Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Using hreflang for international pages - is this how you do it?
-
My client is trying to achieve a global presence in select countries, and then track traffic from their international pages in Google Analytics.
The content for the international pages is pretty much the same as for USA pages, but the form and a few other details are different due to how product licensing has to be set up.
I don’t want to risk losing ranking for existing USA pages due to issues like duplicate content etc.
What is the best way to approach this? This is my first foray into this and I’ve been scanning the MOZ topics but a number of the conversations are going over my head,so suggestions will need to be pretty simple
Is it a case of adding hreflang code to each page and creating different URLs for tracking. For example:
URL for USA: https://company.com/en-US/products/product-name/
URL for Canada: https://company.com/en-ca/products/product-name /
URL for German Language Content: https://company.com/de/products/product-name /
URL for rest of the world: https://company.com/en/products/product-name / -
Thanks Kate...I think this will be our best option for now...differentiate the content as much as we can. I'll refer back to this thread when we're ready to move forward with foreign language pages next year.
-
Changing the duplicated content will take care of it by itself. It will have to be rewritten for each market though. It is up to you to decide if that is the best course of action for you. If you translate the content using regional dialects (have someone in that region write the page fresh), then hreflang is useful. That's when the en-us and en-ca, etc. come into play. Would something like that be possible?
-
Tom, thanks.
The company is small-med and is growing fast, with a presence in some other countries to handle business there as it grows. I think I understand how we have to handle the foreign languages. We may be able to go with ccTLDs as we introduce more languages instead of the subfolder we currently have for Germany only.
But the real issue that we're trying to zero in on is a small group of 'international' English pages designed for non-USA/Canda visitors that have some differences in how the free trial for the product is processed. We want to make it clear to Google that these are not duplicate content. We will be promoting them via advertising etc, but we still don't want them seen to be duplicated content.
Thanks,
Caro -
Kate, although the pages are the same as the USA ones, there's no reason we cannot switch up the language a bit for countries outside the USA...alter the message a little. If we did, would we then be able to use hreflang to indicate to google that there's a different version of the pages for select other markets and prevent them from thinking it's duplicate content?
-
Kate keeps giving great advice.
If you have a multilingual, SEO, PPC & content team Further the budget for the infrastructure ( it's going to be very expensive either way, to be honest)
You will get more out of multiple domains ccTLD's
I would love to hear how big the company is that you're doing this for and exactly how many people will be working on this project?
If this expansion works well and your business decides to go after China and Russia you have a deal with two more search engines. Also if you go to Japan, you want to focus on Yahoo as well.
If you start using
-
https://www.yandex.com/ Russia Ukraine
-
&
-
http://www.baidu.com/ China
-
http://www.yahoo.co.jp/ Approximately 30 to 40% of Japan
-
the good the bad and the scary about Google and Yahoo Japan
-
https://www.clickz.com/who-does-it-better-yahoo-japan-or-google-japan/26403/
-
You will have to deal with regulations as well as differences in the way the search engine handles traffic. IP addresses matter
Companies like Fastly & Akamai will offer a type of super pop that gives you a static IP although it's not inexpensive.
I imagine It's possible for you to end up in Asia from what it sounds like? if there is a return on the investment. Remember in Japan people like Yahoo quite a bit.
- https://www.ajpr.com/search-engine-market-share-in-asia-january-2016/
- http://searchengineland.com/library/baidu
- http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-25/china-tightens-internet-rules-for-baidu-and-other-search-engines
I hope this is of help did not mean to go off track but you are talking about quite a few languages.
Sincerely,
Tom
-
-
corrected the Deutschland tag good catch.
-
Yes sorry about that. The code for Germany is DE–DE the code for the German language is DE
I am sorry about that I tried to make it as easy as possible to understand but even I was getting a little tired towards the end.
excellent catch.
I would definitely customize the folders so that the languages in German Including URLs.
Kate makes an excellent point about a real choice that you have with going with subfolders or a unique domain.
There is an extraordinarily larger amount of work with multi-Geo domains however if you're starting from scratch and you think about it most of the URLs from the country are targeting will benefit your site in Whatever country or ( whatever content is on the site that linked to you)
Also if you're going to focus in the future hypothetically let's say Japan or China you will want to target different search engines other than Google these will be dependent highly on your IP address. There are ways to proxy it and make it work but infrastructure it's expensive and so does essentially doing SEO for a site per a language.
hreflang will allow you to keep the subtle differences in English for instance in the UK and elevator is a lift in Canada color is spelled differently small things do make a difference, and you should have those subtle things in your content.
I understand what you're saying about just using English and pushing it out there. You could generalize English and target no country whatsoever I would be interested to see how that worked out. Obviously, you have more than one copy Of English without hreflang you will have problems with duplicate content.
Kate brings up a very good question how big your team is? Who else will be assisting does everyone understand that search is impossible to do if you do not know the language as well as PPC. So you'll have to have native speakers I'm sure you do just want to bring up a couple of points.
What are you using for a CMS for have you made that choice yet? What are you going to do to host the site?
Hope this is helpful,
Tom
-
No, hardly at all.
There are two major phrases they all use, with modifiers at the end:
EG:
keyword
keyword solution
keyword software
keyword product
keyword downloadetc
-
Does anything about how people search for the product change in the 5 countries?
-
Kate,
What they have is:
1. a subfolder for the German content which has 6 pages that will be targeted to German speakers both inside and outside of Germany - which I'm assuming will need hreflang code specifying language but not country, right?
2. URLs for the English pages targeting English speakers outside the USA that are simply different page names. So:
USA page - www.company.com/product-A
Equivalent International page with different form - www.company.com/product-A-international (we've identified 5 countries we want to show up in, and then any other one by default)
And I'm assuming hreflang is not appropriate for the international page, but I'm not sure what one does instead to avoid dupe content.Does this help?
-
That tool is meant for the business as a whole.
Are you willing to (or are they, the client/company) put the work into differentiating the content per country? Is that needed? If it is just the form that changes, you can just change the form depending on what country they input into the form. Would that work? Then there is only one site to maintain and all you have to deal with is translations (german, spanish, japanese, french, etc. The languages, not the countries).
All that said you have two choices:
1. One site, different translations (using hreflang in between) with some changes to what happens with the form.
2. Multiple country sites that are operated differently to target each region. These can be ccTLDs or on the same domain but need to be treated as separate sites. No need for hreflang, but major need for different content.
-
Kate, I've been on this all day and I think I need to rephrase my question. I've figured out that if the pages for the international audience are all English and have no real LANGUAGE variations, I don't need to use hreflang, correct?
The difference between the USA pages and the other English countries is that there is a slight variation in how the product licence is issued once they complete the free trial form. So the form processes differently from different pages.
So, with everyone seeing the same content (99% the same) on different URLs, what is the correct way to:
1. Indicate to Google the audience is in a different region
2. Prevent duplicate content issues. -
Thomas when you say "This is the code you should add in a page's tag for the UK version of company.com would be:" are you referring to the code above or the code below? Because the code below refers to Germany. So I'm assuming you meant the code above that text, right?
To answer some of your questions:
The USA site is English only...no plans for Spanish yet.
The Canada site is English only...no plans for French yet.
For Germany customers we have some German pages in a Folder on our company.com domain -
Kate should I use the tool twice...once for English speaking countries with no translation needs (UK, Australia etc), and once for foreign language pages (which will for now be in folders on our .com domain)?
I ran the tool for the scenario of delivering our English pages with international licensing info on them to English speaking countries outside the USA and it says:
- Don't use HREFLANG; you are not translating inside a country, so it's not necessary.
Why no HREFLANG? Our german pages are translated for people in germany. - Don't use IP detection for country targeting, but ask your customers to set a cookie.
How would I ensure Google doesn't see my intl. pages as duplicate content?
- Don't use HREFLANG; you are not translating inside a country, so it's not necessary.
-
Thanks for all this info...looks like I have my work cut out for me this morning. Much appreciated.
-
Thank you! I'll check this out today!
-
You will want to listen to Kate. As simple as it may seem it's extremely complicated.
Your example is right below my example is below that
- "URL for the USA: https://company.com/en-US/products/product-name/ just use /US if not targeting Spanish in the United States
- URL for Canada: https://company.com/en-ca/products/product-name/ No French-Canadian? just use/CA
- URL for German Language Content: https://company.com/de/products/product-name / in Germany I might not be able to read your URL I would speak just Deutsche
- URL for rest of the world: https://company.com/en/products/product-name/." the rest of the world should not need EN as they speak lots of languages. You want to showcase your language offerings to them.
My example is below this line my example is below but say were targeting the United Kingdom with your URLS
- URL for the USA: https://company.com/us/products/product-name/ hreflang=”en-US.”
- URL for Canada: https://company.com/ca/products/product-name/ hreflang=”en-CA”
- URL for Canada FR: https://company.com/ca-fr/produits/nom-du-produit/ hreflang=”fr-CA” />
- URL for German Language Content: https://company.com/de/produkte/produktname/ hreflang=”de” />
- URL for rest of the world: https://company.com/products/product-name/ hreflang=”x-default
This is the code you should add in a page's tag for the UK version of company.com would be:
-
URL for German Language Content: https://company.com/de/produkte/produktname/ hreflang=”de”
-
Note I used German in the URL instead of English because that is what my target audience will be reading.
-
URL for the USA: https://company.com/us/products/product-name/ hreflang=”en-US.”
-
URL for Canada: https://company.com/ca/products/product-name/ hreflang=”en-CA.”
-
URL for Canada: https://company.com/ca-fr/produits/nom-du-produit / hreflang=”fr-CA” />
-
company.com/” hreflang=”x-default” />
Note I used French Canadian in the URL instead of English because that is what my target audience will be reading. ( I do not know French-Canadian so I really just used French) French-Canadian was also modified there are different versions of English as well with Canada and the UK
https://company.com main UK version of the site, a German language German subdirectory, an English-language Canadian subdirectory, and a French Language Canadian subdirectory:
Also, you add to the Hreflang tag is the x default code:
This is an additional line, which tells Google that this version of the site is the one that should be displayed if no other version of the site is suitable. If this link happened added to the example at the top of the page, then if someone from Spain visited the site Google would direct them to https://company.com
All you have to do is list the alternative version of the pages and have the x default at the bottom. For example, this is what you would do for the English Canadian version:
- company.com/” hreflang=”en-GB” />
- company.com/de” hreflang=”de” />
- company.com/ca-fr” hreflang=”fr-CA” />
- company.com/” hreflang=”x-default” />
If you're using any languages that have read right to left this will be an issue with encoding you can no longer get away without making sure, there's no byte order mark in your code, and you must use UTF-8
- http://www.aleydasolis.com/en/international-seo-tools/hreflang-tags-generator/
- http://searchengineland.com/auditing-hreflang-annotations-common-issues-avoid-219483
- https://www.branded3.com/blog/overcome-common-errors-implementing-hreflang-tag/
- https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/hreflang-101-how-to-avoid-international-duplication/
- https://www.branded3.com/blog/implementing-hreflang-tag/
Tools
- https://www.deepcrawl.com
- https://screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
- https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/07/troubleshooting-hreflang-annotations-in.html
Especially when you get into all the different languages and encoding correctly or different dialects being a German myself I am keenly aware of the differences and it would affect my search intent as well.
So if you're going, /de/ German make sure you’re Just looking to target those with the ability to speak and read German not a particular region like Germany itself, Austria, Switzerland, etc.
Not to say that/DE will not suffice but you will want to ensure you're targeting The language as well as the country or just the language depending on what your exact goal is.
I hope this helps,
Tom
-
Hey!
So international can be pretty confusing, so welcome to the world of international expansion. I'd suggest first checking out this tool I built to determine how to approach your situation. It seems like you have needs for translation (German language, not Germany focused) and geo-targeting (Canada focus, same language), and you will have reasons for people to access different content.
http://outspokenmedia.com/international-seo-strategy/
Let me know what result you get and we can go from there. If it is blended, I can give you some pointers from there. It won't be easy, it's not just about hreflang, but we'll get you set up right.
-
Thanks for these resources Thomas...I'll take a look at them shortly.
-
Yes that looks correct, I would add an x-default for the rest of the world. this is a good article: https://hreflang.org/use-hreflang-canonical-together/
http://www.myseosolution.de/downloads/mobile-hreflang-canonical-fixed.png Is a great image to explain things.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel canonical tag from shopify page to wordpress site page
We have pages on our shopify site example - https://shop.example.com/collections/cast-aluminum-plaques/products/cast-aluminum-address-plaque That we want to put a rel canonical tag on to direct to our wordpress site page - https://www.example.com/aluminum-plaques/ We have links form the wordpress page to the shop page, and over time ahve found that google has ranked the shop pages over the wp pages, which we do not want. So we want to put rel canonical tags on the shop pages to say the wp page is the authority. I hope that makes sense, and I would appreciate your feeback and best solution. Thanks! Is that possible?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shabbirmoosa0 -
Should I apply Canonical Links from my Landing Pages to Core Website Pages?
I am working on an SEO project for the website: https://wave.com.au/ There are some core website pages, which we want to target for organic traffic, like this one: https://wave.com.au/doctors/medical-specialties/anaesthetist-jobs/ Then we have basically have another version that is set up as a landing page and used for CPC campaigns. https://wave.com.au/anaesthetists/ Essentially, my question is should I apply canonical links from the landing page versions to the core website pages (especially if I know they are only utilising them for CPC campaigns) so as to push link equity/juice across? Here is the GA data from January 1 - April 30, 2019 (Behavior > Site Content > All Pages😞
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Wavelength_International0 -
Landing pages for paid traffic and the use of noindex vs canonical
A client of mine has a lot of differentiated landing pages with only a few changes on each, but with the same intent and goal as the generic version. The generic version of the landing page is included in navigation, sitemap and is indexed on Google. The purpose of the differentiated landing pages is to include the city and some minor changes in the text/imagery to best fit the Adwords text. Other than that, the intent and purpose of the pages are the same as the main / generic page. They are not to be indexed, nor am I trying to have hidden pages linking to the generic and indexed one (I'm not going the blackhat way). So – I want to avoid that the duplicate landing pages are being indexed (obviously), but I'm not sure if I should use noindex (nofollow as well?) or rel=canonical, since these landing pages are localized campaign versions of the generic page with more or less only paid traffic to them. I don't want to be accidentally penalized, but I still need the generic / main page to rank as high as possible... What would be your recommendation on this issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ostesmorbrod0 -
Substantial difference between Number of Indexed Pages and Sitemap Pages
Hey there, I am doing a website audit at the moment. I've notices substantial differences in the number of pages indexed (search console), the number of pages in the sitemap and the number I am getting when I crawl the page with screamingfrog (see below). Would those discrepancies concern you? The website and its rankings seems fine otherwise. Total indexed: 2,360 (Search Consule)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Online-Marketing-Guy
About 2,920 results (Google search "site:example.com")
Sitemap: 1,229 URLs
Screemingfrog Spider: 1,352 URLs Cheers,
Jochen0 -
What Happens If a Hreflang Sitemap Doesn't Include Every Language for Missing Translated Pages?
As we are building a hreflang sitemap for a client, we are correctly implementing the tag across 5 different languages including English. However, the News and Events section was never translated into any of the other four languages. There are also a few pages that were translated into some but not all of the 4 languages. Is it good practice to still list out the individual non-translated pages like on a regular sitemap without a hreflang tag? Should the hreflang sitemap include the hreflang tag with pages that are missing a few language translations (when one or two language translations may be missing)? We are uncertain if this inconsistency would create a problem and we would like some feedback before pushing the hreflang sitemap live.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kchandler0 -
Effect of Removing Footer Links In all Pages Except Home Page
Dear MOZ Community: In an effort to improve the user interface of our business website (a New York CIty commercial real estate agency) my designer eliminated a standardized footer containing links to about 20 pages. The new design maintains this footer on the home page, but all other pages (about 600 eliminate the footer). The new design does a very good job eliminating non essential items. Most of the changes remove or reduce the size of unnecessary design elements. The footer removal is the only change really effect the link structure. The new design is not launched yet. Hoping to receive some good advice from the MOZ community before proceeding My concern is that removing these links could have an adverse or unpredictable effect on ranking. Last Summer we launched a completely redesigned version of the site and our ranking collapsed for 3 months. However unlike the previous upgrade this modifications does not URL names, tags, text or any major element. Only major change is the footer removal. Some of the footer pages provide good (not critical) info for visitors. Note the footer will still appear on the home page but will be removed on the interior pages. Are we risking any detrimental ranking effect by removing this footer? Can we compensate by adding text links to these pages if the links from the footer are removed? Seems irregular to have a home page footer but no footer on the other pages. Are we inviting any downgrade, penalty, adverse SEO effect by implementing this? I very much like the new design but do not want to risk a fall in rank and traffic. Thanks for your input!!!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
Alan0 -
Can too many "noindex" pages compared to "index" pages be a problem?
Hello, I have a question for you: our website virtualsheetmusic.com includes thousands of product pages, and due to Panda penalties in the past, we have no-indexed most of the product pages hoping in a sort of recovery (not yet seen though!). So, currently we have about 4,000 "index" page compared to about 80,000 "noindex" pages. Now, we plan to add additional 100,000 new product pages from a new publisher to offer our customers more music choice, and these new pages will still be marked as "noindex, follow". At the end of the integration process, we will end up having something like 180,000 "noindex, follow" pages compared to about 4,000 "index, follow" pages. Here is my question: can this huge discrepancy between 180,000 "noindex" pages and 4,000 "index" pages be a problem? Can this kind of scenario have or cause any negative effect on our current natural SEs profile? or is this something that doesn't actually matter? Any thoughts on this issue are very welcome. Thank you! Fabrizio
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
Are there any negative effects to using a 301 redirect from a page to another internal page?
For example, from http://www.dog.com/toys to http://www.dog.com/chew-toys. In my situation, the main purpose of the 301 redirect is to replace the page with a new internal page that has a better optimized URL. This will be executed across multiple pages (about 20). None of these pages hold any search rankings but do carry a decent amount of page authority.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Visually0