Meta keywords confusion: include none, 3, 5, 20?
-
Over the last few months, I have come across a great variety of opinions on the use of meta keywords in the SEO plug ins or tools I fill out for customers. Some people and organizations advise to leave that field empty, others suggest to use maximum 3 keywords, but I have also heard 5 or maximum 20. I am quite confused about this? Does anyone know Google's latest opinion on this? And what about the other search engines Yahoo and Bing?
-
Thanks Thomas for all the extra links. I will check them out later!
-
Dont bother with it. It's not really important. You can rank fine without them
You will find it confusing since most sites that are old and ranking will probably have them lol.
-
Hi,
As Thomas said in his first comment...your competitors (and I do this when researching for our clients) will use this when trying to see what keywords you are trying to compete for so I always leave it out. There are obviously other ways of seeing this so it's not going to mean they'll never know what you are targeting but it makes them work a bit harder to get the info.
In short...leave it out.
-
I want to be certain that were talking about the same thing here. Did you mean to say use them in your copy or your text that people would be able to see on your webpage?
If you meant only meta tag keywords please move on below the text however if you weren't keep reading the content and bold
If you were discussing using them on a webpage I'm sorry I mistook your comment for something else and here's some information that you may like.
http://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo/keyword-research
** Authoritylabs.com as a free keyword checker which is quite fine as does SERPS.com**
You can use my favorite witches scribecontent.com as well it will show you a lot of metrics on how to weight your content the correct way
OR
Did you mean use meta keywords?
essentially if you meant meta keyword tags
you'll find these links are very helpful
http://moz.com/learn/seo/meta-description
the answer is you should have absolutely 0 listed on your website do not put them on their waste of time and they will tell competitors. What you're trying to rank for here's some information on that subject. Along with 2 tools that will help you to generate helpful meta tags like your title tag or the most important if not the most important tag you can possibly choose. This will basically decide where your website ranks and if people click on or not. Very important to get right the others author is very popular now and helpful and do not forget your description which will tell your customers/people browsing the web looking for your site exactly what your site does and why they should go there you have to stick to a blank and these 2 tools will allow you to create the metadata tags correctly as always you do not fill-in the keyword tag unfortunately they all seem to still have this stupid thing as an option
The only search engine that looks at the keywords anymore is Microsoft's Bing – and they use it to help detect spam. To avoid hurting your site, your best option is to never add this tag.
_ from search engine land_
http://www.metatags.org/meta_tags_code_generator
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/meta-tag-generator/
below is information backing up why you should not use keyword meta tags
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067564/How-To-Use-HTML-Meta-Tags
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_element
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/worthless-meta-tags-used-by-seo-companies/6099/
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
I would never use the keyword box simply for 2 big reasons the 1st one is all you're going to really do is ensure your competitors know what keywords you are trying to rank for that's it.
The 2nd Google has not used it since 2006 to rank anything.
So you're best off leaving the box empty and putting your keywords in your content sparingly and wisely. Check out scribecontent.com it will give you some good hints as to how to add content. And deal with keyword boxes.
I hope I have been of help,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which top 5 questions to ask for a first meeting?
Hi Mozzers, I have a question: which top 5 questions to ask for a first meeting with a "future" customer to avoid bad surprises? Thank you for your help. Regards,
Industry News | | JonathanLeplang
Jonathan0 -
Any thoughts on Penguin 3.0?
Ok ok, so it's just a data refresh and not a major - but does anyone has some additional insight now that the data has been refreshed? Any thoughts about the winners and losers in this one?
Industry News | | Takudzwa0 -
Nuked by Panda 3.3?
As I understand it, Panda 3.3 was a relatively minor refinement to the general Panda process. We have a site that was absolutely nuked on or about the same time as the Panda 3.3 update. Does anyone have any particular insight as to what was contained in this update? We're scratching our heads. Thanks.
Industry News | | ChrisInColorado0 -
Google Keyword Tool Showing Conflicting Data
Google Adwords Keyword Tool is showing different data for the same keywords. Broad Match Local Search Volume is 2400 apiece logged in from my main account. Local Search Volume 3600 and 1900 logged in from a different account. Can anybody explain this? I have screenshot of both.
Industry News | | Choice0 -
Huge Hit and Bouncing Rankings Since Panda 3.3 Update?
Has anyone else seen rankings bouncing all over the place since the end of Feb? A client's site is for the term hcg which I know is controversial but we were in 3rd or 4th for the past couple of months until this update. Now for the term "hcg" the rankings are bouncing from the twenties to over 100 multiple times a day. I check them throughout the day with non personalized search, rank checker, etc to just try and keep updated. I have never seen rankings bounce around so much after an update and am wondering if this update is somehow effecting these more controversial search terms. Since The end of Feb our traffic has almost dropped in half due to the drop in just the "hcg" term ranking We have been cleaning up the site, updating lower quality content, blogging frequently and trying to build better links for the past couple months of working on the site.The problem is there have been a few other previous SEO companies that worked on the site and I don't know how much black hat tactics were used. Any insight or suggestions on this would be appreciated, we are all scrambling to try and recover from this.
Industry News | | Netmark0 -
Keyword Strategy
I am working with a company that has had a few "SEO Experts" work on it's site over the last year. The strategy these "experts" used to generate keywords is to optimize on many general keywords and, when mixed all together, make the keywords they are optimizing against. For example, they did photo printing. They would optimize for the keywords: photo prints printing print photographs photography 4x6 cheap .... Maybe I am missing something, but I have never seen a keyword list managed this way... is this "normal"? Is this something "new" I am missing? Any advice or strategy tips on this one? Thanks in advance!
Industry News | | smulto0 -
Google Panda 2.5 Update?
On Sunday 18th Sept I noticed a huge drop in our rankings for keywords that we were doing extremely well. Majority of the keyword SERP positions for our main targetted keywords were #1 and #2. These have all drop the bottom part of first page. Other new keywords we were targetting had climbed very well (some hovering just below top 10 and some in top 10 of Google UK SERP. These have all completely dropped off. Although analysing the site thouroughly (both on-page and link profile) it doesnt appear to have any issue significant enough to cause a penalty. From Monday 20th Sept (everybody back to work) the threads here http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=76830633df82fd8e&hl=en&start=5760 and http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4364389.htm seem to be buzzing over unexpected SERP drops and increases. By that I assume Panda 2.5 or at least some form of update taken/taking place? If anybody know of the reent heavy fluctuations which seem to have started in the weeken or have experienced unexpected positions increaes/drops, I would be very interested to hear/read from you. Cheers, Mo Raja
Industry News | | MoRaja0 -
Confusion on schema.org
I have begun marking up the site for schema.org and Google has now begun indexing those pages with a weird result. Instead of using meta description in search it is using the ALT text from an item marged as ImageProp="image". I was hoping it would display the picture not change my description. Any ideas?
Industry News | | oznappies0