I can't crawl the archive of this website with Screaming Frog
-
Hi
I'm trying to crawl this website (http://zeri.info/) with Screaming Frog but because of some technical issue with their site (i can't find what is causing it) i'm able to crawl only the first page of each category (ex. http://zeri.info/sport/) and then it will go to crawl each page of their archive (hundreds of thousands of pages) but it won't crawl the links inside these pages.
Thanks a lot!
-
I think the issue comes from the way you handle the pagination and or the way your render archived pages.
Example: First archive page of Aktualehttp://zeri.info/arkiva/?formkey=7301c1be1634ffedb1c3780e5063819b6ec19157&acid=aktuale
Clicking on page 2 adds the date
http://zeri.info/arkiva/?from=2016-06-01&until=2016-06-16&acid=aktuale&formkey=cc0a40ca389eb511b1369a9aa9da915826d6ca44&faqe=2#archive-results => I assume that you're only listing the articles published from June 1st till today.
If I check all the different section & the number of articles listed in each archive I get approx. 1200 pages - add some additional pages linked on these pages and you get to the 2K pages you mentioned.
There seems to be no possibility to reach the previously published content without executing a search - which Screaming Frog can't do. It's quite possible that this is causing issues for Google bot as well so I would try to fix this.
If you really want to crawl the full site in the mean time - add another rule in url rewriting - this time selecting 'regex replace' -
add regex: from=2016-06-01
replace regex from=2010-01-01 (replace by the earliest date of publishing)This way - the system will call url http://zeri.info/arkiva/?from=2010-06-01&until=2016-06-16&acid=kultura&formkey=5932742bd5dd77799524ba31b94928810908fc07&faqe=2 rather than the original one - listing all the articles instead of only the june articles.
Hope this helps.
Dirk
-
I can't make it work. After removing 'fromkey' parameter i was able to crawl 1.7k and it stopped there. The site has more than 400k pages so .. something must be wrong
I want to crawl only the root domain without subdomains and all i can crawl is around 2k pages.
Do you have any idea what might be happening?
-
Great it worked. Just a small note - if Screaming Frog is getting confused by all these parameters, it could well be that Googlebot (while more sophisticated) is also having these issues. You could consider to exclude the formkey parameter in the Search Console (Crawl > URL parameters)
DIrk
-
Dirk, thanks a lot.
I just added "formkey" to be removed as a parameter and it seems to be working. I crawled 1k pages until now and i'm going to monitor how it goes.
The site has more than 400k pages so the process to crawl them all will take time (and i'm going to have to crawl each sector so i can create sitemaps for them).
Thanks again
Gjergj -
In the menu 'url rewriting' you can simply put the parameters the site should ignore (like date, formkey,..). I removed the formkey parameter and I checked the pages of the archive in Screaming Frog.
It is clearly able to detect all the internal links on the page - so will crawl them.
How are you certain that the pages below are not crawled - could you give a specific example of page that should be crawled but isn't?
Dirk
-
I've tried changing settings to respect noindex & canonical .. it will stop crawling the archive pages but still it won't crawl the links inside those pages. (i've added NOINDEX, FOLLOW in all archive pagination pages)
What do you mean by rewriting the url to ignore the formkey? How do you think it should be.
Gjergji
-
It think Screaming Frog is going nuts on the formkey value in the url which is constantly changing when changing pages.
Could you modify the settings of the spider to respect noindex & respect canonical - looks like this is solving the issue.
Alternatively you could rewrite the url to ignore the formkey (remove parameter)
Dirk
-
Hi Logan
I've tried going back to default configuration but it didn't help .. still i don't believe Screaming Frog is to blame, i think there is something wrong with the way the site has been developed (they are using a custom CMS) .. but i can't find the reason why this is happening. As soon as i find the solution then i can ask the guys who developed this site to make the necessary changes.
Thanks a lot.
-
Hi Dirk
Thanks a lot for replying back. The issue is that Screaming Frog is crawling the archive pages (like these examples) but it won't crawl the articles that are listed inside these pages.
The hierarchy of the site goes like this:
Homepage
- Categories (with about 20 articles in them)
- Archive of that category (with all the remaining articles, which in this case means thousands since they are a news website)Screaming Frog will crawl the homepage and categories ... but after it goes to the archive it won't crawl the articles inside archive, instead it will only crawl the pages (pagination) of that archive.
Thanks again.
-
Try going to File > Default Conif > Clear Default Configuration. This happens to me sometimes as well as I've edited settings over time. Clearing it out and going back to default settings is usually quicker than clicking through the settings to identify which one is causing the problem.
-
Did you put in some special filters - just tried to crawl the site & it seems to work just fine?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any SEO-wizards out there who can tell me why Google isn't following the canonicals on some pages?
Hi, I am banging my head against the wall regarding the website of a costumer: In "duplicate title tags" in GSC I can see that Google is indexing a whole bunch parametres of many of the url's on the page. When I check the rel=canonical tag, everything seems correct. My costumer is the biggest sports retailer in Norway. Their webshop has approximately 20 000 products. Yet they have more than 400 000 pages indexed by Google. So why is Google indexing pages like this? What is missing in this canonical?https://www.gsport.no/herre/klaer/bukse-shorts?type-bukser-334=regnbukser&order=price&dir=descWhy isn't Google just cutting off the ?type-bukser-334=regnbukser&order=price&dir=desc part of the url?Can it be the canonical-tag itself, or could the problem be somewhere in the CMS? Looking forward to your answers Sigurd
Technical SEO | | Inevo0 -
Google how deal with licensed content when this placed on vendor & client's website too. Will Google penalize the client's site for this ?
One of my client bought licensed content from top vendor of Health Industry. This same content is on the vendor's website & my client's site also but on my site there is a link back to vendor is placed which clearly tells to anyone that this is a licensed content & we bought from this vendor. My client bought paid top quality content for best source of industry but at this same this is placed on vendor's website also. Will Google penalize my client's website for this ? Niche is HEALTH
Technical SEO | | sourabhrana1 -
I've had a sudden a increase in crawl issues as of yesterday (like 300 from a steady 10, does anyone else have this issue?
the main issue is that it's now indexing both www and http:// - anyone else got this issue or had any changes suddenly on their crawl results?
Technical SEO | | beckyhy0 -
How to find temporary redirects of existing site you don't control?
I am getting ready to move a clients site from another company. They have like 35 tempory redirects according to MOZ. Question is, how can I find out then current redirects so I can update everything for the new site? Do I need access to the current htaccess file to do this?
Technical SEO | | scott3150 -
Can someone interpret this entry in my htaccess file into english so that I can understand?
There are a number of entries in my htaccess and I'd like to understand what they are doing so that I can understand if they need to be there or not. So, can someone tell me what this says...in plain english? RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^legacytravel.com$ [OR]
Technical SEO | | cathibanks
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.legacytravel.com$
RewriteRule ^carrollton-travel-agent$ "http://www.legacytravel.com/carrollton-travel-agent" [R=301,L] Thank you a million times in advance.0 -
What I doing wrong when trying to search for links from external websites to my website
This is just the little frustrating question nothing important but I’m sure somebody will know the answer. In the white board Friday this week Rand suggested at one point that when you’re searching for results links to your website if you put a - followed by site followed by your url like –site:yourwebsite.com you get the results of pages with links on other websites but excluding your own webpages but it just doesn’t work I get no results just an error message, any idea why? If I remove the - I get tons of results but there on my own webpages……….
Technical SEO | | whitbycottages0 -
Diagnosing Canonical Errors Is Screaming frog reliable?
Morning from suny & warm wetherby UK 🙂 On this page http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/how-we-care-for-you/right-to-manage/ screaming frog is citing a canonical error but I'm confused as this piece of code is in place: http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/About/right-to-manage" /> So my question is please - "Does this page http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/how-we-care-for-you/right-to-manage/ have a caninical error or is screaming frog useless? Other examples where screaming frog is picking up canonical errors include:
Technical SEO | | Nightwing
http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/what-our-customers-say/right-to-manage/
http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/buying-a-home/right-to-manage/ Oh forgot to say the preffered version is http://www.goldsboroughestates.co.uk/About/right-to-manage/ Any insights welcvome 🙂0 -
Issue with 'Crawl Errors' in Webmaster Tools
Have an issue with a large number of 'Not Found' webpages being listed in Webmaster Tools. In the 'Detected' column, the dates are recent (May 1st - 15th). However, looking clicking into the 'Linked From' column, all of the link sources are old, many from 2009-10. Furthermore, I have checked a large number of the source pages to double check that the links don't still exist, and they don't as I expected. Firstly, I am concerned that Google thinks there is a vast number of broken links on this site when in fact there is not. Secondly, why if the errors do not actually exist (and never actually have) do they remain listed in Webmaster Tools, which claims they were found again this month?! Thirdly, what's the best and quickest way of getting rid of these errors? Google advises that using the 'URL Removal Tool' will only remove the pages from the Google index, NOT from the crawl errors. The info is that if they keep getting 404 returns, it will automatically get removed. Well I don't know how many times they need to get that 404 in order to get rid of a URL and link that haven't existed for 18-24 months?!! Thanks.
Technical SEO | | RiceMedia0