Search Console - Average position vs Page Views
-
Hello,
I would like to find out relation between Average position and Views, one of our sites have strange activity.Average position going up but Views going down in Google Webmaster tools. I mention exactly views to be more specific because clicks could fluctuate due to CTR but views should stay the same.
Anyone can describe what could going on ? I notice on other sites that on some days when Average Position drops 50% less than normal views going up on some day, but overall I can not see any relation ship between Average Position and Views.
-
Hi Dani! Did Matt or John answer your question? If so, please mark one or more responses as a "Good Answer." It'll give them some bonus MozPoints, and it helps us keep track of things.
-
You have products that get sold at Valentine's and impressions dropped after Valentine's but avg position went up? Yes, that's related. I would say you can't really judge impressions on time-specific events like Valentine's Day if you sell things related to that holiday. You should see them go back up around Easter if you sell candy, at least.
Give it a month or so, see if things normalized away from the holiday. If so, you're good to go.
-
Hi,
Thanks for you replies.
Yes I do mean impressions when i said views, i like to count impressions more than clicks because ctr could drop but impressions should stay approx same in relation to average position in my opinion except as you said those queries related to some event. I got a lot of long queries in shopping niche so they could be related to Valentine day thats could be one of the reasons in traffic spike but those queries are showing up as "not set" so can not check for sure.
Right now volumes are not that big but its over 5000 impressions and I still see declining in number of impressions compare to days before Valentine and average position as i said much higher than before.
So I decide to finish experiment and do not make any changes at all for at least another week to see if impressions would still go down while average position would stay in place.
-
There are a few parts to this:
-
Is overall search volume going down for the terms? You may see an increase in ranking for, say, "Jeb Bush campaign" but after this week, traffic is going to plummet so even if you got to #10 last week and #1 next week, you'd get more views last week.
-
Were the views before somewhat excessive? Do they fit what you believe the search volumes should be? For instance, I have a client who's on page 3 of a main term. He looks at page 3 every day. I don't think he ever clicks page 2 though. So he's responsible for at least 30-50 views per month on that term on Google. But he never looks at page 2. So if you were on page 3 with him, you'd get many more views than if you then improve to ranking on page 2.
-
Average position is often manipulated by your social graph on G+. If you have more than 500-1000 people on Google+, you could definitely see average rank go up (as more friends & connections see your link) but views go down (if they've already clicked your site and know what it is.)
-
Similarly, you could see views go down as people become familiar with your brand. I know most of the SEO brands in my market. But if a new one comes in, they'll get a lot of clicks from me & other competitors in the next 2-3 months. But over time those views will decrease.
I don't put a lot of stock in average position to be honest. I like "Views" as a leading metric but only when clicks start following behind. If they don't, check meta descriptions. But avg is just too ... weird. Five views from friends and 5 views from non-connections can move your average up quite a lot from 10 non-connections.
Also, the volumes you're looking at - are you talking about 50 views? Where "big" changes are still really just 10 people not looking? Or are you talking 1500 where yes, it's that significant?
-
-
Firstly have you limited the scope of the search to the relevant country?
When you say views, assuming impressions. If so we see it is as not usual... the correlation between the two can be limited for some pages. I find it relatively good for queries. Over the 90 days it is usually shows more consistency and a more realistic correlation. I have an issue that my CTR was 3% for a client on page 1 for a keyword getting a 300 clicks a month - then the keyword drops to page 2, CTR goes to 10% but gets 20 clicks. ie the CTR goes up but clicks goes down....
I personally use clicks as my measurement on WMT's and the other three as "helpers" to try and identify what is happening.
Not sure if that assists but hope it does.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it necessary to have unique H1's for pages in a pagination series (i.e. blog)?
A content issue that we're experiencing includes duplicate H1 issues within pages in a pagination series (i.e. blog). Does each separate page within the pagination need a unique H1 tag, or, since each page has unique content (different blog snippets on each page), is it safe to disregard this? Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | BopDesign0 -
Link reclamation: What happens when backlinks are pointing to other page than the most related page? Any risks?
Hi all, We have started link reclamation process as we failed to redirect our old website links to newly created pages. Unfortunately most of the backlinks are pointing to a page which already has lots of backlinks. Just wondering if I can redirect the old pages to the other pages than the actual related page they must be pointing to make sure only one page doesn't take away all the backlinks. And what happens if Google find that backlink is pointing to a different page than the actual page? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Would having links on wikipedia help search engine rankings?
I am wondering that having a listing on Wikipedia would help search engine rankings in general? I know all of the Wikipedia links are no-follow links but I think it'd still help to rank higher on search engines. What are your thoughts?
Algorithm Updates | | ahmetkul1 -
Google's Local Search Results for Broad Keywords
I have a question regarding Google's local search results for broad keywords. Since Google is changing their algo to reflect local results for broad words, would it be beneficial now to start going after those words as well? For example: we have a client ranking for 'miami security alarm', but I would like to know if it would be beneficial to start optimizing for 'security alarm' as well. Also, since Google's keyword research tool reflects searches on a national level, how would I be able to find out how many searches a broad keyword is receiving on a local level? Thank you in advanced!
Algorithm Updates | | POPCreative0 -
Branded vs non-branded query
So there's an obvious difference between a branded and non-branded search term, but I'm interested in the SERPs that are shown as a result. Branded search only results in 7 listings on the first page - obviously because branded search is generally more navigational in nature and the lower results get minimal CT. Are their any technical differences beyond this? Also, how does google define a branded search term? Because a search for Vodafone or Dell show reduced results, but Coca Cola does not. Thanks guys 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | underscorelive0 -
Does Search Volume Directly Effect Organic Search Result Rankings?
For example, if 20,000 people searched for "seomoz toasters," do you think a page on seomoz.org that mentioned toasters would begin to rank well for the query "toasters"?
Algorithm Updates | | tatermarketing0 -
Google Dropped 3,000+ Pages due to 301 Moved !! Freaking Out !!
We may be the only people stupid enough to accidentally prevent the google bot from indexing our site. In our htaccess file someone recently wrote the following statement RewriteEngine On
Algorithm Updates | | David_C
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mysite.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mysite.com/$1 [L,R=301] Its almost funny because it was a rewrite that rewrites back to itself... We found in webmaster tools that the site was not able to be indexed by the google bot due to not detecting the robots.txt file. We didn't have one before as we didn't really have much that needed to be excluded. However we have added one now for kicks really. The robots.txt file though was never the problem with regard to the bot accessing the site. Rather it was the rewrite statement above that was blocking it. We tested the site not knowing what the deal was so we went under webmaster tools then health and then selected "Fetch as Google" to have the website. This was our way of manually requesting the site be re-indexed so we could see what was happening. After doing so we clicked on status and it provided the following: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Content-Length: 250
Content-Type: text/html
Location: http://www.mystie.com/
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
MicrosoftOfficeWebServer: 5.0_Pub
MS-Author-Via: MS-FP/4.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:27:49 GMT
Connection: close <title>301 Moved Permanently</title> Moved Permanently The document has moved here. We changed the screwed up rewrite mistake in the htaccess file that found its way in there but now our issue is that all of our pages have been severely penalized with regard to where they are now ranking compared to just before the indecent. We are essentially freaking out because we don't know the real time consequences of this and if or how long it will take for the certain pages to regain their prior ranks. Typical pages when down anywhere between 9-40 positions on high volume search terms. So to say the least our company is already discussing the possibilities of fairly large layoffs based on what we anticipate with regard to the drop in traffic. This sucks because this is peoples lives but then again a business must make money and if you sell less you have to cut the overhead and the easiest one is payroll. I'm on a team with three other people that I work with to keep the SEO side up to snuff as much as we can and we sell high ticket items so the potential effects if Google doesn't restore matters could be significant. My question is what would you guys do? Is there any way we can contact Google about such a matter? If you can I've never seen such a thing. I'm sure the pages that are missing from the index now might make their way back in but what will there rank look like next time and with that type of rewrite has it permanently effected every page site wide, including those that are still in the index but severely effected by the index. Would love to see things bounce back quick but I don't know what to expect and neither do my counterparts. Thanks for any speculation, suggestions or insights of any kind!!!0 -
Does searching for brand names really affect search results?
Hey all, So I heard Rand Fishkin speak the other day at an event in Palo Alto and I tokk anyway an interesting little concept from the day. He mentioned that there might be some overall ranking benefits to having people search for your company's brand and hence arrive at your home page root URL. I was thinking and I'm going to put into place a little test to check this out, does anyone know if search results as a whole are positively affected by having a large number of searches for your company's brand name? I've referred to this in the past as "Branded Search" but perhaps there's another term... I'm interested in running a test whereby I actually remove our URL from the web almost entirely. From social media profile and potentially even from our business cards and instead replace this with "Google Us" or "Google: Junction Marketing". 25907011
Algorithm Updates | | blahblahblah20150