Feature Request for Page Optimization at Campaign
-
Please ensure that old URLs, which are not anymore in the Search Engine Index or online at the campaign site, appearing at the Page Optimization page in Moz Pro.
It is very annoying to remove every week these outdated pages, which have 301 in Server Reponse.
Greetings,
Hans
-
Hello Hans,
Thanks for reaching out.
Jo here from the Moz Support team, I'm currently tracking your page optimisation reports to nail down what is at play here.
I'll be sure to keep you updated through through your support ticket.
Cheers!
Jo
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Page claiming
Can we claim the Lawrence location with only having a Topeka location and also claiming the Topeka location
Feature Requests | | KleerVue0 -
Can I track Page Authority on a custom report?
I'm trying to set up a custom report that will track my e-commerce website's authority. I've already added the Domain Authority module, but I can't find a Page Authority module. (There are options to track the page score or grade, but this appears to be very different from Page Authority--whereas Page Authority is a holistic score, page score/grade seems to focus only on page content.) Is it possible to track Page Authority on a custom report? If possible, I'd like to track the following pages: Page Authority of my homepage, compared to my competitors' homepages Page Authority of each of my 4 product pages, compared to my competitors' product pages
Feature Requests | | Jessica_Pettit1 -
Any way to programatically retrieve a campaign's Search Visibility score?
I would like to retrieve a campaign's Search Visibility score, and preferably historical too, in an automated fashion. However, as far as I know the API has no access to this. Is there something I'm missing? If not, is there a formula I can use to calculate this score?
Feature Requests | | MaddenMediaSEO1 -
Timeline for limiting users by campaign?
It seem that having the ability to Add users to your account and limit which campaigns they have access to, has been a big feature request for several years now. Is there an actual roadmap/ETA to implement this? I love Moz but I have no use for 10 additional users if I can't limit what campaigns they receive updates on.
Feature Requests | | RucksackDigital3 -
One of my Moz Campaigns was accidentally deleted. Any tips on getting it back?
I had a campaign setup with all of my keywords meticulously labeled and branded. Then by mistake, it was deleted. Is there any way I can restore/get the data back for an accidentally deleted campaign?
Feature Requests | | midcenturybliss0 -
MOZ Site Crawl - Ignore functionality Request
I now understand that the ignore option found in the MOZ Site Crawl tool will permanently remove the item from ever showing up in our Issues again. We desire to use the issues list as kind of like a To-Do checklist with the ultimate goal to have no issues found and would like to "Temporarily Remove" an issue to see if it is shows back up in future crawls. If we properly fix the issue it shouldn't show back up. However, based on the current Ignore function, if we ignore the issue it will never show back up, even if the issue is still a problem. At the same time, the issue could be a known issue that the end user doesn't want to ever show back up and they desire to never have it show again. In this case it might be nice to maintain the current "Permanently Ignore" option. Use the following imgur to see a mockup of my idea for your review. pzdfW
Feature Requests | | StickyLife0 -
Migrate campaign from when site changes from http:// to https://
We moved from our site from http:// to https://, redirecting all traffic to the new https connection. However, in our campaign all scores have dropped (only 1 page crawled). Is there something we can do to migratie the data, or update the existing campaign to reflect this minor change to our existing site?
Feature Requests | | BentoPres0 -
Including "Volume" on the Tracked Keywords Overview Page in Moz Pro
I've searched Q&A but I did not see where this question has been asked before, so hopefully I'm not repeating a question that has already been asked (and answered). For the past couple of years I have been using Conductor Searchlight as our SEO toolset, however recently I have made the decision to switch to Moz Pro. My question is regarding the Tracked Keywords Overview Page. In the current display, the Overview Page shows Keyword, Location, Universal Results, Rank, URL and Optimize. Has there every been any consideration to also include Volume? One of the nice features of CS Keyword Overview page was that I was able to view the rank of all my keywords, and the volume of each, at the same time. We currently track 275 keywords. Some keywords are obviously more important than others. The CS Overview Page allowed me to quickly scan through the list of keywords, see the ones that were within striking distance of page one (by rank), and since I could also see the volume at the same time, it also allowed me to prioritize which keyword to focus on. If two keywords were both ranked "11", but one had triple of volume of the other, it makes sense to focus on the one with the greater volume. From Moz's Tracked Keywords Overview Page I can drill down and get the "Volume" information that I'm looking for (and lots of other really good information), but I have to do it for each individual keyword. Moz Pro is a great SEO tool and the information available is amazing. The switch from CS has been an easy one, but CS did have some features that I liked, and being able to see both rank and volume on the Overview Page was one them. Any information, suggestions, or work-arounds regarding my question is appreciated. Regards Scott
Feature Requests | | WScottDuncan0