SEO For New Website
-
Hello Mozzers,
I've recently (2 weeks ago) launched a website with a brand new domain for a client. I know I can't expect instant results but I'd like to know I've done all I can to get the best results as fast as possible.
I've done the following already:
- It's a WordPress driven website so the site is very SEO friendly
- Submitted the sitemap.xml to Google
- Listed the site on Bing
- Sorted out the canonical issue
- Got keyword rich URLs
- Meta tags are in
- Site structure is heavily optimized with H1, H2 tags, etc. used appropriately
- Set up a Google Places listing
- Made sure all images and links are semantically optimized
- Copy can be improved but is pretty keyword rich
However the client is not using Social Media at all and there's no link building strategy in place.
Will this undermine the rankings a lot?
What else can I do to get the client better results, faster?
Any help will be much appreciated.
Best regards,
Rex (SEO Noob)
-
You're welcome.
**I figured as much but was hoping there might be a few onsite things I could do. **
I think that is a common pattern. On site is easier, so we all tend to look for it. Even when we really know that the answer is "lots of hard link building to do now" we tend to look for other answers. You don't have to be a noob to fall in to that trap!
-
Thank for you speedy reply as well Marko. Much appreciated.
Regards,
Rex
-
Thanks for your speedy reply Mat.
I figured as much but was hoping there might be a few onsite things I could do.
If I may ask one more thing: Any idea on how to price for link building and social media services?
Thanks agian,
Rex
-
I agree, if it even makes the slightest sense to have social media, have it.
It doesn't have to take up a lot of your time, (if possible) use apps like Buffer to keep it updated regularly and interact with some followers. It sends the right signals to Google.
-
However the client is not using Social Media at all and there's no link building strategy in place. Will this undermine the rankings a lot?.
Yes - totally. You really cannot underestimate the importance of links. In simple terms: if you niche is in any way competitive (even if that competition is just handful of people with a vague idea) you are not going to rank positively without links.
Getting the site set up well and search ready is great, but you need to get moving on your links. I'd much rather work on a poorly optimised site with a load of links than a well optimised site with none.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will using display:none; to hide images hurt SEO?
A popular trend among bloggers right now is to hide their long images for social media (Pinterest) using the code. This makes it so that when a reader clicks the Pin it browser button, the long image still shows up but is not displayed inside their post. Also note that the alt description for Pinterest marketers are always keyword rich, board line keyword stuffed. I've read this article from Google on hiding text and images https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66353?hl=en but not sure if this practice fits inside that scope. What are your thoughts? Will this hurt SEO?
Social Media | | klhill0 -
Does anyone have a great way to determine where your new Twitter followers are finding you?
We are enjoying some good success with finding new Twitter followers for our account, but the majority of the new followers do not seem to be coming as a result of our posts. How can I determine where these new followers are finding us? Google Analytics can explain those coming from our website but what about the others? Thanks to all for helping!
Social Media | | tempegov
Kris0 -
Is it important for SEO that YouTube and Google + be used under the same Google Account?
Hello - I have a client that has their Google Plus and YouTube under separate Google accounts. My thoughts are that it'd be best for SEO and awareness with Google that their active YouTube channel to be under their active Google Plus account. My question is: Is it recommended for SEO that we upload the videos to her prominent Google business account (they only have about 100 subscribers)? If we did this we would delete them from the other account to avoid dup. content. We are in a position where we can make this change easily if it is recommended and good for SEO--which I would think it would be. So we would like to know now if we should make this change before we grow the YouTube channel further, or if we should leave it how it is. Any insight would be very helpful! Thank you!
Social Media | | dirigodev0 -
SEO wise - what is the impact of Avatar on a blog
Hi all, At the moment we are at the verge of building finally a blog. For SEO purpose I demanded that it would include social interactions with Google+, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and some more. Especially Google+ for the authorship part. But now they come asking me if they can work with Gravatar http://www.gravatar.com/support/what-is-gravatar/ - a Globally Recognized Avatar. I never worked with it before and can't find anything if it will negatively impact SEO on authorship - but I'm still not sure. Does the Gravatar interfer with Google+ authorship?
Social Media | | Letty
I could find information about having to setup the author part in the Gravatar, but this doesn't give me the answer if this helps with Google+. If anybody has experience of can tell me / point me in the right direction it much appreciated. Or maybe having a better solutions than the Gravatar.0 -
SEO Master accounts?
We just got off the phone with our current SEO/ SEM provider and was shocked to hear that we are essentially renting the FB pages and Google + pages we paid them to create for our 100+ locations. We were told that all the pages have been created under a "Master SEO" account and we would immediately lose any juice from these pages if they are not under their account. He claimed the pages were given their rankings because the account they are associated with vs. the actual SEO done. Can anyone shed some light on this claim. I have never heard of such a thing.
Social Media | | Buddys0 -
If we maintain multiple facebook account for a partcular website will it be penalized??
I want to maintain multiple facebook accounts to promote my servicess. Will it be penalized for keeping multiple accounts?
Social Media | | Dillipg0 -
Does it make sense to have one facebook/twitter account for multiple websites?
If you have several different websites with related themes, does it make sense to just have a facebook or twitter page for the company to make managing the account more manageable?
Social Media | | thappe0