Optimize CSS Delivery
-
Hi,
I am loading 3 CSS files here: http://www.viatrading.com/wholesale/9/Domestics.html
PageSpeed is telling me I "should fix" the delivery of these CSS Files (see image).
I read https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/OptimizeCSSDelivery , but can't figure out which is my case. The CSS are big, but even if I split them in several, all CSS files are still showing up as render-blocking. I moved them to the header/footer, but the message is still appearing.
Do you know what might be the problem and how to solve it?
Thank you,
-
The concept that Google is trying to setup here is that your CSS and JS contain elements that are critical for the page to render. The problem is that as the browser downloads them, they can block other resources from being downloaded. This is because the browser wants to read these files to see everything they need to download to render the page. Part of fixing render blocking is to reduce the number of files that a browser has to download, especially those in the critical path (html, CSS, JS) that can block the downloading of other files (images, etc)
Google is getting even more specific in your case. They are looking at the "above the fold" parts of your page. What Google wants you to do is take any CSS or JS that you use to render what is "above the fold" on that page and inline that code into your HTML file. That way when the browser downloads the HTML file it has all it needs to render the visible / "above the fold" part of the page vs having to wait for the CSS and/or JS files to download.
The problem is that defining "above the fold" is relative due to the multiple browser size and OS and devices that your web server sees on a regular basis.
If you have a really good front end developer, they can take the time to figure out what viewport size is the most common and then take all the CSS and JS and inline that (and note this may be different depending on the page) into your HTML (and this assumes that your CSS and JS do not bloat your HTML file size too much). One approach is to take your most common large viewport size and then inline all those items into your HTML that are above the fold so you have everything covered as the viewport gets smaller. The issue there (and this is also with most responsive sites) is that you have a lot of code bloat for your phone browsers. You can also use a sniffer to determine what the size of the viewport is and then having the appropriate amount of CS and JS inlined on the fly. I have also seen people suggesting that we should design websites for the phone first and then expand out from there.
This is the best website I have seen that talks about how all these files interact and what Google is really getting at
https://varvy.com/pagespeed/critical-render-path.html
Here is what I would do.
- Have a single CSS file for your site and host it on your server, not an external domain. This is best practice. Take the time to strip out all of the stuff you do not use out of the CSS to get the file size down. Minify and compress it, reference your CSS in your header. This may help with the render blocking as you are reducing the number of files requested to just 1, but it may not help with the above the fold render blocking.
If you want to move forward with with "fixing" the above the fold render blocking. Extract the CSS that is critical to render above the fold items on your site (noting the caveats above) and place it inline within your HTML file and then put the rest in your single CSS file. https://varvy.com/pagespeed/optimize-css-delivery.html
- Have a single JS file and host it on your server. If there is any external JS try and see if you can host it within your single JS file. Strip out all the JS you do not use to get the file size down. Minify and compress it.
If you want to get past the render blocking above the fold item above, figure out what JS is needed to render the page above the fold. Inline that JS within your HTML and then setup a single file for all the other JS and then defer loading of that file using this technique: https://varvy.com/pagespeed/defer-loading-javascript.html
I noticed your external JS file to Googleadservices. You may not be able to put that JS into your main JS file and have to keep the external JS reference. I would then try and defer the loading of that using the technique above. You need to do some testing to make sure that doing this does not throw off how your ads are displayed or tracked. I would also make sure your GA or other web tracking JS code is inlined as well, otherwise you risk throwing off your web stats.
This is what makes all of this tricky. The Google page speed tool is just looking at a list of best practices and seeing if they are present or not. They are not looking to see if your page is actually getting faster or not, or if you change any of these things if they throw off the function of your site.
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
PageSpeed Insights analyzes the content of a web page, then generates suggestions to make that page faster
This is why with all of this you need to use a tool that shows actual page speed and will show a waterfall chart with timings to see how everything interacts. webpagetest.org is a common one.
It gets really complicated, really fast, and this is where a a really good front end guy or gal is worth it to look at these things. I would start with my initial simple suggestions above and not sweat the above the fold stuff. Test your site with actual speed and see how it does. You can also setup GA to give you page speed data. You can then decide if you need to take it to the next level.
Another thing you can try (I have not been able to get this to work for me) is that Google has a tool that can do all the "above the fold" inlining and other speed tricks for you
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/module/
Just like above, I would benchmark your performance and then see if this makes a difference on your site.
Good luck!
-
The main thing this is trying to communicate is that your CSS files should come above / before any Javascript files. When the browser downloads your HTML, it starts at the top and goes down and downloads resources (CSS, JS, fonts, images, etc).
When the browser comes to a JS file, it calls the server to retreive the file, and once it's downloaded, the browser begins to execute that javascript. When that JS is executing, it's delaying the handling of CSS files which help paint the elements and make them look how you want.
Move your CSS files to be above all your JS files and see if that fixes it.
In general, most (not always ALL) JS files should be loaded as the last thing so that it doesn't block / delay the browser in rendering the page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO optimization for popular long-tail content
I was wondering if you all have tips / best practices to SEO-optimize new pages created for popular long-tail queries, as well as recommendations to assure we don't have duplicate content issues.
On-Page Optimization | | CuriosityMedia0 -
What is the best way to optimize industries served pages?
eg. abcwidgets.com/industries/durable-goods What kind of keywords should pages like these target? Primary service offered + industry name or the reverse order? Something else? Thanks for your feedback!
On-Page Optimization | | benjdonahower0 -
On Page Grade Reports - Which to optimize first?
I'm wanting to prioritize my on-page optimization efforts by doing the work that will have the most impact first. Let's say, hypothetically, that this was my on-page report card: Grade A - 60 reports
On-Page Optimization | | justin-brock
Grade B - 20 reports
Grade C - 70 reports
Grade D - 70 reports
Grade F - 300 reports Where is the biggest opportunity for increasing good traffic? Doing more work on Grade A pages to ensure I continue to rank Moving mid-grade pages up to high-grade pages (e.g., raising a B to A, or a C to B) Moving low-grade pages up to mid-grade pages (e.g., raising a D to C, or a F to D)0 -
In-page Optimization check list....
Hey, Mozzers I have a question about optimizing a web-page. I was just having a conversation with our web developer about optimizing our website and which changes would make the most difference in affecting the SERPs as far as on-page optimization goes. I was explaining to her we wanted to optimize our pages in the following levels (ranked most important to least important): <title>: key word laden </p> <p>2) <H1> : key word in <strong>bold</strong></p> <p>3) page content: keyword laden as well</p> <p>The idea was to have three or four layers of keywords on the page. I work for a real estate brokerage and the context was the actual page of the property listing. So in this case, the keywords would be the address of the property. She explained to me that the the H1 tag is more important than the title tag.</p> <p>Does this ring true with you guys?</p></title>
On-Page Optimization | | AubbiefromAubenRealty0 -
I am optimizing title tags and was wondering if it makes a difference if I use "commas" in between keywords that are synonyms or should I use "and" instead?
For example: "pants, trousers at pants.com" or "pants and trousers at pants.com".
On-Page Optimization | | EcomLkwd0 -
CSS validation
After validating the CSS on my site the error "Parse Error title=" was shown with no explanation. What is this?
On-Page Optimization | | casper4340 -
Two points of view on optimizing our search pages. What should we go with?
So we're in the process of going back and forth with our designer about optimizing our search results, which also doubles as a landing page for visitors searching with keywords like "Meeting Rooms Seattle" and "Seattle Meeting Spaces" We're on the front page in the SERPs, but still have a way to go. This is our current page: http://www.evenues.com/Meeting-Spaces/Seattle/Washington And this is something we've proposed for our designer to work with: http://imgur.com/JU1zg There search page text and links in the top left corner were to be placed for onsite SEO purposes ie we have no real text/content on the page for relevancy. We're currently in the process of writing the copy for each city on the search pages. Our designer made this argument: After giving it some thought I came to the conclusion that we may want to take a step back, and focus on the overall goal of this exercise. From what I have gathered, you would like to generate more click-throus and improve SEO, right? In my opinion, adding all of the provided copy and the link farm to the search results page would not necessarily help that. In fact, I think it would actually push the actual results way down. The content you provided me is more suited for a landing page, not a search results page (that is taking into consideration that you want similar content for other locations). Redfin has done a ton of great SEO work on their site. Using them as an example, if you go to Redfin.com, you will find tiny links in the footer that say "home for sale in seattle" etc. If you click on those, it puts you on a page like this: http://www.redfin.com/cities/1/seattle?src=homepage and then from there you can click to a neighborhood page like this: http://www.redfin.com/city/1387/WA/Bellevue. I would recommend that we create a set of location pages with the content the client is asking for, that are specifically optimized for SEO, and provide links in the footer of the site to get to those pages. Then the links on the new landing pages would land the user on the search results page. By keeping two different pages for two different purposes separate would help keep content more organized and help user find specific info they are looking for. As a quick fix we could put one line of text under the H1 text on search results as well, maybe with a strong tag. By doing that we will be able to keep the page looking clean and easy to navigate through. Anyways, that's just my two cents. Any ideas/input on this?
On-Page Optimization | | eVenuesSEO0 -
I am optimizing my webpages according to suggestions from the On Page Report Card. Should I have more than one keyword for a page?
I am optimizing my webpages according to suggestions from the On Page Report Card. Should I have more than one keyword for a page or should I make separate pages for each keyword even when they are similar? Will Google penalize me for making similar pages? Imagine selling, bargain milk chocolate peanut clusters. Keywords examples could be: Bargain chocolate Bargain milk chocolate Bargain milk chocolate peanut clusters Bargain chocolate peanut clusters Chocolate peanut cluster bargains Milk chocolate peanut cluster bargains Etc. Will one page called http://mycompany/bargainmilkchocolatepeanutclusters.com be OK or should I have one called http://mycompany/bargainmilkchocolate.com and one called http://mycompany/bargainmilkchocolatepeanutclusters.com and one called http://mycompany/chocolatepeanutclusterbargains.com , etc.? Thanks for your advice.
On-Page Optimization | | KSHAYY0