2 sites using 1 CMS... issues?
-
Hi,
We are working with a client that has 2 sites in the same sector. They are currently on separate servers, with separate blogs, images galleries etc.
Both sites rank combined for over 200 terms.
IF we were to "combine" the sites on one CMS, with one IP, two separate front ends, one blog stream, one image gallery what do you think the SEO impact would be from this?
We had an issue with another client whose sites were too close and we had to separate in order to get them both to rank.
Further to this we want both sites to now have their own https certificate however this wouldn't be possible if combined.
Interested to hear thoughts on this. Thanks
-
I know lots of people who have two domains in same sector on the same server. If there content is unique and very different and they are not heavily interlinked then I would be comfortable with that.
-
Correct, I have thought the same as you. However it has been a case of business logistics that this request was put in.
Say we say, ok we will put both sites on separate CMS, blog etc ... what about having these two sites, separate URLs on the same server? They are both in the same sector?
-
When I read your question I was on the assumption that they were on separate servers and that you were going to merge them into a SINGLE DOMAIN.
Now I am thinking that you are going to run both of them from a single CMS install. That just sounds strange to me. I wouldn't do it.
-
One more point on this, would it be better for the sites to be on separate servers? Or would it impact if they were on the same server?
-
Thanks for that. Just to expand on this slightly. The idea is that both the front end sites remain. But their assets are still managed from one CMS. So the only merging would be on the server and assets, both ideally want to keep their own brand and rank for their own terms.
One site ranks very well, the other is still strong - but not as strong.
There is a lot of content overlap .. the difference is one is slightly more high end but target a lot of the same keywords.
Further to this I'm conscious about streamlining the blog, as then there is only one blog content stream for essentially 2 sites.
-
Great answer.
Couldn't have put it any better myself!
-
Merging two sites in the same sector or launching a second site in the same sector should always be given careful consideration.
My thoughts on this are.....
-
If you own the dominant site in a sector then you are in excellent position to launch a second site in that sector.
-
If you don't own the dominant site in a sector then you are better off putting all of your work into your best site (or your only site) to build it into the dominant site.
To me, those two situations are very clear.
About merging sites....
To me, if Site A and Site B have very little content overlap then a merger makes good sense. The strength of the sites will be merged and the rankings might go up for lots of keywords.
However, if Site A and Site B have a LOT of content overlap then merging them requires more careful thought. If one site is strong and the other puny, then the merger of the puny site into the strong site will not accomplish much. I would rather put work into the strong site. If both sites are moderate in strength then the merger will likely give a nice boost to the site that remains.
Before doing any merger I would be sure that both sites are clean of any Panda, Penguin or other problems. Because you don't want to merge poison into a good site.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Not Being Indexed
Hey Everyone - I have a site that is being treated strangely by google (at least strange to me) The site has 24 pages in the sitemap - submitted to WMT'S over 30 days ago I've manually triggered google to crawl the homepage and all connecting links as well and submitted a couple individually. Google has been parked the indexing at 14 of the 24 pages. None of the unindexed URL's have Noindex or follow tags on them - they are clearly and easily linked to from other places on the site. The site is a brand new domain, has no manual penalty history and in my research has no reason to be considered spammy. 100% unique handwritten content I cannot figure out why google isn't indexing these pages. Has anyone encountered this before? Know any solutions? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | CRO_first0 -
Issue with duplicate content
Hello guys, i have a question about duplicate content. Recently I noticed that MOZ's system reports a lot of duplicate content on one of my sites. I'm a little confused what i should do with that because this content is created automatically. All the duplicate content comes from subdomain of my site where we actually share cool images with people. This subdomain is actually pointing to our Tumblr blog where people re-blog our posts and images a lot. I'm really confused how all this duplicate content is created and what i should do to prevent it. Please tell me whether i need to "noindex", "nofollow" that subdomain or you can suggest something better to resolve that issue. Thank you!
Technical SEO | | odmsoft0 -
The use of robots.txt
Could someone please confirm that if I do not want to block any pages from my URL, then I do not need a robots.txt file on my site? Thanks
Technical SEO | | ICON_Malta0 -
When to use canonical urls
I will be the first to admit I am never really 100% sure when to use canonical urls. I have a quick question and I am not really sure if this is a situation for a canonical or not. I am looking at a my friends building website and there are issues with what pages are ranking. Basically there homepage is focusing on the building refurbishment location but for some reason in internal page is ranking for that keyword and it is not mentioned at all on that page. Would this be a time to add the homepage url and a canonical on the ranking page (using yoast plugin) to tell Google that the homepage is the preferred page? Thanks Paul
Technical SEO | | propertyhunter0 -
Will training videos available on the "members only" section of a site contribute to the sites ranking?
Hello, I got asked a question recently as to whether training videos on the deeper pages of a website (that you can only access if you are a member and log in) will help with the sites ranking. On the SEOMoz software these deeper pages have been crawled as far as I can tell with errors reported on pages from the "members only" section of the site, leading me to believe the members only pages and their content will contribute to the sites overall ranking profile. I have suggested uploading the informational videos on the main pages of the site for now, making them accessible to all visitors and putting them in a more obvious place to encourage more sharing and views, however I've also said I would check it out with some experts so any information will be greatly appreciated! Many thanks 🙂 Charlotte
Technical SEO | | CharlotteWaller0 -
Is it a good idea to make 301 from a site which you know google has banned certain keywords for to a new site with similar content
Here is a short question re. 301. I read Dovers article on how to move an old domain to a new one. Say you have been a little inexperienced regarding linkbuilding and used some cheap service in the past and you have steadily seen that certain keywords have been depreciating in the SERP - however the PR is still 3 for the domain - now the qustion is should you rediect with a 301 in .htaccess to a new domain when you know that google does not like certain keywords with respect to the old site. Will the doom and gloom carry over to the new site?
Technical SEO | | Kofoed0 -
Mini site links?
Can anyone point me to information about the "mini" site links on the Google search results or tell me how to get them set up? These aren't the full site links that show 3 by 3 under the first listing but small text links that appear for certain results. (See attached image for reference.) Are these something that can controlled/requested? NAj6E.png
Technical SEO | | DVanSchepen0 -
Site command
How reliable is site command? Is there any other way to check indexed pages.
Technical SEO | | gmk15670