Legit Editorial Placement vs Penalized Guest Posting
-
I'm planning to begin contributing to several different media outlets and blogs on the net, and hoping that I can get some decent placements for me and a few of my colleagues. Looking specifically at legit media outlets and corporate blogs with a structured and considered editorial process where we can contribute thought leadership pieces.
In light of all of the Google algorithm changes surrounding guest blogging, I am curious if this would be viewed as legit editorial placements, or as guest posts that would either carry no weight or be penalized?
Secondly, what are the considerations and value of including a high quality in-article link back to our site vs. a byline link, or both.
Does anyone have any data or experience with this? Thanks in advance! Andrew
and wondering if anyone has any experience or insights
-
To continue this discussion, here is an interesting thing that happened today. It might be a little egotistical but I have a Google Alert set up for my name. I was thrilled to get an alert today that I was mentioned in Forbes. Woohooo. The article mentions my name and an article I wrote and then links to:
https://moz.com/ugc/what-is-an-unnatural-link-an-in-depth-look-at-the-google-quality-guidelines
So, if I had published that content on my own site I could have had a link from Forbes. But...is that true? Most likely if I had published that content on my own site it wouldn't have had the authority to rise to the top of the SERPS and it wouldn't have had nearly as much exposure as it got on the Moz blog. So, I am guessing that I would not have gotten a link from Forbes and I would not have been mentioned by them either.
I think that as I get more authority there are some articles that I want to publish on my own site, but there are others that I want to publish elsewhere for the exposure. One thing that I find does well on my own site is if I do a study with unique information, or if I write an article on a very specific topic. But, if I am writing about a broad subject, at this point an article on my own site is not likely to outrank Moz and SEW.
-
If one or two clients is an adequate reward for writing an article then you might benefit from sharing some content with another site.
But, here is where to be careful... Let's say that I sell green widgets and each sale generates $5,000 in profit. One sale. If I write an article about green widgets and publish it on my website I will start to get some traffic for that topic. Then if I write another, entirely different article on that topic and give it to another website, it is possible that they will outrank me for my own keywords. Then, are the people who read that article on the other guy's website going to come to me to make a purchase after reading that article. Perhaps people interested in buying green widgets will click an ad on that website instead of coming to my website. They might not even recognize that I was the author and also a seller depending upon how obvious that is made to the reader.
Rarely, I publish articles given to me by other people who are experts in a topic area related to my website's industry. My site is more powerful than all but a few in its industry. So, when these folks give me an article it often goes straight to the top of the SERPs for the keywords that it targets. I have received complaints from the "guest authors" about that and about me not wanting to remove their articles after my site ranks above theirs. When they offered the article I told them that I was going to produce photos and graphics that will illustrate it better than any other website. They agreed and thought that was a good idea. Now that my site outranks theirs they change their mind about wanting their article published. They wanted to be #1 for this topic but they are not.
-
Good perspective. I can see you have a very different economic reason for keeping your content on site and it would have to really make sense to give it to another publisher so that they can monazite it.
We're probably along the same lines as Marie in terms of what we're looking for. We're a marketing company - traffic is great and would love to have tons of it, but ultimately we're looking to attract a moderate amount of high quality middle/bottom of the funnel traffic and gain one or two clients from our effort.
-
If you are searching for information on Penguin or manual penalties, you're certain to see a lot of stuff written by me on several different sites.
Flooding the SERPs ?
-
Exactly.
When I post on SEW and Moz, here are the benefits for me:
-People who have a specific problem and are reading this article might recognize me as someone they could hire to help them solve that problem. That's worth a lot to me if that happens.
-I get name recognition. If you are searching for information on Penguin or manual penalties, you're certain to see a lot of stuff written by me on several different sites. I'm trying to build up authority as a person who knows her stuff in these areas.
But do the links in those posts actually help? I don't really know. I think I probably do get some benefit from having a link from high authority sites like that. Sure, my rankings have increased over time, but is that because of those links? I've attracted links too and perhaps some of those came about because people discovered my content after I shared it on Moz or SEW. It's a hard metric to measure.
-
I think that Marie's situation is quite different from mine. I think that one client for her is worth a lot more than the value of one article on my website. Pageviews on my website generate pennies, often less. One client from her shared article can be worth millions of pageviews on my website.
The economics are different.
-
**If you had the capacity to do both,..... **
That is an interesting question... I do all of the writing for my site with the exception of a few articles per year from paid authors who have expertise in subjects where I do not.
If I was able to double my productivity I would continue to place all of that content on my current site.
I am fortunate to have lots of topics where evergreen an article on my site can bring in dozens to hundreds of visitors per day. These are not commercial topics where sales can be made, they are informational topics monetized by ads - which makes a difference in the value of the traffic.
But, considering the value of the traffic and the return. If the return was a lot lower for publishing on my own site compared to getting "fresh blood' traffic from another website then I would write articles for other websites. I have some knowledge of what kind of traffic would be produced on these other websites because I often receive very visible links from their prominent articles. Although they can send an immediate and massive amount of traffic for a short period of time that does not compare with the traffic that an evergreen article on my own site can produce with year-after-year of dozens to hundreds of visitors per day. New articles on my site can also get a blast of traffic as my own visitors share them on social sites and blogs.
So, for my site, I think that I have made an informed decision about sharing articles with other websites. How this works on my site, with my content, in my industry and with my visitors could be very different from what you will see on your site. So, don't assume that I have the "right answer". I think that I have the "right answer" for my situation. Your's might be very different.
-
Hi, Marie. Thanks for your response and agree with everything you wrote here. I am not looking at this exclusively as a link building campaign - I see a lot of potential benefits. Our focus has always been more inbound oriented, with a focus on quality content, value, etc.
That being said, it is one of my goals to increase our site authority and I am looking at different ways to do that. As Egol said, if we develop great content, it will eventually get shared, linked to, etc. We have seen some of that over time, but I am wondering if the strategy of publishing some content externally might accelerate our efforts, and if so, I am really curious to see to what degree.
Do you see a correlation between your posts on Moz and SEW and your site authority over time? Very curious to hear your perspective on if/how it's helped.
Thanks much! Andrew
-
Hi, Egol. Thanks for your perspective and totally agree with what you're saying in terms of giving away content for free and investing on your own site versus others. In my mind there is some return for gaining exposure to larger audiences as well as building authority for my site through off page links. If you had the capacity to do both, do you think that external posting would help accelerate the development of your site authority and ultimately traffic/following or do you just keep the content all internal and let it build?
-
In my opinion, it's all about scale and intent. You won't get penalized by having a couple of guest posts. But, if it becomes clear that you are using guest posting primarily as a means to manipulate Google then you can run into trouble.
A while back there was a situation where someone got a manual penalty and one of the links that Google gave them as an example link was from a byline in a YouMoz post. A lot of people freaked out saying that links from Moz were no longer good. But, in reality, this link was a keyword anchored link that went along with a whole whack of other keyword anchored links from other guest posts.
I guest post on Moz and Search Engine Watch and a few other places and I'll occasionally link to my site where appropriate. Because Moz and SEW are authoritative publications they have strict editorial rules. For example, if I tried to link to my site with the keywords, "Google penalty expert", I'm betting that my editor would either question this or perhaps nofollow this.
My purpose in writing for these publications though extends far beyond getting a link. My purpose is to improve my brand recognition (with my brand being me). The more I write, the more people recognize me.
If there is no purpose beyond SEO, for these guest posts, then they're probably not a good idea.
-
I just thought of another situation where you might give your content away.... content that is time sensitive.
If you have an idea for an article that will only be valuable for a short period of time, that might be a good one to publish on another site.
Keep the evergreen content for your own domain. That is the content that will pull in visitors over time. Something that pulls 50 visitors per day, day-after-day, year-after-year, is worth a lot more than content that will pull in a quick 20,000 visits and then go stale.
I have some content that brings in hundreds, even thousands of visitors per day. If I would have given that away, I would have given away .... I am not going to say how much money.
(It is really rare for me to say anything to anybody about giving content away. If certain people read this they will think that I have abandoned my principles.)
-
I write on SEO forums as a hobby but my serious work goes exclusively to a couple of websites that I own.
I don't give any of that work away. It's too valuable.
If you think that you have what it takes to be a "thought leader" then that stuff should remain on your own website unless the place where you publish it has an absolutely enormous audience, and then you still have even better content on your domain for anyone who goes there.
Work to build your own audience instead of feeding the audience of another website. It will be really slow going at first but as you gain momentum things will start chugging along at a faster rate.
Going back to that "thought leadership".... if you truly have that a lot of other people will want it and they will come to your webssite to get it. If it is really that good and a few people find it they will tweet about it, share it, like it, link to it.... if you really have that just publishing it can be like throwing gasoline on a fire.
Lots of people think that they gotta give their content away. They need to have the courage not to do that... or at least only do that in rare situations where they can get enormous bang in front of just the right people - and then only do that with a small fraction of their treasure.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We've just completed a company video. Should we post it everywhere at once, or stagger on various channels (YouTube, website, LinkedIn, Facebook...)
Hopefully we'll get a lot of traffic from our new corporate video. If we post it everywhere at once, will we get a spike in our analytics, and if so, will it be seen by Google as an anomaly, or even suspicious. If we spread out the distribution over several channels over a little time, should we get a longer bump. In either instance, we may consider a sharing schedule to promote it over time.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SteveMauldin0 -
Bad backlinks is it possible that Google is penalizing me?
Hi guys, since December I'm receiving thousands of bad backlinks from websites that copy my content and content from other websites. I also noticed a drop in the organic visits each month. Is it possible that Google is penalizing me for those backlinks? I know that I can ask the webmaster to remove the links but I don't believe that they will do. Look like it's a robot that does all this automatically. Should I use the Google disavow tool? Any other ideas?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Tiedemann_Anselm
Check images below please.
Thanks! OjAFwgT mni5lke UPVp9bW0 -
Algorithmically penalized site
I have been doing SEO for years, but luckily have never had a client penalized or had to go through that. I see everyone talking about it at conferences and know the absolute basics of recovery, but just had someone come to me that was algorithmically penalized about two years ago. They have no actual data to show me a date and they couldn't tell me a specific date. According to them, their SEO disappeared and wouldn't give them access to the analytics. They are definitely showing just about every red flag with anchor tags and low trust links and tons of duplicate content. Just about everything. I realize you don't have the deep data to go by, but are there cases when it is just better to start over from scratch. They have literally thousands of bad links and strange site pages that they say they weren't even aware of. Whether they were or not I guess isn't the point now, but I have heard rumors that if you start over, Google will still figure it out and follow you with the penalty. Is this true or documented? Don't want to potentially recommend that if that is something that generally happens to bad offenders. Happy to do the work and try to resolve their issues, but it is a lot of work and is going to be expensive and want to present other options. Thanks and any thoughts suggestions are appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jeremyskillings0 -
Seeking Top Notch Marketing Company with experience in growing sites post manual penalty
Does anyone know of a company who has direct experience with growing websites AFTER a manual link penalty has been lifted? Any referrals would be great!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
Guest post linking only to good content
Hello, We're thinking of doing guest posting of the following type: 1. The only link is in the body of the guest post pointing to our most valuable article. 2. It is not a guest posting site - we approached them to help with content, they don't advertise guest posting. They sometimes use guest posting if it's good content. 3. It is a clean site - clean design, clean anchor text profile, etc. We have 70 linking root domains. We want to use the above tactics to add 30 more links. Is this going to help us on into the future of Google (We're only interested in long term)? Is 30 too many? Thanks.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Does posting on Craigslist damage our SEO or reuptation?
We have a website that's a single person barbershop. She has been promoting on Craigslist, and that is outranking the website in the SERPs. However, the craigslist results showing up are actually expired and don't link to anything. They just seem to be cached by Craigslist. My question is, is Craigslist considered to generally not be a good avenue for directing inbound links for services on your site? Or is it a good strategy to use Craigslist to build link traffic for service businesses? I get mixed responses when I search for this. Thanks eYtdHtg.png
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | smallpotatoes0 -
Rel Noindex Nofollow tag vs meta noindex nofollow robots
Hi Mozzers I have a bit of thing I was pondering about this morning and would love to hear your opinion on it. So we had a bit of an issue on our client's website in the beginning of the year. I tried to find a way around it by using wild cards in my robots.txt but because different search engines treat wild cards differently it dint work out so well and only some search engines understood what I was trying to do. so here goes, I had a parameter on a big amount of URLs on the website with ?filter being pushed from the database we make use of filters on the site to filter out content for users to find what they are looking for much easier, concluding to database driven ?filter URLs (those ugly &^% URLs we all hate so much*. So what we looking to do is implementing nofollow noindex on all the internal links pointing to it the ?filter parameter URLs, however my SEO sense is telling me that the noindex nofollow should rather be on the individual ?filter parameter URL's metadata robots instead of all the internal links pointing the parameter URLs. Am I right in thinking this way? (reason why we want to put it on the internal links atm is because the of the development company states that they don't have control over the metadata of these database driven parameter URLs) If I am not mistaken noindex nofollow on the internal links could be seen as page rank sculpting where as onpage meta robots noindex nofolow is more of a comand like your robots.txt Anyone tested this before or have some more knowledge on the small detail of noindex nofollow? PS: canonical tags is also not doable at this point because we still in the process of cleaning out all the parameter URLs so +- 70% of the URLs doesn't have an SEO friendly URL yet to be canonicalized to. PSS: another reason why this needs looking at is because search engines won't be able to make an interpretation of these pages (until they have been cleaned up and fleshed out with unique content) which could result in bad ranking of the pages which could conclude to my users not being satisfied, so over and above the SEO factor, usability of the site is being looked at here as well, I don't want my users to land on these pages atm. If they navigate to it via the filters then awesome because they are defining what they are looking for with the filters. Would love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks, Chris Captivate.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DROIDSTERS0 -
Could this have penalized our domain?
So I've been wracking my brain about a problem. I had posted earlier about our degrading rank that we haven't been able to arrest. I thought we were doing everything right. Many years ago we had a program that would allow other stores in our niche use our site as a storefront if they couldn't deal with setting up their own site. They would have their own homepage with their own domain but all links from that page would go to our site to avoid duplicate content issues (before I knew about canonical meta tags or before they existed, I don't remember). I just realize that we had dozens of these domains pointing to our site without nofollow meta tags. Is it possible that this pattern looked like we were trying to game Google and have been penalized as some kind of link farm since Panda? I've added nofollow meta tags to these domains. If we were being penalized for this, should this fix the problem?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | IanTheScot0