Is it better to find a page without the desired content, or not find the page?
-
Are there any studies that show which is best? If you find my page but not the specific thing you want on it, you may still find something of value. But, if you don't you may associate my site with poor results, which can be worse than finding what you want at a competitor site. IOW maybe it is best to have pages that ONLY and ALWAYS have the content desired.
What do the studies suggest?
I'm asking because I have content that maybe 1/3 of the time exists and 2/3 of the time doesn't...think 'out of stock' products. So, I'm wondering if I should look into removing the page from being indexed during the 2/3 or should keep it. If I remove it then my concern is whether I lose the history/age factor that I've read Google finds important for credibility. Your thoughts?
-
No problem, glad I could help!
-
Great answer Monica -- thank you!
-
I can't think of a study off of the top of my head that could help you. What I can tell you is that if you are directing traffic to a page on your site, the content should be relevant to the search term. For example, you don't want to have a page for blue widgets attracting traffic for pink teddy bears. This will create an awful user experience, high bounce rate and decrease in traffic over time. As the engines see your page as less and less relevant and that it provides a bad user experience you will start to lose rankings.
However, there are exceptions to that logic. For example, I have a page on my site that is the landing page for a very popular product. The manufacturer discontinued the product and I didn't want to give up the value of the page, so I left the relevant content, added the discontinued text and then offered replacement models closer to the top of the page. If anyone happened to land on that page, I wouldn't lose the traffic, but instead give them relevant options. If I had changed the status to 404 or 410, then there would be no possibility of capturing or converting the traffic. Here is a page: http://www.apelectric.com/6241-Generac-Guardian-Series-14kW-p/6241.htm
I have also talked to lots of people who have websites with pages for events, community activities, concert pages and things of that nature. After the shows or events, the page doesn't necessarily have "purpose". The page can be used to aggregate reviews of bands or performers, community fairs. It can be used as a community forum, or it can simply be updated to offer upcoming schedules.
As far as out of stock products go, I wouldn't 404 or take down a page with an "out of stock" product. I don't know what platform you use, but Big Commerce gives me the option to add a "Pre-Order" button to a product when it goes out of stock. It would be optimal if your customers could still order a product if it is coming back into stock in the future. I would add a message near the add to cart button saying the item is temporarily out of stock, but you can order for shipment in the next 2-3 weeks, or however long the window of time is. The more information you give your searcher the more opportunity you are creating for engagement and conversions. 404ing the pages is not the answer to a short term inventory shortage. When you 404 or 410 a page you are running the risk of losing your ranking on that page, so when you enable the page again you will have to start ranking again. It could take time depending on the competition of the product.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there a tool that will find a string from the source code from a list of URLs?
I need a tool that will run through a long list of URLs (from multiple domains), look for a specific string in the source code and then produce a CSV showing in which URLs the the string was found. This is for legitimate research, not for any nefarious purposes Any ideas of such a tool already exists?
Search Behavior | | richdan0 -
Google site: search showing twice amount of indexed pages. why?
I have around 50k pages indexed on my site but when I do a google site: of my site it shows around 100k pages indexed. Why is it showing so much more? It is also only showing around 700 pages indexed in my web masters account for the site. Background: We have a custom site map being generated automatically. Let me know if you would like more info, Thanks.
Search Behavior | | Nicktaylor10 -
Looking for something better than Googles in page analytics
Buongiorno from 12 degrees C wetherby UK 🙂 I'm interested in measuring content engagagement, things like what gets clicked on mouse tracking beahaviour etc. Google Analytics in page analytics does a good job but is there another product able to guage user interactive behaviour with content (Yes ive added event tracking). Thanks in advance,
Search Behavior | | Nightwing
David1 -
Does Page Load Time Affect SEO Rankings?
I was curious about how much page load times affect rankings. Here's what I did: I put together a lot of interactive media on specific landing pages Time-on-Page from organic visitors went from 50 seconds to average of 34 minutes Bounce Rate decreased by 20% Page Load time increased from 1 second to 6 seconds and at peak times to 8 seconds (on 56KB test) In the meantime the page was re-indexed and re-cached My question is three-fold: Would the time on page give higher rankings for keyword Would decreased bounce rate enhance rankings? Would the page load time decrease rankings? Did anyone do a similar test? What were the results?
Search Behavior | | HMCOE0 -
Best way to remove worthless/thin content?
I have a Wordpress site with about 3,000 pages and 1,000 of those are no value/duplicate content and drive no traffic. They are blog posts each with a single image and permalinks like example.com/post1, example.com/post2 etc. I've started by deleting pages and 301 redirecting to relevant pages that actually have content. Is deleting and 301 redirecting the best route? Is 1,000 to many 301 redirects? Should I just delete the pages that aren't really relevant to anything else? Anything else I should know about deleting all of these pages? Any help would be great!
Search Behavior | | gfreeman230 -
How can we provide geo-detection without hurting SEO?
We represent a franchise, and the parent site does well for head terms, but we want to add a feature with the nearest location to a consumer based on geo-detection. We don't want to hurt the rankings for broad head terms. Could we use an iFrame to present the closest shop without affecting the general SEO we have done?
Search Behavior | | lunavista-comm0 -
Dating Blog Posts & How Fast Google Picks up on New Pages
I had until a few months ago included the original post date of a new blog post on the site. I then removed it and none of my results in Google now include the blog post date, although for some (for articles written about events) Google includes the date of the event where you would usually see the post date. Since I did this, it seems like new blog posts are taking longer to rank on Google, some results are ranking well, and others declined relative to what I would have previously expected. What's the best thing to be doing? To include a date (considering a lot of my content is not time-relevant) or to keep it as it is now? The second thing, is I often go through and update my articles with new information and re-post it in my rss feed etc - ie the date becomes new again. How does Google treat this? Any ideas or comments would be great! Thanks
Search Behavior | | ben10001 -
Is a Shorter Page Title Better?
Is there any evidence that SEs give a greater weighting to keyword phrases in the page title if there are less characters? For example: 1. "Buy Silver Bullion" 2. "Buy Silver Bullion Coins Bars Rounds Easily Privately Securely" The key phrase I am trying to optimize for is "Buy Silver Bullion." To my knowledge, current practices would say the 2nd phrase is better optimized since it contains more keywords and it has a few USPs. But is there any evidence that the 1st example would be higher ranked in google for the phrase "Buy Silver Bullion" because it is more focused than the 2nd?
Search Behavior | | nwright0