Wordpress Tags and Catagories
-
I am looking for data in regards to Wordpress and blog tags and categories. Wordpress has these identifies in there tool, but I see them being used less and less. Wordpress also creates annoying pages and duplicate content errors when using tags. Should I remove these tags and categories to improve SEO?
I am also wondering if anyone has noticed a difference in user experience and traffic when changing these.
-
Hi Eric,
Without having too much info to work from, it does sound like you're on the right track here. If the tags aren't really serving a purpose there's no reason to have them junking up your site with duplicates.
If those tags are removed correctly they won't generate 404s because nothing should be linking to them. The only way you might end up with an internal 404 through removing them is if you've linked directly to them in your content.
It's always a good idea to crawl your site with something like Screaming Frog's SEO Spider after the removal to make sure.
The other thing to double-check is your referral traffic in Google Analytics and your backlink profile. Between these two you can confirm that you don't have any links pointing to a tag page that's actually sending real traffic. It's unlikely but still worth checking!
-
Hi Chris,
To follow-up on an old post of yours, I'm faced with hundreds of random WordPress tags that our social media person created during the past couple of years. Most of these serve no purpose and do not support a consistent site-wide theme. In my opinion, these just seem to dilute keyword emphasis and make it difficult for Google to know what our site is actually about.
I am seeing dozens of our /tag/ pages in the search results so I know they've been indexed. Last week I blocked the tags from Google using the no index feature within the Yoast plugin for WordPress, however, I'm reluctant to go in and just delete a bunch of tags for fear of generating hundreds of 404 error pages.
Any words of wisdom are appreciated.
Thanks.
Eric
-
There is very little traffic to those category pages and I think deleting them would be best. Thank you for helping out.
Joey
-
Not specifically, no; I think the benefit in this case is simply reducing the number of pages that may have duplicate content. Do you have a means of checking what traffic to those category pages looks like? GA, perhaps?
-
I think he answered it really well. Did you know of any data or examples that support deleting tags and its effect on SEO?
Thank you,
Joey
-
Hi Joey! Did Chris answer your question?
-
Hi Joey,
There are 2 ways you can go about this and it really just depends on the context of your site - ultimately the decision comes down to user experience.
Option A - Remove the tags As you said, you can simply remove the tags and be done with it all. It's a clean and simple solution that removes that duplication quickly.
If those tags don't really serve any purpose, this is going to be the best route. If you've only got a small number of blog and/or they're all around the same basic topic, there's no need to be dealing with those tag pages and chewing up precious crawl budget. Analytics is your friend on this one - are people actually visiting those tag pages?
Option B - Tidy up and have faith in the search engines This option is far more time-intensive but necessary if those tags are actually serving a purpose. In this instance, do the usual tidying up like making sure you're only displaying snippets of each post, you don't have redundant tag pages (e.g. tags for Onsite SEO, SEO Onsite Elements and Onsite) etc and I generally suggest avoiding or at least cutting down on pagination where you can as well. There's no need to have only 10 snippets per tag page if you're got ~100 posts in each - all this does is frustrate mobile users and give you 10 pages for that tag while taking up that crawl budget as well.
Search engines do a pretty good job these days of understanding how these pages come about and what purpose they serve so as long as they're not blatantly spammy and are tidy enough, you're generally going to be safe. You could block them via robots.txt if you're really worried about it though I personally don't bother.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Multiple H1s and Header Tags in Hero/Banner Images
I work on education websites, and our sites are being flagged by SEO and accessibility checkers for having multiple H1s. The home pages have the site name as an h3 in the hero image, and an aspirational headline (think: Be Like Mike) as an H1. The sub-pages have two H1s: one on the site name in the banner image, and the other on the page title. Note that the site name is very keyword-rich. If we were to remove the H1 and H3 tags from the hero/banner images, would it do any SEO harm? At the same time, we’d rewrite the H1 on the home page to be more keyword-focused. Any other options? I also read that it’s OK to have multiple H1s as long as it’s clear which H1 belongs to the heading area and which one belongs to the body area of the page. Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | UWPCE0 -
Google is putting brandname: in title tag
Hello, I was wondering why this is happening? In html for example the title tag is something like this: keyword 1 | keyword 2 | Brand name. Title is 67 characters.. When I search in google, I see the site but it shows brandname: keyword 1 | keyword 2 Is this bad? does this mean that google doesn't like the title tag that is in the html? I tried looking it up on google, but they were outdated and I honestly didn't really see an answer to what it means when this happens. Does the brandname: affect rankings?? Have any of you dealt with this, or noticed this?
On-Page Optimization | | donnieath0 -
Html to wordpress
I have an html site and most of my pages are ranking well. I want to switch to wordpress but i am afraid that i will loose ranking on my inner pages. Any thoughts? And should i do a redirect or use a html plugin
On-Page Optimization | | benjaminmarcinc0 -
Title tag length
Hi, I am fairly new to SEO and have just noticed the end of my title text has been cut off by Google in the serps results. Everything i have read tells me titles should be maximum of 70 characters, however, Google is only displaying 54. See below Security systems | wireless | battery powered | Police... Nobody else on the page is showing more than 54 characters. Am i missing something obvious? Any and all help gratefully appreciated. Thanks Si
On-Page Optimization | | DaddySmurf0 -
H1 Tags on Volusion Product Pages
So I'm working with a client who has no heading tags on his site and I'm wondering if there is an ideal method to implementing these on the product pages specifically, as the wording I ideally want to specify is is the product title, which i can't really code with an H1. Has anyone run into this issue? If so, what was your solution? Also, how vital are these heading tags on the product pages, anyways? If the Volusion SEO expert could chime in, that would be much appreciated. Thanks everyone!
On-Page Optimization | | BrandLabs0 -
H1 tag in the footer?
Quick question: I have been scouring SEOMoz.org along with webmaster forums looking for an answer, but we have a person who insists that the H1 tag be located in the Footer. I feel that is is fundamentally wrong because it is not the intent of the H1 tag, and I do not believe it is a best practice. That being said would we see what little value the H1 tag has disappear if we put it in the footer, would we be penalized, or am I being too vanilla by wanting to keep it in the Title position?
On-Page Optimization | | travelclickseo0 -
Title tag best practices when domain and brand are the same
I know the old standard for title tag optimization is to use your brand name in the title for a multitude of reasons, all of which are indisputable The most important reason being any strength and awareness can aid in click-thru. But does this hold true for exact match domains? Considering the way a search result is displayed, any awareness and strength derived from using the brand in the title is automatically included in the search result of an exact match domain without having to sacrifice valuable characters in the title. The organic value (or value beyond simply seeing the brand displayed and nothing else) can't have that much of an impact, can it? For Example, given the result attached, is it worth it to repeat dog.com in the title if it is already showing in the result? dog.png
On-Page Optimization | | NextGenEDU0 -
Sequence of heading tags (H1, H2, H3, etc) important?
Meaning heading tags (H1, H2, H3, etc) are a critical part of good on-page optimisation. Fair enough. It helps humans and bots make sense of a page's content. 3 questions regarding implementation of heading tags: Should heading tags appear in sequence in the HTML code. I.e. H1 first, then H2 lower down, etc.? Can the page contain more than one H1 tag? Can the page contain multiple H2, H3, H4 tags?
On-Page Optimization | | AndreVanKets1