Problems ranking in St Louis
-
Hello everybody
We have noticed that when tracking several keywords across the United States, the keywords in St. Louis are almost always ranked the lowest. We rank on the first page for 46/47 locations for several keywords, but St. Louis ranks on page 4 or later. Any ideas? One thought we've had is the different spelling of the city name, St Louis, St. Louis, Saint Louis. Should this have any bearing on the problem?
Thanks in advance, I look forward to any insight you can provide!
-
That's the issue. For every other location we track, we are on page 1 or 2 for every keyword. But in St Louis, we are on page 4-8.
The issue I think has to do with the landing page. When we rank that low, the landing page is our generic sales page, rather than the specific St Louis sales page. We've been working on local citations, but it hasn't moved the needle TOO much yet.
And bring it on!
(preferably in a city other than St Louis though)
-
I must've missed that article, thank you!
-
No problem! We like to think that we know St Louis fairly well, as we are one of the few companies to rank for St Louis SEO company, St Louis internet marketing, and St Louis web design companies all on page one, sometimes more than once
I hope that this information helps you with your local efforts, and gets you showing up. If you are already on page 2, chances are you are just missing a smaller piece of the puzzle. Page two is a sign that you already have a lot of the right elements in place, and something needs to be added or adjusted to bump you up a page. If we ever get a client in St Louis that offers the same local services as you do, we will be sure to see you on the battlefield! Lol
-
Really nice answers from both David and Jeff, here. Very thoughtful, fellows!
Kevin, you might want to do a run-through of this article just to make sure your bases are all covered:
-
Thanks Dave, that's a lot of information. I will start diving into that right away!
-
Having worked with multiple companies in St Louis for rankings, it can be difficult.
I agree with Jeff that people search for things adjacent to their exact neighborhood, as metro St Louis is a very small portion of the "city". There are also people that search for items using the STL, Saint Louis, and St Louis (St Louis being the local lingo and the most popular)
Before you begin modifying anything, I would manually go and check that your keyword reporting tool is working correctly (AWR, MOZ, or whatever you use). Go to Google and see that your suspicions are correct. If they are, then proceed to do the following. Also double check in Bing and Yahoo to see if there are any trends. Chances are if you suck at ranking across all search providers for St Louis, you need more local authority.
1. Manually track what keywords and phrases that rank low. Look at competitor keyword phrases and SEO for signs of what Google is giving the authority status to, and then look for why.
2. Look at the backlinks of those sites. Having worked with a lot of local companies, most high ranking sites are pretty good about doing their citation site and local optimization. Being a larger focused company, you will have to think of ways to get your St Louis-specific content to become "more valued" and authoritative than the local sites that offer the same services. For example: If a local provider has a 100 backlinks from local St Louis citations, all stating that he does "KEYWORD in St Louis" you are going to have to prove that your St Louis content deserves that spot.
3. Look at avenues within the local area where you can distribute content and get people linking back. Easiest and fastest way? Most likely a few Press Releases from one of the larger companies with a wide distribution network that can hyper-focus your content to St Louis. Look for openings or opportunities from The St Louis Business Journal, St Louis Post Dispatch, Local Channel 5, STLtoday.com and any other major news outlets. All of these sites have very high page ranks, and domain authority. Link these releases back to your local St Louis content in various ways and formats, but "St Louis" will most likely be your best bet since most locals type it that way.
4. "My question may be more related to on-page optimization. We rank pretty well when adding the various keyword modifiers at the end of the regular keyword" The on page optimization will have to cover the St Louis area (unless you use those pages to rank in multiple areas under the main keyword phrase), for all of the reasons mentioned above. I know that you are trying to use the local setting within Google, but that is only so accurate as your physical IP is going to be from a different place. Might be worth it to set up a few localized pages on your site to see if it makes a difference in your placement.
5. You also may be seeing this change as a part of the algorithm updates, that do more to separate local and nationwide search. Seems like they are going away from using the IP and location information as one of the most important factors, as users search queries often include the location if they are looking for local. People's search habits change, and Google responds.
Hope any of this helps, and best of luck!
- Dave
-
Jeff
Thanks for the quick response and insight into the area!
My question may be more related to on-page optimization. We rank pretty well when adding the various keyword modifiers at the end of the regular keyword (stl, st louis, etc).
The type of searches that we struggle with are when you change your browser location as if you are searching from St. Louis, then type in the keyword that we are targeting. This works well in every other city, just not St. Louis. We just can't figure out what is different between St. Louis and our other cities, it just doesn't make sense.
Thanks!
Kevin
-
I grew up in St. Louis, so I might have a little bit of insight... It is possible that St. Louis is spelled differently by different people, but most normal users who live in the area are not spelling out "Saint." Google's ability to show synonyms and close words should obviate this issue, too.
While St. Louis - the city - has had a bit of a resurgence in recent years, become more urban and hip, most of the population of the St. Louis metro area doesn't actually live in St. Louis, and probably doesn't use "St. Louis" in broad search terms. The population of St. Louis is actually quite small. Instead, the city is surrounded by many smaller cities that people might identify more specifically with.
For example, people might use Chesterfield, Creve Coeur, Ladue, etc, as a much more detailed way to search.
I hope this helps!
-- Jeff
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to rank local keywords?
Hi guys, I have been enjoying here to be a part of the community. A simple question: I have some local low volume keywords and want to rank on 1 with all. I have set up pages according to the keywords such as "california plumbers" and page is /california-plumbers.html To rank these types of keywords I am doing local listing and adding these particular page instead of "home page". Am I doing right? Would classifieds and local listings are suffice to get these keywords on 1 spot of Google? What else can I do? Can you suggest me some queries to find "deep local directories or classified or other stuff whereby I can target my pages? Thank you in advance for ideas.
Local Listings | | ksmith882 -
Website with higher domain authority and good content not ranking locally?
I've got a client that has a higher domain authority than top ranking sites, is pretty well optimized from a content perspective, has good local reviews but still isn't ranking well at all... often not at all in local results. We don't show in map pack or even regular organic listings in a pretty small city. They are a local sign shop- so they make business signs/church signs etc. Have you seen anything negatively impacting local rankings that is worth digging into as possible cause? A few historical insights: They had some spammy backlinks (we think a competitor was being shady) that I've sent disavow files into Google for They had a previous SEO person create 100's of orphan pages for every possible city + offering combination you can think of- I've cleaned those up via 301 redirects Should I just keep waiting, doing content optimization or am I missing something else?
Local Listings | | karmadigital0 -
Facebook Locations - Good or Bad for Local Rankings?
Our company has multiple (3) offices, including our headquarters, and each has its own Facebook page. Other than the primary company page, the other two locations have only been claimed and do not have posts, reviews, check-ins, etc. Now, Facebook recently granted us access to Facebook Locations, which, if I understand correctly, would remove 2-out-of-3 office pages and add a "Locations" tab to our primary company page where people can see the other offices. _See Starbucks Example: https://www.facebook.com/pg/Starbucks/locations/?ref=page_internal _ I've read mixed reviews regarding using the Locations feature, but nothing definitively answers whether or not this would negatively affect local rankings. Does anyone have firsthand experience going from individual business pages to a single parent business page with Locations? Is there any trustworthy documentation out there about this?
Local Listings | | MPlata1 -
My website Not ranking in google
Hey there, My website Created in wix , & its Ranking in google, i have searched & get know That Websites By wix are nt getting indexed by google is this true?? If not then what are steps i can take To boost MY Site SEO I have Read article Of Wix Here . please check, Thnx in advace
Local Listings | | falguniiepl10 -
Local Search and Schema.org - Do I need to tag up the "same as" Property to all my citations to help with local rankings?
Hi All, We have implemented Schema.og on our website and this also includes the local business schema for all of our branches.However I've read an article (see below ) which says we should also be doing "same as " property and linking this to ALL of our citations such as google plus page , yelp , bing places, city search etc etc as this will help with citations. I am wondering if anyone has done this ? - And if so , has this helped with local rankings etc - I don't really want to invest the extra costs to get this done if I can't find anywhere that says its made a difference - The article from whitespark - says - "when you create new citations for your business (or for your client’s), it’s a waiting game hoping that Google and the other search engines will find your new citations quickly and make the connection between those listings, the business, and the website. The “sameAs” property can help make that process much quicker _and _easier. Schema.org explains that the “sameAs” property is used along with the “URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's [or business’] identity.” By using the “sameAs” property in your NAP schema markup, you can tell search engines that the business you’ve marked up is the same one found at a certain citation URL Of course, Google+ isn’t the only important citation source. There’s also Bing Places, Facebook, Yelp, Citysearch and a few others. The nice thing about many schema.org properties is that you can use them multiple times in your markup." I am wondering what peoples thoughts were and whether they has implemented this and if so , did it help ? thanks Pete | [sameAs](http://schema.org/sameAs) | URL | URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's identity. E.g. the URL of the item's Wikipedia page, Freebase page, or official website. |
Local Listings | | PeteC121 -
Does Google local account access affect local rankings?
Is it possible that being a third party manager to a Google plus account have a negative impact in local rankings since access is coming from a different city? Example: I work in Houston but manage a client's Google account that is in New York.
Local Listings | | mgordon0 -
My #1 (A) ranking client in Maps is now #38 after update?
We have a client with 4 locations and all of them do pretty well in Google Maps. Since the latest update, we dropped from #1 (A) all the way down to #38 in Maps. We're still #1 for our keyword in Organic but our Maps got crushed. We use Yext for the citations but we also do some a lot manual ones too. We have 3 reviews on that location but not sure why the big drop. I'm not even sure where to being to get it back. From our research: We noticed our categories were a little out of order. Our primary was "legal services" instead of "personal injury attorney" (we've now updated that.) I've noticed that all the listings ahead of us, minus a few of them, have their homepage as their link. We've always used a local landing page that has hand written directions on how to find us, our hours and who people will meet when they come in. Things relevant to that location. Our domain authority is a 40. Our homepage Page Authority is 49 and our landing page for that location is a 22. What else should we check to see what's happened? Should I move the Google+ page to the homepage instead of the sub-page (as well as the citations we have)? Thanks for your help!
Local Listings | | DarinPirkey0 -
New website no ranking, due to 2 duplicate websites . Please help.
Hello Everyone, We have a client that has 2 of the same websites, that have the same content, different phone numbers and different content for the Homepages however, there are a few differences that has been done to both with different functionality. For the last 3 weeks, we have been trying to rank "1. www.websitetoronto.com" as this is the branding of the company, and is for 18+ content. We also have "2. www.websitetor.com" that is PG13 content which is for google places for business aka google+ for business (which is still in pending mode, and is the older site about 7 years old, and was ranked before. The reason for both the sites is that Google Places for Business Listing does not allow any adult content, and our main branding "**1. www.websitetoronto.com" is for 18+ content. Here are the specs for both the sites. ** 1. www.websitetoronto.com New Registered site to be ranked organically (however this is no where in the SERPS) as its serving the older site previously No Google Places for business listings.
Local Listings | | EVERWORLD.ENTERTAIMENT
- This is the actual branding of the company and is for 18+ content We have already started building links, organically and white-hat only. Unfortunately (its not showing for our main keywords in the SERPS) ** 2. www.websitetor.com** 7 Years old Google Places for Business (Still in pending mode) not to be ranked organically blocked from searches - robots sets to
User-agent: *
Disallow: / Removed all the links in WMT including We have change all all the links for point to "www.websitetoronto.com" What is the best way to make this work with google, so that we have both websites performing for the different functions and without losing the google places listings for 2. www.websitetor.com and to rank 1. www.websitetoronto.com a) Do I add any tags? Rel=?
b) Should we remove 2. www.mywebsitetor.com from WMT?
c) any other tips and suggestion to get www.mywebsitetoronto.com to rank would be great! Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated. Also, the owner want this set up this way so, we cannot reverse as he wants the **1. www.websitetoronto.com as the branding. **0