EMD vs brand? I'm new to moz
-
Hi to all
so this is my first month using moz tools. When I check my competitors and keywords, everyone close to google #1 is a emd site
But with google always getting smarter, is it smart in order to compete to get an emd?
So say I rank first page #9, or not at all for my brand, if since my site is a construction site, if instead of say abc construction.com I find colorado home builders.com etc would I maybe do better? Or would google give me a bad ranking?
I am just so lost?
One last question? If I did build a emd site then just pointed my brand to it, would this be good or stupid for seo?
thank you for all advice and tips
chris
-
Thanks for the answers, EGOL and Andy. Really appreciate the time you both spend in here!
-
But its hard to know what is right and what is wrong. For years a phone book is all we needed, now we want to be found.
I understand. When I was starting out I spent a lot of time reading the basics of SEO. Moz has lots of resources for people who are learning. You can read the beginner's guide and ask questions here. It is also a good idea to record the changes that you make on your site, what works, what doesn't and use that as a source of learning.
The most valuable thing that I did was to start a site and then hire an experienced person to do a study and review. That person spend a couple hours learning about my business, looking at my website and then gave me an opinion of what I might do. That kept me going down the right road. Still, now, after about ten years and a nice amount of experience, I am still working on websites and still getting paid advice from people who are smarter than me and people who think differently than me and people who know how to do technical work that I don't want to spend time learning. I do 98% of the work myself but smarts, opinions and tech savvy from others are very important.
-
Thank you for the help.
It is truly appreciated.
This is why I am here in the first place to try and learn seo stuff, and Moz seems to be the best site around. So I am playing around with the tools and such, and it is all very scary, and confusing.
Like do I go with wordpress for a construction website that does not get updated very often because it needs new content, or is this exactly what Google wants, new content? So create content to stay afloat and survive the rankings game?
Basically I feel like I am at the bottom of the food chain with all of these big brands, with big advertising dollars eating companies up left and right for online rankings.
I understand that a site must be made for visitors first, then maybe Google. But its hard to know what is right and what is wrong. For years a phone book is all we needed, now we want to be found.
If I may ask, and this is left field - I have two Google + pages. Business and Local. Is it smarter to create posts and get likes and followers for the Business page or Local Page? I have read they may combine them one day, so don't worry about it much, yet I feel like I am in a boat that has a hole in it, so again just trying to survive.
Thank you again so very very much
Chris
-
I'm just a small local company trying to survive.
If this is the case... if you get most of your business from a certain city then you should be putting your time and brains and effort into local search.
** if a company has facebook likes, twitter posts, great backlink profile and content, then you should be able to go by whatever domain I would think?**
You have to beat your competitors by having a stronger web presence. The domain is only part of it or maybe none of it. Right now if people know you by our name and you plan to remain a small local company then your name might be a better choice of domain... like EgolsConstruction.com. I might not use that (or ColoradoGarageBuilders.com) if I was a younger person because I might decide to build homes or barns or do paving someday... and people who want those services might say.... :"EgolsGarages.com"... don't get them, they can build garages but would probably screw up building a house. Keyword domains can be very limiting.
I know a guy who does roofing in my community who has no web presence, does not advertise, does not give estimates, doesn't even have a truck with his name on it and he is flooded with work because he has been in business a long time and has done great work and everybody knows him.
The sign of an established business is a good reputation and immediate access to lots of work. You don't even need a website, in fact it might cause phone calls and queries that eat your time.
-
Wow great insight.
i have a lot to learn and I am truly grateful for your help. The reason I used the example as I did is because with using these moz tools if I put the state at the end, it showed traffic. If I put the state in the beginning, it showed a competition percent of 29, but no traffic.
so if I may venture to say, if a company has facebook likes, twitter posts, great backlink profile and content, then you should be able to go by whatever domain I would think? So maybe emd are helpful, but if you do not bring it, somebody else will.
As I research I find sites in my competition that do not even have the name colorado or term searched showing, yet they have a huge national following.
I'm just a small local company trying to survive.
-
a few years ago he is quoted to have said how Google was going to crack down on EMD's
Matt did say that and Google did do that. But they mainly hit EMDs that had crap content. EMDs that had robust content were not really hurt. The value of the EMD might have been diminished a bit but they are still slightly favored.
Slightly favored means that they will rank well in low competition with few links, however, against major competition the advantage is very small. They still have to earn their position.
I think to myself, as long as I get a good social, link, and content profile, I am going to compete with them.
If they have any strength at all that will not happen. I advocate EMDs but not for that reason. If you think you can buy an EMD and loaf, you will be disappointed.
I think that domain sounds spammy. Very few people are going to type "garage builder colorado" into search. That is the exact match. What will it get you? Sounds like somebody talking who doesn't know proper English. I would not use it. It sounds like a spammy domain and not the domain of a business.
I would use ColoradoGarageBuilders.com if I owned a business that lived up to that name by building garages all over Colorado. buildergaragescolorado and garagebuildercolorado are domains registered because somebody wants to stuff keywords. Just my two cents and personal opinions.
-
Thank you for your thoughts.
I guess my main worry is that I have Google + local, and Business, Facebook, twitter and social stuff that all point to my main brand, which is my business name. Yet there other sites, for years have never left the #1 through 4 positions just based on having so many keywords in their domain name.
Now these are not keyword-keyword-keyword.com These are like garagebuilderscolorado type of domains. So when you type in a variations of this name, the site is always ranked well. Even though a company might be 123 enterprise or whatever.
I am just nervous because I watch Matt Cutts video's almost to the point where I look at him like the all knowing Google prophet. So if he says something, do it. So here a few years ago he is quoted to have said how Google was going to crack down on EMD's so I'm like well if they are doing it, I'm going to do it. Say I buy the un-plural version of the EMD. So in this example, which is completely an example, I go and get garagebuildercolorado to compete with garagebuilderscolorado. I think to myself, as long as I get a good social, link, and content profile, I am going to compete with them.
But this whole thing seems like a chess match. I am just trying to rank at a state level. Colorado is my state. So by adding Colorado to a keyword domain name seems smart, yet now with Google Local, maybe it does not matter?
I just thought well I will get a EMD, and then point my company domain to it. So people will still find me by company name, maybe those backlinks follow a pointed domain, and play this game of keyword rich domains?
Again I appreciate all of your thoughts and advice. I am new to the tools here, and I am having fund with them.
Chris
-
I use all EMDs and have spent good money to obtain them. I believe that they compete better if you place good content on them. In my opinion they convert better and are easier remembered by your visitors.
It is really hard to create a brand if you are competing nationally or globally, however, an EMD can make it easier for you to be remembered, in my opinion.
A lot of people think that EMDs are penalized. In my opinion that is BS. They still give some advantage if you have the Exact Match Domain and not a partial match or an exact match and a word. If I thought that EMDs were penalized or any disadvantage I would be out of them, instead they are kicking butts.
Most important, the EMD gives me mental energy to work on the site. If I have that the competition is in trouble.
I think that you are going to get a lot of "opinions" on this question.
-
Hi Chris,
There is a lot to consider in the purchase of a domain, but you will not get any SEO benefit from having an EMD to a brand. Your positions are all to do with how good your site, content and link profile are.
The trouble with your example of an EMD, is that this then means you are completely tied to that as you move forward. Google have also started to give preference to Brand vs EMD, so I would say you should purchase the brand domain and then work on getting that brand known.
I hope this helps a little.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Thousands of 404's showing up from Wordpress Blog!?!?
Hey guys, Have recently seen thousands of 404 errors thrown up from my wordpress blog in Google Search Console. These are URL's trying to link (i'm not sure where from) to other parts of my site, but they are not relative to the site root... infact they are a mix of random folders/subfolders and pages on my site. E.g: http://www.MYSITE.co.uk/blog/how-to/driving-to-the-alps/attachment/2013-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-front-snow-1/st-martin-de-belleville/chalet-st-martin-de-belleville/ski-holidays/ski-holidays/summer/st-martin-de-belleville/summer/your-stay-st-martin-de-belleville.html This is a link to a picture on the blog: http://www.MYSITE.co.uk/blog/how-to/driving-to-the-alps/attachment/2013-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-front-snow-1/ And the rest of it is finding it's own way there! Any ideas? This is Wordpress by the way. Cheers, Paul. p.s. I got no help from the Wordpress community so am posting here! p.p.s I forgot to mention that MOZ is reporting these issues too, but running Screaming Frog does NOT show any 404's at all on my site...
On-Page Optimization | | SnowTrippin0 -
Proper Use and Interpretation of new Query/Page report
When I'm in WMT/Search Console - I start a process of looking at all of the data initially unfiltered Then I select a query. Let's say its a top query for starters and I filter my results by that top query (exactly) With the filter on, I flip over to Pages and I get about a dozen results. When I look at this list, I get the normal variety of output: impressions, clicks, CTR, avg. position One thing that seems a bit odd to me is that most of the average positions for each of the URLs displayed is about the same. Say they range from 1.0 to 1.3. Does this mean that Google is displaying the dozen or so URLs to different people and generally in the 1st or 2nd position. Does this mean that my dozen or so pages are all competing with each other for the same query? On one hand, if all of my dozen pages displayed most of the time in the SERP all at the same time, I would see this as a good thing in that I would be 'owning' the SERP for my particular query. On the other hand, I'm concerned that the keyword I'm trying to optimize a particular page for is being partially distributed to less optimized pages. The main target page is shown the most (good) and it has about a 15x better CTR (also good). But all together, the other 11 pages are taking in around 40% of impressions and get a far lower CTR (bad). Am I interpreting this data correctly? Is WMT showing me what pages a particular query sends traffic to? Is there any way to extract the keywords that a particular page receives? When I reset my query and then start by selecting a specific page (exact match) and then select queries - is this showing my the search queries that drove traffic to that page? Is there a 'best practices' process to try to target a keyword to a specific page so that it gets more than the 60% of impressions I'm seeing now? Obviously I don't want to do a canonical because each keyword goes to many different pages and each page receives a different mix of keywords. I would think there would be a different technique when your page has an average position off of page 1.
On-Page Optimization | | ExploreConsulting0 -
Content hidden behind a 'read all/more..' etc etc button
Hi Anyone know latest thinking re 'hidden content' such as body copy behind a 'read more' type button/link in light of John Muellers comments toward end of last year (that they discount hidden copy etc) & follow up posts on Search Engine Round Table & Moz etc etc ? Lots of people were testing it and finding such content was still being crawled & indexed so presumed not a big deal after all but if Google said they discount it surely we now want to reveal/unhide such body copy if it contains text important to the pages seo efforts. Do you think it could be the case that G is still crawling & indexing such content BUT any contribution that copy may have had to the pages seo efforts is now lost if hidden. So to get its contribution to SEO back one needs to reveal it, have fully displayed ? OR no need to worry and can keep such copy behind a 'read more' button/link ? All Best Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
What's better for SEO a page per review or a page with all reviews?
Was wondering what's better for SEO. We have a platform where consumers can read and write reviews. But the question is: is it better to give one page per company with all the reviews on it? Or should we have different pages for the specific company? Example: Itunes has a company page with all reviews on the page, but not the whole review. You have to click further to view the whole review (new page), at the moment this the current situation. What if we place the whole reviews on the company page, so you don't have specific pages for the reviews? Hopefully can someone help us out. Contact me if it's not clear or you want more extended information. Kind regards
On-Page Optimization | | MozzieJr0 -
A Bazaar 10 Days In WMT & Moz
Hey All, Just wondering if anyone else has experienced anything like this or has any idea what happen to one of my sites last week. I have a lot of question and unanswered weirdness that seems to be occurring in the data. It kind of plays out like this. Noticeable drop off in organic SE traffic WMT kicks out 70% of my structured schema data Moz drops DA to 14 from 17 Moz MR drops from 3.50 to 2.74 Total Indexed pages (as per SEOQuake tool bar) Drops from 500 to 224 All the images submitted via a sitemap have been unindexed according to WMT. This only a 3 month old web site with a minimal back linking profile, we're talking less than 100. No one has been working on the site, the only thing that has happen in the last month is blog post being posted. All unique content and well formatted. Then at the beginning of this week I saw traffic increasing again, and this was confirmed when WMT updated and I got my Moz update. All schema data back in WMT, with no acknowledgement of the drop; the graph just continues in a steady rise as tho nothing happened. Traffic back up to normal levels, as tho nothing happened. I have noticed a 100% increase in the amount of pages being blocked by robots.txt, I haven't changed it, nor has anyone else, it has been the same since the site was launched. I'm hoping that Moz will put the DA and MR back to where they were, and no damage will be done.\ But my question is, What the hell happened? It nearly wiped the site of the face off the earth for 10 days, how do I find out what did it, why and stop it from happening again? I have noticed the number of pages indexed by google, as quoted by SEOquake tool bar not WMT regularly jumps from anywhere from 200 to 500, Any ideas? I know their are many different elements at play here, where do I start, I can't sit back and hop it never happens again. Thank you to anyone that wants to roll their sleeves up and have ago at this one. Best, IAn
On-Page Optimization | | cookie7770 -
Best practice for introducing new landing page to my site?
I have a client, and want to know the best way to add new, keyword specific landing pages to their site and link to it in a logical way that isn't spammy. Example: My homepage targets “Adelaide Cars” I also want to target “Melbourne Cars” which I would do via a targeted landing page. How then would I logically link to this landing page? As Google gets better at spotting un-natural content, I’d like to know how to introduce this new page to get the best traction. If I was to just create the page, it would not make sense to have it in the main navigation. Same goes from various industry type terms. Eg. pest control and exterminator. How do you target both and still have a logical sitemap and page structure that Google will like and make sense to users.
On-Page Optimization | | letgo3450 -
New website launch - Dupilicate content question
Hi, We are going to be launching a US version of our UK E-commerce web store. The US version will be a standalone site, separate URL/hosting etc. My question is that the US website will carry the same products as the UK site - will the product copy have to be written differently for the US website in order to avoid any SEO duplicate copy? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | WalesDragon0 -
Should I bother with branded keywords in my onsite SEO improvements?
Someone recently told me that using branded keywords extensively in your copy and titles may be unnecessary so long as you have a substantial catalog of back links containing keyword rich anchor text. Can I take this to mean I can privilege non-branded terms over branded in my onsite SEO efforts?
On-Page Optimization | | bbelgard0