"Starting Over" With A New Domain & 301 Redirect
-
Hello, SEO Gurus.
A client of mine appears to have been hit on a non-manual/algorithm penalty. The penalty appears to be Penguin-like, and the client never received any message (not that that means it wasn't manual).
Prior to my working with her, she engaged in all kinds of SEO fornication: spammy links on link farms, shoddy article marketing, blog comment spam -- you name it. There are simply too many tens of thousands of these links to have removed. I've done some disavowal, but again, so much of the link work is spam.
She is about to launch a new site, and I am tempted to simply encourage her to buy a new domain and start over. She competes in a niche B2B sector, so it is not terribly competitive, and with solid content and link earning, I think she'd be ok.
Here's my question:
If we were to 301 the old website to the new one, would the flow of page rank outperform any penalty associated with the site? (The old domain only has a PR of 2).
Anyone like my idea of starting over, rather than trying to "recover?"
I thank you all in advance for your time and attention. I don't take it for granted.
-
RCN
There is no "penalty transfer" per se. It is just that those links will have no value, but you can still get people there. You could use 302's if there is some concern but don't really need to. Remember, you are redirecting a page and that is purposeful. You could also disallow the links to the 301'd pages if you want to be over careful. Again though, I would do the 301's and move on.
Best,
Robert
-
Hi Robert,
This was an answer you gave to a question I asked a while back, and I really appreciate it. I think we might go in the direction of starting over, since I am confident that we can out-content and out-SEO our competitors in the client's niche. Just a question about the 301 redirect: will the penalty associated with the original domain transfer to the new one if we do a 301 redirect? I'm not interested in transferring the page rank, but I would want people who arrive via direct traffic to the old site be able to be redirected to the new site. However, if a 301 is going to transfer the penalty, then I'm not sure how you get return direct users from the old site to the new one. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks again.
-
LOL, Cyrus. Yeah -- it just seemed like the right term. The client is a "bad person" -- she just put link building in the hands of people who used all of the methods that are now taboo.
And thanks to everyone's comments thus far -- it's all great feedback. Here's the other thing: if we were to start with a new domain and not 301 from the old domain, we'd miss a lot of direct traffic. The old domain goes way back, and a LOT of people hit it directly.
It also worth noting that the penalty the client has is not site-wide. It's keyword-specific In fact, the site is actually up for the year on non-brand organic search traffic -- it's just other keyword terms and not the bread and butter ones that used to rank high. Now I'm thinking that maybe we just work around the penalized keywords.
-
Another way of saying it, when you 301 a domain, you redirect all the links that came with it. If those links resulted in algorithmic filters that resulted in loss of rankings and/or traffic, then there is a very good chance to visit those ills on the new domain.
"SEO fornication" - I like this phrase (although I hear they're trying to discourage this behavior at conferences.
-
Here is the short experiment I did.
(A) I took a new domain and added it to Google Webmaster Tools. Google Webmaster Tools showed no backlinks.
(B) Next, I took old domain with couple of thousands of links and 301-redirected it to the new one.
(C) Couple of weeks later the links to the old domain started to show in Google Webmaster Tools for the new domain.
Conclusion: 301 redirect essentially transfers the links from one domain to another. If the old domain triggered a link based penalty, next Penguin refresh will penalise the new domain as all the links are essentially transferred via the redirect.
Do not use 301 to get out of penalty. Period.
-
As to whether to change or not to change to new domain, you seem to be answering your own question:
Prior to my working with her, she engaged in all kinds of SEO fornication: spammy links on link farms, shoddy article marketing, blog comment spam -- you name it. There are simply too many tens of thousands of these links to have removed. I've done some disavowal, but again, so much of the link work is spam.
As to the 301, you are not moving page rank, but link juice. If, your intent is to mitigate the penalty via the 301, it will not do that. The "penalty" is the penalty. So if the algorithm is giving no value to a link with a PA of 50, by having the 301, you are not going to get that value. It will be the same as it was on the original site.
Now, if you want to just clean up and move down the road, a clean site and domain could be the way to go. You can do 301's, but anything that would happen to one will come to the other (someone will say: 301's lose X% of the juice so I will say it is usually not even 10% in my experience). But, if you are a PR of 2 in a non-competitive niche that is B2B, you may want to consider just going cold turkey if there are a lot of pages and hassles.
Use the new domain, add great new content, etc. Make sure your product pages are different and product images are different. Make sure you out SEO the others and you will likely see the PR get to two fairly quickly. In a non competitive area you can get a site to PA of 20 for a main page in about 3 to 6 months depending on content, etc. So, you are back at it and growing without the fear of complications.
Hope that helps,
Robert
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 Redirect in breadcrumb. How bad is it?
Hi all, How bad is it to have a link in the breadcrumb that 301 redirects? We had to create some hidden category pages in our ecommerce platform bigcommerce to create a display on our category pages in a certain format. Though whilst the category page was set to not visable in bigcommerce admin the URL still showed in the live site bread crumb. SO, we set a 301 redirect on it so it didnt produce a 404. However we have lost a lot of SEO ground the past few months. could this be why? is it bad to have a 301 redirect in the breadrcrumb.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | oceanstorm0 -
301 vs 410 for subdirectory that was moved to a new domain, 2-years later
Hi all, I've read a lot about 301 vs 404 and 410s, but the case is pretty unique so I decided to get some feedback from you. Both websites are travel related but we had one destination as a subdirectory of the other one (two neighboring countries, where more than 90% of business was related to the 'main' destination and the rest to the 'satellite'). This was obviously bad practice and we decided to move the satellite destination to its own domain. Everything was done 2 years ago and we opted for 301s to the new domain as we had some good links pointing to satellite content. (All of the moved content is destination specific and still relevant) Few weeks back we figured out that google still shows our subdirectory when doing specific 'site:' search and looking further into it, we realized we still get traffic for satellite destination through the main website via links acquired before the move. Not a lot of hits, but they still sporadically occur. A decision was made (rather hastily) to 410 pages and see if that will make satellite subdir pages not show in google searches. So 3 weeks in, 410 errors are climbing in GWMT, but satellite subdirectory still shows in google searches. One part of the team is pushing to put back in place 301s. The other part of the team is concerned with the 'health' of the main website as those pages are not relevant for it, and want them gone . What would you do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | halloranc0 -
301 process, migration to new domain
Hi all! We have an old site wordpress based, with great ranking and PR 7, called www.europe-internship.com which is going to be migrated into our new Django site www.eurasmus.com (specifically eurasmus.com/en/europe-internships)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Eurasmus.com
The new one is a much more advanced version that we will keep developing. We have been migrating the information already but we are planning to apply the 301s in the next weeks to start passing the SEO value to our new site and traffic. We have all the url structures and everything checked and technically we are ready for it.
Therefore, we are almost ready. I have 2 questions: The new site includes more services, like accommodation, information...not only internships. Therefore, should we point the most relevant urls from our previous site to our home to share the value or just to the internships section? I am afraid that if the bounce rate goes higher from the 301 we could loose some value... 2)Should we point all the urls at the same time to the new site? Home, vacancies, blog pages, etc... or start gradually doing it to see how it goes till we make it to all the pages including the home? The old site still makes some money and I am not sure how quick will be to pass the SEO value, so in the way we may loose few thousand euros...We understand that, but we want to check what would be the best in your opinion. Let me know what you think and your opinion! Thank you in advance!0 -
301 redirect or rel=canonical
On my site, which I created with Joomla, there seems to be a lot of duplicated pages. I was wondering which would be better, 301 redirect or rel=canonical. On SeoMoz Pro "help" they suggest only the rel=canonical and dont mention 301 redirect. However, ive read many other say that 301 redirect should be the number one option. Also, does 301 redirect help solve the crawling errors, in other words, does it get rid of the errors of "duplicate page content?" Ive read that re-=canonical does not right? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | waltergah0 -
301 Redirect question
Which is the best way to set up the 301 redirect on my main home page? http://horsebuggy.com to http://www.horsebuggy.com Or does it make a difference? Boodreaux
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Boodreaux0 -
Any way to find which domains are 301 redirected to competitors' websites?
By looking at the work from an SEO collegue it became clear that his weak linkbuilding graph probably is not the cause for his good rankings for a pretty competitive keyword. (also no social mentions where found) I was wondering what it could be, site structure and other on page optimization factors seems to be ok and I don't think there will be exceptionally good or bad user behavior... Finally I looked at the competitors and found that they have more links, better content en better design, so I got a little stuck. The only reason I can think of is that he is doing 301 redirects (or is rel=canonical tags). Is there a way to trace these redirects back to the source in order to include this important variable in your competitor research? thnx
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | djingel10 -
How to 301 redirect ASP.net URLS
I have a situation where a site that was ASP.net has been replaced with a WordPress site. I've performed a Open Site Explorer analysis and found that most of the old pages, ie www.i3bus.com/ProductCategorySummary.aspx?ProductCategoryId=63 are returning a HTTP Status = NO DATA ... when followed ends up at the 404 catch-all page. Can I code the standard 301 Redirects in the .htaccess file for these ASP URLs? If not, I'm open to suggestions.... Thanks Bill
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Marvo0 -
Question about "launching to G" a new site with 500000 pages
Hey experts, how you doing? Hope everything is ok! I'm about to launch a new website, the code is almost done. Totally fresh new domain. The site will have like 500000 pages, fully internal optimized of course. I got my taticts to make G "travel" over my site to get things indexed. The problem is: to release it in "giant mode" or release it "thin" and increase the pages over the time? What do you recomend? Release the big G at once and let them find the 500k pages (do they think this can be a SPAM or something like that)? Or release like 1k/2k per day? Anybody know any good aproach to improve my chances of success here? Any word will be apreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | azaiats20