Eligible To Rank For Few Queries
-
I can't figure out why this site (www.liveathomeseniors.com) is eligible for so few search queries on Google Webmaster Tools. I know there is a lot of work to be done, but this is my biggest puzzle right now. What am I not seeing? 379 pages are indexed and yet the site is has only been deemed eligible to rank for 3 queries over the past 3 months. Is it all the repetition in the way the content has been structured?
I'd appreciate people's thoughts on this. I can't see the forest for the trees.
Donna
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke. Very helpful. Much appreciated.
-
Yes, "eligible to rank" and "competitive enough to rank" are the key differences.
This site is not competitive enough to rank for the very very general terms that are in the title tags of the posts.
Plus, as I pointed out above this site has a lot of very very thin content and that could have its rankings reduced because of a panda problem.
Getting to actionable items... If this was my site I would....
-
delete all of the pages that have just a few sentences and a link to another website... and stop creating them
-
start writing posts that focus on very specific topics that will not face enormous competition and have title tags that consist of a few very common words
-
any post that I did write would be deep, substantive, beefy content
And, I would evaluate if search is the best place to get traffic for this type of website. Commiserative topics can pull traffic much more effectively from social media rather than search.... but then you have a community that might be viewed as an alternative to the service that this site seems to be selling.
I don't offer SEO services to others because I am fully committed to my own sites. But if I did offer SEO services and the owner of this site asked me to help, I would decline because I don't see an easy way to bring her ROI.
-
-
This may be just a matter of semantics but when you say "eligible to rank", it sounds a bit odd. GWT shows you the terms for which your site has been present on a search result page that the searcher has viewed. GWT does not determine eligibility--it reflects results determined by the algorithm. If GWT shows that your site is being seen by searchers for only 3 terms, it means that for only three different terms has someone searched and your site was on a result page that they viewed.
GWT would probably show that your site showed up for more search terms if visitors searching for terms relevant to your pages/posts clicked through 20 or 50 or 100 pages of search results--but of course they don't do that, they only click through to page 1 or 2 or 3. The issue we were trying to help you recognize above is that by organizing and choosing your concepts and your keywords better (better optimizing) your other pages will rise from page 20 or 50 or 100 to page 1 or 2 or 3 and thus be seen by more people. When that becomes the case, your GWT will reflect that by showing the additional search terms that the algorithm deemed your pages were worth pushing to the top of the results.
-
"You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable."
-
Moz just prompted me to decide whether my question has been answered or not. I don't think I've been clear in my question.
My question is about Google Webmaster Tools. Why is www.liveathomeseniors.com not eligible to rank for more than just 3 queries? I realize there is much that can be done to improve the site from a SEO perspective, and I can see that the site has been indexed - including a lot of duplicate pages. Yet it only shows up as being eligible to rank for three queries:
- "live at home seniors" with an average ranking of 1
- "seniors living at home" with an average ranking of 40; and
- "indemnity plans" with an average ranking of 450.
I also realize GWT only shows us a sampling of queries, but feel I should be seeing more queries showing up after the site has been in existence for more than year. Any ideas or suggestions as to why this might be happening?
-
In a very simplistic way, Google sees your page something vaguely like the following list. This list indicates the words used on http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/can-family-caregivers-deal-feeling-overwhelmed/ and the number of times they're used. As is normal with most pages, at the top of the list are all the articles and conjunctions, etc. After that, there's usually a grouping of vocabulary that directly relevant to your topic. In this case, I see "family", "overwhelmed", "overwhelm" and "caregiver". With that info, I'll do a couple of other things: 1. look to see how much of the rest of the vocabulary relates directly to any or all of those terms (the more there is, higher the content quality and in this case there is almost none). 2. Look to see how well crafted the page's title tag is 3. Do a search for those terms and see who's competing at the top of the search results for those terms. If you do that search, you'll see the caliber of the pages you're competing against. Overall, pages on the site are only vaguely optimized for search.
With all of that said, the words are still only part of the battle for search visibility. Google also wants to see that people find a site relevant and important for the topics around which it is optimized. Back links and social activity are what you need to make the site strong enough to rise above competitors who are already ranking for your primary terms.
18 i
13 the
12 to
9 you
9 and
8 that
8 of
8 a
7 t
6 was
6 take
6 do
5 time
5 family
4 overwhelmed
4 overwhelm
4 on
4 make
4 feeling
4 didn
4 caregiver
4 care
3 yourself
3 when
3 what
3 self
3 overcome
3 my
3 like
3 jane
3 it
3 in
3 have
3 choices
3 can
3 by
3 buried
2 your
2 winter
2 video
2 something
2 snow
2 see
2 permission
2 out
2 minutes
2 meier
2 me
2 learned
2 if
2 heavy
2 hamilton
2 give
2 for
2 bush
2 be
2 at
2 as
2 action
2 about
1 would
1 with
1 wiser
1 will
1 while
1 we
1 way
1 visiting
1 understand
1 under
1 too
1 times
1 thought
1 this
1 think
1 things
1 there
1 than
1 talk
1 social
1 so
1 since
1 share
1 s
1 remember
1 recognize
1 realize
1 please
1 perhaps
1 path
1 partners
1 own
1 never
1 needed
1 myself
1 more
1 missed
1 maybe
1 many
1 making
1 made
1 lot
1 little
1 link
1 layers
1 laughter
1 joy
1 join
1 irritable
1 importance
1 hope
1 here
1 helpful
1 hadn
1 had
1 given
1 get
1 frustration
1 frantic
1 founder
1 focus
1 find
1 felt
1 feel
1 favorite
1 everything
1 even
1 enjoyment
1 end
1 done
1 don
1 doesn
1 difference
1 deal
1 days
1 day
1 d
1 could
1 control
1 completed
1 click
1 channel
1 caregivers
1 burdened
1 brings
1 blog
1 being
1 before
1 are
1 any
1 an
1 among
1 all
1 agree
1 absolutely -
The highest numbers that I see for my sites in that column is 10. Nice to know that higher numbers are possible.
-
Thanks for sticking with this EGOL.
"A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query."
Then I'm not understanding what "average position" means because on other sites, I'm seeing numbers in that column that range from 1 to 750. Is it the average placement for:
- every page on your your site that's eligible to rank for that term, considering of course, personalization and location;
- every page on any site that's eligible to rank for that term; or
- something else altogether?
I searched GWMT looking for an answer and it's not clear (to me anyway) there either.
-
A query will be listed in Google Webmaster Tools when you have a page that competes in the top ten on the web for that query. Considering two things: 1) the enormous number of websites that compete for the words in the queries that I listed above; and, 2) the small amount of authority possessed by the site that we are discussing, I don't find it surprising that it is only in the top ten for a very small number of queries.
I agree that three is pretty small, but most of the title tags have nothing but extremely common words and that puts them in competition with milllions of other sites. They will not be in the Google Top Ten.
The other possibilities are:
-
the site is extremely weak (this is true in my opinion and it compounds the common keyword problem)
-
the site has a panda problem because of thin content. I found a lot of pages on the site that were really thin content. Here are a few. I could find a lot more.
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/learn-about-home-health-care/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/keep-your-aging-parents-safe-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/managed-care-at-home/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/why-hire-a-geriatric-care-manager/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/optimal-aging/
http://www.liveathomeseniors.com/exercise-keeps-aging-brains-healthy-see-more-evidence/
A lot of these types of pages will tank a site. I would stop making them and get rid of the ones that exist.
-
-
Thank you EGOL and Chris Menke for taking the time to look at the site and giving me your thoughtful responses. It's much appreciated.
I realize it's an uphill battle with this site and that the site author is competing with herself in many instances, but I'm wondering why when I look at Google Webmaster Tools (GWMT), she's not even showing up for many search queries. I know GWMT only shows us a sampling, but surely she's eligible to rank for more than just the 3 queries it's showing me now after more than a year in operation. That's why I think I'm missing something.
-
It may seem counter intuitive, but often, the way to get more traffic to a site is to narrow down the topics that you focus on. The broader your topics, the harder it becomes to come across as an authority--and it's all about authority--to your audience and to Google. The topics you cover on your site are broad, diverse and competitive, making the job of being visible for any of them triple tough.
Its nice to be able to write about your passion but when it comes to creating something that you want other people to find in search engines, there's a lot to keep in mind as you're writing. In addition to everything else, you have to think about your competition. With each page you create, you have to carefully consider the key concept you are writing about, what words you are using as your key concept, how reflective of the key concept is the vocabulary used in the body of the copy, how many other authors have also written about such a key concept, and how people actually search for such a key concept. All those things help with your visibility. If you haven't read it yet, this is a good guide on how to do keyword research.
-
I can't see the forest for the trees.
I looked at the title tags of the content and I think that they are in that forest of trees.
For example..... these titles....
What could you do to bring joy to your heart?
Gifts of Family Memories
Medicare Open Enrollment 2013: Part D Prescription Drug
Keeping Your Aging Parents Safe at Home
Learn About Home Health Care
The topics of these blog posts are either: A) composed of very common words that do not distinguish them in search; or, B) go up against an enormous enormous number of other pages on extremely powerful sites with the same words.
You are in a forest of trees that are really hard to tell apart or in a haystack with so many pieces of hay that getting yours showing up at the top of the search engines is going to be improbable.
Pulling in traffic from search with the types of titles that you currently have is going to be very difficult for a small site without a lot of power. To generate traffic from search, in my opinion, will require writing about topics and titles that have some more unique words that still have search volume.
I used to live in a tiny tiny town and someone asked me about getting a brand new site ranked for "gift baskets". There were almost zero customers who would drive to the town to purchase one. That left national search competition to obtain traffic. There are so so so many sites selling gift baskets that the resources required to become competitive would be enormous. Even going after long tail queries would be extremely hard because the web is so flooded with competitors. That, in my opinion, is what you are facing for these "common word" and "massive competition" queries.
Figure out a way to find topics that are not so crowded and competitive. Some of the current blog posts might be able to be retitled or refocused but it is probably better to build from scratch than recreate.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the risk of changing underscores to hyphens in URLs that are ranking
Client wants to change URL structure from underscores to hyphens - reason for doing this is a cosmetic move. What is the risk of changing underscores to hyphens for URLs that that have been around since 2012 and have a lot of keywords ranking in the top 5 in the SERPS? When the created the site - they structured the URL using dashes and underscores. Here is an example of what an URL looks like: /programs-degrees**/clinical-psychology/clinical_phd_kansas****-city****/** *This page ranks for many high volume keywords in the top 5 of the SERPS. I have started to compile a list on why the URL should not be changed... Building trust and authority from scratch 301 redirects do not pass 100% of the link juice 301 redirecting from underscored to hyphenated versions of the same content is an unnecessary risk to some of that link equity. Good chance rankings/traffic will drop because of the URL change
Technical SEO | | The-frank-Agency0 -
Homepage Domain not Ranking, only subpages is?
What do you think can be causing issues that my main homepage is not showing on search results for the main search terms, only my sub-pages are showing up like the reservations page. ps. I did not get a manual penalty action email. Thanks,
Technical SEO | | EVERWORLD.ENTERTAIMENT0 -
Unstable ranking
Hello, I own a website wich lately (since like few months ago) have a unstable ranking, I mean that one day I get 800 organic visits (good sells) and then a week when organic visits fall to 700,600,500,400.. then up again Why does this happen? I am lossing ranking :S site : todorepuestoselectro(dot)com Thank you very much im learning a lot here!
Technical SEO | | matiw0 -
Sudden Drop in Keyword Rankings
We launched http://www.manufacturedfun.com/ earlier this year and had been ranking 1 & 2 on Google SERPs for the keywords we optimized, but last week we experienced a sudden drop in rankings that pretty much took us off the radar. For instance, 'popcorn machines' went as far back as page 5 and 'popcorn poppers' dropped even further to page 9. We are currently working on fixing the numerous Duplicate Page Title and Duplicate Page Content errors identified by SEOmoz, but since we have had those for about 6 months and ranked well anyway, I wonder if there's something else that we are missing. Any insight you can offer will be sincerely appreciated. Thank you!
Technical SEO | | GRIP-SEO0 -
URL query considered duplicate content?
I have a Magento site. In order to reduce duplicate content for products of the same style but with different colours I have combined them on to 1 product page. I would like to allow the pictures to be dynamic, i.e. allow a user to search for a colour and all the products that offer that colour appear in the results, but I dont want the default product image shown but the product image for that colour applying to the query. Therefore to do this I have to append a query string to the end of the URL to produce this result: www.website.com/category/product-name.html?=red My question is, will the query variations then be picked up as duplicate content: www.website.com/category/product-name.html www.website.com/category/product-name.html?=red www.website.com/category/product-name.html?=yellow Google suggest it has contingencies in its algorithm and I will not be penalised: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2007/09/google-duplicate-content-caused-by-url.html But other sources suggest this is not accurate. Note the article was written in 2007.
Technical SEO | | BlazeSunglass0 -
How do I get my keyword rankings to update?
My keyword rankings did not update. It says updates every Thursday and the last update shows as Aug 23 (which was the original update). Any idea why this would happen and how I can get the updated info?
Technical SEO | | pattersonla1 -
Rankings Dropped Dramatically
Hi All, I need some advice on this one, one of our websites is performing very badly and I am lost to know why. We migrated from an old website www.myclient.co.uk and re-directed to www.myclient.com. The issue we had was that the old site relied on search results i.e. www.myclient.co.uk/search+villas+in+marbella However most ranked url's were not as tidy as the example above and had lots of characters. Because of this and the fact that all incoming links were to the homepage we do not carry out any 301 re-directs. In some keywords we have increased our rankings but for others we have dropped dramatically. keyword 1 4th Jan position 22 9th Jan position 90 keyword 2 4th jan position 34 9th jan position 89 keyword 3 4th jan position 12 9th jan position 16 (a smaller drop than the others) We do have some top 10s for this domain so I don't think we have been penalised for anything but I am shocked to see such drops in rankings. I have setup the website so that each page targets different keywords and I have checked and they get A grades within SEOmoz. Any advice would be really appreciated, as the client is not too happy at the moment. Many thanks Andy
Technical SEO | | iprosoftware0 -
Does ViewState affect SEO Rankings
We are redesigning our website and looking at our large data in the viewstate hidden field. Our thoughts are to move to bottom of page but our developers are stating this is an old myth and no resent documentation if it improves our SEO. Does ViewState (big data in hidden fields ) effect SEO in any way? If ViewState (hidden field) is present at the end of HTML document instead of near the start of HTML document then will it increase our ranking in search engines? Does Google or any other engine read the hidden fields? or do they ignore them? Can you point me to some valid documentation to back this up? Feed back is appreciated. Cathy
Technical SEO | | SEO-Team0