Bogus Search Results
-
Hi,
A website I look after was hacked. We cleaned it up , removed malicious content and changed passwords. However the bogus links which were created have kept multiplying. Search Console is all clear. But they keep adding to Google, bogus links.
My client site is www.mechfieldfm.com.au
For example http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/
There are thousands of bogus links created. But I believe they are outside the hosting.
Any help would be appreciated.
-
Thanks for your follow up.
Regards
Wayne
-
These invasive URL hacks can be very tricky to get under control. Sometimes if you're lucky, it's just a matter of erasing the pages and stuff. In other circumstances scripts are injected which recreate the bad URLs (and links to them) when you take them down. You certainly want to be on the lookout for unknown scripts on your site, or links to external scripts which didn't exist before
-
Thanks very much for your detailed response.
When the website was hacked they created the hacked pages and when you searched in Google you would go to an actual page. Once we shut the attack down, the links went back to our website.
I thought I had it under control. Listed in search console not to to index links and was going to place redirects on. But in the last few days another 5 pages of the bogus links have been created. Just checked again and more bogus links are being created. Therefore it could be an endless job, if they are going to be added to.
Correct client is a Air Conditioning service business. When you go to site:mechfieldfm.com.au the first couple of pages are actually from client website.
I will look at locking down the HTTP>HTTPS redirect.
-
Are you sure that this:
http://mechfieldfm.com.au/JCB-BACKHOE-IGNITION-SWITCH-WITH-2-KEYS-PART-NO-70180184-70145500-372796/... is an example of a bogus or hacked page? Because when I check Google's cache for the URL:
https://d.pr/i/6sioLy.png (screenshot)
It looks like it was once a 'real' page. Google's cached version only looks so messed up as they failed to capture the CSS properly. It just seems weird that someone would hack your client's site and just leave info for construction-related products on your client's domain. Usually with hacks it's a phishing / political agenda or something like that (or some kind of scam)
Still, having said that; although your client is in construction they don't seem to list any products of any kind (your client appears to be service-based). You have to admit though, to an outsider, it looks more like 'dev-gone-wrong' than a hack. It's just really weird, at the very least
Can't you just write a redirect rule that 301s or 302s all of those bogus URLs somewhere else? Those URLs shouldn't be accessible anyway. Your client has a valid SSL certificate and the site loads just fine on HTTPS: https://mechfieldfm.com.au - so another question is, why was HTTP left exposed? The bogus URLs are on HTTP, maybe they found an entry-point because that architecture was left exposed instead of being properly redirected
Even Google mostly link to the site on HTTPS:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Amechfieldfm.com.au
https://d.pr/i/XfbNF7.png (screenshot)
Where they're not doing this, it's because they are linking to more examples of 'bogus' URLs. Personally I'd just slap no-index tags and status code 410 (gone) on all of those problematic URLs. If you're worried you can't use no-index as the HTML of those pages is gone, you can still fire Meta no-index directives through the HTTP header using X-Robots, so be sure to look that up
It will probably take a while (some weeks) for Google to digest all the disruption and fixes. In the future, ensure that disused architectures (like HTTP) are made physically inaccessible via redirects. Leaving old architectures active is a recipe for disaster. Once this is all cleaned up, be sure to properly implement HTTP -> HTTPS redirects
Here's something odd. On your client's homepage, the HTTP->HTTPS redirect is properly implemented. Somehow these 'hacked' URLs are evading that redirect. You need to at least lock that down or it could happen again
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Add a Search box (content hub) for my website?
Hello We would like to introduce a search area in our website, to help our users to find all information regarding a specific topic (landing pages, infographics, blogs, videos, etc...). Before we decide to build everything internally, we were wondering if there is any widget or plugging to make this in a smooth way and that works fine. I have also seen that Google offers a custom search option to make this happens. I would really appreciate advice about what to do regarding this topic: Is there any company that offers a really good solution for this? Is worth to use Google custom search option? Or the best option is build it internally? PS: I have seen that there are many plugins for wordpress, but our site is not a wordpress blog. Just to clarify. Many thanks for your help 🙂
Content Development | | AutoEurope0 -
My keywords have low search volume - is it still worth starting a blog?
I'm thinking of starting a new blog, but when I did my keyword research I found that my keywords all have low search volume (under 100 searches per month, with the occasional keyword having 480 searches a month). Is this a deal breaker? Any recommendations would be great - thanks everyone!
Content Development | | Trevorneo1 -
Google Image Search - How to rank?
Hi, How would you optimise for rank higher in image search? Any tips/rules which need to be applied. Thanks.
Content Development | | Bondara0 -
Why is an old meta description displaying in search results?
We launched a new version of our retail website in Dec. 2012. This included new content and new metadata. When our homepage displays in search results, it almost always displays with designated meta description - except when it's searched with the .com. In that case, an old version of our meta description (pre-Dec. 2012) is visible, though our current title displays. The old metadata isn't loaded anywhere in our content management system. What can we do to change this?
Content Development | | bcbsm0 -
Can forums bring down your search engine rankings?
it might be my imagination, but i could swear that after the launch of a bbpress forum and posts and replies coming from members, the site alexa website rankings actually went DOWN for a while. i always thought forums would de facto bring up rankings - more content, traffic, etc. Is it possible that forum content is considered lower quality? i remember reading that lots of new threads and such from forum members can actually hurt your rankings- is this true? i guess i'm trying to figure out: on balance, what is the impact of forums on rankings - and if there are any negative impacts, if you still want to have one, how to minimize the downside? thanks much for any help!
Content Development | | prospects0 -
Google Site Search
Hi, I was just wondering if anyone had used Google Site Search before and what they thought of it? http://www.google.com/sitesearch/ It seems quite expensive for just returning your own pages but would be interested to find out more. Thanks
Content Development | | ASOS0 -
Where is microdata (schema.org) already being used by major search engines?
I know Google recently launched their recipes search, but apart from this where else are you seeing microdata being used?
Content Development | | nicole.healthline0