Search Console - Average position vs Page Views
-
Hello,
I would like to find out relation between Average position and Views, one of our sites have strange activity.Average position going up but Views going down in Google Webmaster tools. I mention exactly views to be more specific because clicks could fluctuate due to CTR but views should stay the same.
Anyone can describe what could going on ? I notice on other sites that on some days when Average Position drops 50% less than normal views going up on some day, but overall I can not see any relation ship between Average Position and Views.
-
Hi Dani! Did Matt or John answer your question? If so, please mark one or more responses as a "Good Answer." It'll give them some bonus MozPoints, and it helps us keep track of things.
-
You have products that get sold at Valentine's and impressions dropped after Valentine's but avg position went up? Yes, that's related. I would say you can't really judge impressions on time-specific events like Valentine's Day if you sell things related to that holiday. You should see them go back up around Easter if you sell candy, at least.
Give it a month or so, see if things normalized away from the holiday. If so, you're good to go.
-
Hi,
Thanks for you replies.
Yes I do mean impressions when i said views, i like to count impressions more than clicks because ctr could drop but impressions should stay approx same in relation to average position in my opinion except as you said those queries related to some event. I got a lot of long queries in shopping niche so they could be related to Valentine day thats could be one of the reasons in traffic spike but those queries are showing up as "not set" so can not check for sure.
Right now volumes are not that big but its over 5000 impressions and I still see declining in number of impressions compare to days before Valentine and average position as i said much higher than before.
So I decide to finish experiment and do not make any changes at all for at least another week to see if impressions would still go down while average position would stay in place.
-
There are a few parts to this:
-
Is overall search volume going down for the terms? You may see an increase in ranking for, say, "Jeb Bush campaign" but after this week, traffic is going to plummet so even if you got to #10 last week and #1 next week, you'd get more views last week.
-
Were the views before somewhat excessive? Do they fit what you believe the search volumes should be? For instance, I have a client who's on page 3 of a main term. He looks at page 3 every day. I don't think he ever clicks page 2 though. So he's responsible for at least 30-50 views per month on that term on Google. But he never looks at page 2. So if you were on page 3 with him, you'd get many more views than if you then improve to ranking on page 2.
-
Average position is often manipulated by your social graph on G+. If you have more than 500-1000 people on Google+, you could definitely see average rank go up (as more friends & connections see your link) but views go down (if they've already clicked your site and know what it is.)
-
Similarly, you could see views go down as people become familiar with your brand. I know most of the SEO brands in my market. But if a new one comes in, they'll get a lot of clicks from me & other competitors in the next 2-3 months. But over time those views will decrease.
I don't put a lot of stock in average position to be honest. I like "Views" as a leading metric but only when clicks start following behind. If they don't, check meta descriptions. But avg is just too ... weird. Five views from friends and 5 views from non-connections can move your average up quite a lot from 10 non-connections.
Also, the volumes you're looking at - are you talking about 50 views? Where "big" changes are still really just 10 people not looking? Or are you talking 1500 where yes, it's that significant?
-
-
Firstly have you limited the scope of the search to the relevant country?
When you say views, assuming impressions. If so we see it is as not usual... the correlation between the two can be limited for some pages. I find it relatively good for queries. Over the 90 days it is usually shows more consistency and a more realistic correlation. I have an issue that my CTR was 3% for a client on page 1 for a keyword getting a 300 clicks a month - then the keyword drops to page 2, CTR goes to 10% but gets 20 clicks. ie the CTR goes up but clicks goes down....
I personally use clicks as my measurement on WMT's and the other three as "helpers" to try and identify what is happening.
Not sure if that assists but hope it does.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Descriptive domain vs business name domain
I originally set up my domain as "overlandparkphotographer.com" and then have my "jpshots.com" pointing to it. What I recently discovered is that even though the pages of my I set Yost SEO Title to be "JPShots Senior Pictures | Wedding Photographer" When you search "overland park photographer" the snippet tile is just "overland park photographer" which sounds super sketchy. I don't know if this is something to do with yost, or if my sneaky Domain isn't worth much, and I should simply use my regular jpshots.com domain as the primary. I know it works like a charm with yahoo, but I'm not sure how much the domain name factors google these days.
Algorithm Updates | | JPRichardson0 -
Searching for Compelling Hard Data on why B2B Websites Should Be Responsive
I am being asked to provide hard data in support the migration to a responsive website for a large B2B website. I have searched for any case studies showing before/after comparisons - no luck. I can easily show: Current data on desktop vs mobile visitors, their bounce rate, pages per visit, etc. Google Analytics Benchmark data - really compelling stuff there! In the past year, 100K visitors have come to the site from mobile devices. GWMTs shows the client not receiving mobile impressions for important keywords, All the close competitors have gone responsive. In APAC regions, mobile is more widely used than in the USA. BUT, I can’t show that making this expensive and time-consuming transition will result in more revenue. The client is a financial services software company, with a 2-3 year sales cycle. Has anyone seen data to support this transition? Thanks everyone! Have a great long weekend.
Algorithm Updates | | RosemaryB0 -
Duplicate Product Pages On Niche Site
I have a main site, and a niche site that has products for a particular category. For example, Clothing.com is the main site, formalclothing.com is the niche site. The niche site has about 70K product pages that have the same content (except for navigation links which are similar, but not dupliated). I have been considering shutting down the niche site, and doing a 301 to the category of the main site. Here are some more details: The niche sites ranks fairly well on Yahoo and Bing. Much better than the main site for keywords relevant to that category. The niche site was hit with Penguin, but doesn't seem to have been effected much by Panda. When I analyze a product page on the main site using copyscape, 1-2 pages of the niche site do show, but NOT that exact product page on the niche site. Questions: Given the information above, how can I gauge the impact the duplicate content is having if any? Is it a bad idea to do a canonical tag on the product pages of the niche site, citing the main site as the original source? Any other considerations aside from duplicate content or Penguin issue when deciding to 301? Would you 301 if this was your site? Thanks in advance.
Algorithm Updates | | inhouseseo0 -
.org appearing in browser search when .com is the primary domain
In most browsers, our visitors search for our domain and when they start typing the URL the drop down auto choices list .org as the first choice for our website. We do own the .org but it points to the .com and the .com is our primary domain. Why does .org seem to dominate Google search in this case? And since we have the .org forwarded to the .com, do we need to be concerned?
Algorithm Updates | | jimmyzig0 -
Not sure whether to update existing page or create a new one
Hello guys, So far I have found this Q&A to be very helpful. I have a couple of product pages on my website which rank very low in the search results. This was because in the past they were not at all optimized in terms of title, description, etc. I would like to now optimize these pages, get some inbound links to them, etc. I'm not sure whether to do this with the existing product pages or create new ones. I'm afraid that if I optimize the current pages, the low ranking from before will carry over. Would it be better to start fresh? Thank you, Pravin
Algorithm Updates | | goforgreen0 -
Perfect Landing Page for jewelry website?
What would be the Perfect Landing Page for jewelry website? Show me some examples and tell me why do you think so. Thanks in advance to everyone who participated.
Algorithm Updates | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
Anyone have stats on numbers of Google users searching while logged in?
In light of Google's recent "social search update", I am curious to know how many Google users perform searches while logged into their Google account thereby showing "social results".
Algorithm Updates | | Gyi0 -
Local SEO url format & structure: ".com/albany-tummy-tuck" vs ".com/tummy-tuck" vs ".com/procedures/tummy-tuck-albany-ny" etc."
We have a relatively new site (re: August '10) for a plastic surgeon who opened his own solo practice after 25+ years with a large group. Our current url structure goes 3 folders deep to arrive at our tummy tuck procedure landing page. The site architecture is solid and each plastic surgery procedure page (e.g. rhinoplasty, liposuction, facelift, etc.) is no more than a couple clicks away. So far, so good - but given all that is known about local seo (which is a very different beast than national seo) quite a bit of on-page/architecture work can still be done to further improve our local rank. So here a a couple big questions facing us at present: First, regarding format, is it a given that using geo keywords within the url indispustibly and dramatically impacts a site's local rank for the better (e.g. the #2 result for "tummy tuck" and its SHENANIGANS level use of "NYC", "Manhattan", "newyorkcity" etc.)? Assuming that it is, would we be better off updating our cosmetic procedure landing page urls to "/albany-tummy-tuck" or "/albany-ny-tummy-tuck" or "/tummy-tuck-albany" etc.? Second, regarding structure, would we be better off locating every procedure page within the root directory (re: "/rhinoplasty-albany-ny/") or within each procedure's proper parent category (re: "/facial-rejuvenation/rhinoplasty-albany-ny/")? From what I've read within the SEOmoz Q&A, adding that parent category (e.g. "/breast-enhancement/breast-lift") is better than having every link in the root (i.e. completely flat). Third, how long before google updates their algorithm so that geo-optimized urls like http://www.kolkermd.com/newyorkplasticsurgeon/tummytucknewyorkcity.htm don't beat other sites who do not optimize so aggressively or local? Fourth, assuming that each cosmetic procedure page will eventually have strong link profiles (via diligent, long term link building efforts), is it possible that geo-targeted urls will negatively impact our ability to rank for regional or less geo-specific searches? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | WDeLuca0