Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Crawl rate dropped to zero
-
Hello, I recently moved my site in godaddy from cpanel to managed wordpress. I bought this transfer directly from GoDaddy customer service. in this process they accidentally changed my domain from www to non www. I changed it back after the migration, but as a result of this sites craw rate from search console fell to zero and has not risen at all since then.
In addition to this website does not display any other errors, i can ask google manually fetch my pages and it works as before, only the crawl rates seems to be dropped permanently. GoDaddy customer service also claims that do not see any errors but I think, however, that in some way they caused this during the migration when the url changed since the timing match perfectly. also when they accidentally removed the www, crawl rate of my sites non www version got up but fell back to zero when I changed it back to www version. Now the crawl rate of both www and non www version is zero. How do I get it to rise again? Customer service also said that the problem may be related to ftp-data of search console? But they were not able to help any more than .Would someone from here be able to help me with this in anyway please?
-
Hello, asnwers to the questions bolded:
- At this rate, how long would it take Google to crawl all of your pages, (maybe it feels 10-15 is fast enough)? Over 50 days, i still cannot believe that it would be just a coincidence that crawl rate dropped so suddenly only because google suddenly thinks that my page should not be crawled that often. After all, amount of new content, quality of new links and all the other factors are much better all the time on my site, and before the drop, crawl rate increased steadily. It has to be some technical issue?
- Has the average response time increased? If so, maybe Google feels it's overloading the server & backing off. No, it has actually went down a little bit (not much though)
-
Interesting. I have 2 more thoughts:
- At this rate, how long would it take Google to crawl all of your pages, (maybe it feels 10-15 is fast enough)?
- Has the average response time increased? If so, maybe Google feels it's overloading the server & backing off.
-
Crawl rate still is extremely slow, average 10-15 per day except when i sent pages to be manually crawled, then it crawls those page. Before the drop the crawl rate was never under 200 per day and it was usually over 1000. anything more I can do? It seems to have no effect my rankings or anything else as l can see, but I still would like this be fixed. It has be something to do with the fact that i changed my hosting to godaddy managed wordpress hosting. but they have no clue about what could cause this. robot.txt file change seemed to have no effect or very minimum effect
-
Not that I'm aware of, unfortunately. Patience is an important skill when dealing with Google
-
Thanks! I will try that. I see that search console shows crawl rates with few days delay, is there somewhere i could check if it works instantly?
-
I thought of one other possibility: Your sitemap.xml is probably auto-generated, so this shouldn't be a problem, but check to make sure that the URLs in the sitemap.xml have the www.
Other than that I'm out of ideas - I would wait a few days to see what happens, but maybe someone else with more experience watching Google will have seen this before. If it does resolve, I'd like to know what worked.
-
I'm not convinced that robots.txt is causing your problem, but it can't hurt to change it back. In fact, while looking for instructions on how to change it I came across this blog post by Joost de Valk, (aka Yoast), that pretty much says you should remove everything that's currently in your robots.txt - and his arguments are right for everything:
- Blocking wp-content/plugins will stop Google from loading JS and/or CSS resources that it might need to render the page properly.
- Blocking wp-admin is redundant, because the wp-admin if it's linked it can still be found, and important pages already have an X-Robots HTTP header that says not to index them.
If you're using Yoast SEO, here are instructions on how to change the robots.txt file.
-
Hi, one more thing. Are you 100% sure tht robot.txt file hs nothing to do with this? It changed at the sime time when the problems started to occur. It used to be :
User-agent: *
Disallow: /wp-admin/
Allow: /wp-admin/admin-ajax.phpBut now it is :
User-agent: *
Crawl-delay: 1
Disallow: /wp-content/plugins/
Disallow: /wp-admin/At the sime time "blocked resources" notifications started to occur in search console.
Blocked Resources > Rendering without certain resources can impair the indexing of your web pages. Learn more.Status: 3/19/16152 Pages with blocked resources
This has to have something to do with it right?
-
Thank you for your answer, my answers bolded here below
- Do you see any crawl errors in the Google Search Console? **Nothing new after the crawl rate dropped, just some old soft 404 errors and old not found errors. **
- If you search for your site on Google, what do you see, (does your snippet look normal)? Yes everything looks perfectly normal, just like before when the crawl rate dropped
- How many pages does Google say it has indexed? Is it possible it's indexed everything and is taking a break, (does it even do that?) I dont thin this is possible, since the cralw rate dropped lmost instantly from average 400 to zero after the site migration.
One theory is: When you moved to the non-www version of the site, Google started getting 301s redirecting it from www to non-www, and now that you've gone back to www it's getting 301s redirecting it from from non-www to www, so it's got a circular redirect. If this is the problem, how should i start to get it fixed?
Here's what I would do to try to kick-start indexing, if you haven't already:
- Make sure you have the "Preferred Domain" set to the www version of your site in_ both the www and non-www versions of your site_ in Google Search Console. Yes that is how it has been all the time
- In the Search Console for the www-version of your site, re-submit your sitemap. Done
- In the Search Console for the www-version of your site, do a Fetch as Google on your homepage, and maybe a couple of other pages, and when the Fetch is done use the option to submit those pages for indexing, (there's a monthly limit on how much of this you can do). I have done this many times since i noticed the problem, fetch as google works normally without any issues
Is there anything more i can do? If i want hire someone to fix this, is there any recommendations? I am not a tech guy so this is quite difficult task for me
-
I don't know why this is happening, but this is what I would check:
- Do you see any crawl errors in the Google Search Console?
- If you search for your site on Google, what do you see, (does your snippet look normal)?
- How many pages does Google say it has indexed? Is it possible it's indexed everything and is taking a break, (does it even do that?)
One theory is: When you moved to the non-www version of the site, Google started getting 301s redirecting it from www to non-www, and now that you've gone back to www it's getting 301s redirecting it from from non-www to www, so it's got a circular redirect.
Here's what I would do to try to kick-start indexing, if you haven't already:
- Make sure you have the "Preferred Domain" set to the www version of your site in both the www and non-www versions of your site in Google Search Console.
- In the Search Console for the www-version of your site, re-submit your sitemap.
- In the Search Console for the www-version of your site, do a Fetch as Google on your homepage, and maybe a couple of other pages, and when the Fetch is done use the option to submit those pages for indexing, (there's a monthly limit on how much of this you can do).
Good luck!
-
That's not so horrible - it just says not to crawl the plugins directory or the admin, and to delay a second between requests. You probably don't want your plugins or admin directories being indexed, and according to this old forum post Google ignores the crawl-delay directive, so the robots.txt isn't the problem.
-
Hi, my robot.txt file looks like this:
User-agent: * Crawl-delay: 1 Disallow: /wp-content/plugins/ Disallow: /wp-admin/ This is not how it suppose to look like, right? could this cause the problem?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any crawl issues with TLS 1.3?
Not a techie here...maybe this is to be expected, but ever since one of my client sites has switched to TLS 1.3, I've had a couple of crawl issues and other hiccups. First, I noticed that I can't use HTTPSTATUS.io any more...it renders an error message for URLs on the site in question. I wrote to their support desk and they said they haven't updated to 1.3 yet. Bummer, because I loved httpstatus.io's functionality, esp. getting bulk reports. Also, my Moz campaign crawls were failing. We are setting up a robots.txt directive to allow rogerbot (and the other bot), and will see if that works. These fails are consistent with the date we switched to 1.3, and some testing confirmed it. Anyone else seeing these types of issues, and can suggest any workarounds, solves, hacks to make my life easier? (including an alternative to httpstatus.io...I have and use screaming frog...not as slick, I'm afraid!) Do you think there was a configuration error with the client's TLS 1.3 upgrade, or maybe they're using a problematic/older version of 1.3?? Thanks -
Technical SEO | | TimDickey0 -
Do YouTube videos in iFrames get crawled?
There seems to be quite a few articles out there that say iframes cause problems with organic search and that the various bots can't/won't crawl them. Most of the articles are a few years old (including Moz's video sitemap article). I'm wondering if this is still the case with YouTube/Vimeo/etc videos, all of which only offer iFrames as an embed option. I have a hard time believing that a Google property (YT) would offer an embed option that it's own bot couldn't crawl. However, let me know if that is in fact the case. Thanks! Jim
Technical SEO | | DigitalAnarchy0 -
Bingbot appears to be crawling a large site extremely frequently?
Hi All! What constitutes a normal crawl rate for daily bingbot server requests for large sites? Are any of you noticing spikes in Bingbot crawl activity? I did find a "mildly" useful thread at Black Hat World containing this quote: "The reason BingBot seems to be terrorizing your site is because of your site's architecture; it has to be misaligned. If you are like most people, you paid no attention to setting up your website to avoid this glitch. In the article referenced by Oxonbeef, the author's issue was that he was engaging in dynamic linking, which pretty much put the BingBot in a constant loop. You may have the same type or similar issue particularly if you set up a WP blog without setting the parameters for noindex from the get go." However, my gut instinct says this isn't it and that it's more likely that someone or something is spoofing bingbot. I'd love to hear what you guys think! Dana
Technical SEO | | danatanseo1 -
Schema, aggregate ratings and trustpilot
Hi! I'm looking to include rich snippets on some of my product sites, such as price etc. In addition, it would be nice to include our overall ratings (from Trustpilot) on the different pages.
Technical SEO | | eyephone
However, I've been looking all over, and haven't really found a clear answer, as to if this is even in adherence with the Google guidelines. As it is our company overall, and not the specific products that are being rated, I have done it likes this (on product pages): name of organization
248
8,2
10. other product-specific information Would this be against guidelines?0 -
Googlebot Crawl Rate causing site slowdown
I am hearing from my IT department that Googlebot is causing as massive slowdown/crash our site. We get 3.5 to 4 million pageviews a month and add 70-100 new articles on the website each day. We provide daily stock research and marke analysis, so its all high quality relevant content. Here are the crawl stats from WMT: http://imgur.com/dyIbf I have not worked with a lot of high volume high traffic sites before, but these crawl stats do not seem to be out of line. My team is getting pressure from the sysadmins to slow down the crawl rate, or block some or all of the site from GoogleBot. Do these crawl stats seem in line with sites? Would slowing down crawl rates have a big effect on rankings? Thanks
Technical SEO | | SuperMikeLewis0 -
Crawling image folders / crawl allowance
We recently removed /img and /imgp from our robots.txt file thus allowing googlebot to crawl our image folders. Not sure why we had these blocked in the first place, but we opened them up in response to an email from Google Product Search about not being able to crawl images - which can/has hurt our traffic from Google Shopping. My question is: will allowing Google to crawl our image files eat up our 'crawl allowance'? We wouldn't want Google to not crawl/index certain pages, and ding our organic traffic, because more of our allotted crawl bandwidth is getting chewed up crawling image files. Outside of the non-detailed crawl stat graphs from Webmaster Tools, what's the best way to check how frequently/ deeply our site is getting crawled? Thanks all!
Technical SEO | | evoNick0 -
Do search engines still index/crawl private content?
If you have a membership site, which requires a payment to access specific content/images/videos, do search engines still use that content as a ranking/domain authority factor? Is it worth optimizing these "private" pages for SEO?
Technical SEO | | christinarule1