Quotery.com Suggestions?
-
Hello,
I'm hoping to find some advice on how to proceed with a site I started last year — Quotery. I've spent a ton of time and money on it, tried my best to build value to what is typically a copycat niche, and adhered to Google's SEO recommendations (I believe, anyway). Yet, subpar sites rank well above mine. Now I'm wondering if I should find a buyer for the site and cut my losses. Does anyone have any suggestions on what the next steps might be in order to rank higher?
Here is what we've tried/accomplished so far:
- We were mentioned on Netted.
- We built a well-designed and easy to navigate site that works on all devices.
- We've added topic descriptions and images, unique author descriptions and pictures, and exclusive picture quotes.
- We built a well-designed and useful WordPress plugin, and kept the backlinks nofollow (note: our main competitor also has a subpar WordPress plugin with dofollow backlinks, yet they don't get penalized for it).
- We've published curated blog posts, along with infographics that have been shared millions of time #1, #2, #3.
- We've built up significant social media profiles on Facebook, Twitter, and elsewhere.
- We even tried hiring 97thFloor (highly recommended on Moz) for 4 months, although most of their efforts seemed spammy and/or very basic to me (and cost a fortune), so we decided to take SEO into our own hands afterwards.
- We've added sources, pictures, and relevant information for thousands of quotes (e.g. example seen here).
- We started working on user profiles, and had plans for much more down the road.
However, despite these efforts, sites like BrainyQuote dominate Google's rankings. So is it truly value that will earn you rankings... or is it still all about gaming the system? Of course, any suggestions in my case specifically would be much appreciated.
-
I think either of those would be better. If you do the change make sure you do your 301s correctly.
-
If Google tells you to do something for better SEO, it's unlikely to produce any significant results short-term. You might get some results if you stay at it for years.
I'm not going to endorse any specific tactics, but if you rely on Google for your SEO advice, you're being fooled. Google DOES NOT want people to be able to manipulate their search engine - why would they give you accurate advice on how to do it?
-
This is a great post to help with site architecture. Published in 2011 and still relevant today.
Site architecture determines, in part, how your link equity is distributed across the site. Right now you have it spread too thin because the vast majority of indexed pages sit in the root directory. I think you'd be better off grouping pages by related topics, much like you have in your left-hand margin, by author and topic. Read the post and see what you think.
Another thing I though of is when I search for a quote, I tend to type in whatever I can remember of it. For example, if I search for "never give up", brainyquote is the 2nd result I see. They have that specific text in their title tag. I don't see quotery anywhere in my search results. It doesn't have quote text in title tags.
Now in this instance, you could say it's because the actual quote is "never give in" (in vs up), but you could use that common misconception as an opportunity to add more text to the page and increase your chances of ranking.
Another example is a search for "nasty, brutish and short". You guys don't show up anywhere although I do see you have that quote in your inventory.
-
Thanks! I'll have my developer work on fixing some of this. Could you please elaborate on: "Your site architecture is very flat."
-
Hi Jason,
I have a couple of suggestions.
- The site is slow. That will bump up your bounce rates and impact your rankings. You should try speeding it up.
- You have a ton of redirects going on. I did a partial scan of your site and found roughly 20% of the html files found were redirected. For example http://www.quotery.com/rick-warren redirects to http://www.quotery.com/rick-warren/. If it were me, I'd check to see if I had an incoming traffic or links to these pages and if not, I'd delete them and get rid of the redirect. It'll help speed your site.
- You also have a lot of duplication. For example http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/15/, http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/16/, http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/17/, http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/18/, http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/19/, http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/20/, and http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/page/21/ are all competing to rank for "william shakespeare quotes". I see you've canonicalized them so they point to themselves, but that isn't helping. You should be pointing the pages to http://www.quotery.com/william-shakespeare/ or using rel = next / prev.
- Your title tags all contain your brand name. That's unnecessary. Yes I see Brainy Quotes does the same thing, but that doesn't mean you should too.
- Your search is funky. I searched for "h jackson brown" and found 0 results. I searched for "h. jackson brown" (notice the dot after the h) and found two.
- Your site architecture is very flat. That's spreading your SEO equity too thin. I'd group content differently.
- You have a lot of "thin" content, less than 400 words per page. I'd be looking for ways to beef that up.
Those are just a few things I noticed. You should probably get an independent audit of the site and supporting processes and use it to identify risks and opportunities, and then set priorities for next steps.
-
Thank you for the suggestions. Originally I was under the impression that urls didn't carry much weight anymore, so I decided to stick with the simplest url structure possible (cater to the user). But I think you bring up some fair points that I'm going to try.
What are your thoughts on www.quotery.com/quotes/mark-twain instead?
or maybe even...
-
What — specifically — are you referring to?
-
You have certainly built a nice looking website. I looked at this page, http://www.quotery.com/mark-twain/?PageSpeed=noscript and assumed you wanted this page to rank for the keyword "Mark Twain quotes".
1. Have you looked at changing your url to http://www.quotery.com/mark-twain-quotes/
2. Your first image has correct alt text, but the ones after that say "grid-author". Instead of using the same picture 20 times on this page I would either get rid of the pictures after the top one, get a variety of pictures, or at the very least fix the alt image tag.
3. I see at the very top you have "Mark Twain Quotes" in your h1 tag. But not anywhere else on the page, even though Moz showed you used it 4 times in the body. When I looked at the source code it seems like it appeared mostly with the addthis buttons. Keyword density is pretty dated but I would try to have it in at least one place in the body.
-
Adhering to Google's SEO recommendations is your biggest problem. You won't be successful for a long time - if ever - doing that, and don't let people here brainwash you into thinking you will be.
-
Jason,
You seem to understand the concepts very well so as Kevin has said, just keep plugin along... use that 5k, or part of it, on your own marketing ideas and eventually you will get there...
You can still promote that video you know? It's a bit depressing for my liking but I see people sharing similar content on social media sites nearly every day.
The spammy example you gave is technically not spammy - it's a website for content publishing, article is in relevant section, fairly well written and is linking to relevant websites (even though it's 3 different businesses) using no-follow links. It certainly isn't spammy but I can see why you would expect more for your 5k.
Good luck!
-
Jason, I couldn't get whois.org to pull up your domain, so was just taking an educated guess since you said "with a site I started last year". I took a look on archive.org, and saw it being a lot longer! Thanks and good luck!
-
Our site went live weeks before a PageRank update, which is why I believe we have a 0. Unfortunately, now that Google has announced they no longer plan to update it, we may be stuck on 0 indefinitely, which I believe puts us at a disadvantage since some publishers might be reluctant to link to us (you'd think Google would have thought of that) (here's an example where they linked to our Twitter account, rather than our actual website).
"a) your content is not unique or pages are too similar"
It is a quote website, so the uniqueness of a page has its limits. As mentioned, we did our best to provide value (and did a much better job at that than most other quote sites that are currently ranking).
"b) majority of your links are spammy (and since you have 100k links pointing to your site I would suggest this is the most probable scenario)"
Using OpenSiteExplorer, the tool is showing 2,810 total links to the homepage, but only 129 root domains. Most of the multiple links are coming from things like a) slideshows b) sitewide links coming from the WordPress plugin (which are nofollow... a factor that Google swears will have zero effect on your site).
"Also I find it hard to believe a large, well-known agency would be involved in spammy techniques, any examples please?"
Sure, I'll provide three examples of what I believe to be
Spammy example: This article on B2C has what is obviously a forced backlink to Quotery. In addition, 97thFloor knocked out three different clients in one article (increase their profits, lessen their workload). Their clients are easy to spot. Hint: "Biz Stone said" ""Entrepreneur developer" and "mobile app developers".
Basic example: The first month, they'll simply present a "report" to you. This is essentially a copy/paste report taken directly from Moz.com itself. The only difference is that instead of paying $99 for a Moz subscription, you're paying 97thFloor $5,000 to present the report to you.
Marketing Example: Finally, I'll provide an example of what they do on the viral end. I gave them free reign to do whatever they wanted for a viral video, seen here (I provided the logo animation for the intro). This video went absolutely nowhere. It wasn't shared a single time on our social media accounts, and I even spent some money on YouTube advertising for the video (to no avail). The only viral campaign they worked on that went anywhere was an idea I actually gave to them (this infographic that was shared hundreds of thousands of times). And believe it or not, they recommended dumping the idea and doing something else.
So while 97thFloor might be well-known, and extremely costly, they absolutely do not provide any value that I have witnessed.
-
Quotery (the domain) is 15 years old, and it's registered for the next 8... so if either of the two patents you mentioned do have a beneficial effect, we're already getting that advantage.
-
Without doing a serious analysis of your site, links, stats etc. its like drawing circles on water, but...
Google Page Rank 0 while domain authority is pretty high (38), suggests you have an algorithmic penalty, so:
a) your content is not unique or pages are too similar
b) majority of your links are spammy (and since you have 100k links pointing to your site I would suggest this is the most probable scenario)
c) both a and b are true
To answer your question - gaming the system never really works in the long run Jason.
Also I find it hard to believe a large, well-known agency would be involved in spammy techniques, any examples please?
-
One factor is that brainyquote has been around for many years (the domain was registered in 2001, but how long they had a site up--not sure). The age factor (IMHO) has a decent weight in the algo, and a Google patent states:
(1) … the date that a domain with which a document is registered may be used as an indication of the inception date of the document.
(2) Certain signals may be used to distinguish between illegitimate and legitimate domains. … Valuable (legitimate) domains are often paid for several years in advance, while doorway (illegitimate) domains rarely are used for more than a year. Therefore, the date when a domain expires in the future can be used as a factor in predicting the legitimacy of a domain and, thus, the documents associated therewith.Just keep plugging along. Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
.com or other TLD?
Hi, We are in the process of considering our domain url options for a new site. The plan is to migrate other site (bringing their link juice) to an main brand level domain. At the moment our desired .com url is unattainable however from a band perspective another extension e.g (.group) would probably be a better brand fit - however I wanted to know what the implications might be from an SEO perspective. At the moment some of our sub domains are ranking extremely well for desired keywords. Assuming we implement the correct redirect rules to maintain these rankings, would there be any other implication for our rankings (particularly in the UK and US) for not using a .com domain and using an alternatve TLD extension. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | carlsutherland0 -
My Domain authority dropped 9 points... Does anyone have any suggestions to fix this significant drop.
My domain authority dropped by 9 points and I haven't done anything differently since the last scan. What is going on?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | infotrust20 -
Domain Authority... http://www.domain.com/ vs. http://domain.com vs. http://domain.com/
Hey Guys, Looking at Page Authority for my Site and ranking them in Decending Order, I see these 3 http://www.domain.com/ | Authority 62 http://domain.com | Authority 52 http://domain.com/ | Authority 52 Since the first one listed has the highest Authority, should I be using a 301 redirects on the lower ranking variations (which I understand how works) or should I be using rel="canonical" (which I don't really understand how it works) Also, if this is a problem that I should address, should we see a significant boost if fixed? Thanks ahead of time for anyone who can help a lost sailor who doesn't know how to sail and probably shouldn't have left shore in the first place. Cheers ZP!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mr_Snack0 -
SEO question regarding rails app on www.site.com hosted on Heroku and www.site.com/blog at another host
Hi, I have a rails app hosted on Heroku (www.site.com) and would much prefer to set up a Wordpress blog using a different host pointing to www.site.com/blog, as opposed to using a gem within the actual app. Whats are peoples thoughts regarding there being any ranking implications for implementing the set up as noted in this post on Stackoverflow: "What I would do is serve your Wordpress blog along side your Rails app (so you've got a PHP and a Rails server running), and just have your /blog route point to a controller that redirects to your Wordpress app. Add something like this to your routes.rb: _`get '/blog', to:'blog#redirect'`_ and then have a redirect method in your BlogController that simply does this: _`classBlogController<applicationcontrollerdef redirect="" redirect_to="" "url_of_wordpress_blog"endend<="" code=""></applicationcontrollerdef>`_ _Now you can point at yourdomain.com/blog and it will take you to the Wordpress site._
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Anward0 -
Canonical Rel .uk and .au to .com site?
Hi guys, we have a client whose main site is .com but who has a .co.uk and a com.au site promoting the same company/brand. Each site is verified locally with a local address and phone but when we create content for the sites that is universal, should I rel=canonical those pages on the .co.uk and .com.au sites to the .com site? I saw a post from Dr. Pete that suggests I should as he outlines pretty closely the situation we're in: "The ideal use of cross-domain rel=canonical would be a situation where multiple sites owned by the same entity share content, and that content is useful to the users of each individual site." Thanks in advance for your insight!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wcbuckner0 -
New my domain.com/blog option vs. my blog.mydomain.com option
Our e-commerce site has been on Big Commerce for about a year now. One thing many SEO folks had told us is that having a blog located at /blog was going to help more than a subdomain blog. option. BC has never had the option to have a blog hosted on their platform (/blog) until now. I am now wondering, since we have lost traffic in the past and are trying everything we can to regain it, if we should purchase the Wordpress Site Redirect upgrade and move the subdomain blog (blog.) to the new site option /blog. Any help or feedback from you is very much appreciated. I have attached a screenshot of our main website vs. our blog from Open Site Explorer in case it helps anything. I29Tw5P
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | josh3300 -
Can the experts out here can review our site for improved performance and suggestions
Hi - we have started off with Auto Site based in India - 15 months back The site is - www.mycarhelpline.com - generating close to 2500 visits / daily basis. we aim to scale to new heights to touch atleast 10,000 visits / daily basis in coming 12 months Can we request your review to recommend for :- Link Building Site review Loading time Improvements / suggestion to take it up - (leaving aside dynamic url's) . Though may seem as SEO Audit and review - but any recommendations or suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Modi0 -
Branching out from .com... good idea?
Lets say I want to branch out from the normal ".com" genre, can you Rank a ".ly" in google search results?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HCGDiet0