Development site is live (and has indexed) alongside live site - what's the best course of action?
-
Hello Mozzers,
I am undertaking a site audit and have just noticed that the developer has left the development site up and it has indexed. They 301d from pages on old site to equivalent pages on new site but seem to have allowed the development site to index, and they haven't switched off the development site. So would the best option be to redirect the development site pages to the homepage of the new site (there is no PR on dev site and there are no links incoming to dev site, so nothing much to lose...)? Or should I request equivalent to equivalent page redirection?
Alternatively I can simply ask for the dev site to be switched off and the URLs removed via WMT, I guess...
Thanks in advance for your help!
-
Very pleased to have been of assistance
heres links to older threads where i asked similar before, for further verification and credit to those that originally helped me:
-
Thanks Amelia - yes you're definitely on the right lines - Dan's response below is v helpful too, that's for sure. I do struggle with developers from time to time, so teaching myself coding and so on via codeacademy, etc. - learnt at uni many years ago but v out of date! Will come in useful for SEO too.
-
Many thanks Dan - much appreciated - that process there makes perfect sense even though in my case too :)))) I will report back on progress in a month or so...
-
Yes a great answer there from Dan - and thanks for your useful input - good point re: not relying on robots.txt alone!
-
Thanks Robert and for the extra comments too !
I cant remember which Mozzer helped me with the above in the first place who should be credited but ill track down the original thread and add it to this post since also contains further info and discussion
All Best
Dan
-
Dan,
This is a very good answer. Just to emphasize, probably the most important piece with a "dev" site is the last one Dan mentions: Password protection. Once you clean up the issue, add it then you should not have the issue going forward.
Even with robots.txt on our dev sites and our design studio, we have had pages end up on the SERPS. Because of the DA of our design studio (where clients go to approve a comp, etc.) we recently had a new political client's comp ranking for a search term on page one. (Ahead of their actual site (we were building another to replace it). So, even with robots.txt, there is still no guarantee it will not be crawled.
Adding password protection will assist in that.Lastly, if you have someone building you a site, and they say they do not want to take down the dev version after your launch, tell them you do not wish to pay them. It will go down. That is unreasonable. I cannot think of a reason to keep the dev version live once the client site launches.
Again, good job Dan.
-
Hi
I'm in a similarish situation with a clients site.
Their situation is that the dev site is on a subdomain i.e. staging.domain.com and they want to keep the staging area active for demonstrating future development work, so situation may be slightly different from yours.
They have now blocked via robot.txt but that's like shutting the stable door after the horse has already bolted.
I asked Moz Q&A a few months ago and got the below answer from a few very helpful and wize Mozzers
-
Setup a completely different Webmaster Tools account unrelated to the main site, so that there
is a new W.T account specific to the staging area sub-domain -
Add a robots.txt on the staging area sub domain site that disallows all pages and all crawlers
OR use the no-index meta tag on all pages but Google much prefers Robots.txt usage for this
Note: Its very important when you update the main site it does not include or push out these files and
instructions too (since that would result in main site being de-indexed)-
Request removal of all pages in GWT. Leave the form field for the page to be removed blank,
since will remove all subdomain pages -
After about 1 month OR you see that the pages are all out of the Search Engine listings (SERPS),
and Google has spidered and seen the robots.txt, then put up a password on the entire staging
site.
Hope that helps
All Best
Dan
-
-
Hi Luke,
I'm interested in other responses to this question...
If I was in your position after seriously berating the dev I would make sure you disallow the dev site in your robots.txt and use webmaster tools to remove the URLs from the index. Then I would password protect the dev site so the search engines couldn't get there even if they try.
Like I say, I'm interested in other responses! This is what I would do, but I don't really know if it's definitely the right thing to do. Does anyone else have anything to add?
Best of luck - its crappy when someone else's error cocks up your work: when our site launched for the first time our IT department screwed up on a monumental scale by getting the DNS settings wrong.
Amelia
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Taxonomy question - best approach for site structure
Hi all, I'm working on a dentist's website and want some advice on the best way to lay out the navigation. I would like to know which structure will help the site work naturally. I feel the second example would be better as it would focus the 'power' around the type of treatment and get that to rank better. .com/assessment/whitening
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bee159
.com/assessment/straightening
.com/treatment/whitening
.com/treatment/straightening or .com/whitening/assessment
.com/straightening/assessment
.com/whitening/treatment
.com/straightening/treatment Please advise, thanks.0 -
Ranking 1st for a keyword - but when 's' is added to the end we are ranking on the second page
Hi everyone - hope you are well. I can't get my head around why we are ranking 1st for a specific keyword, but then when 's' is added to the end of the keyword - we are ranking on the second page. What could be the cause of this? I thought that Google would class both of the keywords the same, in this case, let's say the keyword was 'button'. We would be ranking 1st for 'button', but 'buttons' we are ranking on the second page. Any ideas? - I appreciate every comment.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Brett-S0 -
Something happened within the last 2 weeks on our WordPress-hosted site that created "duplicates" by counting www.company.com/example and company.com/example (without the 'www.') as separate pages. Any idea what could have happened, and how to fix it?
Our website is running through WordPress. We've been running Moz for over a month now. Only recently, within the past 2 weeks, have we been alerted to over 100 duplicate pages. It appears something happened that created a duplicate of every single page on our site; "www.company.com/example" and "company.com/example." Again, according to our MOZ, this is a recent issue. I'm almost certain that prior to a couple of weeks ago, there existed both forms of the URL that directed to the same page without be counting as a duplicate. Thanks for you help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wzimmer0 -
Sites still rank who don't seem like they should. Why?
So you've been MOZing and SEOing for years and we're all convinced of the 10x factor when it comes to content and ranking for certain search terms... right? So what do you do when some older sites that don't even produce content dominate the first page of a very important search term? They're home pages with very little content and have clearly all dabbled in pre Panda SEO. Surely people are still seeing this and wondering why?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wearehappymedia0 -
Why is /home used in this company's home URL?
Just working with a company that has chosen a home URL with /home latched on - very strange indeed - has anybody else comes across this kind of homepage URL "decision" in the past? I can't see why on earth anybody would do this! Perhaps simply a logic-defying decision?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Could this be seen as duplicate content in Google's eyes?
Hi I'm an in-house SEO and we've recently seen Panda related traffic loss along with some of our main keywords slipping down the SERPs. Looking for possible Panda related issues I was wondering if the following could be seen as duplicate content. We've got some very similar holidays (travel company) on our website. While they are different I'm concerned it may be seen as creating content that is too similar: http://www.naturalworldsafaris.com/destinations/africa-and-the-indian-ocean/kenya/suggested-holidays/the-wildlife-and-beaches-of-kenya.aspx http://www.naturalworldsafaris.com/destinations/africa-and-the-indian-ocean/kenya/suggested-holidays/ultimate-kenya-wildlife-and-beaches.aspx http://www.naturalworldsafaris.com/destinations/africa-and-the-indian-ocean/kenya/suggested-holidays/wildlife-and-beach-family-safari.aspx They do all have unique text but as you can see from the titles, they are very similar (note from an SEO point of view the tabbed content is all within the same page at source level). At the top level of the holiday pages we have a filtered search:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KateWaite
http://www.naturalworldsafaris.com/destinations/africa-and-the-indian-ocean/kenya/suggested-holidays.aspx These pages have a unique introduction but the content snippets being pulled into the boxes is drawn from each of the individual holiday pages. I'm just concerned that these could be introducing some duplicating issues. Any thoughts?0 -
Google can't access/crawl my site!
Hi I'm dealing with this problem for a few days. In fact i didn't realize it was this serious until today when i saw most of my site "de-indexed" and losing most of the rankings. [URL Errors: 1st photo] 8/21/14 there were only 42 errors but in 8/22/14 this number went to 272 and it just keeps going up. The site i'm talking about is gazetaexpress.com (media news, custom cms) with lot's of pages. After i did some research i came to the conclusion that the problem is to the firewall, who might have blocked google bots from accessing the site. But the server administrator is saying that this isn't true and no google bots have been blocked. Also when i go to WMT, and try to Fetch as Google the site, this is what i get: [Fetch as Google: 2nd photo] From more than 60 tries, 2-3 times it showed Complete (and this only to homepage, never to articles). What can be the problem? Can i get Google to crawl properly my site and is there a chance that i will lose my previous rankings? Thanks a lot
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | granitgash
Granit FvhvDVR.png dKx3m1O.png0 -
Huge Google index on E-commerce site
Hi Guys, Refering back to my original post I would first like to thank you guys for all the advice. We implemented canonical url's all over the site and noindexed some url's with robots.txt and the site already went from 100.000+ url's indexed to 87.000 urls indexed in GWT. My question: Is there way to speed this up?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ssiebn7
I do know about the way to remove url's from index (with noindex of robots.txt condition) but this is a very intensive way to do so. I was hoping you guys maybe have a solution for this.. 🙂0