Local SEO - Do I need it if I don't do business locally?
-
Super confused about this. Our office is located in Los Angeles, but it is not a storefront, and our clients are from all over the country... and our business involves travel to other countries. So there is nothing "local" about us. But everything I read seems to say we should be doing local SEO. How to approach this?
-
Hi there
"never" on my end was a strong word - I apologize. What I am saying that without proper optimization and taking advantage of opportunities like those listed above, you probably won't appear for those search queries here in Chicago.
My point being - you need to invest in associating your brand with these different regions that you provide services in and have representatives in. Whether it is dedicated on-site content or mentions on other sites that are in those regions, you have opportunities to appear for location based searches.
"It seems like what you're saying is that we need to establish locality in every large and small city in the U.S. and order to be found by people who live anywhere in the U.S."
Not at all - I am saying people in these cities do searches for hotels / tours / travel packages for different cities/countries around the world, researching where they want to go on vacation and get a deal. What I am saying is take opportunities to appear on hotels / tours / travel package websites in those cities/countries that are legitimate and relevant to your business.
Two things happen - you appear on sites in different countries and regions that you legitimately do business in and you increase chances of appearing for location based searches because you appear on sites in those countries and regions.
Does this make sense?
-
Thank you.
"here in Chicago, you're never going to pop up for a search I conduct like "horse back riding beach tours in Cancun"
Ok, so if this is true, then this is serious, serious problem for us. And this seems like an awful side effect of the current algorithm. Why wouldn't a successful, well established, 40 year old national business, whose physical headquarters is in Los Angeles, which operates horse back riding beach tours in Cancun show up in search results for horse back riding beach tours in Cancun by a person who lives in Chicago? That makes no sense. Our clients live in New York City or Ft Collins, Colorado or Emeryville, CA or Anytown, USA. It seems like what you're saying is that we need to establish locality in every large and small city in the U.S. and order to be found by people who live anywhere in the U.S. -- I can't imagine that is what the SEOverlords expect businesses like mine to do.
"I am trying to associate your brand to local businesses and tourist packages in different locales/regions you do business in."
As mentioned, we are in international tour operator. We do not operate tours in the United States, therefore, we have no U.S. based local businesses with whom we can be associated with.
"there are still opportunities based on brand mentions and link building via the questions above, meaning you could appear for searches based around locations + the services you are associated with in those areas."
So then, is the solution to try and make it appear to the search engines that we are local to the places we offer tours (such as your example of Cancun), even if we are not? If we did that, and you are in Chicago and you do your search for horse back in Cancun, will we pop up then?
And as far as the brand mentions... I understood that. And the new importance of brand is directly related to the other question I posted in the forum, which has not been answered yet, and is a completely different and unique problem. Maybe you could look at that and see if you have any insight there.
-
Hey Ben
That's totally fine - what I am more or less referencing is brand mentions.
Point being, here in Chicago, you're never going to pop up for a search I conduct like "horse back riding beach tours in Cancun" - I'm not even sure you do that, but let's suspend disbelief.
By asking you the questions above, I am trying to associate your brand to local businesses and tourist packages in different locales/regions you do business in, letting you know there are opportunities out there.
So while not directly "local SEO", there are still opportunities based on brand mentions and link building via the questions above, meaning you could appear for searches based around locations + the services you are associated with in those areas.
So, say that I do do that particular search. If you are somewhere mentioned in tour packages or itineraries, or even as a trusted partner to hotels or tour groups, this can potentially help you appear as a travel agency where people can set up vacations. This could send traffic your way where people could potentially book vacations through you.
Does that make sense? Hope this gives a bit more perspective and reasoning.
Let me know if you have any more questions or comments! Good luck!
-
The Google Service-area businesses looks like it could be helpful. I'll look at that more closely.
As far as your questions go... These are reasonable questions, but I am not certain how this would apply as far as Local SEO goes.
We are a tour operator. So, of course, our site is all about mentioning the locations/countries we provide travel to, and the specific packages, etc.. So we have that covered.
We do partner with hotels, and we have local representative offices in the countries we provide services to. However... if our clients are 100% U.S. based, and they are contacting us because we are a U.S. based business, is it really helpful (SEO wise - or otherwise) for us to get us listed in directories and such as a local business in Aukland, New Zealand (for example)? We're not a local business in Aukland. But we provide services there. And have local reps.
We hired an SEO firm 4 years ago who listed us all over the place (on non-travel related sites and directories, like YellowPages and such) as a local Los Angeles business. They said it would help us, but didn't seem to help us in any way, and in fact ends looks to me like it is confusing to say that we are a Los Angeles tour operator. We're not. We don't do tours in Los Angeles. And people clicking on those links are going to realize that when they get to our site and contribute to a high bounce rate.
So, ultimately, the question of Local SEO that I keep reading as being important to have, just doesn't feel like it applies to us, yet, we don't want to close a door that could be helpful in search results -- which is really the only thing we are concerned about in this regard. We are a 40 year old business and have had a web presence for a long time, and we just want to stay relevant in search results.
Thank you.
-
Hi there
You do have the opportunity to take advantage of Google Service-area businesses through Google My Business, so keep that in mind. I would also make sure that your website mentions the areas you provide travel for.
A few questions:
- Do you have any local/regional businesses you have partnered with to provide travel options?
- Any international businesses or agencies you work with?
- What about hotels? Are there any hotels that you work with or provide packages through?
- Are you a certified agency of any kind? Can you be listed on those sites?
- Are you able to create testimonials for clients/hotels that have you used your service?
- Are you able to mention (in your About Us or Services pages) different locations/countries you provide travel opportunities to? Even beyond that, are you able to mention specific businesses/touristy packages you provide mentioning landmarks or tours?
Keep in mind, while you are a national business, you do have opportunities at the local level to mention or be mentioned by specific hotels or businesses in certain areas that can loosely associate you with different locales or regions. It's just something to keep in mind.
Hope this helps! Good luck!
-
I think what you are interpreting - is take the "beach head" principle first. Which I believe in. Like the invasion of Europe in World War II - we started with a tiny beach - Normandy and then expanded to conquer the whole of Europe. But we made ensure we owned Normandy first.
It is unusual if your space does not have competitors. If it doesn't then you may not have to change anything.
However if it does have strong competitors - it is easiest & often best to own or rank well or at the top at least in your suburb, then build out to your town then State and slowly the Country. That said it depends on every business model. So if yours is a global business and niche it may be best to skip the "beachhead" principle.
I think it is a tactical decision you need to consider. 60% of your customers may come from Alabama and you know there is more there - so it may be best to focus there... even though your office is LA. Not sure if that helps but a good glass of red may clarify the tactical choices you have!
There are alot of business that do not focus on Local so do not run with the tide if it is not in your companies interests.
-
This is a topic I have struggled with as I have a client who sells digital products to a national audience. As if it could not get any worse my client sells a digital product in the very competitive fitness industry.
So how do you start a campaign where the client wants to have national legs but has yet to make a name for himself? Answer: Locally.
You need to start somewhere. The competitive nature of a national campaign can be overwhelming. Though my client had the grand vision of promoting his product nationally to start, he did not have a bankroll to reach that kind of audience. National campaigns require onsite and offsite seo as well as large advertising campaign to produce buzz about a product.
So we started locally here in New Jersey optimizing the site to attract local customers from the state creating new content as we moved along. Building links and reaching out to influencers beyond our local reach has now produce a regional campaign.
We can only grow from here but at every level the work load gets greater and greater.
If you do not prefer the slow build from local grass roots you could use sub domains to create region based sites that you could optimize. Rember that original content is preferred so this process could become a burden.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
After hack and remediation, thousands of URL's still appearing as 'Valid' in google search console. How to remedy?
I'm working on a site that was hacked in March 2019 and in the process, nearly 900,000 spam links were generated and indexed. After remediation of the hack in April 2019, the spammy URLs began dropping out of the index until last week, when Search Console showed around 8,000 as "Indexed, not submitted in sitemap" but listed as "Valid" in the coverage report and many of them are still hack-related URLs that are listed as being indexed in March 2019, despite the fact that clicking on them leads to a 404. As of this Saturday, the number jumped up to 18,000, but I have no way of finding out using the search console reports why the jump happened or what are the new URLs that were added, the only sort mechanism is last crawled and they don't show up there. How long can I expect it to take for these remaining urls to also be removed from the index? Is there any way to expedite the process? I've submitted a 'new' sitemap several times, which (so far) has not helped. Is there any way to see inside the new GSC view why/how the number of valid URLs in the indexed doubled over one weekend?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rickyporco0 -
Lightboxes and SEO
Do lightboxes (AKA popup boxes when you click "learn more" type CTAs) have any negative effect on SEO? We are looking at revamping our sites to have more of a tiled approach, and a lightbox with summary content popping out with additional CTAs, directing to pages with more information or free trial pages. Is there any downside to this approach from an organic perspective? is there anything specific to keep in mind when creating these if not?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chris81980 -
Can 'follow' rather than 'nofollow' links be damaging partner's SEO
Hey guys and happy Monday! We run a content rich website, 12+ years old, focused on travel in a specific region, and advertisers pay for banners/content etc alongside editorial. We have never used 'nofollow' website links as they're no explicitly paid for by clients, but a partner has asked us to make all links to them 'nofollow' as they have stated the way we currently link is damaging their SEO. Could this be true in any way? I'm only assuming it would adversely affect them if our website was peanalized by Google for 'selling links', which we're not. Perhaps they're just keen to follow best practice for fear of being seen to be buying links. FYI we now plan to change to more full use of 'nofollow', but I'm trying to work out what the client is refering to without seeming ill-informed on the subject! Thank you for any advice 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEO_Jim0 -
Why isn't the rel=canonical tag working?
My client and I have a problem: An ecommerce store with around 20 000 products has nearly 1 000 000 pages indexed (according to Search Console). I frequently get notified by messages saying “High number of URLs found” in search console. It lists a lot of sample urls with filter and parameters that are indexed by google, for example: https://www.gsport.no/barn-junior/tilbehor/hansker-votter/junior?stoerrelse-324=10-11-aar+10-aar+6-aar+12-aar+4-5-aar+8-9-aar&egenskaper-368=vindtett+vanntett&type-365=hansker&bruksomraade-367=fritid+alpint&dir=asc&order=name If you check the source code, there’s a canonical tag telling the crawler to ignore (..or technically commanding it to regard this exact page as another version of the page without all the parameters) everything after the “?” Does this url showing up in the Search Console message mean that this canonical isn’t working properly? If so: what’s wrong with it? Regards,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Inevo
Sigurd0 -
Interlinking vs. 'orphaning' mobile page versions in a dynamic serving scenario
Hi there, I'd love to get the Moz community's take on this. We are working on setting up dynamic serving for mobile versions of our pages. During the process of planning the mobile version of a page, we identified a type of navigational links that, while useful enough for desktop visitors, we feel would not be as useful to mobile visitors. We would like to remove these from our mobile version of the page as part of offering a more streamlined mobile page. So we feel that we're making a fine decision with user experience in mind. On any single page, the number of links removed in the mobile version would be relatively few. The question is: is there any danger in “orphaning” the mobile versions of certain pages because links don’t exist pointing to those pages on our mobile pages? Is this a legitimate concern, or is it enough that none of the desktop versions of pages are orphaned? We were not sure whether it’s even possible, in Googlebot’s eyes, to orphan a mobile version of a page if we use dynamic serving and if there are no orphaned desktop versions of our pages. (We also plan to link to "full site" in the footer.) Thank you in advance for your help,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Eric_R
Eric0 -
I'm Looking SEO Person for my project.
Hi Guys. I'm looking seo person who can help me in my project. I'm losing ranking day by day from last 2 months. For more detail and price please PM me. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KLLC0 -
Will blocking google and SE's from indexing images hurt SEO?
Hi, We have a bit of a problem where on a website we are managing, there are thousands of "Dynamically" re-sized images. These are stressing out the server as on any page there could be upto 100 dynamically re-sized images. Google alone is indexing 50,000 pages a day, so multiply that by the number of images and it is a huge drag on the server. I was wondering if it maybe an idea to blog Robots (in robots.txt) from indexing all the images in the image file, to reduce the server load until we have a proper fix in place. We don't get any real value from having our website images in "Google Images" so I am wondering if this could be a safe way of reducing server load? Are there any other potential SEO issues this could cause?? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James770 -
SEO - What Should We Do...
Hi Guys, Hope your all OK. Were having major problems with our homepage ranking for our main keyword - we were originally 4 but over the Christmas period our SEO company reported a fault with one of there servers that they were using for links, because of this fault these links were de-indexed from the search engine and in turn we have plummeted to 10th... At the time we had a landing page with an exact match keyword in it, e.g: www.ourdomainname.co.uk/key-word/ we were told to 301 this to our main page in Google but when we have looked today its now showing this page instead of our homepage. We also have another domain that we are using for a forum at the moment, now this domain name is an exact match doming e.g www.keyword.co.uk. The question is do we gamble and 301 our whole site to www.keyword.co.uk and see if we can get this ranking better? Thanks, Scott
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ScottBaxter0