article, or at the end of article, tell us some tips, if you are experiences on this section! Thanks,
Link Building | | leadsprofi0 -
Article Marketing - still valid if done right?
Much of the work I do tends to be on a lot of small to medium sized company websites, the kind of businesses that do not have thousands of pounds to spend or the budgets to create reems of quality content. That said, neither do the competition so one approach that has worked well in the past has been article marketing. The approach would usually be to develop some relevant content for the site itself, even if that is just a range of service type landing pages or answers to relevant customer problems and then build links from the article marketing sites (primarily ezinearticles.com). An average approach would be to write articles that are relevant to the individual services, for instance, problems that can be solved by the service and then to link these articles back to the service pages with the desired keywords in the anchor text. Another approach has been to develop an article with the client that solves a common customer problem for their own site and then to write a few summarised versions of the article for the article marketing sites. Again, with the intention of gathering traffic, giving a basic answer and linking back to the main article with the main keywords we wish to rank this page for. For smaller sites serving a fairly tight geographic area this approach, combined with submission to some quality directories (local and niche) has been a strong combo historically. I know there is a lot of junk on the article marketing sites and there could be negative affects from posting loads of pointless articles but using them properly, to broaden the net, provide answers (albeit summarised) and generate links - is this still a valid approach post the Google Farmers update? It may be interesting to see how the article sites like ezine have to tighten up the editorial process now and if the content becomes better across the board, it may possibly strengthen this approach over time. Do any of you still use article marketing as part of your SEO campaigns? If so, what are your strategies and where do you use? Would love to hear your thoughts folks. Marcus
Link Building | | Marcus_Miller0