Value of URL Changes
-
Hi Guys,
I have a question. Each product listed on my webstie has product number like /product.php?id=3624. After I spent many hours with MOZ, I figured out that this approach is wrong and I should use the product name as URL to achieve better SEO performance.
Now I am planing to change the URL generating algoritm but should I do it for existing products. Some of them have already been linked to external websites. I am thinking to create mirror URLs but this may cause rather damage on my website. Do you know what is the right answer?
Best,
Tony
-
I agree with Alex I was trying to think of a way to make the URLs little bit shorter and would recommend doing so as well.
The chicken is not an insult it is an analogy of somebody making changes to a site without checking the site structure and testing it prior.
When you make the changes use a tool like deep crawl or Screaming Frog SEO Spider
https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/test-development-changes/
Look out for redirect chains shown below and or redirecting which you can check using this handy tool in addition to the other fantastic tools above.
https://varvy.com/tools/redirects/
You need to redirect from https// & http:// to one URL
See the bigger photo here http://i.imgur.com/zQYE65R.png
please keep in mind the chicken is just to be humorous and lighten everyone's day it's not an insult.
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
There's always a small amount of authority lost through a 301 redirect or canonical, but as long as you set the 301 redirects up correctly I wouldn't worry about it. It should benefit your site in the long-term.
I've overseen a few site migrations where unfriendly URLs (e.g. /product.php?id=1234) were replaced with friendly URLs (e.g. /category/product) and more often than not, immediately after the migration organic traffic and rankings remained consistent or improved. I think there was one where traffic and rankings dropped in the short-term but then recovered to a better level within a month.
If you go ahead with the URL change and 301 redirects, keep a crawl/record of your current website, then when you've completed the redirects, crawl the old URLs to see if they're redirecting as you expect. If they're not, fix them as quickly as you can.
I agree with Tom in terms of the URL structure and breadcrumb trail, though I am a fan of short URLs, so I'd shorten some of the category names when used in your URLs e.g.
/transport/air
instead of
/motors-and-transport/air-transportAlso be aware that
/transport/air
is different to
/transport/air/- so make sure only one version exists - with or without the trailing slash.
-
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your reply.
I thought that if I used 301 for redirection would work. What are methods that will not affect my traction?
Best,
Tony
-
Tony on the URL I referenced below there is a clear breadcrumb trail to the product. If you created URLs that used a subfolder for the category and then an additional subfolder for the product new for instance / The used a subfolder for the category and then an additional subfolder for the product new for instance
- www.threeding.com/antiques-historical/gravestone/
- www.threeding.com/antiques-historical/early-middle-ages/gravestone/
HOME ANTIQUES & HISTORICAL EARLY MIDDLE AGES GRAVESTONE
As Alex said anytime you change your URL structure or your site structure you are going to deal with a lot of complications. Including loss of traction in the search engine's. There are methods of doing it where you go about making small changes as you work.
Let me know if this is something you're considering doing it so I'll give you more information on it and I if you want.
All the best, Tom
-
Hi Tony,
I took a random URL
http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567 out of your site and found the structure was identical to what you had shown us.
If you give me some time and happy to give you a lot more information on what can be done to help you.
I see Not found “Rel="canonical"Not found
http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567
Meta Robots
Not found
Rel="canonical"
Not found
Page Load Time 2.394 seconds Google Cache URL
http://google.com/search?q=cache:http://www.threeding.com/product.php?id=567
IP Address 54.72.236.205 Country United States
Private message me or allow me 24 hours and I will have quite a bit more data
Tom
-
Hi Alex, Thomas,
Thanks a lot. Much appreciate your responds.
Thomas,
We use proprietary CMS. You can take a look at my website. www.threeding.com. I have noticed there are a lot of things to improve. The platform has plenty of content, much more than the competition but Google ranking is lower than many of the competitors. Now I am reading about SEO and it seems that we are on the right way.
Regards,
Tony
-
Tony,
Are using magento as a CMS platform if not what CMS?
you do not want to kill your crawl budget by having Google index session ID URLs.
http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/news/2064349/crawl-index-rank-repeat-a-tactical-seo-framework
- https://blog.kissmetrics.com/googlebot-optimization/
- http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/crawl-optimization
- http://www.seoadjust.com/seo/url-parameters-in-google-webmaster-tools/
Indicate How to Handle Dynamic Parameters
Tell Google and other search engines when to ignore any parameters added to your URL, such as a session ID or pagination. By doing this you are telling Google that http://yourdomain.com/keyword?sessionid=54 has the same content as http://yourdomain.com/keyword.Try using the URL Parameters tool in Google Webmaster Tools. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/crawl-url-parameters
Depending on your content management system, the URLs it generates may be “pretty” like this one:
or “ugly” like this one:
-
https://www.quicksprout.com/2015/04/06/does-url-structure-even-matter-a-data-driven-answer/
-
http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/learn-seo/technical-guides/seo-clean-urls
-
http://mysiteauditor.com/blog/top-10-most-important-seo-tips-for-url-optimization/
-
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/five-steps-to-seo-friendly-site-url-structure/
-
https://moz.com/blog/visual-guide-to-keyword-targeting-onpage-optimization
-
https://moz.com/blog/url-rewrites-and-301-redirects-how-does-it-all-work
-
https://moz.com/blog/4-graphics-to-help-illustrate-onpage-optimization
Large photo
https://moz.com/rand/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/elements-optimized-lrg.gif
- https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-glossary-url-definitions/
- http://stallion-theme.co.uk/seo-static-html-vs-dynamic-urls/
- https://www.searchenginegenie.com/Dynamic-URLs-versus-Static-URLs.html
- http://platform.productsup.com/help/35
- https://moz.com/blog/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls-the-best-practice-for-seo-is-still-clear
-
Hey Tony and Alex,
Thumbs up Alex did an excellent job of explaining what I was trying to get across. I apologize I did not have much time when I replied.
Tony I agree with everything Alex has said I would award him best answer.
Sincerely,
Tom
-
It isn't wrong to use question marks in URLs.
However - as Thomas says, short and descriptive URLs describe what is on the page, whereas the query parameters you use currently don't. "Keyword present in the page's URL" was also believed to be an important ranking factor by the participants in Moz's Ranking Factors survey earlier this year: https://moz.com/search-ranking-factors/survey
By mirroring URLs, will each product then exist at 2 URLs? E.g.:
example.com/product.php?id=3624
and
example.com/category/productIf so, you don't want to do that as it creates duplicate content. Using canonical tags to fix the duplication doesn't solve the problem completely.
If you change URLs, you should 301 redirect the old to the new, so
example.com/product.php?id=3624
would 301 redirect to
example.com/category/productJust in case you aren't aware - a "301" is a permanent redirect, so when using a permanent redirect, even if other websites have linked to example.com/product.php?id=3624 - the browser will automatically redirect to the new URL, passing most of the authority built up from the links you mentioned.
Whether I'd advise you to change the URLs of existing products depends on whether you can implement the redirects. In the short-term you'll lose a slight bit of link authority through the redirect, but in the longer-term, the frendlier URLs should benefit your website.
Also, there's always a risk when making large scale changes to URL structure - you need to make sure customers can still navigate the site without issues, and search engine crawlers understand the changes you've made - 301 redirects are best-practice to ensure this.
Ideally, when URLs are changed, all internal links should be updated.
-
Thanks. In this case I will duplicate the products and use the absolute canonical.
Just want to make sure I understand correctly: All my products URL's are with question marks. I just don't understand, is this wrong?
Regards,
Tony
-
/product.php?id=3624 In in the example you have given it shows a question mark which means you are hopefully not using that URL as your canonical.
/product/shoes/air-jordans/ vs /product.php?id=3624
Would tell a customer
more about what they are actually clicking on.
Remember that you have given an example of “?” “<element id="id”>”
Please use the absolute canonical and do not change-year-old links
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO value of old press releases (as content)?
Howdy Moz Community, I'm working with a client on migrating content to a new site/CMS and am wondering whether anyone has thoughts on the value of old press releases. I'm familiar with the devaluation of press release links from early 2013, but I'm wondering more about their value as content. Does importing old press releases (3-5 years old) create contextual depth of content that has some value for the site as a whole (even though the news contained within is useless)? Or, do these old press releases just create clutter and waste time (in migration). The site has a wealth of additional content (articles and videos), so the press releases wouldn't be covering up for thin content. I'm just wondering whether there's any best practices or a general rule of thumb. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | MilesMedia0 -
Is tracking code added to the end of a URL considered duplicate content
I have two URLs one with a tracking coded and one without. http://www.towermarketing.net/lets-talk-ux-baby and http://www.towermarketing.net/lets-talk-ux-baby/**#.U6ghgLEz64I ** My question is will this be considered as two separate URLs, will Google consider this as two pages with duplicate content. Any recommendations would be much appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | TowerMarketing0 -
Indexed/Submitted URLS vs Total Indexed
Hello, My site is www.colbysphotography.com. I have Total Indexed 195 while I have 87 URLs submitted and only 79 URLs Indexed. What is the difference and is there a problem? Thanks ahead of time,
On-Page Optimization | | littlecolby
Colby0 -
Best URL structure for my page
Hey everyone, I am wondering what is the best URL structure for my activity booking page in Bali. http://www.thingstodoinbali.com/bali/sports/water-sports/rafting/ or http://www.thingstodoinbali.com/bali/sports/water-sports/rafting-bali/ or would you recommend something else? Most people would google for "activity bali" in this case "rafting bali". Please advice. Thanks for your time and help in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | c.eiermann0 -
Long URL in listing job portal
Hello I have job portal and I am listing job offers by: regions, position, sector, language skill For example, when user searchs job in Bratislava, Programmer, information technology, english. My URL is www.presbium.sk/bratislava/pragrammer/information-technology/english Title:Job in Bratislava, Programmer, Information technology, english I know, that URL is too long and no good for SEO. Is it solution? When user chooses max. 2 items for example: www.presbium.sk/bratislava/programmer/ than I put in every next links atribute nofollow and google will index only pages with max. 2 items: www.presbium.sk/bratislava/ or www.presbium.sk/programmer/ or www.presbium.sk/bratislava/programmer/ but not www.presbium.sk/bratislava/protrammer/english/, because english link has atribut nofollow. And I want to ask, what is the best solution for SEO when I am listing job offers by regions, position, sector, language skill and I have than long URL and Title www.presbium.sk/bratislava/pragrammer/information-technology/english Title:Job in Bratislava, Programmer, Information technology, english
On-Page Optimization | | PeterSEO0 -
301 redirect and then keywords in URL
Hi, Matt Cutts says that 301 redirects, including the ones on internal pages, causes the loss of a little bit of link juice. But also, I know that keywords in the URL are very important. On our site, we've got unoptimized URLs (few keywords) in the internal pages. Is it worth doing a 301 redirect in order to optimize the URLs for each main page. 301 redirects are the only way we can do it on our premade cart For example (just an example) say our main (1 of the 4) keywords for the page is "brown shoes". I'm wondering if I should redirect something like shoes.com/shoecolors.html to shoes.com/brown-shoes.html In other words, with the loss of juice would we come out ahead? In what instances would we come out ahead?
On-Page Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Does google treat all urls equal?
Sorry for the lame title, i couldn't think of a better one. I want to know if google treats this: http://www.domain.com/products/some-product-name the same as it would treat: http://www.domain.com/?products=some-product-name if not, could you tell me the differences?
On-Page Optimization | | adriandg0 -
SEO Value of Within-Page Links vs. Separate Pages
Title says it all. Assuming that you're talking about similar content (let's say, widgets), which is better: using within-page links for variations or using separate pages? I.e., do we have a widget page and then do in-page links to describe green, blue, and red widgets, or separate pages for each type of widget? In-page pro: more content on a single page, thus more keywords, key phrases, and general appearance of real content. In-page con: Jakob Neilsen says they're confusing. Also, for SEO, you only get one page title, rather than a separate page title for each. My personal bias is for in-page, since I hate creating dozens of short pages for what could be on one page, but my suspicion is that separate pages are better for SEO.
On-Page Optimization | | maxkennerly0