Backlinks or content? What is the problem here?
-
My Moz ranking is 29, Ahrefs Domain rank is 49 and Majestic Citation flow is 44 whereas trust flow is 17.
This is a plain question - If the above are the rankings for backlink problem, then where is the problem more likely to be found? Backlink or content?
In more detail - My site has been dropping in search since the last few weeks. With these rankings, is it likely that a backlink related problem is there? I myself agree that some content is poor and thin and there is a problem of plagiarism also. But overall, do i keep focusing on content? I do not know how good are these rankings as shown above.
My URL is www.marketing91.com
Please let me know whether the backlink profile looks good or not? So that at least i am not worried that there is a backlink problem as well. (i will surely work on toxic links soon) I can worry only on content.
-
Thank you Andy. This was a week long foray into backlink audit and its finally coming to an end. Now its content content and content.
-
**They are purely for links. So do i directly disavow them? **
Yes, if there is no way to do anything about it, just disavow.
Should i go ahead and disavow the bad links? Or let it be?
Yes, these sorts of links will be doing you no favours at all. OK, Google might just be ignoring them, but much better to err on the side of caution. If Google was just ignoring them but then changes their stance at a later stage, you know you are covered.
-Andy
-
Dear Andy,
I hope you answer this. Yes, i checked ahrefs and Moz.com backlinks thoroughly. I could find 57 backlinks which included "Payday loans" or from link farms or in general bad backlinks. They might have a Domain rating of 40 in Ahrefs, but they were bad back links.
I cannot remove them because these sites just dont have a contact us button. They are purely for links. So do i directly disavow them?
Secondly, my answer to content is that i am rewriting all content which was top of the serps again. I am a problogger now and i have more time in my hands. This solves the plagiarism problem and also ensures that i get the google "answer box" which is repeatedly a pain in the A. I am losing to competition because of some poorly written articles by other authors. So content will be overhauled.
The question in my mind is, even if the loss looks because of content, should i go ahead and disavow the bad links? Or let it be?
-
Hi,
** I myself agree that some content is poor and thin and there is a problem of plagiarism also**
This is a biggie - Page quality is a huge thing for Google and you must ensure that pages someone lands on, have a reason to exist, and answer the question they asked correctly.
If you know there are spammy links, just how spammy? Are they damaging? Do they link with money-phrases? Has there been any penalty on the site at any time? All these should be looked at (and more) when assessing a backlink profile.
If you know there are links that are so poor that they could be damaging, either ask for them to be removed, or disavow them.
-Andy
-
On an average, in AHREFS, my competitors have a Domain rank of 53 and i have of 49.
In moz, they have a rank of 50 again. But i have around 29. So yes, the competitors are ahead of me. But till date i was ranking well with the same backlinks. At least for my keywords?
So any insight with this data? Major question, do i rectify my backlinks, build more content, or the more exhausting and expensive one, do both?
-
Backlinks: depends on the quantity and quality of the backlink profiles for your competitors. If they have a much higher DA/PA/Trust, than you probably need to build that up to compete.
Content: unique, long form content works best. Aim to be share worthy... if people share your link on social media, they will probably link back to your website as well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz reports way fewer backlinks than google search?
My site is only 11 months old but has steadily (if not slowly) been gaining backlinks. My question, is why Moz shows me at 303 backlinks and Google search console is showing at 1,237? I am more than a little suspicious that this could highlight the reason Moz shows such an unfavorable DA ranking for our site at a DA12. Other competitors that rank for similar keywords to mine are DA 42, DA 65, DA 73, etc. If the largest ranking factor is links, and they have mine reported incorrectly - is this the issue with DA as it relates to sites like mine? Any answer from someone who has experienced similar, or has a definitive answer is more than welcome to chime in! Thanks, Kevin
Reporting & Analytics | | kvncrll0 -
Fresh Content Still As important?
We have an internal debate, that perhaps y'all can help us resolve. In the past "freshness" of content has been important, correct? (Google's QDF for example) In the past (to present) when we build a site with the intent to SEO the site, we build the core pages with the expectation that we will be adding more site pages as the project progresses, thus settling the "fresh content" factor. But it has been proposed to us, from a client, that completely building the site out with all the pages you hope to rank, getting the upfront bang for your buck. The expectation is that the traffic soars right-off. Now the client says that he has been doing this for years and has not been affected by any alog changes. (although we have not seen proof of this from him) So our question is this: Is it better to provide a website full of fresh content at the beginning of the project, for a jumpstart on traffic, then leave the site alone ( for the most part) or Is it better to have core pages of fresh content at the start, and build out new pages from their, so the website remains fresh every month? And can you prove your argument? (we need cold hard facts to be convinced 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | Britewave0 -
Backlink Tool Finding Links That Aren't Visible
I'm using a variety of backlink toolsl; OSE, SEM Rush, Link Research Tools and Google Webmaster Tools. On some occasions the tools are telling me there is a link to my site on a certain page, however when I open that page I can't see any mention of my company. I have run all these reports today, so I think it is unlikely that Google is using old data. Does anyone know why this happens and if I should still be concerned about links that I cannot see but backlink tools are telling me are there? Thanks guys.
Reporting & Analytics | | AAttias0 -
Strange Traffic / Viewed content in Analytics
Hi Im looking at the content viewed in December for a clients site and there's a high number of page views for some non-existent pages which received multiple hits eg. domain.com/dr-capability/ with 241 page views (54 unique page views) How can you have multiple page views (and many unique page views) for pages that don't exist ? Is it possible page is being generated automatically or something ? if so how come ? Any ideas as to whats causing this much appreciated ? All Best Dan ps - also many above average home page views
Reporting & Analytics | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
404 errors more than 1.8 lacs, Duplicate Content, Duplicate title, missing meta description increasing as site is based on regular ticket selling (CRM), kindly help
Sites error increasing i.e. 404 errors more than 1.8 lacs, Duplicate Content, Duplicate title, missing meta description increasing day by day as site is based on regular ticket selling (CRM), We have checked with webmasters for 404's, but it is not easy to delete 1.8 lac entries. How to resolve this issue for future. kindly help and suggest the solution.
Reporting & Analytics | | 1akal0 -
What is the best way to eliminate this specific image low lying content?
The site in question is www.homeanddesign.com where we are working on recovering from some big traffic loss. I finally have gotten the sites articles properly meta titled and descriptioned now I'm working on removing low lying content. The way there CMS is built, images have their own page (every one that's clickable). So this leads to a lot of thin content that I think needs to be removed from the index. Here is an example: http://www.homeanddesign.com/photodisplay.asp?id=3633 I'm considering the best way to remove it from the index but not disturb how users enjoy the site. What are my options? Here is what I'm thinking: add Disallow: /photodisplay to the robots.txt file See if there is a way to make a lightbox instead of a whole new page for images. But this still leaves me with 100s of pages with just an image on there with backlinks, etc. Add noindex tag to the photodisplay pages
Reporting & Analytics | | williammarlow0 -
It appears there's a problem with our connection to your Google Analytics account. Please go to your Settings page to update your connection.
I keep getting this error though I have confirmed I have the correct information. Any recommendations?
Reporting & Analytics | | x3oadmin0 -
Duplicate content and ways to deal with it.
Problem I queried back a year for the portal and we can see below that the SEO juice is split between the upper and lowercase. You can see the issue in the attached images. http://i.imgur.com/OXnPp.png Solutions: 1) Quick: Change the link on the pages above to be lowercase 2) Use canonical link tag http://www.seomoz.org/blog/canonical-url-tag-the-most-important-advancement-in-seo-practices-since-sitemaps The tag is part of the HTML header on a web page, the same section you'd find the Title attribute and Meta Description tag. In fact, this tag isn't new, but like nofollow, simply uses a new rel parameter. For example: http://www.darden.virginia.edu/MBA" /> ''This would tell Yahoo!, Live & Google that the page in question should be treated as though it were a copy of the URL http://www.darden.virginia.edu/MBA and that all of the link & content metrics the engines apply should technically flow back to that URL.'' 3) See if there is any Google Analytics filters at the site level I can apply. I will check into this and get back to you. What do you all think?????? OXnPp voJdp.png OXnPp.png
Reporting & Analytics | | Darden0