Was I hit by Panda/Payday Loan/Penguin?
-
Good Mozzing,
So, as some of you may know based on my previous post, I am working with an odd situation here. I have taken over an account for a company and the Main domain pretty much falls into the category of everything Google hates. I have suggested to the CEO that the practices they did before me were sorta in the Grayhat realm bordering on Blackhat but I need empirical data before I can make any drastic changes.
In May and June of 2013 Panda, Penguin, and Payday Loan all had updates. Our company has nothing do to with porn, apartment rentals, finances, or anything like that, but the SEO methods used were, as I said, questionable.
In June of 2013 there was a drop from 8,000 sessions to 5,000 sessions from organic traffic. If I switch over to all referring traffic the loss increases to 11,000 to 7,000 sessions. To me that seems pretty substantial. Not only that, but according to the data we have not been able to recover.There was a steady climb for about 5 months before the drop, and then now we are in this middle ground.
I have only been here for about 2 weeks, so the things I have been uncovering are pretty amazing.
Is that enough to assume that we were indeed hit by the updates?
-
Who cares to admit complete defeat? Practically no one, of course. Every natural instinct cries out against the idea of personal powerlessness.
I have come to terms with the fact that I am going to need help on this one. I am trying to make a case to my boss for a "second opinion".
UPDATE As this window was open my boss called me in for our meeting. I explained the circumstance and basically his answer was:
"Give me a timeline of everything that needs to happen. We can't cut anything until we build anything (unfortunately I fear he may have stolen my sentence from my interview when I said "don't burn a bridge before you build a bridge")."
So we will go from there. I do think he is beginning to understand the severity. He made an analogy to the Corleone's going 'legit' in the Godfather but wasn't comfortable doing so until we had a plan to go 'legit.'
Thanks again everybody! You have all been a tremendous help!
-
First off...thank you EGOL for mentioning me as someone who understands penalties. The crazy thing is that even though that's all that I do these days, I can sometimes spend several hours digging in to a site's analytics, backlinks and the site itself and still not be completely sure what is causing the traffic drop. It seems that the important point that most are trying to get across in this thread is that you're not likely to be able to solve your problem in this Q&A.
With that being said, here are a few things that you can look at that might give you some clues:
-Have you checked in Webmaster Tools for any manual actions? Go to Search Traffic --> Manual Actions
-Have you run a check for malware? Run the site through sucuri.net.
-Take a look at just the organic non-branded traffic in Google Analytics. To do that look at click Acquisition --> Keywords --> Organic. Then near the right hand side click on "advanced". Set it to exclude your brand name.
Once you've done that can you see a distinct day where the traffic starts to drop? This might give you a clue as to which algorithm you were likely affected by. With that being said, although Panda officially rolled out May 20, many sites that had Panda changes started seeing changes as early as May 17 and Payday loans was live either May 17 or 18. Still, if your drop happened on a day other than May 17-20 then you could be looking at something else. I personally think there have been some minor Panda refreshes in June, but sites that were affected were the ones who saw a big change around May 20.
If there was no obvious change on that date then here's a list of other things you can look at that might be reasons for a traffic drop that are NOT algorithmic:
http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/
But, I want to repeat that it's often not a simple diagnosis.
Just to clarify your original post, there was no Penguin update recently. The last one was October of 2013.
-
I want to come back to something important. I want to preach to your boss.
Search engine battles are won through smarts and resources. Resources are content, user experience and promotional investments that you have made in your website. Smarts includes these things: the knowledge, skill and ingenuity of a dedicated staff.
As I said above I have been doing this for a long time. I don't know everything. And, everything in SEO changes constantly. The knowledge that you have today will be less valuable over time. To continue building and revising my knowledge resource, I read and participate in a couple of SEO forums every - single - day. I read what smart people write every - single - day. Two hours a day. I don't have a large company, three or four people. But that investment is made in continuing education.
Above I told you that....
You are being sent out to fight the heavyweight champ alone.
You don't want to do that. If you have a consultant and make a few firm friends here then you can use those relationships to take a gang to your fights. By asking and answering questions for a long time here I can ask lots of people who I have helped but who know things that I do not for assistance and they give me enormous immediate help. You should start building this. Your boss should understand that this is a valuable investment for his business and give you that time.
You are the guy who will be makin' the rain.
Companies who understand this have entire teams of SEOs who will be competing against you. And, they will get advice from their consultants too. Don't fight them alone if you care about winning.
-
Wow....
This has actually turned into a really amazing thread. I can't thank you enough... I'll keep you all posted in some way or another.
Thanks guys!
-
Just to let you know. I have been doing SEO since about 2000 and posting every day in SEO forums since about 2002. I run websites that get millions of visitors per month. I have seen and solved lots of different SEO problems.
Still, when I have to make any important decision, an important repair, a change in the site, or even if I am just looking for ways to improve. I regularly consult with people who know more about these things than me. I often consult with two people on the same problem. Why? I run a few sites but they do SEO on MANY sites. Their experience is broad and they have seen many things that I have not.
I consult with at least one of them every week. Sometimes two or three. I am waiting to get on a call with one of them today. SEO is a highly technical, highly competitive business. Nobody knows everything. One piece of knowledge can increase the income of your site by thousands of dollars a month and millions over time.
You are being sent out to fight the heavyweight champ alone.
Your boss needs to understand this. Share some of the comments you receive here with your boss. I am not trying to sell you anything. I only work on my own sites. Just telling you what I have learned to be valuable.
I give you lots of credit for coming here to ask questions. As you learning and have questions post them here when people can help you. But, small questions about a single topic are the best. You can get quick answers.
Look at many questions here everyday. Subscribe to them so you learn answers. You should read everything that penalty experts like Marie Haynes write. Here is one of her sites and a good place to begin. http://www.mytrafficdropped.com/
She sometimes answers questions here in Q&A. Read penalty questions going back to about 2011 to hear what might affect your site. She has written many good posts on the moz blog. Here is a simple one about penalties.
Your boss should read it too.
http://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird
You will also find that people, even experienced ones with lots of clients and websites under their care will not agree. Why? Because nobody knows exactly how search engines work and how they will respond to changes on a website. There is a lot of guessing but different people guess about different things and different people know about different things. That is why I regularly seek advice from others, here and in private.
Good luck in your work.
-
If it helps when speaking to your boss, know that I'm a Moz employee and do no consulting, and we do not have any type of lead compensation for when we recommend people on the recommended companies, and EGOL does not accept consulting gigs either. Neither of us are saying what we are saying to try to make any money off of you or your company, but rather to try to honestly help your company get the information it needs.
-
The problem I am having is that the CEO feels that he brought me on to solve these problems. He is struggling to justify bringing someone else on.
And yes, they are depending on these hits for cashflow. Thanks again for your input.
It is validating for me knowing that I'm not just incapable and that this is a legitimate problem. Seriously.
-
I remember you have 1500 domains with tons of links between them.
You might have been hit by Panda or Penguin or unnatural links or just been throttled for spam or many other possible problems.
These are complex things to diagnose. Anybody who gives you an answer without looking into your big bunch of sites, your historical traffic, looks at the content and links into your main site and examines your content for panda problems is guessing. Doing all of this work properly and making a recommendation will require a lot of work, and still there will be some guessing. A few to several days, done by someone who knows the problems of sites that have suffered traffic loss will probably be needed.
Some questions are too complex to solve with a quick Q&A consultation. This is one of them.
If your company is depending upon this income to support cashflow, jobs and pay the rent then spending the time needed to get your own skills up might be much more costly than going straight to someone who might be able to solve the problem and get you on track. Your current situation reflects man-years of poor work. Will not be solved overnight.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Penguin penalty is automated or manual?
Hi, I have seen some of our competitors are missing from top SERP and seems to be penalised as per this penalty checker: http://pixelgroove.com/serp/sandbox_checker/. Is this right tool to check penalty? Or any other good tools available? Are these penalties because of recent Penguin update? If so, is this a automated or manual penalty from Google? I don't think all of these tried with black-hat techniques and got penalised. The new penguin update might triggered their back-links causing this penalty. Even we dropped for last 2 weeks. What's the solution for this? How effectively link-audit works? Thanks, Satish
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | vtmoz0 -
The purpose of these Algo updates: To more harshly push eCommerce sites toward PPC and enable normal blogs/forums toward reclaiming organic search positions?
Hi everyone, This is my first post here, and absolutely loving the site and the services. Just a quick background, I have dabbled in SEO in the past, and have been reading up over the last few months and am amazed at the speed at which things are changing. I currently have a few clients that I am doing some SEO work for 2 of them, and have had an ecommerce site enquire about SEO services. They are a medium sized oak furniture ecommerce site. From all the major changes..the devaluing of spam links, link networks, penalization of overuse of exact match anchor text and the overall encouraging of earned links (often via content marketing) over built links, adding to this the (not provided) section in Google Analytics, and the increasing screen real estate that PPC is getting over organic search...all points to me thinking on major thing..... That the search engine is trying to push eCommerce sites and sites that sell stuff harder toward using PPC and paid advertising and allowing the blogs/forums and informational sites to more easily reclaim the organic part of the search results again. The above is elaborated on a bit more below.. POINT 1 Firstly as built links (article submission, press releases, info graphic submission, web 2.0 link building ect) rapidly lose their effectiveness, and as Google starts to place more emphasis on sites earning links instead - by producing amazing interesting and unique content that people want to link to. The fact remains that surely Google is aware that it is much harder for eCommerce sites to produce a constant stream of interesting link worthy content around their niche (especially if its a niche that not an awful lot could be written about). Although earning links is not impossible for eCommerce sites, for a lot of them it is more difficult because creating link worthy content is not what eCommerce sites were originally intended for. Whereas standard blogs and forums were built for that exact purpose. Therefore the search engines must know that it is a lot easier for normal blogs/forums to "earn" links through content, therefore leading to them reclaiming more of the organic search ranking for transaction and non transaction terms, and therefore forcing the eCommerce sites to adopt PPC more heavily. POINT 2 If we add to the mix the fact that for the terms most relevant to eCommerce sites, the search engine results page has a larger allocation of PPC ads than organic results (above the fold), and that Google has limited the amount of data that sites can see in terms of which keywords people are using to arrive on their sites, which effects eCommerce sites more - as it makes it harder for them to see which keywords are resulting in sales. Then this provides further evidence that Google is trying to back eCommerce sites into a corner by making it more difficult for them to make sense of and track sales from organic results in comparison to with PPC, where data is still plentiful. Conclusion Are the above just over exaggerations? Can most eCommerce sites still keep achieving a good percentage of sales from organic search despite the above? if so, what do the more niche eCommerce sites do to "earn" links when content topics are thin and unique outreach destinations can be exhausted quickly. Do they accept the fact that the are in the business of selling things, so should be paying for their traffic as opposed to normal blogs/forums which are not. Or is there still a place for them to get even more creative with content and acquire earned links..? And finally, is the concentration on earned links more overplayed than it actually is? Id really appreciate your thoughts on this..
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | sanj50500 -
Panda Recovery: Is a reconsideration request necessary?
Hi everyone, I run a 12-year old travel site that primarily publishes hotel reviews and blog posts about ways to save when traveling in Europe. We have a domain authority of 65 and lots of high quality links from major news websites (NYT, USA Today, NPR, etc.). We always ranked well for competitive searches like "cheap hotels in Paris," etc., for many, many years (like 10 years). Things started falling two years ago (April 2011)--I thought it was just normal algorithmic changes, and that our pages were being devalued (and perhaps, it was). So, we continued to bulk up our reviews and other key pages, only to see things continue to slide. About a month ago I lined up all of our inbound search traffic from Google Analytics and compared it to SEO Moz's timeline of Google updates. Turns out every time there was a Panda roll-out (from the second one in April 2011) our traffic tumbled. Other updates (Penguin, etc.) didn't seem to make a difference. But why should our content that we invest so much in take a hit from Panda? It wasn't "thin." But thin content existed elsewhere on our site: We had a flights section with 40,000 pages of thin content, cranked out of our database with virtually no unique content. We had launched that section in 2008, and it had never been an issue (and had mostly been ignored), but now, I believed, it was working against us. My understanding is that any thin content can actually work against the entire site's rankings. In summary: We had 40,000 thin flights pages, 2,500 blog posts (rich content), and about 2,500 hotel-related pages (rich and well researched "expert" content). So, two weeks ago we dropped almost the entire flights section. We kept about 400 pages (of the 40,000) with researched, unique and well-written information, and we 410'd the rest. Following the advice of so many others on these boards, we put the "thin" flights pages in their own sitemap so we could watch their index number fall in Webmaster tools. And we watched (with some eagerness and trepidation) as the error count shot up. Google has found about half of them at this point. Last week I submitted a "reconsideration request" to Google's spam team. I wasn't sure if this was necessary (as the whole point of dropping the pages, 410'ing and so forth was to fix it on our end, which would hopefully filter down through the SERPs eventually). However, I thought it was worth sending them a note explaining the actions we had taken, just in case. Today I received a response from them. It includes: "We reviewed your site and found no manual actions by the webspam team that might affect your site's ranking in Google. There's no need to file a reconsideration request for your site, because any ranking issues you may be experiencing are not related to a manual action taken by the webspam team. Of course, there may be other issues with your site that affect your site's ranking. Google's computers determine the order of our search results using a series of formulas known as algorithms. We make hundreds of changes to our search algorithms each year, and we employ more than 200 different signals when ranking pages. As our algorithms change and as the web (including your site) changes, some fluctuation in ranking can happen as we make updates to present the best results to our users. If you've experienced a change in ranking which you suspect may be more than a simple algorithm change, there are other things you may want to investigate as possible causes, such as a major change to your site's content, content management system, or server architecture. For example, a site may not rank well if your server stops serving pages to Googlebot, or if you've changed the URLs for a large portion of your site's pages..." And thus, I'm a bit confused. If they say that there wasn't any manual action taken, is that a bad thing for my site? Or is it just saying that my site wasn't experiencing a manual penalty, however Panda perhaps still penalized us (through a drop in rankings) -- and Panda isn't considered "manual." Could the 410'ing of 40,000 thin pages actually raise some red flags? And finally, how long do these issues usually take to clear up? Pardon the very long question and thanks for any insights. I really appreciate the advice offered in these forums.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TomNYC0 -
Post-Penguin 2.0 Gust Blogging
I'm really just curious about everyone’s thoughts on post-Penguin 2.0 guest blogging. Is it still a viable option for link building? Is there anything you should proactively do to make it "safe"? What makes a guest blog post "advertorial" (or would it never be, if it is clearly marked as a guest post with a writer's bio)? Will moderate guest blogging on highly related, top ranked sites ever be a prime target for Google updates? I feel like guest blogging is still a viable way to build links, as long as it is on high quality and highly relevant sites that post content people actually read. Limit the number of links to 1-3 for every post, use generic or branded text as anchor text rather than your "top keyword" anchor text of old, and make the content interesting (educational or funny, not just for the sake of getting links) and completely unique to the site you are posting on. Just my 2 cents. Anyone else?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | jaredkipe0 -
I need de-spam help/advice
For one of my sites I am working on I outsourced SEO about 3 years ago. One of the "tricks" the SEO used at the time was to pay for several Blog posts to be "sponsored" by this web site using exact match keywords for the domain. 1 Where do I look to determine the spammy links pointing to this site? 2 Have you had success getting rid of these bad links?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | kadesmith0 -
404checker.com / crawl errors
I noticed a few strange crawl errors in a Google Webmaster Tools account - further investigation showed they're pages that don't exist linked from here: http://404checker.com/404-checker-log Basically that means anyone can enter a URL into the website and it'll get linked from that page, temporarily at least. As there are hundreds of links of varying quality - at the moment they range from a well known car manufacturer to a university, porn and various organ enlargement websites - could that have a detrimental effect on any websites linked? They are all nofollow. Why would they choose to list these URLs on their website? It has some useful tools and information but I don't see the point in the log page. I have used it myself to check HTTP statuses but may look elsewhere from now on.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Alex-Harford0