Help! added WWW to wordpress site and now lost SEO ranking
-
Hi there Everyone!
I have recently added a www to my wordpress website by going to settings>general and adding "www" to the wordpress address and the site address. After i did that i lost my SEO ranking, and also that MOZ is detecting that im getting site crawl issues stating that i have duplicate pages. an example is below:
any ideas on how to fix this?
-
WordPress should take care of it, I don't know why it didn't happen. Between that and you seeing the non-www canonical, maybe there's a full-page cache in action, that hadn't been invalidated yet.
-
Do you want the www or not?
If you remove it now, you run the risk of people who visit the site frequently being stuck in a redirect loop and not being able to visit your site. When a browser receives a 301 redirect it caches it, very stubbornly. If you now change the 301 to point back to the original location your frequent visitors browsers will have cached the 301 that points from non-www to www, and if www returns a 301 that points to non-www, they'll just be stuck in a loop. If you want to go back I would try to make turn the current 301 from non-www to www into a 302, then change back in several days or weeks. That might not be very great for your SEO, though.
If you want to stick with the www, then stick with it. I'm not sure what I was seeing earlier, but when I check your homepage now with curl the non-www redirects me to www, as expected:
Johns-MBP:~ John$ curl -I http://mefco.co.nz
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:38:22 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.31 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.31 OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.16
X-Pingback: http://www.mefco.co.nz/xmlrpc.php
Location: http://www.mefco.co.nz/
Cache-Control: max-age=604800
Expires: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 20:38:22 GMT
Vary: User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8Johns-MBP:~ John$
Where did you get the canonical info you posted above, is it from Moz? If so, it's probably outdated information. Remember what Matt wrote above about Moz & Google taking time to re-crawl your site. The way to check what your canonical tag, if any, says right now is to view the page source, ( in Chrome: View > Developer > View Source), and look for it, (Ctrl/Cmd + F to Find in the source, then type "canonical"). In your case, your canonical is now set to the www- URL - I'm not sure if you changed it since Matt looked, or if a cache expired, but it appears correct now.
You could go through any HTTP 301 and canonical settings in the Yoast SEO plugin, (which I see you're using), but I don't think you're at that point yet. Go through and make sure everything's set to www, if that's what you want to use. Really, I think you're almost there, and probably at a point where you should wait a few days to see what happens. I made a huge change on our site last weekend, (changed 99% of our URL structure), and after a bit of bug-fixing during the week we're only seeing the start of the result in Google & Moz now.
-
Furthermore, would me removing the "www" from the general settings fix my issues?
-
Thanks Matt and John, I have run the instructions you have linked me, and i am recieing the 301 redirect on the news page, the homepage is also showing that im getting a 301 redirect (this is with cleared cache, and incognito). In saying this after checking the canonical tag it seems that http://mefco.co.nz refers back to itself (see attached)
Im just trying to figure out how to fix this on wordpress. Yes the non-/news section are on the same wp install.
Silly question, is there a way to wipe all the tags and redirects and just start over?
-
Good find on the homepage - I saw it was Wordpress and assumed that would take care of the problem but you're right, something is wrong.
Also, the canonical tag is set to non-www and needs to be fixed.
-
In addition to what Matt said, make sure you're using a 301 redirect to redirect from the non-www version of your site to the www version. I'm pretty sure WordPress does this on its own, but you can check:
- Open a new tab in your browser
- Open the Developer Tools, (in Chrome it's Cmd/Ctrl + Alt/Option + i, or View > Developer > Developer Tools).
- Click the "Network" tab of the developer tools.
- Turn on recording by clicking the grey circle at the left of the bar that says things like "Preserve log" and "Disable Cache"
- Check the "Preserve Log" checkbox
- Type http://mefco.co.nz/news (without the www, but with the HTTP - this will ensure the initial request goes to the non-www URL), into the browser and press enter.
- A bunch of stuff will fly by - scroll back to the top, you're looking for the first request, in Chrome it'll just say "news" because that's the final part of your URL, but if you mouse over it you'll see the whole URL.
- Check the response code on that request, if it's 301 you're fine, if it's 302 you'll want to update that somewhere. If you use Yoast SEO maybe that can handle it, or you can do it in your .htaccess file. I've attached a screenshot showing a request to http://moz.com, you can see there's a 301 redirect - in this case to https://moz.com - the address is a bit different, but it's the same principle.
I thought of something while I was writing this, so I checked for you, and found:
- http://mefco.co.nz/news DOES use a HTTP 301 redirect to http://www.mefco.co.nz/news
- http://mefco.co.nz DOE NOT always use a HTTP 301 redirect to http://mefco.co.nz (I seem to sometimes get the redirect and sometimes not, I'm not sure if it's browser caching giving it to me or if your server sometimes returns it - you may have to use an incognito window, or clear your cache, or both, to see it, as 301 responses are notoriously hard to un-cache from browsers).
Does the non-/news section of the site use the same WP install? If only part of the URL is redirecting I imagine that Google & Moz may be slightly confused.
-
These things resolve themselves over time. Google (and Moz) have a record of what your site looked like. If they have 100 "pictures" of your pages and they see the www one, well that's new. We'll put that .. oh wait, it's duplicate.
They haven't gone back to see that the one it's a duplicate of is no longer there and is now redirecting. Once the bot crawls the new site entirely, those type of issues go away.
Your rankings should bounce back as soon as Google gets your domain crawled again. In the meantime if you don't have Search Console setup, do that. Go into the section that says Fetch as Google and get them to recrawl your site. Also, if you have a sitemap.xml on your site you can submit a sitemap through Search Console to help them crawl more of your site.
Those two things should get you back on track a bit quicker.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Speed or Site Speed which one does Google considered a ranking signal
I've read many threads online which proves that website speed is a ranking factor. There's a friend whose website scores 44 (slow metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Despite that his website is slow, he outranks me on Google search results. It confuses me that I optimized my website for speed, but my competitor's slow site outperforms me. On Six9ja.com, I did amazing work by getting my target score which is 100 (fast metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Coming to my Google search console tool, they have shown that some of my pages have average scores, while some have slow scores. Google search console tool proves me wrong that none of my pages are fast. Then where did the fast metrics went? Could it be because I added three Adsense Javascript code to all my blog posts? If so, that means that Adsense code is slowing website speed performance despite having an async tag. I tested my blog post speed and I understand that my page speed reduced by 48 due to the 3 Adsense javascript codes added to it. I got 62 (Average metric score). Now, my site speed is=100, then my page speed=62 Does this mean that Google considers page speed rather than site speed as a ranking factor? Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/YSxSwOG Regarding: https://etcnaija.com
Technical SEO | | etcna0 -
New SEO manager needs help! Currently only about 15% of our live sitemap (~4 million url e-commerce site) is actually indexed in Google. What are best practices sitemaps for big sites with a lot of changing content?
In Google Search console 4,218,017 URLs submitted 402,035 URLs indexed what is the best way to troubleshoot? What is best guidance for sitemap indexation of large sites with a lot of changing content? view?usp=sharing
Technical SEO | | Hamish_TM1 -
If I change Tags and Categories in Wordpress blog post, will it negatively affect SEO and cause 404s?
Hi, I have belatedly come to the conclusion that I have been using tags and categories when blogging in wordpress incorrectly. The result is that Google seems to prefer to show my archives and tags in search results rather than the post itself. Not good UX. As the site is only a few months old, am I best to learn my lesson and tag and categorize correctly moving forward or Should I go back in to these posts and clean them up & categorize and tag correctly. If I do this, will it cause 404s and hurt my SEO? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | johnyfiveisalive2 -
SEMRush's Site Audit Tool "SEO Ideas"
Recently SEMRush added a feature to its site audit tool called "SEO Ideas." In the case of specific the site I'm looking at it with, it's ideas consist mostly of suggesting words to add to the page for the page/my phrase(s) to perform better. It suggests this even when the term(s) or phrases(s) it's looking at are #1. Has anybody used this tool for this or something similar and found it to be valuable and if so how valuable? The reason I ask is that it would be a fair amount of work to go through these pages and find ways to add the select words and phrases and, frankly, it feels kind of 2005 to me. Your thoughts? Thanks... Darcy
Technical SEO | | 945010 -
Help with onpage keyword optimization, site architecture, and how those aspects affect the SERPs.
Hey guys, I've made a post or two before, but my story is that I've been learning SEO for a while now and have only recently (in the last four months) had the opportunity to actually apply what I've been reading about. What I've learned while trying to put these things into practice is that it can be pretty tough sledding, even when it comes to basic elements like keywords and search results. Anyway, to the good stuff. I've been helping my brother's startup company in my spare time because I want them to do well. They're on the last legs of their series A funding and have no money to put towards SEO, content marketing or social, so I'm helping when and where I can for free. The company is Maluuba, a siri-like personal assistant app for Android with a ton of different domains. They launched at TechCrunch Disrupt and actually have a lot of traction and a fair amount of publicity, so I'm not exactly working with scraps, but I don't work with them in their offices and only really communicate with my brother, who is having a really hard time getting buy-in for some of the stuff I want them to do. Their initial website was pretty terrible, so my brother got the okay to redesign the site and together, we worked with a designer to implement the site I linked to. Because they have so many domains (search, social, organization) I thought creating specific pages along with a one homepage would be a good way to optimize for different things and funnel a wider audience to convert to the one macro goal of the site: getting people to download the app. The results haven't been exactly what I expected and I fear I didn't really implement what I still think is a good plan correctly. I've only tried to optimize the pages for a few keywords to start. The main keyword for the homepage and indeed the brand is 'personal assistant app' which is a fairly competitive keyword that I know have them ranking second for on Google CA. I used 'siri-alternative' as a secondary keyword, since that's how they label themselves in the Play Store. For the three other main (pages search, social, organization) I used 'personal assistant app' as a secondary keyword and tried to optimize each page for 'search app', 'social app' and 'organizer app', respectively. While I'm really quite proud that I managed to get a page ranking in the top three for our main keyword, I'm just as disappointed that it's the search page and not the homepage, mainly because I have no idea why it's happening. So, all of that to ask a few questions: Did I make a mistake by trying to add funnels to the site? Or did I just go about optimizing the pages incorrectly? Why does the search page rank really, really well for 'personal assistant app' while the other pages - including the one I intended to rank the highest for that term - lag behind? I'd guess that Google is indexing this page alone as the main representative of 'personal assistant app', but that wasn't my intention. I'm also not using any rel=canonical tags, if that matters. Also, this page has been flipping around in the 1-3 range in the SERPs for about a month, but I still haven't noticed any traffic from 'personal assistant app'. Alright, this is getting way to long. I'd very much appreciate any and all insights as to what I'm doing wrong or what I'm missing. It could be really obvious and thus make this post silly, but I really have read and tried to learn a lot. I just can't see what's going on here because I don't have any experience to compare it to. Thanks in advance for any help. Cheers, JD
Technical SEO | | JDMcNamara1 -
Why is this site ranking better than me
Hi just used the compare tool to try and find out why a site is ranking better than me http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=www.lifestylemonthly.co.uk%2F my site is www.in2town.co.uk and the site i am comparing with is http://www.lifestylemonthly.co.uk/ Can anyone explain what is going on and how i can achieve better ranking results
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Our sites have a high number of long urls. how does this affected ranking
Hi, A few of the sights in our networks have a high number of urls. How does this affect our rankings Thanks in advance for your help
Technical SEO | | Feily0 -
Google is somehow linking my two sites that aren't linked! HELP
Good Morning... In my Google webmaster account it is showing an increase of backlinks between one site i own to the other.... This should not happen, as there are no links from one site to the other. I have thoroughly checked many pages on the new site to see if i can find a backlink, but i can't. Does anyone know why this is showing like this (google now shows 50,000 links from one site to the other).. Can someone please take a look and see if you can find any link from one to the other... original site : http://goo.gl/JgK1e new site : http://goo.gl/Jb4ng Please let me know why you guys think this is happening or if you were actually able to find a link on the new site pointing back to the old site... thanks a lot
Technical SEO | | Prime850