What's wrong with this robots.txt
-
Hi. really struggling with the robots.txt file
this is it:User-agent: *
Disallow: /product/#old sitemap
Disallow: /media/name.xmlWhen testing in w3c.org everything looks good, testing is okay, but when uploading it to the server, Google webmaster tools gives 3 errors. Checked it with my collegue we both don't know what's wrong.
Can someone take a look at this and give me the solution.
Thanx in advance!Leonie
-
I think thats a great Idea .net is not my thing.
All the best!
Tom
-
Ah thanks, it's an Azure platform, so no SFTP, SSH or .htaccess. but i'll give the stack link to the technical guys then they have to translate it to our environment ( .net)
-
Believe me it took me plenty of time to realize how to do this but if you're handy with SFTP or SSH you can change the
And for the ultimate in ease if you're using WordPress there is actually a plug-in for 410s so it wasn't something anyone found easy to do.
https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-410/
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
Hi Leonie,
That's very kind of you I am very happy that you got it working correctly.
All the best,
Thomas
-
Hi ,
i got it working with a proper sitemap. Special thanks to Thomas for the great effort in his answers!
-
Hi, Thanx for your reply, i'm not sure i understand you by "please note you are disallowing more than just media"
the thing with this is the xml file is an old file but somewhere in the google archive. i tried do remove it with the wmt, but returns. It's not on the server anymore. the directory "media" doesn't exist anymore, also from an old website.
Because the file still returns in wmt i thought let's try it with the robots.txt
new robots.txt not tested waiting for deployment
Oh call me stupid, but how do i make a 410?
Grtz, Leonie
-
By the way here is an outdated site map that has when it looks like errors that really is telling me the protocol for putting a site map inside a robots.txt file is not endorsed by Google or Bing however I truly feel it is helpful so I do it. I've also added extra video site maps from an external host which is what's throwing out the errors the red color of the disallows is not a error it is just letting you know they are being blocked. Hopefully this will be of help
bigger photo is right here as well please give me a look at what errors are getting
http://i.imgur.com/Xg7EXwO.png
http status: 200
Syntax check robots.txt on http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/robots.txt (359 bytes)
| Line | Severity | Code |
| 6 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 7 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 8 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 9 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |
| 10 | Warning | The official standard does not include Sitemap support even though major crawlers (Google and Bing) support it. It is still nonstandard. |Warnings Detected: 5
Errors Detected: 0
robots.txt source code for http://
| Line | Code |
| <a name="line-1"></a>1 | User-agent: * |
| <a name="line-2"></a>2 | Disallow: /wp-content/plugins/ |
| <a name="line-3"></a>3 | Disallow: /wp-admin/ |
| <a name="line-4"></a>4 | Disallow: /wp-includes/ |
| <a name="line-5"></a>5 | |
| <a name="line-6"></a>6 | Sitemap: http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/sitemap_index.xml |
| <a name="line-7"></a>7 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/11323.xml |
| <a name="line-8"></a>8 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/4339.xml |
| <a name="line-9"></a>9 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/14213.xml |
| <a name="line-10"></a>10 | Sitemap: http://app.wistia.com/sitemaps/23283.xml | -
Hi Leonie,
I believe that you should create a robots.txt file that allows for a user agent disallow a folder /media/ and /.xml file. make the Unwanted xml file a 410 it will be dead to Google. however I think I have come up with a solution below please try pasting that in if it does not work.
A another tool for building robots.txt files and comparing them to the existing file from the same company believe it or not is right here.
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/robots-txt-generator/
please note you are disallowing more than just media you are disallowing something that should be more like this is for the xml sitemap why not just set it to a 410 killing the link in Google's eyes then you will not have to Disallow.
User-agent: *
Disallow: /product/
Disallow: /media/
Disallow: /bcc.xmlSitemap: http://example.com/sitemap_index.xml
putting your new site map in where I have placed a site map or where the rule above will give you the spot to put it will help you tell Google where your new site map resides along with of course submitting it to Google Webmaster tools and fetching it as a Google bot.
I would like to look at the architecture of your site if you're getting errors with what you showed me you can send me a private message and I promise I will respond if you are not comfortable showing the URL on Q&A.
I hope this is of help,
Thomas
-
Hi Dean happy to be of help!
-
Thanx for the url: it gives a warning on
Disallow: /product/
and
Disallow: /media/bcc.xmli wonder why?
-
Thomas,
That's an awesome tool, thank you for sharing.
-
if you want to find out anything that could possibly be wrong with that this tool is the holy grail of finding out what's wrong with robots.txt issues in my opinion just expect a lot more info than a simple response from it.
http://tools.seochat.com/tools/robots-txt-validator/
Sincerely,
Thomas
-
if i test the blocked url's they are blocked so it looks like the file is doing what's supposed to do. but still is strange i got these errors.
@Dean Andrews, thanx i will test it without empty lines, though have to wait for another deployment
-
Okay i got these errors in webmaster tools, very strange it is
-
Sounds more like a bug in the tool that you're as I tested the syntax just now in Google Webmaster Tools and it's not causing any issues there.
-
Hi, Lines containing only a comment are discarded completely, and therefore do not indicate a record boundary however you may need to remove the line break (not 100% sure but worth testing): User-agent: * Disallow: /product/ Disallow: /media/bcc.xml -
Hi, sorry forgot to mention that
syntax error @ User-agent: *
no user agent @ Disallow: /product/
no user agent @ Disallow: /media/name.xml
Thanx, Leonie
-
Hi Leonie, what are the 3 errors as it seems that the robots.txt file syntax is correct.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A few misc Webmaster tools questions & Robots.txt etc
Hi I have a few general misc questions re Robots.tx & GWT: 1) In the Robots.txt file what do the below lines block, internal search ? Disallow: /?
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence
Disallow: /*? 2) Also the sites feeds are blocked in robots.txt, why would you want to block a sites feeds ? **3) **What's the best way to deal with the below: - old removed page thats returning a 500 response code ? - a soft 404 for an old removed page that has no current replacement old removed pages returning a 404 The old pages didn't have any authority or inbound links hence is it best/ok to simply create a url removal request in GWT ? Cheers Dan0 -
404's in WMT are old pages and referrer links no longer linking to them.
Within the last 6 days, Google Webmaster Tools has shown a jump in 404's - around 7000. The 404 pages are from our old browse from an old platform, we no longer use them or link to them. I don't know how Google is finding these pages, when I check the referrer links, they are either 404's themselves or the page exists but the link to the 404 in question is not on the page or in the source code. The sitemap is also often referenced as a referrer but these links are definitely not in our sitemap and haven't been for some time. So it looks to me like the referrer data is outdated. Is that possible? But somehow these pages are still being found, any ideas on how I can diagnose the problem and find out how google is finding them?
Technical SEO | | rock220 -
Google using descriptions from other websites instead of site's own meta description
In the last month or so, Google has started displaying a description under links to my home page in its search results that doesn't actually come from my site. I have a meta description tag in place and for a very limited set of keywords, that description is displayed, but for the majority of results, it's displaying a description that appears on Alexa.com and a handful of other sites that seem to have copied Alexa's listing, e.g. similarsites.com. The problem is, the description from these other sites isn't particularly descriptive and mentions a service that we no longer provide. So my questions are: Why is Google doing this? Surely that's broken behaviour. How do I fix it?
Technical SEO | | antdesign0 -
Would duplicate listings effect a client's ranking if they used same address?
Lots of duplication on directory listings using similar or same address, just different company names... like so-and-so carpet cleaning; and another listing with so-and-so janitorial services. Now my client went from a rank around 3 - 4 to not even in the top 50 within a week. -- -- -- Would duplication cause this sudden drop? Not a lot of competition for a client using keyword (janitorial services nh); -- -- -- would a competitor that recently optimized a site cause this sudden drop? Client does need to optimize for this keyword, and they do need to clean up this duplication. (Unfortunately this drop happened first of March -- I provided the audit, recommendations/implementation and still awaiting the thumbs up to continue with implementation). --- --- --- Did Google make a change and possibly find these discrepancies within listings and suddenly drop this client's ranking? And they there's Google Places:
Technical SEO | | CeCeBar
Client usually ranks #1 for Google Places with up to 12 excellent reviews, so they are still getting a good spot on the first page. The very odd thing though is that Google is still saying that need to re-verify their Google places. I really would like to know for my how this knowledge how a Google Places account could still need verification and yet still rank so well within Google places on page results? because of great reviews? --- Any ideas here, too? _Cindy0 -
Replacing H1's with images
We host a few Japanese sites and Japanese fonts tend to look a bit scruffy the larger they are. I was wondering if image replacement for H1 is risky or not? eg in short... spiders see: Some header text optimized for seo then in the css h1 {
Technical SEO | | -Al-
text-indent: -9999px;
} h1.header_1{ background:url(/images/bg_h1.jpg) no-repeat 0 0; } We are considering this technique, I thought I should get some advise before potentially jeopardising anything, especially as we are dealing with one of the most important on page elements. In my opinion any attempt to hide text could be seen as keyword stuffing, is it a case that in moderation it is acceptable? Cheers0 -
Is it terrible to not have robots.txt ?
I was under the impression that you really should have a robots.txt page, and not having one is pretty bad. However, hubspot (which I'm not impressed with) does not have the capability of properly implementing one. Will this hurt the site?
Technical SEO | | StandUpCubicles1 -
How to handle URL's from removed products?
Hi All, I have a question about a fashion related webshop. Every month about 100 articles are removed and about the some amouth is added to the site. Most of the products are indexed on brandname and type (e.g. MyBrand t-shirt blue) My question is what to do with the URL / page after the product is removed. I'm thinking about a couple of solutions: 301 the page to the brand categorie page build a script which shows related articles on the old URL (and try to keep it indexed) 404 page optimized for search term with links to brand category any other suggestons? Thanks in advance, Sam
Technical SEO | | U-Digital0 -
Why do I have one page showing as two url's?
My SEOMoz stats show that I have duplicate titles for the following two url's: http://www.rmtracking.com/products.php and http://www.rmtracking.com/products I have checked my server files, and I don't see a live page without the php. A while back, we converted our site from html to php, but the html pages have 301's and as you can see the page without the php is properly redirecting to the php page. Any ideas why this would show as two separate url's?
Technical SEO | | BradBorst0
