My Search Rankings Are In FreeFall Since Last One Month. Should I Be Worried?
-
My site www.midigital.co until the 10th of December, 2015 was ranking more or less in the top 10 for 92 Keywords most of them 1 word and 2 word, built upon over 10 years of SEO and optimization (all ethical).
Since that time however it's like Google's decided that we didn't belong there and all the rankings are in free fall. The only change was that we updated our Wordpress Version. Nothing else was changed. Links were same as always.
My organic traffic figures have fallen 99%, many KWs have been buried beyond 51+ and because of that client's queries we got have virtually disappeared. PPC helps but it's not Organic.
Should I be Worried or is it just more Google Dance?
-
Thanks Peter. Duplicate content was never an issue before this month. We're really stumped because most of the duplicate content even is years old. The content from last year is all new.
But as you mentioned it could be that Google Finally Woke up. The same content btw was responsible for our 92 very highly trafficked KWs. I'll have our SEO team look at it.
Sigh! hope it's just temporary. Thank you so much for taking time out for me. Really appreciate it.
-
Hi Chris,
Thank you so much for the detailed answer. Our KWs Radiation has been built around Digital Agency and Digital Marketing Services. So all in all KWs like Digital Media, Digital Media Agency, Digital Agency, Digital Agency USA, etc etc have been used as our core KWs, and then building up with KWs for services such as Web Design, Creative, etc. However It's been some time since we visited our Content Strategy, about time we gave the site the value it deserve.
For Thin Content, as mentioned the site is old. In those times, we didn't always have access to long form content and we never really do update the older content. I doubt anyone has value for a mobile article written in 2007 (one of them is) and we don't remove it because it's just part of our growth.
Content Spam: We were hit last year with a Spam Bot - one of those crazy BOTS that hacks websites and then creates massive links to the site. That's where those LV sunglasses variations came in but we since cleaned up the site and most of those link profiles have been disavowed in Webmaster. Unfortunately, we couldn't get rid of the incoming links entirely.
Thanks for your time, btw. Really appreciate it.
-
Hi Umair,
There are a few changes I'd suggest here if this was one of our clients. There is no real clarity around the most recent Google updates but there has been talk of onsite elements taking more of a focus either now or in the near future.
Either way, here are my suggestions from a quick glance of the site:
Keyword Focus - The page title for the home page is keyword-stuffed but the page itself doesn't seem to have a focus. The other pages lack a focus as well. Through the page titles, headings and content there doesn't appear to be any particular focus term(s)
Thin Content - Most landing pages seem to have ~100 - 400 words. We consistently see the best results from 1500+ words per landing page, though even boosting them to closer to 1000 words should see an improvement. Just make sure the content is legitimately valuable to the user, not just a sales pitch about your company.
**Site Speed **- GTmetrix gives a page speed score of E. Site speed is quite important these days
Excessive URLs - Some of the URLs are quite excessive. This appears to be done to fit keywords in but this can be done in a cleaner, more succinct way. For example, rather than _www.midigital.co/about-mi-digital-agency-marketing-services/, _either about-us or digital-agency would be perfectly acceptable and still on point.
Footer Links - The use of sitewide footer links on a few sites isn't ideal. The worst example having well over 30,000 links from the one domain
Blog or Comment Spam - Most of your anchor text profile is made up of variations of "louis vuitton sunglasses" terms. While I haven't dug down to confirm this, it does at least raise a red flag for me and search engines.
I hope that helps!
-
Yes - you should be worried.
Only known change was RankBrain on 26 Oct 2015:
https://moz.com/google-algorithm-changeSo you must check for Panda (probably). In Moz there are many articles how to escape it.
Now let's see your site structure:
http://www.midigital.co/?s=
http://www.midigital.co/partners-affiliates/?s=
http://www.midigital.co/digital-marketing-and-media-innovations-agency/www.meezanbank.com/ribaseazaadi/?s=
http://www.midigital.co/digital-marketing-and-media-innovations-agency/page/2/?s
http://www.midigital.co/digital-marketing-and-media-innovations-agency/page/3/?s
and this happen 981 times... RU index also search results?http://www.midigital.co/tag/anderson/
http://www.midigital.co/tag/consulting/
http://www.midigital.co/tag/data/
total - 1402 URLs with tags... RU index also tags?http://www.midigital.co/mi-digital-thinking-and-ideas-digital-happenings/page/8/
http://www.midigital.co/mi-digital-thinking-and-ideas-digital-happenings/page/7/
http://www.midigital.co/mi-digital-thinking-and-ideas-digital-happenings/page/5/
total - 214 URLs... RU index also pages?Also your host sabotage you:
http://midigital.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/HIp2-1030x704.jpg
http://www.midigital.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/HIp2-1030x704.jpg
total 346 images sitting on non-www version. But if you access HTML document - 301 redirect to www. RU your 301 redirect works?You also have 32 404 pages. Few domains that didn't work anymore -> http://www.pascrackit.com/ http://blog.mediastation.co.uk/ but you still keep links to them. Few minor problems -> mailto:mailto:careers@mediaidee.com + http://www.midigital.co/digital-marketing-and-media-innovations-agency/page/15/www.meezanbank.com/ribaseazaadi/ http://www.midigital.co/digital-marketing-and-media-innovations-agency/page/15/www.meezanbank.com/ribaseazaadi/?s=
As you can see you have colossal duplicated content. And you're with huge probability hit by Panda.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
404s clinging on in Search Console
What is a reasonable length of time to expect 404s to be resolved in Search Console? There was a mass of 404s that were built up from directory changes and filtering URLs that have been fixed. These have all been fixed but of course there are some that slipped the net. How long is it reasonable to expect the old 404s that don't have any links to drop away from Search Console? New 404s are still being reported over 4 months later. 'First detected' is always showing as a date later than the fixed 404's date. Is this reasonable, i've never seen this being so resilient and not clean up like this? We manually fix these 404s and like popcorn more turn up. Just to add the bulk of 404s came into existence around a year ago and left for around 8 months.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MickEdwards0 -
An improved search box within the search results - Results?
Hello~ Does anyone have any positive traffic results to share since implementing this? Thanks! MS
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MargaritaS0 -
Noindex search pages?
Is it best to noindex search results pages, exclude them using robots.txt, or both?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | YairSpolter0 -
Rubber Ball Ranking Results
We noticed a few weeks ago that rankings for the phrase
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jayblue
Charity Collection Buckets
Were bouncing between this page
http://www.carefundraisingsupplies.co.uk/fundraising-products/Charity-Collection-Buckets
Rank 16
to this page
http://www.carefundraisingsupplies.co.uk/fundraising-products/fundraising-supplies
Rank 85
So we de-SEO'd the second page and added more content to the first page.
This seemed to lock Google onto the first page at 16, but it then started to slowly slide downwards. We have made a few more on page text tweaks, tried to reduce keywords density all to no avail. Even though overall this site has a better DA and MOZ profile than those ranked 1 and 2 for the phrase, we just cannot seem to get it moving in the right direction. We are just about to apply some quality links to see if that helps. But we are wondering if we are missing something at a technical level, like category structure, Canonicalisation, 301 redirects or something else. Any thoughts?0 -
Doing a re-design but worried about my new navigation affecting rankings
Hi, I'm a little worried/interested in the affects of my new navigation on ranking. So here is the current site - followuk.co.uk/mothers-day I have chosen an internal page because 99% of my traffic goes to these and generally external links and social shares happen on these pages (naturally because of the nature of the content). As you can see I have a nav bar on the left which links to all other pages. In my new design I will get rid of this nav bar altogether and have a breadcrumb which will give the user the option to root back to a category page which will contain these links instead. Kind of like this: Home > Important Dates > Mothers Day (if your on the mothers day page) I'm in two minds because maybe pages are passing PageRank helping each other to rank, but on the other side maybe the strong pages which do rank well and gain links/social shares are not ranking as well because they are passing link juice through the navigation to other pages. Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | followuk0 -
To index search results or not?
In its webmaster guidelines, Google says not to index search results " that don't add much value for users coming from search engines." I've noticed several big brands index search results, and am wondering if it is generally OK to index search results with high engagement metrics (high PVPV, time on site, etc). We have an database of content, and it seems one of the best ways to get this content in search engines would be to allow indexing of search results (to capture the long tail) rather than build thousands of static URLs. Have any smaller brands had success with allowing indexing of search results? Any best practices or recommendations?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
What is the best: one big site or several small ones?
Sometimes I've felt that my choice was incorrect. I know taht with a big amount of content on the same subject a bigger one is better: it’s easier to maintain, and a big number of pages is good for Google ranking, but when you have many small sites, each one focusing on a totally different subject, you can crosslink them and this will improve your rankings. Furthermore, many small sites allow you to focus in specific niches and help you rank better for different keywords. So, what is the best choice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sergio_redondo0 -
Local Search Results Tanked My 1st Page Ranking
My site was routinely ranking in the top 2-3 in Google for my relevant search terms. Then I started working on my local SEO. Now I'm in the map list at 1-2, but my site no longer shows up with the rest of the search results. I've heard that this has been happening to other local businesses with a big Google presence. I'm thinking that I should create some micro sites for each location listing that gives a location specific intro and then links to my main site. Then I can sever my main site from Google places. Here are my two questions: 1) Is this going to kill my placement in the map results; and, How long will it take for my main site to get back to its 2-3 spot rankings in Google's regular results?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ToughTimesLawyer0