Transferring old articles to new site even if they are written horribly
-
OK my question for today is...
If you currently have 300 articles on your current site but are building a new site would you transfer all of the articles over to the new site or focus on quality and rewrite the articles that had traffic? For example we have about 300 articles currently on our website 60 of which actually get traffic, We rewrote those articles to make sure they were written well. Someone thought that it would be best to simply transfer the other 240 articles over and rewrite them at another time to avoid 404 redirects. I would like your feedback on how you would approach this. Please be as detailed as possible explaining your thought process.
Thanks!
-
I would do the following:
-
Redirect every URL from the old site to the appropriate page on the new site.
-
Rewrite any content that is below standards prior to moving it over to the new site.
The old idea of having more pages meaning more internal pagerank, etc.. went out the window years ago with the Panda update.
-
-
In the end, it will be best to have all of the pages redirect. You will have a higher page count, more internal links, better overall site authority, and more chances to rank for more queries.
The first thing I would do is see what traffic the poorly-written articles have, and if it makes sense to rewrite them. Not sure what you mean by poorly written, is that an opinionated view, or is there data and feedback stating the articles are bad? If they have zero visitors over a 3 month span, I would see why.
Second, look at why the better written articles do so well. Is it the way they are written? The way the page visually is laid out? (prettier is better) Is the topic more heavily searched for? Did you share or market those posts or pages differently than the other ones? Spend a bit of time in analytics and webmaster tools to analyze some of the less-quality pages, and you might discover a trend.
If you choose to redirect, I would make sure to test all the redirects when you are done as Biron29 stated. The slightest variation in the URL will cause the redirect to fail. Screaming Frog seo spider is a great resource for testing for 404 errors, and its free up to a certain number of URLs.
-
Well in my mind the first step would be to have a really solid 301 redirect strategy. Moz has a great article here regarding redirects. I say this because the slightest name change or location change can cause a 404 error. Secondly I would focus first on the content that is most valuable to carry over first. Thirdly and lastly I would go through and evaluate the quality and relevance of the articles not receiving traffic and find out why. Then you can adjust to take calculated steps to generate traffic for these articles as well. So that long description was to say yes I would carry all the content over use your 301 redirects and canonical urls and adjust the content as needed to increase its value. Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can service request pages be indexed for a service site?
I think there is no point in indexing service request pages for a service site. And it causes the indexing of the main pages to be done with a delay. Does anyone have experience with indexing service request pages and their results?
On-Page Optimization | | sora.ya04680 -
How to check code to text ratio of Mobile Site?
Hello All, How to check code to text ratio of Mobile Site? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | adamjack0 -
Is there a benefit to hiding words from Google on ecommerce sites?
I think we all know that ecommerce sites have a lot of repeating functional texts on them. Is there a benefit from hiding this text from Google's crawler? Take this page for example, http://storage3.static.itmages.com/i/16/0805/h_1470425505_1090542_224cc344d4.png Some of the most dense words on the page are "Add to cart", "Add to Wishlist", "New", and "Sale". Is there any benefit to hiding those words from Google? The method of hiding I am talking about is not cloaking, but this, https://www.google.com/support/enterprise/static/gsa/docs/admin/70/gsa_doc_set/admin_crawl/preparing.html#1076243 using the google:off index tag. So the content will be there still, but it will not be indexed.
On-Page Optimization | | LesleyPaone0 -
On site SEO review please
I'd appreciate it its anyone could take the time to review my on site SEO and suggest improvements. it's an adult dating site at http://www.local-sex-search. All pages can be found at http://www.local-sex-search.com/sitemap
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
UGC News articles
Hi! Quick question regarding UGC... On our site - http://designrfix.com - we have a /news section (which contains about 40 000 news items) - shown in the right sidebar at the bottom I recently changed the /news (and all subpages) section to noindex and asked a removal on Google Webmaster Tools... was this a good idea? Those pages are low content pages and the bounce rate is really high since all articles are external sites.
On-Page Optimization | | designrfix0 -
2 sites made - almost same day question
So i made 2 sites within 24 hours of each other:
On-Page Optimization | | mweidner2782
babysitters-nyc.com
and
http://nanny-nyc.com/ nanny has 530 pages index and babysitters only 10. Any idea why that would happen and what the problem would be? Thanks and happy holidays!0 -
How is my on-site SEO looking like?
I know this is a broad question. My site's content has been written more than one year ago and haven't been changed so far. Our main goal is to make the application hosted in the site work better every day, so we don't worry much about writing content. The URL is http://www.onlinelogomaker.com
On-Page Optimization | | rpedri0