Syntax for canonical tag for a default page in a sub directory (not subdomain) of a web site?
-
I'm getting two "no canonical tag" errors for the default page of a sub-directory default page (www and root) - again NOT a subdomain.
Since the page is not the root of its own site, I tagged it as --
I have tried without the default.asp, but the error remains. Been doing this for 24 years and don't remember running across this before.
-
RE:
Changed page name, etc - still get a "missing canonical tag" error. At this point, I could be wrong, but I am convinced there's hidden problem, or a bug in the system.
No more posts here, I emailed help@moz.com
-
What I ended up doing is just changing the page name from default.asp to "fedex-routes-forSale.asp", changing the navigation links and setting an .asp code page to redirect. Effectively skirting the default page canonical syntax conundrum.
This also cleared up the duplicate content issue as well - default vs root - www vs root. etc.
I'm still curious as to the dynamics of this issue, but opted for a nice, tidy PDF for my client, with all issues solved.
-
Hey there,
Thanks so much for reaching out - Sam from Moz's Help Team here!
Could you please pop a message about this over to help@moz.com, along with the affected campaign name, so we can take a closer look into this for you?
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I have a site that is showing Internal 0 Equity-Passing Links, 0 Internal links, and every page bar the homepage has a PageAuthority of 0\. Any suggestions on why this could be?
The website has been around for several years, although did undergo a significant redesign at the end of last year. I greatly appreciate any help.
Moz Pro | | embracedarrenhughes0 -
Site Crawl Error
In moz crawling error this message is appears: MOST COMMON ISSUES 1Search Engine Blocked by robots.txt Error Code 612: Error response for robots.txt i asked help staff but they crawled again and nothing changed. there's only robots.XML (not TXT) in root of my webpage it contains: User-agent: *
Moz Pro | | nopsts
Allow: /
Allow: /sitemap.htm anyone please help me? thank you0 -
Rel=canonical Notice
In the Crawl Diagnostics report we see there 314 Rel Canonical notices. We use the Yoast Wordpress SEO plugin and noticed that the URL is the exact same as the Tag value. When looking into the issue more, I see that the rel canonical tag is pointing to the same page as itself. For example, on the www.domain.com/blog/ page, there is a link rel="canonical" href="/blog/". Is this an issue that needs to be fixed? How can it be fixed? Will this cause any potential ranking issues? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Moz Pro | | Prager0 -
Site Explorer shows links as followable but they have nofollow tags
Hello, I am looking at site explorer and sites linking to my site moneyfact.co.uk. I've got thousands of links showing as 'followable' but when i check them they have rel="nofollow" tags. e.g: http://www.dianomioffers.co.uk/partner/moneyfacts.co.uk/brochures.epl?partner=93&partner_id=93&partner_variant_id=33 Why would they show as followable when the links are nofollowed? Thanks Steve
Moz Pro | | SteveBrumpton0 -
Root domain or sub domain
When I crawl my site as a root domain, I get more errors is my campaign than when I set my site as a sub domain. Which one is the correct way: root domain or subdomain. My site is www.aa-rental.com
Moz Pro | | tanveer10 -
Directories still on the do list?
on a new project do you still submit to some directories on the list?http://www.seomoz.org/directories do they still add some value? can they hurt SEO effort?
Moz Pro | | ciznerguy0 -
HTTPS In Open Site Explorer
Hey All I was hoping a friendly mozzer might help me out, heard they're hard to track down though 🙂 I see OSE automatically has the http:// for the URL you enter. Anyway to tell if an https:// version of a page has backlinks coming into it with OSE? Thanks! -Dan
Moz Pro | | evolvingSEO0 -
Open Site Explorer Data
Good afternoon SEOmoz, I first want to congratulate with you for the amazing new look and new features of Open Site Explorer, it's an amazing and valuable tool that I use every day and that has helped me build tons of links for my clients. I have been keeping track of the OPE data on a monthly base and I just noticed something strange. In May 2011, OSE was showing that my client's website had 12,624 links, in July 2011 the website had 14,157 links and today I just ran a new report that showed just 6,401 links. I don't want to believe that in 2 months we lost half of the links, so I was wondering if you guys can give me more insights about this data.
Moz Pro | | Aviatech
Did SEOMoz change the way they measure the number of links? Or is this just a bug or issue they are having with the new version of OSE? Thanks!0