Longevity of robot.txt files on Google rankings
-
This may be a difficult question to answer without a ton more information, but I'm curious if there's any general thought that could shed some light on the following scenario I've recently heard about and wish to be able to offer some sound advice:
An extremely reputable non-profit site with excellent ranking had gone through a re-design and change-over into WordPress. A robots.txt file was used during development on the dev site on the dev server.
Two months later it was noticed through GA that traffic was way down to the site. It was then discovered that the robot.txt file hadn't been removed and the new site (same content, same nav) went live with it in place. It was removed and a site index forced. How long might it take for the site to re-appear and regain past standing in the SERPs if rankings have been damaged. What would the expected recovery time be?
-
They were paying attention to GA but lapsed and when they checked back in, saw a drop in traffic. Great point about that "critical" message.. The developers did force a crawl and I'm hoping you are correct about the time it might take.
-
Thank you methodicalweb. Great suggestions.
-
Thanks, Travis. You've offered a lot of very interesting points.
I will double-check that they have looked at the server log files, but I'm pretty confident that they have done that.
They did assure me that the proper redirects were done but I'm not sure what they did regarding extensions. There was also a server change.....
-
Thanks for clarifying KeriMorgret. Much appreciated. As are all your thoughts. I will definitely suggest that the monitoring software be used to avoid any future problems. This was such an unnecessary and frustrating experience.
-
If they were paying attention to WMT they would have seen a "critical" message that the site was blocked right away. Forcing a crawl (crawl all urls) should result in the site getting indexed extremely quickly. Rankings should return to where they were before.
-
The only thing I would add to the existing responses, is that if following a "site:www.mysite.com" query you notice that some key landing pages haven't been indexed then submit them via Webmaster Tools (Fetch as Google).
I would also make sure your sitemap is up to date and submitted via WMT too. It will also tell you how many of the sitemap URLs have been indexed.
These 2 things could speed up your re-indexing. My guess is that if it's a reputable site, and the migration of URLs was done properly, you'll probably get re-indexed quickly anyway.
George
-
Hi Gina,
Yes, that is what I mean. The dev team (or you, if you chose) would get an email that says the robots.txt file had changed. I was inhouse at a non-profit where we had an overseas dev team that wasn't too savvy about SEO, so I was the one who would get the emails, then go and send them an email asking them to fix it.
I don't believe there's a hard and fast answer here, as it in part depends on how quickly your site is crawled.
-
If possible, take a look at the server log files. That should give you a better idea of when/how often Google crawled the site in recent history. The user agent you're looking for is googlebot.
Aside from the robots.txt faux pas, it's also possible that the proper redirects weren't put in place. That would also account for a dip in traffic. Generally WordPress is extensionless. Which means any previous URL that contained an extension won't properly resolve - which means the site would lose a chunk of referral traffic and link equity if the URLs contained an extension (.php, .html, .aspx). Further, if the URL names have been changed from something like /our-non-profit.html to /about-our-non-profit those would require a redirect as well.
I've seen brand new domains index in a matter of days, then rank very well in as little as one month. But that's the exception, not the rule.
Provided proper redirects are in place and nothing too drastic happened to on-page considerations, I would guesstimate two weeks to a month. If you start heading into the month time frame, it's time to look a little deeper.
edit: If the server changed, that would also add another wrinkle to the problem. In the past, one of my lovely hosts decided to force a change on me. It took about a month to recover.
-
Thanks so much for your response KeriMorgret. I'm not sure I fully understand your suggestion unless you are saying that it would have alerted the dev team to the problem? I will pass this on to them and thank you if that is what your intention was.
The developer removed the robot.txt file which fixed the problem and I am trying to ascertain if there is a general expectation on how something like this - a de-indexing - gets reversed within the Google algorithm.
-
I don't know how long it will take for reindexing, but I do have a suggestion (have been in a real similar situation at a non-profit in the past).
Use a monitoring software like https://polepositionweb.com/roi/codemonitor/index.php that will check your robots.txt file daily on your live and any dev servers and email you if there is a change. Also, suggest that the live server's robots.txt file be made read-only, so it's harder to overwrite when updating the site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Search Console
To the Moz Community, Should we be considering the information that Google Search Console is telling us? It is showing a dramatic drop in our SEO and our pages are not being indexed, however it is showing differently in our Moz Analytics section. Any clarification will be greatly appreciated. Many thanks Dawn
Reporting & Analytics | | DawnQ0 -
Search and Replace filter on Google Analytics?
Hello! On our GA account for one of our clients, we'd like to add a search and replace filter to the Views section of the account. The URL is www.askergoworks.com (it redirects to askergoworks.com), and Google has flagged us to have redundant hostnames. This is why we'd like to add the filter. Would the regular expression be askergoworks.com|www.askergoworks.com ? Any help would be great - I'm not a regex expert, so I really don't how to go about this. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | AGILITY0 -
Why only a few pages of my website are being indexed by google
Our website www.navisyachts.com has in its sitemap over 3000 pages of information, and this is all unique content written by our team. Now Google Webmaster central shows only 100 urls indexed from 3500 submitted. Can you help me understand why and how I can fix this issue? The website has 4 years old, is a Joomla 3.3 up to date. It has part of the content in the Joomla core content systems and part in K2. Thank you. Pablo
Reporting & Analytics | | FWC_SEO0 -
Google Analytics: Multi channel funnel
Hi 🙂 I have a little problem. In Multi-channel Funnel Overview I see 50 conversions from Paid Search (screenshot 1). But when I click on Assisted Conversion and then choose Paid Search, I see 31 Assisted Conversions and 32 Last Interaction Conversion. (screenshot 2) So my question is - why the number of converstions in overview (50) is different than number in Assisted Conversions (assisted or last interaction conversion, or both together)? Probably, the answer is so simply, but I can found out it! 🙂 thanks a lot. X6UihL7.png lCNsw4T.png
Reporting & Analytics | | visibilitysk0 -
Tips for migrating Google News traffic?
We are about to relaunch a site that gets a lot of Google News traffic. We are not changing domain, but the site structure is changing greatly, with the URLs of both news index pages and articles being shaken up. Obviously, we've 301-ed every page to its closest equivalent on the new site. We've also got a news sitemap. As we are not changing domain, is there anything further we need to do to help protect our Google News traffic. On a related note, does anyone have a relaible way of measuring traffic from Google News listings in universal search?
Reporting & Analytics | | Dennis-529610 -
301 Tracking with Google Analytics hurts SEO?
Hey guys, I have an old-domain.com and a new-domain.com. old-domain.com has reputation and through a 301 redirect it's handling it over to new-domain.com. I want to know how many people still visit old-domain.com and track this with Google Analyitcs. I read the best solution for this would be a Google Campaign URL. My question: Does a URL like "http://www.new-domain.com /?utm_source=&utm_medium=redirect&utm_campaign=" hurt the effectiveness of the 301 redirect?
Reporting & Analytics | | optimiert-es0 -
Google analytics
I updates all my google analytics accounts after the update and now i went to each campaign and it appears there is a problem and now if I reset it i loose history. Is this a glitch or a problem
Reporting & Analytics | | JAGlasvegas0 -
Google Search Results inconsistent from different computers
Recently after some optimization activities - I do not see much movement in search rankings - my client is seeing the results on page 1 position 3 and I see page 2 for the same keyword. How does Google change ranking based on past searches and how can I get an accurate picture of what the actual rank is?
Reporting & Analytics | | devonkrusich0