Website not being indexed after relocation
-
I have a scenario where a 'draft' website was built using Google Sites, and published using a Google Sites sub domain. Consequently, the 'same' website was rebuilt and published on its own domain.
So effectively there were two sites, both more or less identical, with identical content.
The first website was thoroughly indexed by Google.
The second website has not been indexed at all - I am assuming for the obvious reasons ie. that Google is viewing it as an obvious rip-off of the first site / duplicate content etc.
I was reluctant to take down the first website until I had found an effective way to resolve this issue long-term => ensuring that in future Google would index the second 'proper' site.
A permanent 301 redirect was put forward as a solution - however, believe it or not, the Google Sites platform has no facility for implementing this.
For lack of an alternative solution I have gone ahead and taken down the first site. I understand that this may take some time to drop out of Google's index, however, and I am merely hoping that eventually the second site will be picked up in the index.
I would sincerely appreciate an advice or recommendations on the best course of action - if any! - I can take from here.
Many thanks!
Matt.
-
Nice catch, Lynn. That's got to be (at least the majority of) the problem.
-
Hi Matt,
It looks like you have no index headers being sent out on your site. if you have the web developers toolbar installed on firefox and view the response headers on your homepage you will see:
X-Robots-Tag: noindex, nofollow, nosnippet
So this is like a noindex, no follow meta tag and is basically blocking the search engines from spidering and indexing your site. If you find out where those headers are getting set and get rid of them you should see your site getting indexed pretty quickly.
-
Hi Matt,
Majestic, Open Site Explorer and ahrefs are all showing zero links pointing to the entire domain, waydownunder.com.au.
I'm not suggesting this proves that you don't have enough links for Google to crawl/index the site, as I have also repeatedly seen Google index sites that don't have links yet. However, if these three major link indexes are showing zero links, there's a good chance Google's not discovering the site through regularly crawling as well.
Have you tried creating and submitting a sitemap via Webmaster Tools?
Best,
Mike -
Thanks Lynn and Mike - really appreciate your feedback. What you've both said about duplicate content being a ranking rather than indexing issue certainly makes sense.
Unfortunately the old site is unable to be restored. On the other hand, regular links have been posted to the site through social media (facebook) as well as a blog site (which IS being indexed regularly).
So - this has me entirely stumped!!!! I just cannot see any reason why the site is not being indexed at all! The site has been live now for around 2 -3 months; and I've had other sites with far less content / active links etc etc being indexed in no time at all.
The website in question is www.waydownunder.com.au - if anyone had a minute to take a quick look and see if I've missed anything obvious, I would really really appreciate it.
Thanks kindly,
Matt.
-
Hi Matt,
I would echo Lynn's recommendations here.
I doubt Google is actively filtering the 2nd site from search results (the duplicate content filter is employed scarcely, you'll find no shortage of duplicated sites that are indexed - it's also more of a results filter than an index filter, meaning duplicate content is still indexed, it just isn't shown in SERPs when the filter is active).
It's more likely that you simply haven't sent Google a strong enough ping that the site is worth indexing. Generate some marketing activity around the site, link to it from the current site as Lynn suggested (esp. with turning those pages into summaries), and I expect the site will show up in the index within a couple of weeks.
Best of Luck,
Mike -
Hi Matt,
It can take some time to index new sites. Submitting a sitemap to GWT, building a couple of links and sharing it a bit on social channels will usually help speed up the process. I am not very familiar with google sites, but if you can re-enable the google hosted site then maybe it is an idea to announce there that the site is now hosted elsewhere and link to it. You could reduce the content on the google site pages to just an abstract/intro on each page and link to the full content which is now on the new site which should take care of duplicate content issues and also show a clear connection between the two of them (for both incoming users and search engines).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Temporarily redirecting a small website to a specific url of another website
Hi, I would like to redirect a small website that contains info about a specific project temporarily to a specific url about this project on my main website. Reason for this is that the small website doesn't contain accurate info anymore. We will adapt the content in the next few weeks and then remove the redirect again. Should I set up a 301 or a 302? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mat_C1 -
Development/Test Ecommerce Website Mistakenly Indexed
My question is - relatively speaking, how damaging to SEO is it to have BOTH your development/testing site and your live version indexed/crawled by Google and appearing in the SERPs? We just launched about a month ago, and made a change to the robots text on the development site without noticing ... which lead to it being indexed too.So now the ecommerce website is duplicated in Google ... each under different URLs of course (and on diff servers, DNS etc) We'll fix it right away ... and block crawlers to the development site. But again, may general question is what is the general damage to SEO ... if any ... created by this kind of mistake. My feeling is nothing significant
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | estampe1230 -
Website (.BE) showing up in .NL SERPS
Fellow mozzers, we need your help We have a situation where a customer has two websites for each country: flowtracksurf.be → Belgium flowtracksurf.nl → Netherlands They used to have very good keyword rankings in the SERPS in BE & NL. Flowtracksurf.nl had good rankings in Google.nl and Flowtracksurf.be in Google.be.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jacobe
Recently there has been a change: Flowtracksurf.nl is not showing up in Google.nl anymore. It also seems that all the rankings from flowtracksurf.nl have been switched to flowtracksurf.be. .BE is doing very well, .NL is suffering. Data shows us that .NL : In the first two weeks of december 2014, we see a massive drop in traffic (GA) In that same week(s) we see a drop in search queries (Webmaster Tools) We see the exact opposite in .BE (growing strong in those weeks) When we look at the cache of flowtracksurf.nl we see only reference to flowtracksurf.be. Is that a hint of what was going on? On the same date that we see a massive drop in traffic on .NL, we see a peak in 'indexation' of .BE We see that the MOZ pages crawled dropped in that same week for NL We're also seeing that all the traffic from Google.nl is now going to flowtracksurf.be. Some keywords we were scoring #1-2 for are: surfvakanties, surfvakantie, surfcamp mimizan, surfcamp, frankrijk, surfcamp spanje, surfen frankrijk We just can't figure out the hard evidence in the data.
Can you help us on that?0 -
Urls in Bilingual websites
1-I have a bilingual website. Suppose that I am targeting a page for keyword "book" and I have included it in that page url for the English version: English version: www.abc.com/book Can I use the translation of "book" in the second language of the website url instead of "book" ? Please let me know which of the following urls are right " French Verison: www.abc.com/fr/book or www.abc.com/fr/livre livre=Book in French 2- Does Google have any tool to check if the second language page of the website has exactly the same content as the English version. What I want to do is for example for a certain page in English version, my targeted keyword is "book" . So my content would be around books. But in the French version of this page, I want to focus on keyword "Pencil" in French instead of "book". Is it wrong or any consequences? That was the main reason for the question number one. Because if it is ok to do what I explained in item 2 then I will set my urls like: In English : www.abc.com/book In French: www.abc.com/fr/crayon crayon=Pencil in French
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlirezaHamidian0 -
First Website
Hi Everyone, I have just published my first website and was wondering if anybody would like to help me with some hints and tips. This is my first time branching into SEO and could really do with some help. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. The site address is www.theremovalistsguide.com.au which targets the furniture removal industry in Australia. Thanks for your help.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RobSchofield0 -
To remove from index or not and stop words
Each product is an item of jewellery based on a letter of the alphabet. At present all 26 are indexed but as you guess they all share the same description, title and URL (apart from change in letter). What I was going to do was set all but one to no-index, recreate new descriptions and revert back to index. But then that got me thinking - through stop words will the titles be seen as duplicates: letter bracelet letter a bracelet letter i bracelet
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MickEdwards0 -
Page Indexed but not Cached
A section of pages on my site are indexed (I know because they appear in SERPs if I copy and paste a sentence from the content), however according to the text-only cached version of the page they are not being read by Google.Why are they indexed event hough it seems like Google is not reading them..... or is Google in fact reading this text even though it seems like they should not be?Thanks for your assistance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | theLotter0 -
Ajax website and SEO
Hi all, A client of mine has a website similar to Pintrest. All in Ajax/. So imagine an ajax-grid based animal lover site called domain.com. The domain has three different Categories Cats, Dogs, Mice. When you click on a category, the site doesn't handle the URL and doesn't change the domain So instead of the domain going from domain.com to domain.com/cats, it uses the Ajax script and just shows all the cat pins. and when you click on each pin/post it opens a page such as domain.com/Pin/123/PostTitle It doesn't reference the category. However a page domain.com/cats does exist and you can go there directly. Is this an SEO issue for not grouping all pins under a category? How does Google handle Ajax these days, it use to be real bad but if Pintrest is going so well i'm assuming times have changed? Any other things to be wary of for a grid based/ajax site? I am happy to pay for an hour or two for a more in depth audit/tips if you can feed back on the above. Fairly urgent. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Profero1